From Newsgroup: sci.geo.satellite-nav
On 2025-02-13 10:45, Abandoned Trolley wrote:
On 13/02/2025 10:38, Java Jive wrote:
On 2025-02-13 00:56, micky wrote:
In 4 years or when the idiot dies, whichever comes first, we in the US
can rid of all this nonsense.
That's what the rest of the world hoped in 2020, but your voting
population was stupid enough to vote him in twice, so, even if the US
Constitution turns out to be strong enough to thwart his attempts to
Putinise it and make himself POTUS for life-a --a as US citizens are
fond of maintaining but seen from the outside seems frighteningly
uncertain - -a-a what's to stop them voting in another narcissistic
wrecking ball of an idiot?
Call me a cynical old git if you like, but I suspect that this problem
might go away just as soon as the Democrats realise that the American electorate dont like women or blacks (or maybe I mean Blacks ?)
Substitute "social media influencers" for "American electorate" and I
think you'd be nearer the truth.
Kamala Harris seemed a pretty good candidate to me, at any rate way
better than Trump, though that's a very low standard to have to beat,
and nearly all the polls had her leading by small margins right up to
the vote, but Trump won *easily*. Why? A sizeable chunk of the
electorate now don't watch main-stream media at all, and also tend not
to be sampled by standard polling methods, and thus didn't contribute to
the picture in the run up to the election, but of course their actual
votes still count just the same as everyone else's.
They get all their so-called 'news' from social media influencers like
Musk and Josh Rogan (if I recall his name correctly) who have never had
any journalistic training, see no need to be impartial, etc - on the contrary, the more extreme the views voiced on their channels, the more controversy they whip up, the more the algorithms suggest their channels
to punters, so the better their ratings. Hence they regularly
regurgitate Russian propaganda, while Musk openly biased the Twitter
algorithm towards Trump, and Josh Rogan wouldn't agree to travel to
interview Kamala Harris - he wanted her to come to him, which to
someone of my generation seems like the tail trying to wag the dog, but
we all know the result.
What I think that result proves - as did 2016 where Trump had senior
people from the three main social media companies working out of his
campaign HQ and won, and 2020 where social media largely ditched him and
he lost - that you can't win a modern election with out winning the
social media campaign. However bigoted, unreasonable, and self-serving
they are, you have to engage with these narcissists on their own ground
and at very least appear reasonable and competent, hopefully also
thereby showing them up starkly by contrast for their lack of such
leadership qualities.
--
Fake news kills!
I may be contacted via the contact address given on my website: www.macfh.co.uk
--- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2