• Butchery activities associated with member 5 at Sterkfontein, South Africa

    From Primum Sapienti@invalide@invalid.invalid to sci.anthropology.paleo on Sun Feb 2 22:14:24 2025
    From Newsgroup: sci.anthropology.paleo


    https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12520-024-02135-w
    Published: 01 February 2025

    Abstract
    The origin of animal tissue consumption
    within the hominin lineage remains a central
    question in palaeoanthropology and taphonomy.
    This question is mostly addressed through the
    study of bone surface modifications (e.g.,
    butchery marks) observed on fossils from East
    African sites. Albeit somewhat overlooked
    compared to East Africa, South Africa
    provides an additional body of evidence
    regarding the evolution of hominin behaviours.
    Here, we provide a comprehensive description
    and analysis of a butchered bone assemblage
    from the Sterkfontein Name Chamber and
    Member 5 East Oldowan infill in South Africa,
    dated conservatively to between 1.4 and
    2.18 Ma. Based on the anatomical location and
    morphology of the bone surface modifications,
    we demonstrate that hominins using Oldowan
    tools were capable of performing a complete
    butchery sequence that included skinning,
    disarticulation, defleshing and marrow
    extraction. Furthermore, comparison with the
    butchered bones from the neighbouring sites
    of CooperrCOs D and Swartkrans shows a
    continuity, or the repeated emergence, of
    similar butchery patterns through the Early
    Pleistocene. The identification of distinct
    butchery patterns, the range of exploited
    animals, as well as the presence of bone
    tools in many sites highlight the diversity
    of hominin subsistence behaviours during the
    Early Pleistocene, which we interpret as a
    reflection of the likely non-linear
    evolution of such behaviours. Finally, we
    argue that the research focus of taphonomic
    analyses should address how hominins
    processed carcasses in addition to how and
    when these were acquired. Such analyses
    would help identifying the development of
    complex butchery practices in the
    archaeological record.
    --- Synchronet 3.21d-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From JTEM@jtem01@gmail.com to sci.anthropology.paleo on Mon Feb 3 09:36:48 2025
    From Newsgroup: sci.anthropology.paleo

    On 2/3/25 12:14 AM, Primum Sapienti wrote:

    https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12520-024-02135-w
    Published: 01 February 2025

    Abstract
    The origin of animal tissue consumption
    within the hominin lineage remains a central
    question in palaeoanthropology and taphonomy.
    This question is mostly addressed through the
    study of bone surface modifications (e.g.,
    butchery marks) observed on fossils from East
    African sites. Albeit somewhat overlooked
    compared to East Africa, South Africa
    provides an additional body of evidence
    regarding the evolution of hominin behaviours.

    So, ,cut marks.

    Finally, we
    argue that the research focus of taphonomic
    analyses should address how hominins
    processed carcasses in addition to how and
    when these were acquired.

    I have to applaud them for not immediately leaping on
    the assumption that they only ever could have hunted.
    --
    https://jtem.tumblr.com/tagged/The%20Book%20of%20JTEM/page/5
    --- Synchronet 3.21d-Linux NewsLink 1.2