• LanScan for Windows?

    From joegwinn@joegwinn@comcast.net to sci.electronics.design on Thu Apr 9 17:20:25 2026
    From Newsgroup: sci.electronics.design

    I have LanScan.app (green duck face icon) on my MacOS computers, and
    it works very well for finding live IPv4 addresses and ports used in
    my local network.

    I'd like to do the same thing on my Win10 ThinkPad. This led me to
    the "Angry IP Scanner", which I attempted to install. Norton scanned
    the installer and flagged a bit of malware and stopped the train. No
    bullets flew by, but it was _very_ emphatic. So I stopped.

    I'm not the first to need to ports et al, so my question is what to
    people actually use and why do they choose this versus that?

    And, is Norton all wet, or has Angry been infected on GitHub?

    Joe
    --- Synchronet 3.21f-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Don Y@blockedofcourse@foo.invalid to sci.electronics.design on Thu Apr 9 14:33:25 2026
    From Newsgroup: sci.electronics.design

    On 4/9/2026 2:20 PM, joegwinn@comcast.net wrote:
    I have LanScan.app (green duck face icon) on my MacOS computers, and
    it works very well for finding live IPv4 addresses and ports used in
    my local network.

    I'd like to do the same thing on my Win10 ThinkPad. This led me to
    the "Angry IP Scanner", which I attempted to install. Norton scanned
    the installer and flagged a bit of malware and stopped the train. No
    bullets flew by, but it was _very_ emphatic. So I stopped.

    I'm not the first to need to ports et al, so my question is what to
    people actually use and why do they choose this versus that?

    Nmap on my Eunices (I think a Windows port is available but it may
    not be a GUI).

    EMCO's Network Inventory Enterprise on Windows (and, oriented
    towards detecting windows hosts on the network)

    And, is Norton all wet, or has Angry been infected on GitHub?
    No idea. I don't use an AV.

    Of course, you can also just ping a range of addresses if all
    you want to know is "anyone home?"
    --- Synchronet 3.21f-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From John R Walliker@jrwalliker@gmail.com to sci.electronics.design on Thu Apr 9 23:33:49 2026
    From Newsgroup: sci.electronics.design

    On 09/04/2026 22:33, Don Y wrote:
    On 4/9/2026 2:20 PM, joegwinn@comcast.net wrote:
    I have LanScan.app (green duck face icon) on my MacOS computers, and
    it works very well for finding live IPv4 addresses and ports used in
    my local network.

    I'd like to do the same thing on my Win10 ThinkPad.-a This led me to
    the "Angry IP Scanner", which I attempted to install.-a Norton scanned
    the installer and flagged a bit of malware and stopped the train. No
    bullets flew by, but it was _very_ emphatic.-a So I stopped.

    I'm not the first to need to ports et al, so my question is what to
    people actually use and why do they choose this versus that?

    Nmap on my Eunices (I think a Windows port is available but it may
    not be a GUI).

    EMCO's Network Inventory Enterprise on Windows (and, oriented
    towards detecting windows hosts on the network)

    And, is Norton all wet, or has Angry been infected on GitHub?
    No idea.-a I don't use an AV.

    Of course, you can also just ping a range of addresses if all
    you want to know is "anyone home?"

    +1 for nmap ( I use it from linux)

    The router can of course also give excellent information as it
    will normally be acting as a dhcp server and may have other
    diagnostic capabilities.
    Capturing traffic promiscuously as pcap files for display in
    Wireshark is also useful as it can show ARP requests which give
    more low level clues about what is physically present than many
    other tools.
    Most networks use switches which prevent anything apart from
    broadcasts from being visible to all devices. Packet dumping
    using tools within the router is probably the most useful if
    available as it will capture anything that is trying to access
    the internet.
    John


    --- Synchronet 3.21f-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Martin Rid@martin_riddle@verison.net to sci.electronics.design on Thu Apr 9 18:39:48 2026
    From Newsgroup: sci.electronics.design

