1. Forum
  2. USENET
  3. sci.astro.amateur

  • Stricken Japanese Moon mission landed on its nose

    From StarDust@csoka01@gmail.com to sci.astro.amateur on Thu Jan 25 10:51:43 2024
    From Newsgroup: sci.astro.amateur

    Stricken Japanese Moon mission landed on its nose https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/science-environment-68091389
    It should've eject a small robot to lift it up to erect position?
    Efno
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Rich@rander3128@gmail.com to sci.astro.amateur on Sun Jan 28 19:34:42 2024
    From Newsgroup: sci.astro.amateur

    On Thursday 25 January 2024 at 13:51:45 UTC-5, StarDust wrote:
    Stricken Japanese Moon mission landed on its nose https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/science-environment-68091389

    It should've eject a small robot to lift it up to erect position?
    Efno
    I think it's impressive they had the baseball sized thing ejected to take the image itself. Nice piece of forward thinking and inexpensive.
    Something that would have have occurred to NASA because it isn't "big" enough. --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Chris L Peterson@clp@alumni.caltech.edu to sci.astro.amateur on Mon Jan 29 09:06:44 2024
    From Newsgroup: sci.astro.amateur

    On Sun, 28 Jan 2024 19:34:42 -0800 (PST), Rich <rander3128@gmail.com>
    wrote:

    On Thursday 25 January 2024 at 13:51:45 UTC-5, StarDust wrote:
    Stricken Japanese Moon mission landed on its nose
    https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/science-environment-68091389

    It should've eject a small robot to lift it up to erect position?
    ?

    I think it's impressive they had the baseball sized thing ejected to take the image itself. Nice piece of forward thinking and inexpensive.
    Something that would have have occurred to NASA because it isn't "big" enough.

    You don't even understand the purpose of the device.
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From StarDust@csoka01@gmail.com to sci.astro.amateur on Mon Jan 29 13:52:36 2024
    From Newsgroup: sci.astro.amateur

    On Monday, January 29, 2024 at 8:06:52rC>AM UTC-8, Chris L Peterson wrote:
    On Sun, 28 Jan 2024 19:34:42 -0800 (PST), Rich <rande...@gmail.com>
    wrote:
    On Thursday 25 January 2024 at 13:51:45 UTC-5, StarDust wrote:
    Stricken Japanese Moon mission landed on its nose
    https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/science-environment-68091389

    It should've eject a small robot to lift it up to erect position?
    ?

    I think it's impressive they had the baseball sized thing ejected to take the image itself. Nice piece of forward thinking and inexpensive.
    Something that would have have occurred to NASA because it isn't "big" enough.
    You don't even understand the purpose of the device.
    Please, enlighten US?
    Efno
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Chris L Peterson@clp@alumni.caltech.edu to sci.astro.amateur on Mon Jan 29 15:19:07 2024
    From Newsgroup: sci.astro.amateur

    On Mon, 29 Jan 2024 13:52:36 -0800 (PST), StarDust <csoka01@gmail.com>
    wrote:

    On Monday, January 29, 2024 at 8:06:52?AM UTC-8, Chris L Peterson wrote:
    On Sun, 28 Jan 2024 19:34:42 -0800 (PST), Rich <rande...@gmail.com>
    wrote:
    On Thursday 25 January 2024 at 13:51:45 UTC-5, StarDust wrote:
    Stricken Japanese Moon mission landed on its nose
    https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/science-environment-68091389

    It should've eject a small robot to lift it up to erect position?
    ?

    I think it's impressive they had the baseball sized thing ejected to take the image itself. Nice piece of forward thinking and inexpensive.
    Something that would have have occurred to NASA because it isn't "big" enough.
    You don't even understand the purpose of the device.

    Please, enlighten US?
    ?
    It's a rover. One of two. Not ejected to evaluate the landing problem,
    but part of the science mission. The same sort of missions that NASA
    designs.
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2