Ah. What you have there is "Believes(you, L, x)", I believe.
On 5/23/2026 5:41 PM, Ross Finlayson wrote:
Ah. What you have there is "Believes(you, L, x)", I believe.
No! It is all computed objective truth on the basis
of stipulated objectively true atomic facts.
On 24/05/2026 02:34, polcott wrote:
On 5/23/2026 5:41 PM, Ross Finlayson wrote:
Ah. What you have there is "Believes(you, L, x)", I believe.
No! It is all computed objective truth on the basis
of stipulated objectively true atomic facts.
What you call "stipulated objectively true atomic facts" may be
objectively false and so can be whatever is computed from them
even when the computation itelf is objetively valid.
On 5/24/2026 3:08 AM, Mikko wrote:
On 24/05/2026 02:34, polcott wrote:
On 5/23/2026 5:41 PM, Ross Finlayson wrote:
Ah. What you have there is "Believes(you, L, x)", I believe.
No! It is all computed objective truth on the basis
of stipulated objectively true atomic facts.
What you call "stipulated objectively true atomic facts" may be
Are things such as "cats" <are> "animals" where
disagreement is error.
objectively false and so can be whatever is computed from them
even when the computation itelf is objetively valid.
SEMANTIC TAUTOLOGIES are expressions of language that
are proved necessarily true entirely on the basis of
other expressions of language.
In epistemology (theory of knowledge), a self-evident
proposition is a proposition that is known to be true
by understanding its meaning without proof. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Self-evidence
On 25/05/2026 01:31, olcott wrote:
On 5/24/2026 3:08 AM, Mikko wrote:
On 24/05/2026 02:34, polcott wrote:
On 5/23/2026 5:41 PM, Ross Finlayson wrote:
Ah. What you have there is "Believes(you, L, x)", I believe.
No! It is all computed objective truth on the basis
of stipulated objectively true atomic facts.
What you call "stipulated objectively true atomic facts" may be
Are things such as "cats" <are> "animals" where
disagreement is error.
The proposed service is not very useful if its scope is testricted
to what everbody already knows.
objectively false and so can be whatever is computed from them
even when the computation itelf is objetively valid.
SEMANTIC TAUTOLOGIES are expressions of language that
are proved necessarily true entirely on the basis of
other expressions of language.
In epistemology (theory of knowledge), a self-evident
proposition is a proposition that is known to be true
by understanding its meaning without proof.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Self-evidence
A self-evident proposition is outside of the main scope of
epistemology though it may have some marginal significance.
On 5/25/2026 3:03 AM, Mikko wrote:
On 25/05/2026 01:31, olcott wrote:
On 5/24/2026 3:08 AM, Mikko wrote:
On 24/05/2026 02:34, polcott wrote:
On 5/23/2026 5:41 PM, Ross Finlayson wrote:
Ah. What you have there is "Believes(you, L, x)", I believe.
No! It is all computed objective truth on the basis
of stipulated objectively true atomic facts.
What you call "stipulated objectively true atomic facts" may be
Are things such as "cats" <are> "animals" where
disagreement is error.
The proposed service is not very useful if its scope is testricted
to what everbody already knows.
If it is not what somebody know then it is not knowledge.
The key purpose of the system is to disseminate correct
knowledge dividing well crafted lies from truth.
objectively false and so can be whatever is computed from them
even when the computation itelf is objetively valid.
SEMANTIC TAUTOLOGIES are expressions of language that
are proved necessarily true entirely on the basis of
other expressions of language.
In epistemology (theory of knowledge), a self-evident
proposition is a proposition that is known to be true
by understanding its meaning without proof.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Self-evidence
A self-evident proposition is outside of the main scope of
epistemology though it may have some marginal significance.
That is flatly incorrect to the degree of calling a
cat some kind of breed of dog. Self-evidence is the
primary core of epistemology. It is the glue that
holds semantics together.
On 05/25/2026 07:12 AM, olcott wrote:
On 5/25/2026 3:03 AM, Mikko wrote:
On 25/05/2026 01:31, olcott wrote:
On 5/24/2026 3:08 AM, Mikko wrote:
On 24/05/2026 02:34, polcott wrote:
On 5/23/2026 5:41 PM, Ross Finlayson wrote:
Ah. What you have there is "Believes(you, L, x)", I believe. >>>>>>>
No! It is all computed objective truth on the basis
of stipulated objectively true atomic facts.
What you call "stipulated objectively true atomic facts" may be
Are things such as "cats" <are> "animals" where
disagreement is error.
The proposed service is not very useful if its scope is testricted
to what everbody already knows.
If it is not what somebody know then it is not knowledge.
The key purpose of the system is to disseminate correct
knowledge dividing well crafted lies from truth.
objectively false and so can be whatever is computed from them
even when the computation itelf is objetively valid.
SEMANTIC TAUTOLOGIES are expressions of language that
are proved necessarily true entirely on the basis of
other expressions of language.
In epistemology (theory of knowledge), a self-evident
proposition is a proposition that is known to be true
by understanding its meaning without proof.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Self-evidence
A self-evident proposition is outside of the main scope of
epistemology though it may have some marginal significance.
