The pictures, it's noteworthy to say, make the device look like it has
been built into the case of a small flashlight, not a remote control.
But are infra-red controlled speakers really common? I'd expect
bluetooth to be the protocol of choice and not easily duped by such a device. Or is this something else, and the news story has it garbled?
Eli the Bearded wrote:
===================
The pictures, it's noteworthy to say, make the device look like it has been built into the case of a small flashlight, not a remote control.** The IR LED is likely stronger than usual and needs to be focused to work at long distance.
But are infra-red controlled speakers really common? I'd expect
bluetooth to be the protocol of choice and not easily duped by such a device. Or is this something else, and the news story has it garbled?
** IR is the only common method of remote control for audio gear.
Bluetooth is mainly used with cameras or smartphones.
FYI:
The news item makes no sense - even if you manage to trigger the "mute"
on a speaker the users will soon put it back in action.
** IR is the only common method of remote control for audio gear. Bluetooth is mainly used with cameras or smartphones.
FYI:
The news item makes no sense - even if you manage to trigger the "mute"
on a speaker the users will soon put it back in action.
The 'arms race' will continue...
IR is disappearing on consumer gear.
We're seeing a majority of LCD & OLED TVs
now come with an RF (Bluetooth) remote, not IR
| Sysop: | Amessyroom |
|---|---|
| Location: | Fayetteville, NC |
| Users: | 65 |
| Nodes: | 6 (0 / 6) |
| Uptime: | 06:12:33 |
| Calls: | 862 |
| Files: | 1,311 |
| D/L today: |
921 files (14,318M bytes) |
| Messages: | 264,699 |