isn't it nice to use Mixfit with PlugMate and an additionally set Duress
PIN with it, when for example traveling? Try that with QSL or OmniMix...
https://github.com/Ch1ffr3punk/Mixfit
https://plugos.net/plugmate
isn't it nice to use Mixfit with PlugMate and an additionally set Duress PIN with it, when for example traveling? Try that with QSL or OmniMix...
https://github.com/Ch1ffr3punk/Mixfit
https://plugos.net/plugmate
A USB flash drive with a virtual Linux, a mail client, Tor Browser and OmniMix costs a fraction of that. No reason to trust an Android device.
Nomen Nescio wrote:
isn't it nice to use Mixfit with PlugMate and an additionally set Duress >>> PIN with it, when for example traveling? Try that with QSL or OmniMix... >>>
https://github.com/Ch1ffr3punk/Mixfit
https://plugos.net/plugmate
A USB flash drive with a virtual Linux, a mail client, Tor Browser and
OmniMix costs a fraction of that. No reason to trust an Android device.
But you have no Duress-PIN for border control and no hardware sandbox,
like we have with PlugMate, which can also be used with Windows or macOS
and does not require a hobby student OS like Linux with it's many bugs.
Privacy in modern times cost money,
which mature adults can afford and
no UX nightmare OmniMix and it originates from Eurasia for security
reasons, which non-professional westerns hate.
Nomen Nescio wrote:
isn't it nice to use Mixfit with PlugMate and an additionally set Duress
PIN with it, when for example traveling? Try that with QSL or OmniMix...
https://github.com/Ch1ffr3punk/Mixfit
https://plugos.net/plugmate
A USB flash drive with a virtual Linux, a mail client, Tor Browser and OmniMix costs a fraction of that. No reason to trust an Android device.
But you have no Duress-PIN for border control and no hardware sandbox,
Irrelevant with an encrypted USB drive holding a hidden container.
like we have with PlugMate, which can also be used with Windows or macOS and does not require a hobby student OS like Linux with it's many bugs.
A hobby student OS like Linux? OMG! You're as stupid as can be, in
each and every respect on the wong side of history and technology.
Privacy in modern times cost money,
Claas, you're just a criminal trying to fleece uninformed people.
which mature adults can afford and
no UX nightmare OmniMix and it originates from Eurasia for security reasons, which non-professional westerns hate.
OM is nothing short of the proverbial quality of German workmanship. Its perfection is the only reason why you struggle with it from day one. But
no matter how hard you try your hacks will never reach that level.
But you have no Duress-PIN for border control and no hardware sandbox,
Irrelevant with an encrypted USB drive holding a hidden container.
Nomen Nescio wrote:
But you have no Duress-PIN for border control and no hardware sandbox,
Irrelevant with an encrypted USB drive holding a hidden container.
I desperately hope that people reading your dangerous nonsense do a search...
Nomen Nescio wrote:
Nomen Nescio wrote:
isn't it nice to use Mixfit with PlugMate and an additionally set Duress
PIN with it, when for example traveling? Try that with QSL or OmniMix...
https://github.com/Ch1ffr3punk/Mixfit
https://plugos.net/plugmate
A USB flash drive with a virtual Linux, a mail client, Tor Browser and >> > > OmniMix costs a fraction of that. No reason to trust an Android device. >> > >
But you have no Duress-PIN for border control and no hardware sandbox,
Irrelevant with an encrypted USB drive holding a hidden container.
like we have with PlugMate, which can also be used with Windows or macOS >> > and does not require a hobby student OS like Linux with it's many bugs.
A hobby student OS like Linux? OMG! You're as stupid as can be, in
each and every respect on the wong side of history and technology.
Privacy in modern times cost money,
Claas, you're just a criminal trying to fleece uninformed people.
which mature adults can afford and
no UX nightmare OmniMix and it originates from Eurasia for security
reasons, which non-professional westerns hate.
OM is nothing short of the proverbial quality of German workmanship. Its
perfection is the only reason why you struggle with it from day one. But
no matter how hard you try your hacks will never reach that level.
It is funny how LEA people like you try to defend old shit like OmniMix.
Sure you have a mission and that is to falsify facts so that people
believing you guys can be caught. Your methods in anonymity circles
are known to professionals.
Nomen Nescio wrote:
But you have no Duress-PIN for border control and no hardware sandbox,
Irrelevant with an encrypted USB drive holding a hidden container.
I desperately hope that people reading your dangerous nonsense do a search...
Ch1ffr3punk wrote:immediately.
Nomen Nescio wrote:??????????, ???????? ?????????, rCo ????? ??????? ????? ?? ???? ???????.
