Only professional criminals, traitors and SUPER paranoids need play
with all that github nonsense junk.
Those two fuck-twats Stefan and Gabx have totally destroyed a.p.a-s and sci.crypt with their SUPER ego display.
In article <dbf4ca3d1d65a57325caa81d219b625d@msgid.frell.theremailer.net> Fritz Wuehler <fritz@spamexpire-202510.rodent.frell.theremailer.net> wrote:
Only professional criminals, traitors and SUPER paranoids need play
with all that github nonsense junk.
Those two fuck-twats Stefan and Gabx have totally destroyed a.p.a-s and
sci.crypt with their SUPER ego display.
They're both contributing to the community, wheather you like it or not.
So, what have you contributed, other than whining?
Claas wrote:
In article <dbf4ca3d1d65a57325caa81d219b625d@msgid.frell.theremailer.net> Fritz Wuehler <fritz@spamexpire-202510.rodent.frell.theremailer.net> wrote:
Only professional criminals, traitors and SUPER paranoids need play
with all that github nonsense junk.
Those two fuck-twats Stefan and Gabx have totally destroyed a.p.a-s and sci.crypt with their SUPER ego display.
They're both contributing to the community, wheather you like it or not.
So, what have you contributed, other than whining?
Take a few basic English lessons, preppy. You idiot always stick out.
Take a few basic English lessons, preppy. You idiot always stick out.
Anonymous User wrote:
Take a few basic English lessons, preppy. You idiot always stick out.
Yours contribution to this group is zero.
You and yuor mates do nothing here.
Just spreading ignorance and insults.
We're here to discuss privacy and anonymous servers.
Whether you use Omnimix, QS, or none of the above doesn't matter.
In APA-S we're open to dialogue.
If I work hard and then proudly publish my links to the seven worlds, it's not ego that.
I give free services and i'm an egoist ?
It's just obvious you've never worked or fought to achieve results in your life.
This attitude won't get you anywhere.
Trying to denigrate me or Stef in this NG is a leap into the unknown.
I don't know where your verbal slur comes from, but I don't specialize in sociology, psychology, or psychiatry.
It's certainly not our area of ??expertise, you know?
With great humility we have always helped those who asked for help, we realize that a command line can't be easy at first, but it remains just a command line, you understand?
If you don't remember commands, you write them down and than you will remember, you know?
It's just IT man, information technology and this is APA-S, >ALT.PRIVACY.ANON-SERVER
You conform or get the hell out of here,
all of you!
Gabx
Gabx <anonymous@postings.1312> wrote:
Anonymous User wrote:
Take a few basic English lessons, preppy. You idiot always stick out.
Yours contribution to this group is zero.
You and yuor mates do nothing here.
Just spreading ignorance and insults.
We're here to discuss privacy and anonymous servers.
Whether you use Omnimix, QS, or none of the above doesn't matter.
In APA-S we're open to dialogue.
If I work hard and then proudly publish my links to the seven worlds, it's not ego that.
I give free services and i'm an egoist ?
It's just obvious you've never worked or fought to achieve results in your life.
This attitude won't get you anywhere.
Trying to denigrate me or Stef in this NG is a leap into the unknown.
I don't know where your verbal slur comes from, but I don't specialize in sociology, psychology, or psychiatry.
It's certainly not our area of ??expertise, you know?
With great humility we have always helped those who asked for help, we realize that a command line can't be easy at first, but it remains just a command line, you understand?
If you don't remember commands, you write them down and than you will remember, you know?
It's just IT man, information technology and this is APA-S, ALT.PRIVACY.ANON-SERVER
You conform or get the hell out of here,
all of you!
Gabx
So we aren't allowed to express our concerns about the risks of active web contents compromizing our anonymity?
And we aren't allowed to point to the flaws of the real-time Tor network compared with anonymous remailing?
And we aren't allowed to discuss the disadvantages of anonymous data packets in transmission indicating net message size?
And we aren't allowed to name a type 1 remailing scheme with no more than a single chain what it is, broken?
And we aren't allowed to refuse services offered by companies aiming at making profits?
And if we nevertheless express our concerns we're confronted with repeating quibbles and lies and your constant denigration of the confidable work of others, which exposes your hybris and is inconsistent with the humility you claim for yourself.
