• Re: Stellar aberration - again

    From Deshawn Wronski@sirok@ewiiw.pl to sci.physics.relativity,sci.math on Wed Jun 3 14:35:46 2026
    From Newsgroup: sci.math

    Paul B. Andersen wrote:

    Einstein didn't agree with you.
    It is an observed effect that points the way to SR,
    and it has to come out right, also for a water-filled telescope.

    Do you really mean that according to Einstein is "dragged ether"
    important to explain stellar aberration? :-D

    this usenet user doesnt know, at his age, that this worlds models mathematically by Fluid Dynamics. How about getting first a proper
    education, in Finite Elements, Numerical Analysis etc, to make sure you
    are familiar with numbers, which are embedded into the manifold, as a characteristic.
    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Chadd Babaitsev@sace@iddi.ru to sci.physics.relativity,sci.math on Thu Jun 4 12:50:23 2026
    From Newsgroup: sci.math

    Paul B. Andersen wrote:

    The logic of a brainwashed religious maniac:

    An SI-clock in GPS orbit must be adjusted down by the factor (1 -
    4.4647e-10) to make it stay in sync with an SI-clock on the ground.

    you adjust by offsets, not by factors. You regulate and control by
    factors, where you need a feedback and a setpoint, to do the factor.
    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn@PointedEars@web.de to sci.physics.relativity,sci.math on Sat Jun 6 09:05:39 2026
    From Newsgroup: sci.math

    The 'nym-shifting troll demonstrated their ignorance as "Chadd Babaitsev":
    Paul B. Andersen wrote:
    The logic of a brainwashed religious maniac:

    An SI-clock in GPS orbit must be adjusted down by the factor (1 -
    4.4647e-10) to make it stay in sync with an SI-clock on the ground.

    you adjust by offsets, not by factors. You regulate and control by
    factors, where you need a feedback and a setpoint, to do the factor.

    *facepalm*

    1 - 4.4647e-10 = ?

    See also: <https://link.springer.com/article/10.12942/lrr-2003-1>

    F'up2 <news:sci.physics.relativity>
    --
    PointedEars

    Twitter: @PointedEars2
    Please do not cc me. / Bitte keine Kopien per E-Mail.
    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Troyonta Funakoshi@kttr@auso.jp to sci.physics.relativity,sci.math on Sat Jun 6 11:08:50 2026
    From Newsgroup: sci.math

    inbreed wanker braindead Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn wrote:

    An SI-clock in GPS orbit must be adjusted down by the factor (1 -
    4.4647e-10) to make it stay in sync with an SI-clock on the ground.

    you adjust by offsets, not by factors. You regulate and control by
    factors, where you need a feedback and a setpoint, to do the factor.

    *facepalm*

    1 - 4.4647e-10 = ?

    this illiterate imbecile doesnt know what an offset is. Nor anything else. Some countries puts you in prison for being this stupid.
    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn@PointedEars@web.de to sci.physics.relativity,sci.math on Sat Jun 6 23:38:32 2026
    From Newsgroup: sci.math

    The 'nym-shifting troll demonstrated their ignorance as "Troyonta-aFunakoshi":
    inbreed wanker braindead Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn wrote:
    [Paul B. Andersen wrote:]
    An SI-clock in GPS orbit must be adjusted down by the factor (1 -
    4.4647e-10) to make it stay in sync with an SI-clock on the ground.

    you adjust by offsets, not by factors. You regulate and control by
    factors, where you need a feedback and a setpoint, to do the factor.

    *facepalm*

    1 - 4.4647e-10 = ?

    [didn't answer the question, instead threw a temper tantrum]

    The correct answer is 0.99999999955353

    This number lies between 0 and 1 exclusive, thus multiplying by it is equivalent to adjusting the original value by a small negative offset,
    namely 4.4647e-10 of the original value (here: x):

    x (1 - +|) = x - +| x.
    --
    PointedEars

    Twitter: @PointedEars2
    Please do not cc me. / Bitte keine Kopien per E-Mail.
    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Abner Ustinovich@ibuvov@sbucn.ru to sci.physics.relativity,sci.math on Sun Jun 7 08:23:10 2026
    From Newsgroup: sci.math

    half german Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn wrote:

    The correct answer is 0.99999999955353

    This number lies between 0 and 1 exclusive, thus multiplying by it is equivalent to adjusting the original value by a small negative offset,
    namely 4.4647e-10 of the original value (here: x):

    this inbreed wanker observes he is an imbecile, now calling it by the
    correct term, offset. Get yourself a proper education, you deplorable
    fool. Your natzi country is historically a shithole. You dont even have
    food to eat, something that etches your fucking brain.
    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn@PointedEars@web.de to sci.physics.relativity,sci.math on Mon Jun 8 08:54:23 2026
    From Newsgroup: sci.math

    The 'nym-shifting troll trolled as "Abner Ustinovich":
    half german Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn wrote:

    Is "half german" supposed to be an insult? :-D

    The correct answer is 0.99999999955353

    This number lies between 0 and 1 exclusive, thus multiplying by it is
    equivalent to adjusting the original value by a small negative offset,
    namely 4.4647e-10 of the original value (here: x):

    this inbreed wanker [...]