But you have no Duress-PIN for border control and no hardware sandbox, >> >Irrelevant with an encrypted USB drive holding a hidden container.
I desperately hope that people reading your dangerous nonsense do a search...
1. The Hidden Container vs. the Duress-PIN (The Human Factor)
They claim a hidden container makes the Duress-PIN unnecessary. This is dangerously naive.
The hidden container is designed for plausible deniability of the data. The Duress-PIN, however, is designed to protect you from physical/psychological coercion, lengthy detention, or denial of entry.
Even if your hidden container is mathematically perfect, modern forensic tools at border control check more than just free space. They analyze filesystem metadata, access timestamps, and the entropy pattern of the outer volume. If your outer volume looks completely unused or filled with random garbage, trained agents will spot it
Without a Duress-PIN that opens a believable, actively used outer system, you have no way to satisfy the officer in a stressful situation. The hidden container alone does absolutely nothing to stop the rubber-hose (coercion) attack. Ignoring the human factor is a rookie mistake.
2. The Hidden Container vs. the Hardware Sandbox (The Kill Shot)
This is where their claim becomes outright dangerous and technically absurd. They say a sandbox is irrelevant because the drive is encrypted. That is fundamentally wrong.
The hidden container protects Data-at-Rest (the stored files on the drive). The hardware sandbox protects Data-in-Use (the active decryption process).
The moment you plug your drive into an untrusted computer at the border and enter your hidden container password, that foreign machine decrypts the data directly into its RAM.
If that host lacks a hardware sandbox (or is compromised), it can easily run malware that:
Captures your password via a keylogger before it even reaches the drive.
Extracts the decrypted files directly from the system's RAM (via Cold-boot or DMA attacks) while the container is mounted.
Injects malicious code into your USB drive's firmware (an Evil-Maid attack), which will then exfiltrate your password the next time you plug it into your own trusted computer at home.
Ch1ffr3punk <ch1ffr3punk@gmail.com> wrote:
Nomen Nescio wrote:
But you have no Duress-PIN for border control and no hardware sandbox,
Irrelevant with an encrypted USB drive holding a hidden container.
I desperately hope that people reading your dangerous nonsense do a search...
You really think border guards are less suspicious when they get
hold of your PlugMate device? Oh boy, what a funny guy you are!
Ch1ffr3punk <ch1ffr3punk@gmail.com> wrote:
Nomen Nescio wrote:
Nomen Nescio wrote:
isn't it nice to use Mixfit with PlugMate and an additionally set Duress
PIN with it, when for example traveling? Try that with QSL or OmniMix...
https://github.com/Ch1ffr3punk/Mixfit
https://plugos.net/plugmate
A USB flash drive with a virtual Linux, a mail client, Tor Browser and
OmniMix costs a fraction of that. No reason to trust an Android device.
But you have no Duress-PIN for border control and no hardware sandbox,
Irrelevant with an encrypted USB drive holding a hidden container.
like we have with PlugMate, which can also be used with Windows or macOS
and does not require a hobby student OS like Linux with it's many bugs.
A hobby student OS like Linux? OMG! You're as stupid as can be, in
each and every respect on the wong side of history and technology.
Privacy in modern times cost money,
Claas, you're just a criminal trying to fleece uninformed people.
which mature adults can afford and
no UX nightmare OmniMix and it originates from Eurasia for security reasons, which non-professional westerns hate.
OM is nothing short of the proverbial quality of German workmanship. Its perfection is the only reason why you struggle with it from day one. But no matter how hard you try your hacks will never reach that level.
It is funny how LEA people like you try to defend old shit like OmniMix.
Sure you have a mission and that is to falsify facts so that people believing you guys can be caught. Your methods in anonymity circles
are known to professionals.
Mixmaster, yamn and tor are distributed networks run by volunteers not interested in making any money, and their flawless methods of
anonymizing messages are well-known and analyzed multiple times by
experts. There's no need for a profit-driven company in this sector.
Claas spreads FUD:
Ch1ffr3punk wrote:
Nomen Nescio wrote:
But you have no Duress-PIN for border control and no hardware sandbox,
Irrelevant with an encrypted USB drive holding a hidden container.
I desperately hope that people reading your dangerous nonsense do a search...
??????????, ???????? ?????????, ??? ????? ??????? ????? ?? ???? ???????.
1. The Hidden Container vs. the Duress-PIN (The Human Factor)
They claim a hidden container makes the Duress-PIN unnecessary. This is dangerously naive.
The hidden container is designed for plausible deniability of the data. The Duress-PIN, however, is designed to protect you from physical/psychological coercion, lengthy detention, or denial of entry.
