https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-024-04194-4
Humans evolved for distance running rCo but ancestor
rCyLucyrCO didnrCOt go far or fast
Ancient human relatives ran on two legs, like
modern humans, but at a much slower pace,
suggest 3D computer simulations of
Australopithecus afarensis1 rCo a small hominin
that lived more than three million years ago.
The analysis offers a detailed snapshot of the
homininrCOs running speed and the muscular
adaptations that enabled modern humans to run
long distances, says Herman Pontzer, an
evolutionary anthropologist at Duke University
in Durham, North Carolina. rCLItrCOs a very thorough
approach,rCY he says. The findings were published
this week in Current Biology.
...
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0960982224015665
<https://pdf.sciencedirectassets.com/272099/AIP/1-s2.0- S0960982224015665/main.pdf?X-Amz-Security- Token=IQoJb3JpZ2luX2VjEAUaCXVzLWVhc3QtMSJHMEUCIQCv9sjIMAhAWHlDsq10mZxaYwUDojyZPdNyMY3UCu%2FnwwIgYBdOiwpAd9%2FrK%2FCe9nKRwfLrpNEbqjLLrEHFxv9D9ooquwUIzv%2F%2F%2F%2F%2F%2F%2F%2F%2F%2FARAFGgwwNTkwMDM1NDY4NjUiDL2kW02vRJ610Mfn3SqPBQ4RNs8kAnKCvEArSMgbQ1CUVbkFHNZXvSDODHBFD9rlnSHx0fZTrIwD9ytdAUZRU4RheAGWAQS%2BTFtjZ411lWA8o4XlN0rQ5LanQIwaDaCv7%2ByCzZpzn3PsUkhlAc8%2FhbOMNB9BO6JXbQgCqq%2BPZekXQ7uMCNM0ndmpyJF0%2BkRjPW%2FLjC2U9QBQCiS2cGHzyrZOK7OqG2Ci15vVvPlpOOc5enXgFR6p4qBUl9ehSdRGN95bcDb7XXfEeqHPgrsZ8Vn0lF9FGVNJyvXojR%2FWPYIswddj05aiPH7BqCGgYgJPFO%2Fdb%2Fq13iun1newg9slJM5%2Fji10tTzQavWvnf5lO%2FxfoRtMfIVpIsUdsRD%2BVwQ%2Fcbm7gBqKgZQzy36kHNcPTORaKHb7Iz1w5HuIqra4FLzTTYGWTSMTorcHKUTXf7Lk7X4ouMwj4FjqlwLlK5kjnvK0zehveuPR0XrmGjQ8zluTzmHzUHpXT%2B260gu9V%2FfebDTSsvwq3GHQvYTh4UJ6tphZpEGBfKanDlmFXJq8FpjIBe%2FtOSDGdX2A49JNUQdnDbssF5HUDbJepxzAB4Zc9Zgc3u%2BKGQRrYn68GNxI8X39Ea4elbi2%2F7aIx7LQtZ0WMGF9wqfHznaI0yEnvSIBKUXGnjEzP9aIOXIIP%2FWa4MftEOeecBKxkubXcIThsJt0bZG%2BkgaQLGym2bEP9nRZlomwe4aAI0Uz77qfA7LVRxLk53OwHExcv7MXdVPYuMn%2BfG3FA5fxZKJaIXdo3wDR1muNzAZy61TO%2BvohxN8sSBqQcDCcEsDVL3HHu2u3F007Rbdj%2F0GJ%2Fqn2%2FzmTMsQcwTAExpsNhpGz8lIqbBx7qnCy8g0yJbVYRO5uL5S5074wqdyjuwY6sQHhr8NRKYWIUF%2FUbXVKqg5iD%2B44dBf4%2B9ZsFDBkBu6Y2uHZtHc6slGsDP8fiI09ezk5LijxKHD5DAes8jLi9pHHJQdgdlUXoNtFGU27oy64ftP%2B%2FHIIlDVV%2ByGnLOCuXATR%2FCL%2FVm3olcq0bgyQs6JPpOhGs%2BeAEGcUg3wfDuxm3P6tgcyZH1%2F1Co30o964yTJzFbWqVgiDz72BcdA9KlBk4K0Luj2wFanlixqdYweRspE%3D&X-Amz-Algorithm=AWS4-HMAC-SHA256&X-Amz-Date=20241223T054203Z&X-Amz-SignedHeaders=host&X-Amz-Expires=300&X-Amz-Credential=ASIAQ3PHCVTYX372UAOF%2F20241223%2Fus-east-1%2Fs3%2Faws4_request&X-Amz-Signature=319711f5523d2e0e4b3639327466f5604ddafbf9ac94cce5f2e4117e844c4a86&hash=d76f884b05bb7152d93f53f246a98d4116835e5c17b3eba9668a506d529e072a&host=68042c943591013ac2b2430a89b270f6af2c76d8dfd086a07176afe7c76c2c61&pii=S0960982224015665&tid=spdf-7f4cd257-3ed2-411d-aad5-2c009dd9e302&sid=2199f7aa37eec0402a0b6ce9360acd94ba21gxrqa&type=client&tsoh=d3d3LnNjaWVuY2VkaXJlY3QuY29t&ua=13135e0250545f530153&rr=8f6606b0a86d4ca2&cc=us>
Running performance in Australopithecus afarensis
Summary
The evolution of bipedal gait is a key adaptive
feature in hominids, but the running abilities of