    Apparently it is again time to let your (new) Usenet provider know about
    your trolling. As you simply cannot help yourself, yes?

    F'up2 where it belongs
    --
    PointedEars

    Twitter: @PointedEars2
    Please do not cc me. / Bitte keine Kopien per E-Mail.
    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Newton =?iso-8859-1?q?Gr=FCnewald?=@dznn@ldt.de to sci.physics.relativity,sci.math on Mon Jun 8 09:58:27 2026
    From Newsgroup: sci.math

    pear shaped fag half german Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn wrote:

    half german Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn wrote:

    Is "half german" supposed to be an insult? :-D

    it's well established historically that the russians gang raped your
    mothers, thus mathematically you mostly can be half gearmon and extremely stupid, as here by snipping the parts proving you an imbecile
    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Dylan Wyrzyk@wnyl@yzwrr.pl to sci.physics.relativity,sci.math on Mon Jun 8 10:13:08 2026
    From Newsgroup: sci.math

    Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn wrote:

    half german Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn wrote:

    Is "half german" supposed to be an insult? :-D

    it's documented in the history books, the russians gang raped your
    shithole of a whore country. Now you are going to become mostly a quarter gearmon, as apparently you like being gang raped, you indolent stupid
    natzi mazarfaka.
    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From phoenix@j63840576@gmail.com to sci.physics.relativity,sci.math on Mon Jun 8 07:42:00 2026
    From Newsgroup: sci.math

    Dylan Wyrzyk wrote:
    Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn wrote:

    half german Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn wrote:

    Is "half german" supposed to be an insult? :-D

    it's documented in the history books, the russians gang raped your
    shithole of a whore country. Now you are going to become mostly a quarter gearmon, as apparently you like being gang raped, you indolent stupid
    natzi mazarfaka.

    You're the stupid fuck promoting the false concept that gang-rape leads
    to stupidity. It's hard to say it but it has nothing to do with it. You
    are putting forward half-ideologies of your pathetic, perverse mind.
    --
    The future has begun
    The waiting is over
    We have gained time
    For one blink of an eye
    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Andreas Amoretto@tossto@trmatad.it to sci.physics.relativity,sci.math on Mon Jun 8 15:00:02 2026
    From Newsgroup: sci.math

    phoenix wrote:

    it's documented in the history books, the russians gang raped your
    shithole of a whore country. Now you are going to become mostly a
    quarter gearmon, as apparently you like being gang raped, you indolent
    stupid natzi mazarfaka.

    You're the stupid fuck promoting the false concept that gang-rape leads
    to stupidity. It's hard to say it but it has nothing to do with it.

    why are you even open you stinking dirty mouth, once you admit it's hard
    to say, the correctness of the history books documenting the gang rape on
    the natzis, with palpable proofs
    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From phoenix@j63840576@gmail.com to sci.physics.relativity,sci.math on Mon Jun 8 09:06:51 2026
    From Newsgroup: sci.math

    Andreas Amoretto wrote:
    phoenix wrote:

    it's documented in the history books, the russians gang raped your
    shithole of a whore country. Now you are going to become mostly a
    quarter gearmon, as apparently you like being gang raped, you indolent
    stupid natzi mazarfaka.

    You're the stupid fuck promoting the false concept that gang-rape leads
    to stupidity. It's hard to say it but it has nothing to do with it.

    why are you even open you stinking dirty mouth, once you admit it's hard
    to say, the correctness of the history books documenting the gang rape on
    the natzis, with palpable proofs

    Because you have shown yourself to know zero about hereditary
    attributes. You come in here with your stinking genetic ignorance,
    projecting vulnerability where there is none. Next you will be telling
    us about ass-babies and blonde Chinese people.
    --
    The future has begun
    The waiting is over
    We have gained time
    For one blink of an eye
    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Raymundo Nishikawa@iunm@aiamr.jp to sci.physics.relativity,sci.math on Tue Jun 9 13:12:53 2026
    From Newsgroup: sci.math

    yet another pear shaped fag, former it-supporter, said phoenix wrote:

    Andreas Amoretto wrote:
    phoenix wrote:
    why are you even open you stinking dirty mouth, once you admit it's
    hard to say, the correctness of the history books documenting the gang
    rape on the natzis, with palpable proofs

    Because you have shown yourself to know zero about hereditary
    attributes.

    where did he that, you fucking inbreed cretin, by naming the facts?? This wannabe scientist cant even read the fucking english

    eat shit and fuck off, you already are too stupid to talk.
    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2