Even if your hidden container is mathematically perfect, modern forensic tools at border control check more than just free space. They analyze filesystem metadata, access timestamps, and the entropy pattern of the outer volume. If your outer volume looks completely unused or filled with random garbage, trained agents will spot itimmediately.
Any proof? I don't think so. That's just another FUD attack.
Without a Duress-PIN that opens a believable, actively used outer system, you have no way to satisfy the officer in a stressful situation. The hidden container alone does absolutely nothing to stop the rubber-hose (coercion) attack. Ignoring the human factor is a rookie mistake.
And a Duress-PIN helps in that situation where the simple presence of a PlugMate computer indicates that you have something to hide? That's the exact opposite of plausible deniability. Furthermore, can you imagine
how LEAs react when you offer them a PIN that clears your device? Good
luck with it.
2. The Hidden Container vs. the Hardware Sandbox (The Kill Shot)
This is where their claim becomes outright dangerous and technically absurd. They say a sandbox is irrelevant because the drive is encrypted. That is fundamentally wrong.
The hidden container protects Data-at-Rest (the stored files on the drive). The hardware sandbox protects Data-in-Use (the active decryption process).
An isolated hidden OS on a hidden device is a sandbox.
The moment you plug your drive into an untrusted computer at the border and enter your hidden container password, that foreign machine decrypts the data directly into its RAM.
Who would do that? Only you, Claas, come to my mind.
If that host lacks a hardware sandbox (or is compromised), it can easily run malware that:
Captures your password via a keylogger before it even reaches the drive.
Extracts the decrypted files directly from the system's RAM (via Cold-boot or DMA attacks) while the container is mounted.
Injects malicious code into your USB drive's firmware (an Evil-Maid attack), which will then exfiltrate your password the next time you plug it into your own trusted computer at home.
Yes, the party is over when your PlugMate device has to access
peripherial devices of its host system like its touch screen.
Anonymous wrote:
Claas spreads FUD:
Ch1ffr3punk wrote:
Nomen Nescio wrote:
But you have no Duress-PIN for border control and no hardware sandbox,
Irrelevant with an encrypted USB drive holding a hidden container.
I desperately hope that people reading your dangerous nonsense do a search...
??????????, ???????? ?????????, ??? ????? ??????? ????? ?? ???? ???????.
1. The Hidden Container vs. the Duress-PIN (The Human Factor)
They claim a hidden container makes the Duress-PIN unnecessary. This is dangerously naive.
The hidden container is designed for plausible deniability of the data. The Duress-PIN, however, is designed to protect you from physical/psychological coercion, lengthy detention, or denial of entry.
Even if your hidden container is mathematically perfect, modern forensic tools at border control check more than just free space. They analyze filesystem metadata, access timestamps, and the entropy pattern of the outer volume. If your outer volume looks completely unused or filled with random garbage, trained agents will spot itimmediately.
Any proof? I don't think so. That's just another FUD attack.
Without a Duress-PIN that opens a believable, actively used outer system, you have no way to satisfy the officer in a stressful situation. The hidden container alone does absolutely nothing to stop the rubber-hose (coercion) attack. Ignoring the human factor is a rookie mistake.
And a Duress-PIN helps in that situation where the simple presence of a PlugMate computer indicates that you have something to hide? That's the exact opposite of plausible deniability. Furthermore, can you imagine
how LEAs react when you offer them a PIN that clears your device? Good luck with it.
2. The Hidden Container vs. the Hardware Sandbox (The Kill Shot)
This is where their claim becomes outright dangerous and technically absurd. They say a sandbox is irrelevant because the drive is encrypted. That is fundamentally wrong.
The hidden container protects Data-at-Rest (the stored files on the drive). The hardware sandbox protects Data-in-Use (the active decryption process).
An isolated hidden OS on a hidden device is a sandbox.
The moment you plug your drive into an untrusted computer at the border and enter your hidden container password, that foreign machine decrypts the data directly into its RAM.
Who would do that? Only you, Claas, come to my mind.
If that host lacks a hardware sandbox (or is compromised), it can easily run malware that:
Captures your password via a keylogger before it even reaches the drive.
Extracts the decrypted files directly from the system's RAM (via Cold-boot or DMA attacks) while the container is mounted.
Injects malicious code into your USB drive's firmware (an Evil-Maid attack), which will then exfiltrate your password the next time you plug it into your own trusted computer at home.
Yes, the party is over when your PlugMate device has to access
peripherial devices of its host system like its touch screen.
What you fail to understand, VeraCrypt usage, like you propose with
a hidden container, can easily been spotted by Border Control, so
that you have to reveal your password.