    Don Y <blockedofcourse@foo.invalid> Wrote in message:r
    On 4/9/2026 2:20 PM, joegwinn@comcast.net wrote:> I have LanScan.app (green duck face icon) on my MacOS computers, and> it works very well for finding live IPv4 addresses and ports used in> my local network.> > I'd like to do the same thing on my Win10 ThinkPad. This led me to> the "Angry IP Scanner", which I attempted to install. Norton scanned> the installer and flagged a bit of malware and stopped the train. No> bullets flew by, but it was _very_ emphatic. So I stopped.> > I'm not the first to need to ports et al, so my question is what to> people actually use and why do they choose this versus that?Nmap on my Eunices (I think a Windows port is available but it maynot be a GUI).EMCO's Network Inventory Enterprise on Windows (and, orientedtowards detecting windows hosts on the network)> And, is Norton all wet, or has Angry been infected on GitHub?No idea. I don't use an AV.Of course, you can also just ping a range of addresses if allyou want to know is "anyone home?"

    Nmap, yes the windows port works well.

    Cheers
    --


    ----Android NewsGroup Reader---- https://piaohong.s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com/usenet/index.html
    --- Synchronet 3.21f-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Don Y@blockedofcourse@foo.invalid to sci.electronics.design on Thu Apr 9 15:58:42 2026
    From Newsgroup: sci.electronics.design

    On 4/9/2026 3:33 PM, John R Walliker wrote:
    +1 for nmap-a ( I use it from linux)

    I guess it depends on whether your goal is discovery, security,
    etc.

    The EMCO tool is good because it provides an accounting of
    all (Windows) hosts on the network -- including the applications
    installed, hardware they're running on, etc.

    <https://emcosoftware.com/network-inventory/screenshots>

    Of course, is doesn't do shit for non-windows hosts
    (beyond pings, etc.)

    The router can of course also give excellent information as it
    will normally be acting as a dhcp server and may have other
    diagnostic capabilities.
    Capturing traffic promiscuously as pcap files for display in
    Wireshark is also useful as it can show ARP requests which give
    more low level clues about what is physically present than many
    other tools.
    Most networks use switches which prevent anything apart from
    broadcasts from being visible to all devices.-a Packet dumping
    using tools within the router is probably the most useful if
    available as it will capture anything that is trying to access
    the internet.

    All of these things assume "traditional" hosts. E.g., my prototypes
    don't run ICMP, ARP, IP, TCP, UDP, etc. so I've had to build my own tools.
    --- Synchronet 3.21f-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Don Y@blockedofcourse@foo.invalid to sci.electronics.design on Thu Apr 9 17:17:30 2026
    From Newsgroup: sci.electronics.design

    On 4/9/2026 3:39 PM, Martin Rid wrote:
    Nmap, yes the windows port works well.

    Is it a graphical interface? Or, just a text console?
    --- Synchronet 3.21f-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Jeff Liebermann@jeffl@cruzio.com to sci.electronics.design on Thu Apr 9 19:29:40 2026
    From Newsgroup: sci.electronics.design

    On Thu, 9 Apr 2026 17:17:30 -0700, Don Y <blockedofcourse@foo.invalid>
    wrote:

    On 4/9/2026 3:39 PM, Martin Rid wrote:
    Nmap, yes the windows port works well.

    Is it a graphical interface? Or, just a text console?

    GUI for NMAP:
    <https://nmap.org/zenmap>

    Norton considers any port scanner to be a hacker tool and therefore
    blocks the installation. Just turn Norton off (see below). You
    should also add Angry IP Scanner to Norton's exclusion list.

