• =?UTF-8?Q?Laetoli_site_G_tracks_judged_to_be_=22adult_male=e2=80=93?= =?UTF-8?Q?female_pair_than_a_parent=e2=80=93offspring=22?=

    From Primum Sapienti@invalide@invalid.invalid to sci.anthropology.paleo on Sun Apr 13 22:29:35 2025
    From Newsgroup: sci.anthropology.paleo


    Clever, but...


    https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/evolutionary-human-sciences/article/relationship-between-trackmakers-of-the-laetoli-footprints-from-gait-synchronization/D90BD458E36116BAC371606D34760ED2

    Abstract
    The parallel trails of footprints at Laetoli
    site G are important fossils for studying the
    characteristics of Australopithecus afarensis.
    However, the relationship between the
    trackmakers rCo i.e. whether it was that of an
    adult malerCofemale pair or of parentrCooffspring
    rCo remains unclear. The footprints show that the
    two individuals walked side by side with a
    narrow and constant distance between them and
    synchronized their leg movements and step
    lengths (gait synchronization), although they
    had a large height difference. In this study,
    live camera videos were collected to obtain
    data on gait synchronization in Homo sapiens,
    the closest extant species to A. afarensis.
    The data showed that when two humans with a
    large height difference walked alongside each
    other, with (at least) one of the pair having
    their arm around the otherrCOs shoulder or back,
    adult malerCofemale pairs (couples) frequently
    synchronized their gait, but parentrCooffspring
    pairs did not, whereas both couples and
    parentrCooffspring seldom synchronized when
    they walked side by side without connection
    or with handholding. Two individuals only
    maintained a narrow and constant distance like
    that between the Laetoli footprints when they
    walked with an arm-around connection.
    Therefore, assuming that A. afarensis had the
    same gait synchronization tendency as
    H. sapiens, the trackmakers were more likely
    to be an adult malerCofemale pair than a
    parentrCooffspring one.
    --- Synchronet 3.21d-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From JTEM@jtem01@gmail.com to sci.anthropology.paleo on Mon Apr 14 02:00:18 2025
    From Newsgroup: sci.anthropology.paleo

    On 4/14/25 12:29 AM, Primum Sapienti wrote:

    Clever, but...

    Probably a bear.

    Yes there /Were/ bears in Africa. They didn't vanish in
    north Africa until historic times and they existed down
    south stretching way back...

    There were some comparisons made to bears belonging to
    a different genus but, WHY THE HELL WOULD THEY DO THAT?

    Damn. They wanted to fail...
    --
    https://jtem.tumblr.com/tagged/The%20Book%20of%20JTEM/page/5
    --- Synchronet 3.21d-Linux NewsLink 1.2