And consider this rookie, border control can if they don't like your face format your VeraCrypt USB stick properly, so that you can't use your hidden software and then you loose your oudated OpenPGP secret key(s), nym aliases and other outdaded anonymous software settings, like from OmniCrap etc.
Claas wrote:
And consider this rookie, border control can if they don't like your face format your VeraCrypt USB stick properly, so that you can't use your hidden software and then you loose your oudated OpenPGP secret key(s), nym aliases and other outdaded anonymous software settings, like from OmniCrap etc.
In case you missed it, there's a general tendency towards
backup devices stored in safe remote places.
Anonymous wrote:
Claas spreads FUD:
Even if your hidden container is mathematically perfect, modern forensic tools at border control check more than just free space. They analyze filesystem metadata, access timestamps, and the entropy pattern of the outer volume. If your outer volume looks completely unused or filled with random garbage, trained agents will spot itimmediately.
Any proof? I don't think so. That's just another FUD attack.
The moment you plug your drive into an untrusted computer at the border and enter your hidden container password, that foreign machine decrypts the data directly into its RAM.
Who would do that? Only you, Claas, come to my mind.
What you fail to understand, VeraCrypt usage, like you propose with
a hidden container, can easily been spotted by Border Control, so
that you have to reveal your password.
It's you who has absolutely no idea. When they ask for my VeraCrypt key
I'd offer them the password for the host volume and not the hidden one.
Do you think that borders guards are that stupid when they search
people and see VeraCrypt usage?
What experts?
You should run a Mixmaster or YAMN remailer by yourself
and learn about the deficiencies Type II technolgy with smtp(s) usage
has, when not properly used with the Nym Mixnet...
Ch1ffr3punk wrote:
Do you think that borders guards are that stupid when they search
people and see VeraCrypt usage?
And if you use for passwords, NFT tags, hidden in a book etc.,
US law enforcement has devices to destroy them.
Anonymous wrote:
Claas wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Claas spreads FUD:
Even if your hidden container is mathematically perfect, modern forensic tools at border control check more than just free space. They analyze filesystem metadata, access timestamps, and the entropy pattern of the outer volume. If your outer volume looks completely unused or filled with random garbage, trained agents will spot itimmediately.
Any proof?
It's you who has absolutely no idea. When they ask for my VeraCrypt keyC'mon rookie, If border guards see that you use VeraCrypt and give them
I'd offer them the password for the host volume and not the hidden one.
your password, they know that stupid VeraCrypt users, like you, are most
like using hidden volumes and simply format your OmniCrap etc. on your
USB drive and then you look really stupid.
But now imagine the reaction of border guards confronted with your impertinence of offering them the erasure PIN for your PlugMate device
while they asked for the access passphrase. Good luck facing the legal consequences of tampering with evidence.
Ch1ffr3punk <ch1ffr3punk@gmail.com>wrote:
Ch1ffr3punk wrote:
Do you think that borders guards are that stupid when they search
people and see VeraCrypt usage?
And if you use for passwords, NFT tags, hidden in a book etc.,
US law enforcement has devices to destroy them.
Ch1ffr3punk <ch1ffr3punk@gmail.com>wrote:
Ch1ffr3punk wrote:
Do you think that borders guards are that stupid when they search
people and see VeraCrypt usage?
And if you use for passwords, NFT tags, hidden in a book etc.,
US law enforcement has devices to destroy them.
Anybody been swallowing micro-sdcards?
address@is.invalid (LucLan)wrote:
In alt.cypherpunks Jan Panteltje <alien@comet.invalid> wrote:No. Why?
Ch1ffr3punk <ch1ffr3punk@gmail.com>wrote:
Ch1ffr3punk wrote:
Do you think that borders guards are that stupid when they search
people and see VeraCrypt usage?
And if you use for passwords, NFT tags, hidden in a book etc.,
US law enforcement has devices to destroy them.
Anybody been swallowing micro-sdcards?
Claas wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Claas wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Claas spreads FUD:
Still no reply to
Even if your hidden container is mathematically perfect, modern forensic tools at border control check more than just free space. They analyze filesystem metadata, access timestamps, and the entropy pattern of the outer volume. If your outer volume looks completely unused or filled with random garbage, trained agents will spot itimmediately.
Any proof?
Why don't you answer that question though that's essential for your reasoning? Tell us!
Ch1ffr3punk <ch1ffr3punk@gmail.com>wrote:
Ch1ffr3punk wrote:
Do you think that borders guards are that stupid when they search
people and see VeraCrypt usage?
And if you use for passwords, NFT tags, hidden in a book etc.,
US law enforcement has devices to destroy them.
Anybody been swallowing micro-sdcards?
