From Newsgroup: sci.logic

On 6/8/2026 9:48 PM, Moebius wrote:

Am 09.06.2026 um 06:44 schrieb Moebius:

Am 08.06.2026 um 07:37 schrieb Chris M. Thomasson:

The Bear (1988)
Always loved that movie. It might be on Youtube full thing:
https://youtu.be/wJogk28uCAw

Yeah, great film. He shouldn't have ate magic mushrooms, imho. :-)

Nice sceen though.

Anyway, beware of the drugs!

Ditto.
--- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: sci.logic

On 6/10/26 12:16 PM, Chris M. Thomasson wrote:

On 6/8/2026 9:48 PM, Moebius wrote:

Am 09.06.2026 um 06:44 schrieb Moebius:

Am 08.06.2026 um 07:37 schrieb Chris M. Thomasson:

The Bear (1988)
Always loved that movie. It might be on Youtube full thing:
https://youtu.be/wJogk28uCAw

Yeah, great film. He shouldn't have ate magic mushrooms, imho. :-)

Nice sceen though.

Anyway, beware of the drugs!

Ditto.

gunna have to hard disagree there,

> altered states of mind are incredibly important from time to time
>
> #god
--
why are we god?
let's end war EfOa

--- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: sci.logic

On 6/10/2026 12:46 PM, dart200 wrote:

On 6/10/26 12:16 PM, Chris M. Thomasson wrote:

On 6/8/2026 9:48 PM, Moebius wrote:

Am 09.06.2026 um 06:44 schrieb Moebius:

Am 08.06.2026 um 07:37 schrieb Chris M. Thomasson:

The Bear (1988)
Always loved that movie. It might be on Youtube full thing:
https://youtu.be/wJogk28uCAw

Yeah, great film. He shouldn't have ate magic mushrooms, imho. :-)

Nice sceen though.

Anyway, beware of the drugs!

Ditto.

gunna have to hard disagree there,

altered states of mind are incredibly important from time to time

#god

Go ask Alice!

Amrita: The elixir of the Gods

SOMA

The Soma elixir, requiring an elaborate preparation during the Soma
sacrifice, was probably originally a hallucinogenic or intoxicating
substance prepared from the Soma mushroom plant.

This plant, as Gordon Wasson has argued, may have been the fly agaric
mushroom (Amanita muscaria) whose use in inducing mystical states of conscious is attested in Shamanism.

--- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: sci.logic

On 05/06/2026 10:30, Mikko wrote:

On 05/06/2026 07:41, dart200 wrote:

u'd rather just banter back and forth with polcott's ai induced
psychosis???

Olcott has no AI induced psychosis. An AI poweful enough to induce
psychosis is a fairly new thing.

The public demonstration of such seems to be new, but I don't think you
can know the stronger claim to be so.
--
Tristan Wibberley

The message body is Copyright (C) 2026 Tristan Wibberley except
citations and quotations noted. All Rights Reserved except that you may,
of course, cite it academically giving credit to me, distribute it
verbatim as part of a usenet system or its archives, and use it to
promote my greatness and general superiority without misrepresentation
of my opinions other than my opinion of my greatness and general
superiority which you _may_ misrepresent. You definitely MAY NOT train
any production AI system with it but you may train experimental AI that
will only be used for evaluation of the AI methods it implements.
--- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: sci.logic

On 05/06/2026 11:11, dart200 wrote:

On 6/5/26 2:30 AM, Mikko wrote:

On 05/06/2026 07:41, dart200 wrote:

u'd rather just banter back and forth with polcott's ai induced
psychosis???

Olcott has no AI induced psychosis. An AI poweful enough to induce
psychosis is a fairly new thing.

oh right, ai enhanced psychosis i suppose...

but like seriously: wtf is up with trying to define the complexity for problems that can have no solution?

To characterise the attempt? There is an element of resource consumption
that may be used to thwart a computational adversary (time vs space vs order/heat).

consider Lieutenant Commander Data's complicated loop with which he
defeated The Borg.
--
Tristan Wibberley

The message body is Copyright (C) 2026 Tristan Wibberley except
citations and quotations noted. All Rights Reserved except that you may,
of course, cite it academically giving credit to me, distribute it
verbatim as part of a usenet system or its archives, and use it to
promote my greatness and general superiority without misrepresentation
of my opinions other than my opinion of my greatness and general
superiority which you _may_ misrepresent. You definitely MAY NOT train
any production AI system with it but you may train experimental AI that
will only be used for evaluation of the AI methods it implements.
--- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: sci.logic

On 12/06/2026 00:00, Tristan Wibberley wrote:

On 05/06/2026 10:30, Mikko wrote:

On 05/06/2026 07:41, dart200 wrote:

u'd rather just banter back and forth with polcott's ai induced
psychosis???

Olcott has no AI induced psychosis. An AI poweful enough to induce
psychosis is a fairly new thing.

The public demonstration of such seems to be new, but I don't think you
can know the stronger claim to be so.

Doens't matter. Olcott has had no access to other than public AI.
--
Mikko
--- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: sci.logic

On 6/11/26 2:03 PM, Tristan Wibberley wrote:

On 05/06/2026 11:11, dart200 wrote:

On 6/5/26 2:30 AM, Mikko wrote:

On 05/06/2026 07:41, dart200 wrote:

u'd rather just banter back and forth with polcott's ai induced
psychosis???

Olcott has no AI induced psychosis. An AI poweful enough to induce
psychosis is a fairly new thing.

oh right, ai enhanced psychosis i suppose...

but like seriously: wtf is up with trying to define the complexity for
problems that can have no solution?

To characterize the attempt? There is an element of resource consumption

characterize the attempt to totally solve a problem proven to not be
totally solvable?

it's an unsolvable problem, as per the theory: a solution to it would
imply a contradiction

the thought experiment constructs this hierarchy by banning
self-reference within each step of hierarchy. a halting oracle O' can
decide on all machines, but nothing that involves itself O'. a 2nd-tier halting oracle O'' can decide on O', but not itself O''

to me this is _avoiding_ the problem, not hypothesizing a resolution. a
true resolution would provide allow for self-referential analysis to
occur in a coherent manner, and would collapse the basis for the hierarchy

that may be used to thwart a computational adversary (time vs space vs order/heat).

consider Lieutenant Commander Data's complicated loop with which he
defeated The Borg.

--
arising us out of the computing dark ages,
please excuse my pseudo-pyscript,
~ the lil crank that could
--- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2