    "AI Overview
    To temporarily turn off Norton Antivirus on Windows or Mac,
    right-click the yellow Norton icon in the system tray/menu bar and
    select Disable Auto-Protect and Disable Smart Firewall. Select a
    duration, such as 15 minutes or until system restart, to allow for
    temporary tasks like software installation."
    --
    Jeff Liebermann jeffl@cruzio.com
    PO Box 272 http://www.LearnByDestroying.com
    Ben Lomond CA 95005-0272 AE6KS 831-336-2558

    --- Synchronet 3.21f-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From joegwinn@joegwinn@comcast.net to sci.electronics.design on Fri Apr 10 10:58:48 2026
    From Newsgroup: sci.electronics.design

    On Thu, 09 Apr 2026 19:29:40 -0700, Jeff Liebermann <jeffl@cruzio.com>
    wrote:

    On Thu, 9 Apr 2026 17:17:30 -0700, Don Y <blockedofcourse@foo.invalid>
    wrote:

    On 4/9/2026 3:39 PM, Martin Rid wrote:
    Nmap, yes the windows port works well.

    Is it a graphical interface? Or, just a text console?

    GUI for NMAP:
    <https://nmap.org/zenmap>

    I'll look into this one.


    Norton considers any port scanner to be a hacker tool and therefore
    blocks the installation. Just turn Norton off (see below). You
    should also add Angry IP Scanner to Norton's exclusion list.

    Ahh. So Angry IP is probably OK. I did wonder.


    "AI Overview
    To temporarily turn off Norton Antivirus on Windows or Mac,
    right-click the yellow Norton icon in the system tray/menu bar and
    select Disable Auto-Protect and Disable Smart Firewall. Select a
    duration, such as 15 minutes or until system restart, to allow for
    temporary tasks like software installation."

    Yep. I've seen that button.

    Thanks,

    Joe
    --- Synchronet 3.21f-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From joegwinn@joegwinn@comcast.net to sci.electronics.design on Sun Apr 12 18:03:08 2026
    From Newsgroup: sci.electronics.design

    Follow-up report at bottom.

    On Fri, 10 Apr 2026 10:58:50 -0400, joegwinn@comcast.net wrote:

    On Thu, 09 Apr 2026 19:29:40 -0700, Jeff Liebermann <jeffl@cruzio.com>
    wrote:

    On Thu, 9 Apr 2026 17:17:30 -0700, Don Y <blockedofcourse@foo.invalid> >>wrote:

    On 4/9/2026 3:39 PM, Martin Rid wrote:
    Nmap, yes the windows port works well.

    Is it a graphical interface? Or, just a text console?

    GUI for NMAP:
    <https://nmap.org/zenmap>

    I'll look into this one.


    Norton considers any port scanner to be a hacker tool and therefore
    blocks the installation. Just turn Norton off (see below). You
    should also add Angry IP Scanner to Norton's exclusion list.

    Ahh. So Angry IP is probably OK. I did wonder.


    "AI Overview
    To temporarily turn off Norton Antivirus on Windows or Mac,
    right-click the yellow Norton icon in the system tray/menu bar and
    select Disable Auto-Protect and Disable Smart Firewall. Select a
    duration, such as 15 minutes or until system restart, to allow for >>temporary tasks like software installation."

    Yep. I've seen that button.

    Thanks,

    Joe

    What probably happened was that I clicked on the wrong "download"
    button, and did get something evil, which Norton promptly shot.

    What worked was to sign into GitHub and download from there. Probably
    didn't need to sign in, actually. Even so, there were all manner of
    ads and other decoys intruding from all sides. I did hit one that
    downloaded an EXE and urgently insisted that I click on it Right Now!

    Umm, No! Deleted the EXE and got the download straight from GitHub.
    Smooth, and no complaints from Norton.

    I'm now learning how to use Angry IP.

    Joe
    --- Synchronet 3.21f-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From =?UTF-8?Q?Niocl=C3=A1s_P=C3=B3l_Caile=C3=A1n?= de Ghloucester@thanks-to@Taf.com to sci.electronics.design on Mon Apr 13 01:21:57 2026
    From Newsgroup: sci.electronics.design

    Below I quote a webpage about Norton by me from yesterday. This
    webpage reports a tendency of Norton to publish unfounded alarms. This
    webpage gives examples, none of which is about a port scanner. So
    decide for yourselves whether or not you shall read it.

    This website also has screenshots, which are not in the USENET.