Anonymous <nobody@yamn.paranoici.org> wrote:
Claas wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Claas wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Claas spreads FUD:
Still no reply to
Even if your hidden container is mathematically perfect, modern forensic tools at border control check more than just free space. They analyze filesystem metadata, access timestamps, and the entropy pattern of the outer volume. If your outer volume looks completely unused or filled with random garbage, trained agents will spot itimmediately.
Any proof?
Why don't you answer that question though that's essential for your reasoning? Tell us!
Why?
Because Claas is a liar, a mudslinger, an enemy of free speech,
of free societies, a fascist, Putin's asset.
But his lies are exposed, secure free anonymity tools prevail,
Putler's terror state is defeated with Russia up to the hilt in
debt and most Russian companies teetering on the brink of
bankruptcy. Kaboom!
Alexander Schreiber <als@usenet.thangorodrim.de>wrote:
Jan Panteltje <alien@comet.invalid> wrote:
Ch1ffr3punk <ch1ffr3punk@gmail.com>wrote:
Ch1ffr3punk wrote:
Do you think that borders guards are that stupid when they search
people and see VeraCrypt usage?
And if you use for passwords, NFT tags, hidden in a book etc.,
US law enforcement has devices to destroy them.
Anybody been swallowing micro-sdcards?
Sound like a great recipe for a pain in the ass.
SCNR,
Alex.
Alexander Schreiber <als@usenet.thangorodrim.de>wrote:
Jan Panteltje <alien@comet.invalid> wrote:
Ch1ffr3punk <ch1ffr3punk@gmail.com>wrote:
Ch1ffr3punk wrote:
Do you think that borders guards are that stupid when they search
people and see VeraCrypt usage?
And if you use for passwords, NFT tags, hidden in a book etc.,
US law enforcement has devices to destroy them.
Anybody been swallowing micro-sdcards?
Sound like a great recipe for a pain in the ass.
Could perhaps get stuck in your appendix?
Jan Panteltje <alien@comet.invalid> wrote:ROFL!!!!!!!!!!
Ch1ffr3punk <ch1ffr3punk@gmail.com>wrote:
Ch1ffr3punk wrote:
Do you think that borders guards are that stupid when they search
people and see VeraCrypt usage?
And if you use for passwords, NFT tags, hidden in a book etc.,
US law enforcement has devices to destroy them.
Anybody been swallowing micro-sdcards?
Sound like a great recipe for a pain in the ass.
address@is.invalid (LucLan)wrote:
In alt.cypherpunks Jan Panteltje <alien@comet.invalid> wrote:
Ch1ffr3punk <ch1ffr3punk@gmail.com>wrote:
Ch1ffr3punk wrote:
Do you think that borders guards are that stupid when they search people and see VeraCrypt usage?
And if you use for passwords, NFT tags, hidden in a book etc.,
US law enforcement has devices to destroy them.
Anybody been swallowing micro-sdcards?
No. Why?
Put you secret messages and data on it,
swallow it and then pass through customs?
Make sure you carry a big smartphone with lots of OK stuff
to distract security?
Jan Panteltje wrote:
address@is.invalid (LucLan)wrote:
In alt.cypherpunks Jan Panteltje <alien@comet.invalid> wrote:
Ch1ffr3punk <ch1ffr3punk@gmail.com>wrote:
Ch1ffr3punk wrote:
Do you think that borders guards are that stupid when they search people and see VeraCrypt usage?
And if you use for passwords, NFT tags, hidden in a book etc.,
US law enforcement has devices to destroy them.
Anybody been swallowing micro-sdcards?
No. Why?
Put you secret messages and data on it,
swallow it and then pass through customs?
Make sure you carry a big smartphone with lots of OK stuff
to distract security?
Probably a better way would be to carry no devices at all
and only purchase an emtpy USB stick at arrival, when you
download all your goodies from public repositories and
only need to remember the passphrase you exchanged with
your loved ones.
That's how MicroCrypt works and additionally you can
receive/transfer files with NymX over the Nym Mixnet,
so that third-parties do not know with whom you do
files transfers.
https://github.com/Ch1ffr3punk/MicroCrypt
https://github.com/Ch1ffr3punk/NymX
HTH!
Ch1ffr3punk <ch1ffr3punk@gmail.com>wrote:
Ch1ffr3punk wrote:P.S. Prior depature, one can sign-up with https://atomicmail.io/
Jan Panteltje wrote:
address@is.invalid (LucLan)wrote:
In alt.cypherpunks Jan Panteltje <alien@comet.invalid> wrote:No. Why?
Ch1ffr3punk <ch1ffr3punk@gmail.com>wrote:
Ch1ffr3punk wrote:
Do you think that borders guards are that stupid when they search >> > > > > > people and see VeraCrypt usage?
