• Phylogenetic placement of Ctenophora

    From erik simpson@eastside.erik@gmail.com to sci.bio.paleontology on Sun Apr 21 19:31:43 2024
    From Newsgroup: sci.bio.paleontology

    This isn't really paleontology, since fossils are nowhere to be found,
    but the basic question addressed is whether sponges or ctenphores are
    the sister group to all other metazoa. This controversy has been
    ongoing for many years, and traditional phylogentic (of the respective genomes) hasn't resolved the question to general satisfaction. This is,
    after all, the longest branch in the animal kingdom, and all the
    difficulties is resolution that implies. This paper, that I missed this
    last year

    https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-023-05936-6

    addresses the problem using the concept of synteny.

    Wiki: In current biology, synteny more commonly refers to colinearity,
    i.e. conservation of blocks of order within two sets of chromosomes that
    are being compared with each other. These blocks are referred to as
    syntenic blocks.

    Abstract

    A central question in evolutionary biology is whether sponges or
    ctenophores (comb jellies) are the sister group to all other animals.
    These alternative phylogenetic hypotheses imply different scenarios for
    the evolution of complex neural systems and other animal-specific traits1,2,3,4,5,6. Conventional phylogenetic approaches based on
    morphological characters and increasingly extensive gene sequence
    collections have not been able to definitively answer this question7,8,9,10,11. Here we develop chromosome-scale gene linkage, also
    known as synteny, as a phylogenetic character for resolving this
    question12. We report new chromosome-scale genomes for a ctenophore and
    two marine sponges, and for three unicellular relatives of animals (a choanoflagellate, a filasterean amoeba and an ichthyosporean) that serve
    as outgroups for phylogenetic analysis. We find ancient syntenies that
    are conserved between animals and their close unicellular relatives. Ctenophores and unicellular eukaryotes share ancestral metazoan
    patterns, whereas sponges, bilaterians, and cnidarians share derived chromosomal rearrangements. Conserved syntenic characters unite sponges
    with bilaterians, cnidarians, and placozoans in a monophyletic clade to
    the exclusion of ctenophores, placing ctenophores as the sister group to
    all other animals. The patterns of synteny shared by sponges,
    bilaterians, and cnidarians are the result of rare and irreversible
    chromosome fusion-and-mixing events that provide robust and unambiguous phylogenetic support for the ctenophore-sister hypothesis. These
    findings provide a new framework for resolving deep, recalcitrant
    phylogenetic problems and have implications for our understanding of
    animal evolution.

    The paper concludes with the cautionary note:

    "Sponge-sister and ctenophore-sister hypotheses are sometimes
    erroneously interpreted as suggesting that the most recent common
    ancestor of animals was sponge-like or ctenophore-like. We must be
    mindful, however, that the living representatives of sponges,
    ctenophores, bilaterians and placozoans may be poor surrogates for the earliest members of each stem-lineage, as the crown group of each clade
    arose hundreds of millions of years after their divergence from each
    other, let alone from the common metazoan ancestor"
    --- Synchronet 3.21d-Linux NewsLink 1.2