    Joe Gwinn wrote: |----------------------------------------------------------------------|
    |"What probably happened was that I clicked on the wrong "download" | |button, and did get something evil, which Norton promptly shot. |
    | |
    |What worked was to sign into GitHub and download from there. Probably| |didn't need to sign in, actually. Even so, there were all manner of |
    |ads and other decoys intruding from all sides. I did hit one that | |downloaded an EXE and urgently insisted that I click on it Right Now! |
    | |
    |Umm, No! Deleted the EXE and got the download straight from GitHub. | |Smooth, and no complaints from Norton. |
    | |
    |I'm now learning how to use Angry IP. |
    | |
    |Joe" | |----------------------------------------------------------------------|

    Joe Gwinn wrote: |---------------------------------------------------------------------|
    |"I'd like to do the same thing on my Win10 ThinkPad. This led me to |
    |the "Angry IP Scanner", which I attempted to install. Norton scanned|
    |the installer and flagged a bit of malware and stopped the train. No | |bullets flew by, but it was _very_ emphatic. So I stopped. |
    | |
    |[. . .] |
    | |
    |And, is Norton all wet, or has Angry been infected on GitHub?" | |---------------------------------------------------------------------|

    Jeff Liebermann <jeffl@cruzio.com> wrote: |--------------------------------------------------------------------|
    |"Norton considers any port scanner to be a hacker tool and therefore|
    |blocks the installation. Just turn Norton off (see below). You |
    |should also add Angry IP Scanner to Norton's exclusion list. |
    | |
    |[. . .]" | |--------------------------------------------------------------------|

    HTTPS://Gloucester.Insomnia247.NL/Norton_nonsense/Norton_nonsense.HTML
    says:

    " Unfounded Alarms by Norton

    Good things by Norton

    Each computer on which I run Norton software (by Gen Digital Inc.)
    never has a virus (or a trojan or a worm), so far as I detect.

    Norton runs a good virtual private network.

    Norton identified a big size of unneeded files. However, Norton eagerly
    attempts to encourage deletings files which I myself prefer to keep. As
    for the files that it did encourage me to delete, I could had found
    them myself.

    Unfounded alarms by Norton

    Websites

    I allow cookies, so Norton often publishes unfounded alarms against
    websites (e.g. of organisations of which I am a client) by warnings me
    that they track me. Of course they track me!

    Examples of websites which Norton dared to warn me about via unfounded
    alarms include a website of courts' whereby I prosecute; and a shop
    which sells me many envelopes and pages which I post to courts.

    Cookies are not the only things that cause Norton to emit unfounded
    alarms about websites. For examples, Norton likes to "Quarantine"
    completely harmless downloaded files. For example this PDF file from
    the International Court of Justice which "was" not ever "infected with"
    "Malware": International Court of Justice dangerous according to
    Norton2 "False positive
    I downloaded this Adobe-PDF file a year ago from the International
    Court of Justice. You suddenly claimed for the first time on 25th
    November 2025 that it is malware. I.e. Norton enacts Norton's typical
    scaremongering for money."
    say I myself to Norton without a received response since a 25^th day of
    November 2025. Norton waited 22 months to raise an unfounded alarm for
    the 1st time against a particular file International Court of Justice
    dangerous according to Norton

    Norton does not run a profiler

    Norton does not run a profiler, but it often falsely professes:

    "These issues are slowing down
    your Windows PC

    [. . .]
    Apps that Microsoft Office
    slow you Professional Plus 2016 -
    down: en-us" whereas this computer and I do not use Microsoft Office!!!
    95 percent idle but Norton pretends unused Microsoft Office slows a
    LibreOffice-Writer computer on 16th August 2025

    Norton dares to show such unfounded alarms about software which I do
    not even use even when this computer is 95% and 94% idle!!! 94 percent
    idle but Norton pretends unused Microsoft Office slows a
    LibreOffice-Writer computer on 28th August 2025