And if you use for passwords, NFT tags, hidden in a book etc.,
US law enforcement has devices to destroy them.
Anybody been swallowing micro-sdcards?
Put you secret messages and data on it,
swallow it and then pass through customs?
Make sure you carry a big smartphone with lots of OK stuff
to distract security?
Probably a better way would be to carry no devices at all
and only purchase an empty USB stick at arrival, when you
download all your goodies from public repositories and
only need to remember the passphrase you exchanged with
your loved ones.
That's how MicroCrypt works and additionally you can
receive/transfer files with NymX over the Nym Mixnet,
so that third-parties do not know with whom you do
files transfers.
https://github.com/Ch1ffr3punk/MicroCrypt
https://github.com/Ch1ffr3punk/NymX
HTH!
without providing any credentials, so that your loved ones have
your email address, when using MicroCrypt.
--Interesting,
https://oc2mx.net
Ch1ffr3punk <ch1ffr3punk@gmail.com>wrote:
Ch1ffr3punk wrote:P.S. Prior depature, one can sign-up with https://atomicmail.io/
Jan Panteltje wrote:
address@is.invalid (LucLan)wrote:
In alt.cypherpunks Jan Panteltje <alien@comet.invalid> wrote:No. Why?
Ch1ffr3punk <ch1ffr3punk@gmail.com>wrote:
Ch1ffr3punk wrote:
Do you think that borders guards are that stupid when they search >>>>>>>> people and see VeraCrypt usage?
And if you use for passwords, NFT tags, hidden in a book etc.,
US law enforcement has devices to destroy them.
Anybody been swallowing micro-sdcards?
Put you secret messages and data on it,
swallow it and then pass through customs?
Make sure you carry a big smartphone with lots of OK stuff
to distract security?
Probably a better way would be to carry no devices at all
and only purchase an empty USB stick at arrival, when you
download all your goodies from public repositories and
only need to remember the passphrase you exchanged with
your loved ones.
That's how MicroCrypt works and additionally you can
receive/transfer files with NymX over the Nym Mixnet,
so that third-parties do not know with whom you do
files transfers.
https://github.com/Ch1ffr3punk/MicroCrypt
https://github.com/Ch1ffr3punk/NymX
HTH!
without providing any credentials, so that your loved ones have
your email address, when using MicroCrypt.
--Interesting,
https://oc2mx.net
https://oc2mx.net/am.html
I will be 80 in a few month this year, been on internet since it started, used Win 3.1 and Trumpet Winsock,
when Billy The Gates said 'internet is not that important'.
Bill Gates stated that he saw "little commercial potential for the internet for the next 10 years"
during a Comdex trade event in 1994.
Additionally, in his 1995 book "The Road Ahead,"
he described the internet as a novelty that would eventually be replaced by something better.
Before that in 1980 we had 'Videotex' (Viditel in the Netherlands where I am now)..
Have my own website ever since...
https://panteltje.nl/index1.html
Sometimes ran the server at home when I had a fixed IP address (cable) now web hosting outsourced.
Started using Linux when SLS Linux came, end of MS windows for me.
Anyways these days US will also want to know about your online activities for a Visa ..
So not expecting to get a Visa from them, I refused to join CIA many years ago too.
As to transferring encrypted stuff, there are so many ways...
With memory things getting smaller and smaller and having more and more capacity,
hiding something, even in your watch, becomes easier and easier.
Drones... Radio... Satellite..
Played with it all.
Or you can just post your encrypted stuff on Usenet and thousands will read it...
There is more to it...
I tramp keeps going maybe after the nukes try Morse and smoke signs?
Ch1ffr3punk <ch1ffr3punk@gmail.com>wrote:
Ch1ffr3punk wrote:
Jan Panteltje wrote:
address@is.invalid (LucLan)wrote:
In alt.cypherpunks Jan Panteltje <alien@comet.invalid> wrote:
Ch1ffr3punk <ch1ffr3punk@gmail.com>wrote:
Ch1ffr3punk wrote:
Do you think that borders guards are that stupid when they search
people and see VeraCrypt usage?
And if you use for passwords, NFT tags, hidden in a book etc.,
US law enforcement has devices to destroy them.
Anybody been swallowing micro-sdcards?
No. Why?
Put you secret messages and data on it,
swallow it and then pass through customs?
Make sure you carry a big smartphone with lots of OK stuff
to distract security?
Probably a better way would be to carry no devices at all
and only purchase an empty USB stick at arrival, when you
download all your goodies from public repositories and
only need to remember the passphrase you exchanged with
your loved ones.
