• Oldest in situ Homo erectus crania in eastern Asia: The Yunxian site dates to ~1.77 Ma

    From Primum Sapienti@invalide@invalid.invalid to sci.anthropology.paleo on Sun Jun 7 21:21:57 2026
    From Newsgroup: sci.anthropology.paleo


    https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/sciadv.ady2270
    18 Feb 2026


    Abstract
    With the discovery of three almost complete Homo
    erectus crania, Yunxian is one of the most important
    early Pleistocene hominin sites in eastern Asia.
    Yet, the age of the Yunxian fossils has remained
    debated because of the lack of reliable numerical
    dating results. Here, we apply the well-established
    isochron 26Al/10Be burial dating to quartz gravels
    from two sediment layers of the site. The age
    results push the Yunxian crania back to
    1.77 -# 0.08 million years ago (-#1-a internal error),
    representing the oldest H. erectus fossils discovered
    in situ in eastern Asia. A much older age assignment
    to Yunxian supports the model of rapid dispersal and
    widespread distribution of early H. erectus and
    contributes to narrowing the chronological gap
    between the earliest archaeology and hominin
    paleontology in eastern Asia.

    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From JTEM@jtem01@gmail.com to sci.anthropology.paleo on Sat Jun 27 15:28:11 2026
    From Newsgroup: sci.anthropology.paleo

    On 6/7/26 11:21 PM, Primum Sapienti wrote:

    https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/sciadv.ady2270
    18 Feb 2026


    Abstract
    With the discovery of three almost complete Homo
    erectus crania, Yunxian is one of the most important
    early Pleistocene hominin sites in eastern Asia.
    Yet, the age of the Yunxian fossils has remained
    debated because of the lack of reliable numerical
    dating results. Here, we apply the well-established
    isochron 26Al/10Be burial dating to quartz gravels
    from two sediment layers of the site. The age
    results push the Yunxian crania back to
    1.77 -# 0.08 million years ago (-#1-a internal error),
    representing the oldest H. erectus fossils discovered
    in situ in eastern Asia. A much older age assignment
    to Yunxian supports the model of rapid dispersal and
    widespread distribution of early H. erectus and
    contributes to narrowing the chronological gap
    between the earliest archaeology and hominin
    paleontology in eastern Asia.


    It's the oldest on the planet.

    The one they pretend that they found in Africa is a hoax.

    "No! They only make up shit in the case of Naledi. Sure
    they are without shame in the case of Naledi, but they
    are incapable of making up shit in all other cases!"

    THAT is not a compelling argument.

    #1. The African find is associated with Paranthropu. So why not
    Paranthropu, if we are going to call it a primate?

    #2. The claim is that it's a juvenile. Okay. That makes it WORSE!
    It is VERY OFTEN the case where juveniles are far from carbon
    copies of adults, as the claim is reliant on.

    #3. Literally NOBODY saw erectus! Many didn't even see a primate,
    looking at the skull. Not one of the letter crowd -- anyone with a
    Phd -- looked at it and saw an erectus skull... a goat? Yes. But
    not an erectus.

    #4. It was a student who said it was closest to erectus. AFTER
    THE FACT.


    It's lunacy.

    "We long since concluded Out of Africa so we know African erectus
    has to be here, has to be older than Asian erectus... let me
    shoehorn this crap into the that conclusion!"
    --
    https://jtem.tumblr.com/
    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2