That is flatly incorrect to the degree of calling a
cat some kind of breed of dog. Self-evidence is the
primary core of epistemology. It is the glue that
holds semantics together.
"Isn't it ironic?"
The idea of "complementary duals" has for example that
x = x and x = V \ x, where 'V' is the universe,
and V \ x is an elementary embedding of the universe
into itself making the most obvious sort of example
of a resolution of the "Kunen inconsistency", has
that in a true world of fact an object is defined
by everything that it is not.
Most people's account of meaning, or, the epistemological,
is due associations in relations.
Then, both accounts of birth and death often recount
the "into the light", one into the world of sense
the inchoate, the other out, also inchoate.
So, something like "In The Light" from Led Zeppelin
or Alanis Morrisette's "Isn't It Ironic?" makes for
that when one has a theory of everything that's true
then good music lyrically is generally profound,
and otherwise it's personal accounts of often enough
the perspectival, generously, or the fragmented (or insane).
I'm Like a Bird / Seeds of Love
Music's a good medium, for meaning.
On 5/25/2026 11:48 AM, Ross Finlayson wrote:
On 05/25/2026 07:12 AM, olcott wrote:
On 5/25/2026 3:03 AM, Mikko wrote:
On 25/05/2026 01:31, olcott wrote:
On 5/24/2026 3:08 AM, Mikko wrote:
On 24/05/2026 02:34, polcott wrote:
On 5/23/2026 5:41 PM, Ross Finlayson wrote:
Ah. What you have there is "Believes(you, L, x)", I believe. >>>>>>>>
No! It is all computed objective truth on the basis
of stipulated objectively true atomic facts.
What you call "stipulated objectively true atomic facts" may be
Are things such as "cats" <are> "animals" where
disagreement is error.
The proposed service is not very useful if its scope is testricted
to what everbody already knows.
If it is not what somebody know then it is not knowledge.
The key purpose of the system is to disseminate correct
knowledge dividing well crafted lies from truth.
objectively false and so can be whatever is computed from them
even when the computation itelf is objetively valid.
SEMANTIC TAUTOLOGIES are expressions of language that
are proved necessarily true entirely on the basis of
other expressions of language.
In epistemology (theory of knowledge), a self-evident
proposition is a proposition that is known to be true
by understanding its meaning without proof.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Self-evidence
A self-evident proposition is outside of the main scope of
epistemology though it may have some marginal significance.
That is flatly incorrect to the degree of calling a
cat some kind of breed of dog. Self-evidence is the
primary core of epistemology. It is the glue that
holds semantics together.
"Isn't it ironic?"
The idea of "complementary duals" has for example that
x = x and x = V \ x, where 'V' is the universe,
and V \ x is an elementary embedding of the universe
into itself making the most obvious sort of example
of a resolution of the "Kunen inconsistency", has
that in a true world of fact an object is defined
by everything that it is not.
Most people's account of meaning, or, the epistemological,
is due associations in relations.
I am trying to prevent the end of life on Earth through
climate change hired liars. Can you stick to the point?
Are you not intelligent enough to understand the dire
threat of climate change?
Then, both accounts of birth and death often recount
the "into the light", one into the world of sense
the inchoate, the other out, also inchoate.
So, something like "In The Light" from Led Zeppelin
or Alanis Morrisette's "Isn't It Ironic?" makes for
that when one has a theory of everything that's true
then good music lyrically is generally profound,
and otherwise it's personal accounts of often enough
the perspectival, generously, or the fragmented (or insane).
I'm Like a Bird / Seeds of Love
Music's a good medium, for meaning.
On 5/25/2026 3:03 AM, Mikko wrote:
On 25/05/2026 01:31, olcott wrote:
On 5/24/2026 3:08 AM, Mikko wrote:
On 24/05/2026 02:34, polcott wrote:
On 5/23/2026 5:41 PM, Ross Finlayson wrote:
Ah. What you have there is "Believes(you, L, x)", I believe.
No! It is all computed objective truth on the basis
of stipulated objectively true atomic facts.
What you call "stipulated objectively true atomic facts" may be
Are things such as "cats" <are> "animals" where
disagreement is error.
The proposed service is not very useful if its scope is testricted
to what everbody already knows.
If it is not what somebody know then it is not knowledge.
The key purpose of the system is to disseminate correct
knowledge dividing well crafted lies from truth.
objectively false and so can be whatever is computed from them
even when the computation itelf is objetively valid.
SEMANTIC TAUTOLOGIES are expressions of language that
are proved necessarily true entirely on the basis of
other expressions of language.
In epistemology (theory of knowledge), a self-evident
proposition is a proposition that is known to be true
by understanding its meaning without proof.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Self-evidence
A self-evident proposition is outside of the main scope of
epistemology though it may have some marginal significance.
That is flatly incorrect to the degree of calling a
cat some kind of breed of dog. Self-evidence is the
primary core of epistemology. It is the glue that
holds semantics together.
| Sysop: | Amessyroom |
|---|---|
| Location: | Fayetteville, NC |
| Users: | 70 |
| Nodes: | 6 (0 / 6) |
| Uptime: | 39:27:19 |
| Calls: | 948 |
| Calls today: | 2 |
| Files: | 1,325 |
| Messages: | 280,644 |