From Newsgroup: sci.lang

On 1/11/2026 8:39 AM, Tristan Wibberley wrote:

On 11/01/2026 11:31, Richard Damon wrote:

Not one person from any field or combination of
fields has presented any formal resolution of
the Liar Paradox that has been officially accepted.
Did you know that?

WRONG.

What does "officially accepted" mean? His Majesty's crown court has
found that the resolution is so with prejudice? His Majesty's memoirs
"My Liar Paradox and I" has the resolution in it? His Majesty published
a decree in The London Gazette?

You have to pay 500% attention to the actual words Olcott actually uses.

Basically a broad consensus of conventional wisdom
agrees that the Liar Paradox is an open question
that has never been resolved.
--
Copyright 2026 Olcott<br><br>

My 28 year goal has been to make <br>
"true on the basis of meaning expressed in language"<br>
reliably computable.<br><br>

This required establishing a new foundation<br>
--- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2