• Physicists just turned glass into a powerful quantum security device

    From Jan Panteltje@alien@comet.invalid to sci.electronics.design,sci.crypt on Thu Mar 26 05:52:39 2026
    From Newsgroup: sci.crypt

    From:
    https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2026/03/260324024255.htm

    Physicists just turned glass into a powerful quantum security device
    A laser-written glass chip may be the key to unlocking fast, secure quantum communication in the real world.
    Date:
    March 24, 2026
    Source:
    SPIE--International Society for Optics and Photonics
    Summary:
    Scientists have turned simple glass into a powerful quantum communication device that could safeguard data against future quantum attacks.
    The chip combines stability, speed, and versatilityrCohandling both ultra-secure encryption and record-breaking random number generation in one compact system.

    --- Synchronet 3.21f-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From =?UTF-8?Q?Niocl=C3=A1s_P=C3=B3l_Caile=C3=A1n?= de Ghloucester@thanks-to@Taf.com to sci.electronics.design,sci.crypt on Thu Mar 26 12:50:01 2026
    From Newsgroup: sci.crypt

    Jan Panteltje schreef:
    |------------------------------------------------------|
    |"Source: |
    | SPIE--International Society for Optics and Photonics"| |------------------------------------------------------|

    I did not check this research which Mister Panteltje refers to. SPIE
    is dodgy. Cf.
    "Research Article
    Massive Faculty Donations and Institutional Conflicts of Interest
    Bart Kahr, Ph.D.i and Mark D. Hollingsworth, Ph.D.ii

    Abstract
    Most research universities have concrete policies for navigating the
    conflicts of interest of faculty members. Policies that might
    constrain university administrators acting on behalf of their schools, so-called institutional conflicts of interest, are absent or poorly
    developed at most places that could benefit from them. Researchers
    have argued for the illustration of institutional conflicts as a
    foundation for policy development. Here, we show the failure of
    research accountability when a faculty member made massive gifts to a
    leading American public research university, the University of
    Washington in Seattle, thereby creating allegiances that undermined
    commitments to academic values. Correspondence, some from thousands of
    pages acquired through the Washington State Public Records Act, show
    faculty colleagues, department chairs, deans, a provost, presidents,
    and the Board of Regents soliciting and accepting the donor's money
    but not sufficiently guarding the integrity of science when that was
    required. These records offer a rare look inside a university
    scientific misconduct investigation, a process typically shrouded in
    secrecy under the guise of confidentiality. They amount to a forensic
    analysis of what can go wrong with science at the nexus of a secret
    history of misconduct, spectacularly ambitious science, and large
    donations. The inabilities of federal and state authorities to reckon
    with institutional conflicts of interest are highlighted. The
    collective inaction can be understood within LessigrCOs framework of institutional corruption. The failings described herein are
    metaphorical holes in the safety net intended to protect the integrity
    of American science, a shared practice that is under increasing
    strain. All public records are available from the authors upon
    request. Those cited here are included in an appendix posted by the
    journal.

    [. . .]

    Four of the six papers,91,92,93,94were published by SPIE, The
    International Society for Optics and Photonics, and were also
    considered for retraction. Eric Pepper, Director of SPIE
    Publications, chose not to act. He said, rCLRetracting one or
    more of these papers as an outcome of this inquiry would
    be a very consequential action on SPIErCOs part and would not
    go unnoticed.rCY100 Pepper asked LD his opinion, and replied,
    rCLProfessor Dalton claims he was not well informed about
    your role in the development of the chromophore
    material.rCY100 Pepper had the correspondence that showed
    LDrCOs claim was untrue, but he deferred to LD, an SPIE
    Lifetime Achievement Award winner.101"
    says HTTP://Gloucester.Insomnia247.NL/Evil_which_is_so-called_science/Journal_of_Scientific_Practice_and_Integrity/archived_manually/7765-massive-faculty-donations-and-institutional-conflicts-of-interest.pdf

    HTTP://Gloucester.Insomnia247.NL/Evil_which_is_so-called_science/Journal_of_Scientific_Practice_and_Integrity/archived_manually/7765-massive-faculty-donations-and-institutional-conflicts-of-interest.bibtex.txt
    has -
    @article{Kahr2019Massive,
    journal={The Journal of Scientific Practice and Integrity},
    doi={10.35122/jospi.2019.740579},
    number=1,
    publisher={Hamilton Publishing, Inc.},
    title={Massive Faculty Donations and Institutional Conflicts of Interest},
    volume=1,
    author={Kahr, Bart and Hollingsworth, Mark},
    pages={1--33},
    date={2019-04-11},
    year=2019,
    month=4,
    day=11,
    }

    Cf. HTTP://Gloucester.Insomnia247.NL/Evil_which_is_so-called_science/Journal_of_Scientific_Practice_and_Integrity/archived_manually/massive-faculty-donations-and-institutional-conflicts-of-interest__all_files.zip

    (S. HTTP://Gloucester.Insomnia247.NL/ fuer Kontaktdaten!)
    --- Synchronet 3.21f-Linux NewsLink 1.2