That's how MicroCrypt works and additionally you can
receive/transfer files with NymX over the Nym Mixnet,
so that third-parties do not know with whom you do
files transfers.
https://github.com/Ch1ffr3punk/MicroCrypt https://github.com/Ch1ffr3punk/NymX
HTH!
P.S. Prior depature, one can sign-up with https://atomicmail.io/
without providing any credentials, so that your loved ones have
your email address, when using MicroCrypt.
--Interesting,
https://oc2mx.net
https://oc2mx.net/am.html
I will be 80 in a few month this year, been on internet since it started, used Win 3.1 and Trumpet Winsock,
when Billy The Gates said 'internet is not that important'.
Bill Gates stated that he saw "little commercial potential for the internet for the next 10 years"
during a Comdex trade event in 1994.
Additionally, in his 1995 book "The Road Ahead,"
he described the internet as a novelty that would eventually be replaced by something better.
Before that in 1980 we had 'Videotex' (Viditel in the Netherlands where I am now)..
Have my own website ever since...
https://panteltje.nl/index1.html
Sometimes ran the server at home when I had a fixed IP address (cable) now web hosting outsourced.
Started using Linux when SLS Linux came, end of MS windows for me.
Anyways these days US will also want to know about your online activities for a Visa ..
So not expecting to get a Visa from them, I refused to join CIA many years ago too.
As to transferring encrypted stuff, there are so many ways...
With memory things getting smaller and smaller and having more and more capacity,
hiding something, even in your watch, becomes easier and easier.
Drones... Radio... Satellite..
Played with it all.
Or you can just post your encrypted stuff on Usenet and thousands will read it...
There is more to it...
I tramp keeps going maybe after the nukes try Morse and smoke signs?
John Gotti <nobody@domain.invalid>wrote:
Jan Panteltje wrote:
Ch1ffr3punk <ch1ffr3punk@gmail.com>wrote:
Ch1ffr3punk wrote:P.S. Prior depature, one can sign-up with https://atomicmail.io/
Jan Panteltje wrote:
address@is.invalid (LucLan)wrote:
In alt.cypherpunks Jan Panteltje <alien@comet.invalid> wrote:No. Why?
Ch1ffr3punk <ch1ffr3punk@gmail.com>wrote:
Ch1ffr3punk wrote:
Do you think that borders guards are that stupid when they search >>>>>>>>> people and see VeraCrypt usage?
And if you use for passwords, NFT tags, hidden in a book etc., >>>>>>>> US law enforcement has devices to destroy them.
Anybody been swallowing micro-sdcards?
Put you secret messages and data on it,
swallow it and then pass through customs?
Make sure you carry a big smartphone with lots of OK stuff
to distract security?
Probably a better way would be to carry no devices at all
and only purchase an empty USB stick at arrival, when you
download all your goodies from public repositories and
only need to remember the passphrase you exchanged with
your loved ones.
That's how MicroCrypt works and additionally you can
receive/transfer files with NymX over the Nym Mixnet,
so that third-parties do not know with whom you do
files transfers.
https://github.com/Ch1ffr3punk/MicroCrypt
https://github.com/Ch1ffr3punk/NymX
HTH!
without providing any credentials, so that your loved ones have
your email address, when using MicroCrypt.
--Interesting,
https://oc2mx.net
https://oc2mx.net/am.html
I will be 80 in a few month this year, been on internet since it started, used Win 3.1 and Trumpet Winsock,
when Billy The Gates said 'internet is not that important'.
Bill Gates stated that he saw "little commercial potential for the internet for the next 10 years"
during a Comdex trade event in 1994.
Additionally, in his 1995 book "The Road Ahead,"
he described the internet as a novelty that would eventually be replaced by something better.
Before that in 1980 we had 'Videotex' (Viditel in the Netherlands where I am now)..
Have my own website ever since...
https://panteltje.nl/index1.html
Sometimes ran the server at home when I had a fixed IP address (cable) now web hosting outsourced.
Started using Linux when SLS Linux came, end of MS windows for me.
Anyways these days US will also want to know about your online activities for a Visa ..
So not expecting to get a Visa from them, I refused to join CIA many years ago too.
As to transferring encrypted stuff, there are so many ways...
With memory things getting smaller and smaller and having more and more capacity,
hiding something, even in your watch, becomes easier and easier.
Drones... Radio... Satellite..
Played with it all.
Or you can just post your encrypted stuff on Usenet and thousands will read it...
There is more to it...
I tramp keeps going maybe after the nukes try Morse and smoke signs?
Your NewsFleX sucks mate.
Today as in the 80s.
Path traversal in the downloader.
Command injection: URLs and group names end up in shell commands executed with popen().