No, I for my part neither conform with you nor do I leave apa-s. This group is too important to cave in and yield the floor to self-obsessed snake oil peddlers like you and Claas, who poison any honest discussion.
Better create your own unimpeded sphere by starting your own group as you're unable to accept constructive criticism. Better for you and better for us as users of reliable anonymity tools.
In article <20251028.172359.1e28b5b0@msgid.frell.theremailer.net>Fritz Wuehler wrote:
Gabx <anonymous@postings.1312> wrote:
Anonymous User wrote:
Take a few basic English lessons, preppy. You idiot always stick out. >>>>
Yours contribution to this group is zero.
You and yuor mates do nothing here.
Just spreading ignorance and insults.
We're here to discuss privacy and anonymous servers.
Whether you use Omnimix, QS, or none of the above doesn't matter.
In APA-S we're open to dialogue.
If I work hard and then proudly publish my links to the seven worlds, it's not ego that.
I give free services and i'm an egoist ?
It's just obvious you've never worked or fought to achieve results in your life.
This attitude won't get you anywhere.
Trying to denigrate me or Stef in this NG is a leap into the unknown.
I don't know where your verbal slur comes from, but I don't specialize in sociology, psychology, or psychiatry.
It's certainly not our area of ??expertise, you know?
With great humility we have always helped those who asked for help, we realize that a command line can't be easy at first, but it remains just a command line, you understand?
If you don't remember commands, you write them down and than you will remember, you know?
It's just IT man, information technology and this is APA-S,
ALT.PRIVACY.ANON-SERVER
You conform or get the hell out of here,
all of you!
Gabx
So we aren't allowed to express our concerns about the risks of active web contents compromizing our anonymity?
And we aren't allowed to point to the flaws of the real-time Tor network compared with anonymous remailing?
And we aren't allowed to discuss the disadvantages of anonymous data packets in transmission indicating net message size?
And we aren't allowed to name a type 1 remailing scheme with no more than a single chain what it is, broken?
And we aren't allowed to refuse services offered by companies aiming at making profits?
And if we nevertheless express our concerns we're confronted with repeating quibbles and lies and your constant denigration of the confidable work of others, which exposes your hybris and is inconsistent with the humility you claim for yourself.
No, I for my part neither conform with you nor do I leave apa-s. This group is too important to cave in and yield the floor to self-obsessed snake oil peddlers like you and Claas, who poison any honest discussion.
Fine, you deliberately don't want to understand that, but then at least shut up.
+1
Hey, what kind of crap are you writing?
Everyone should participate in this group in as polite a manner as possible, whether it's suggestions for improvement, constructive criticism, or
just questions.
What you're doing here, however, is putting Gabx's and Stefan's work in a
bad light, even though they both do excellent work for the community and their tools are much more modern and much safer than your 30-year-old tools.
Fine, you deliberately don't want to understand that, but then at least shut up.
In article <20251028.172359.1e28b5b0@msgid.frell.theremailer.net>Fritz Wuehler wrote:
Gabx <anonymous@postings.1312> wrote:
Anonymous User wrote:
You conform or get the hell out of here,
all of you!
Gabx
So we aren't allowed to*
Hey, what kind of crap are you writing?
Hey, why are you feeding an obvious troll?
On Tue, 28 Oct 2025 20:03:43 +0300, Radio Eriwan
<bounce.me@radio-eriwan.ru> wrote:
In article <20251028.172359.1e28b5b0@msgid.frell.theremailer.net>Fritz Wuehler wrote:
Gabx <anonymous@postings.1312> wrote:
Anonymous User wrote:
You conform or get the hell out of here,
all of you!
Gabx
So we aren't allowed to*
* Many lines of more nonsense from one of the main trolls of apa-s.
Hey, what kind of crap are you writing?
Hey, why are you feeding an obvious troll?
| Sysop: | Amessyroom |
|---|---|
| Location: | Fayetteville, NC |
| Users: | 54 |
| Nodes: | 6 (0 / 6) |
| Uptime: | 17:44:45 |
| Calls: | 742 |
| Files: | 1,218 |
| D/L today: |
4 files (8,203K bytes) |
| Messages: | 184,414 |
| Posted today: | 1 |