    (This computer does actually have Microsoft Office (which is left
    behind by a previous owner). I still never (intentionally) click on an
    option to accept its licence. I use inter alia LibreOffice Writer; TeX;
    and various text editors. I was going to make and show a screenshot of
    Microsoft Office still not proceeding past the accept-its-licence stage
    but I possibly accidentally clicked on it after many years, apparently
    few weeks before April 2026. So I made a different screenshot instead
    on a 12^th day of April of the Year that is called 2026 A.D. This
    screenshot shows that I use LibreOffice Writer whereas somehow
    Microsoft Word reports that a file dated this 16^th day of October 2024
    was "modified" on a 14^th day of November 2024 despite
    Microsoft-Windows Explorer clearly professing that it was "Created:";
    "Modified"; and "Accessed:" all on this 16^th day of October 2024! So
    whether we are looking at a bug by Microsoft Word or by
    Microsoft-Windows Explorer, we are clearly looking at a bug by
    Microsoft! Microsoft does not stop at a single bug. This same
    screenshot shows Microsoft Word professing that that document is the
    only "Recent" document in 2026 whilst Microsoft-Windows Explorer
    clearly professed that it was "Accessed:" in 2024. The earliest that I
    might have actually (accidentally) clicked on any
    accept-a-Microsoft-Word-licence option is late 2025. Many other
    problems by Microsoft are easily found.) 3 years plus 7 months using
    Norton where MS Office is installed but not run

    Seunadh

    Is ionann leantainn l|?irsinne de fhaidhle seo agus deimhinneachadh chum
    as gu'n geall sibh fianaisean a thabhairt airson mo fh|#rlaidh tro
    ch|aintean a-staigh taigh-|#sta aig b|araichean iarainn."
    (S. HTTP://Gloucester.Insomnia247.NL/ fuer Kontaktdaten!)
    --- Synchronet 3.21f-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From joegwinn@joegwinn@comcast.net to sci.electronics.design on Mon Apr 13 15:27:24 2026
    From Newsgroup: sci.electronics.design

    More follow-up at bottom.

    On Sun, 12 Apr 2026 18:03:10 -0400, joegwinn@comcast.net wrote:

    Follow-up report at bottom.

    On Fri, 10 Apr 2026 10:58:50 -0400, joegwinn@comcast.net wrote:

    On Thu, 09 Apr 2026 19:29:40 -0700, Jeff Liebermann <jeffl@cruzio.com> >>wrote:

    On Thu, 9 Apr 2026 17:17:30 -0700, Don Y <blockedofcourse@foo.invalid> >>>wrote:

    On 4/9/2026 3:39 PM, Martin Rid wrote:
    Nmap, yes the windows port works well.

    Is it a graphical interface? Or, just a text console?

    GUI for NMAP:
    <https://nmap.org/zenmap>

    I'll look into this one.


    Norton considers any port scanner to be a hacker tool and therefore >>>blocks the installation. Just turn Norton off (see below). You
    should also add Angry IP Scanner to Norton's exclusion list.

    Ahh. So Angry IP is probably OK. I did wonder.


    "AI Overview
    To temporarily turn off Norton Antivirus on Windows or Mac,
    right-click the yellow Norton icon in the system tray/menu bar and
    select Disable Auto-Protect and Disable Smart Firewall. Select a >>>duration, such as 15 minutes or until system restart, to allow for >>>temporary tasks like software installation."

    Yep. I've seen that button.

    Thanks,

    Joe

    What probably happened was that I clicked on the wrong "download"
    button, and did get something evil, which Norton promptly shot.

    What worked was to sign into GitHub and download from there. Probably
    didn't need to sign in, actually. Even so, there were all manner of
    ads and other decoys intruding from all sides. I did hit one that
    downloaded an EXE and urgently insisted that I click on it Right Now!

    Umm, No! Deleted the EXE and got the download straight from GitHub.
    Smooth, and no complaints from Norton.

    It turns out that the intruding ads and decoys are an abuse of Google
    Ads. It's quite striking. I have not seen anything like this on
    MacOS.

    .<https://thehackernews.com/2024/04/malicious-google-ads-pushing-fake-ip.html>

    Joe
    --- Synchronet 3.21f-Linux NewsLink 1.2