Memory corruption in NNTP, SMTP, and FTP responses: with a line exactly READSIZE long, the terminator is written beyond the
buffer.
Crash and possible stack corruption caused by a malicious server.
HTML parser without size checking: temp_pos grows without checking the buffer limit.
Insecure credentials: NNTP password saved in clear text and sent via AUTHINFO PASS over a TCP socket without TLS.
The OTP is cryptographically insecure: it generates the key via rand(), without secure initialization.
Predictable keys and possible reuse of the pad, so the promised confidentiality is unreliable.
The filter password uses crypt() with a fixed salt of "P8".
The hash is easily attackable and the same for identical passwords.
Verdict: I would not use it on the Internet, with real credentials, or on the main system.
Above all, it should never be run as root, despite the README explicitly recommending it.
For historical testing, only in a dedicated VM, as a non-privileged user, without a shared home and without personal data.
Ch1ffr3punk <ch1ffr3punk@gmail.com>wrote:
Jan Panteltje wrote:
Ch1ffr3punk <ch1ffr3punk@gmail.com>wrote:
Ch1ffr3punk wrote:P.S. Prior depature, one can sign-up with https://atomicmail.io/
Jan Panteltje wrote:
address@is.invalid (LucLan)wrote:
In alt.cypherpunks Jan Panteltje <alien@comet.invalid> wrote:No. Why?
Ch1ffr3punk <ch1ffr3punk@gmail.com>wrote:
Ch1ffr3punk wrote:
Do you think that borders guards are that stupid when they search
people and see VeraCrypt usage?
And if you use for passwords, NFT tags, hidden in a book etc., >> > > > > > > US law enforcement has devices to destroy them.
Anybody been swallowing micro-sdcards?
Put you secret messages and data on it,
swallow it and then pass through customs?
Make sure you carry a big smartphone with lots of OK stuff
to distract security?
Probably a better way would be to carry no devices at all
and only purchase an empty USB stick at arrival, when you
download all your goodies from public repositories and
only need to remember the passphrase you exchanged with
your loved ones.
That's how MicroCrypt works and additionally you can
receive/transfer files with NymX over the Nym Mixnet,
so that third-parties do not know with whom you do
files transfers.
https://github.com/Ch1ffr3punk/MicroCrypt
https://github.com/Ch1ffr3punk/NymX
HTH!
without providing any credentials, so that your loved ones have
your email address, when using MicroCrypt.
--Interesting,
https://oc2mx.net
https://oc2mx.net/am.html
I will be 80 in a few month this year, been on internet since it started, used Win 3.1 and Trumpet Winsock,
when Billy The Gates said 'internet is not that important'.
Bill Gates stated that he saw "little commercial potential for the internet for the next 10 years"
during a Comdex trade event in 1994.
Additionally, in his 1995 book "The Road Ahead,"
he described the internet as a novelty that would eventually be replaced by something better.
Before that in 1980 we had 'Videotex' (Viditel in the Netherlands where I am now)..
Have my own website ever since...
https://panteltje.nl/index1.html
Sometimes ran the server at home when I had a fixed IP address (cable) now web hosting outsourced.
Started using Linux when SLS Linux came, end of MS windows for me.
Anyways these days US will also want to know about your online activities for a Visa ..
So not expecting to get a Visa from them, I refused to join CIA many years ago too.
As to transferring encrypted stuff, there are so many ways...
With memory things getting smaller and smaller and having more and more capacity,
hiding something, even in your watch, becomes easier and easier.
Drones... Radio... Satellite..
Played with it all.
Or you can just post your encrypted stuff on Usenet and thousands will read it...
There is more to it...
I tramp keeps going maybe after the nukes try Morse and smoke signs?
I am 64 now and been online since the Atari 800XL came out. I will not
travel to the USA, as we have beautiful Eurasia to discover many nice
places.
I do all this privacy stuff mostly for eldery, non-tech and people with
a disabilty, because Linux nerds are mostly selfish and only use outdated >OpenPGP crap etc. which I do not trust.
Usenet is likely one of the last free discussion places online.
As to selfish ,. open sourcing stuff is not a selfish thing.
Deliberately making and selling ever more bloated operating systems and application to force people to buy ever
more expensive hardware while holding shares in hardware companies like microsoft does, is selfish,
But selfishness is the US disease and the US tramp contaminates his people with it.
| Sysop: | Amessyroom |
|---|---|
| Location: | Fayetteville, NC |
| Users: | 74 |
| Nodes: | 6 (0 / 6) |
| Uptime: | 49:03:47 |
| Calls: | 1,100 |
| Files: | 1,339 |
| Messages: | 275,768 |