early hominins have not been extensively studied.
Here, we present physics simulations of
Australopithecus afarensis that demonstrate this
genus was mechanically capable of bipedal running
but with absolute and relative (size-normalized)
maximum speeds considerably inferior to modern
humans. Simulations predicted running energetics
for Australopithecus that are generally consistent
with values for mammals and birds of similar body
size, therefore suggesting relatively low cost of
transport across a limited speed range. Through
model parameterization, we demonstrate the key role
of ankle extensor muscle architecture (e.g., the
Achilles tendon) in the evolution of hominin
running energetics and indeed in an increase in
speed range, which may have been intrinsically
coupled with enhanced endurance running capacity.
We show that skeletal strength was unlikely to have
been a limiting factor in the evolution of enhanced
running ability, which instead resulted from changes
to muscle anatomy and particularly overall body
proportions. These findings support the hypothesis
that key features in the human body plan evolved
specifically for improved running performance and
not merely as a byproduct of selection for enhanced
walking capabilities.
https://youtu.be/eaeZ3RrzpLA?si=TosTJRtqh35sa77X
-a-a-a-a-a-a-a This is like saying, we evolved to fly airplanes, just because
today we are capable of flying airplanes
-a-a-a-a-a-a-a The (wrong) thesis was that we evolved *bipedality* in order to
do endurance running. No, we, obviously, didn't. When bipedality was
already here, then we could adjust it for endurance running.
-a-a-a-a-a-a-a They want to show that wrong thesis is right by twisting things
upside down. Once again, the thesis that we evolved bipedality in order
to endurance running *is wrong*. We evolved bipedality for some other reasons.
-a-a-a-a-a-a-a I repeat, a lot of animals are bipedal, including gibbons. The
real question is why we lost the ability to be quadrupedal.
Quadrupedality is extremely important, and ti is much faster than bipedality, especially in non-endurance applications, which are the
original applications. So, we desperately needed quadrupedality (unlike gibbons, who don't need it at all, and yet, they didn't lose the ability
for it). So, we needed quadrupedality, and yet, we lost it. Why? It has
to be really important reason. I know why, but nobody listens to me.
https://youtu.be/eaeZ3RrzpLA?si=TosTJRtqh35sa77X
-a-a-a-a-a-a-a This is like saying, we evolved to fly airplanes, just because
today we are capable of flying airplanes
-a-a-a-a-a-a-a The (wrong) thesis was that we evolved *bipedality* in order to
do endurance running. No, we, obviously, didn't. When bipedality was
already here, then we could adjust it for endurance running.
-a-a-a-a-a-a-a They want to show that wrong thesis is right by twisting things
upside down. Once again, the thesis that we evolved bipedality in order
to endurance running *is wrong*. We evolved bipedality for some other reasons.
-a-a-a-a-a-a-a I repeat, a lot of animals are bipedal, including gibbons. The
real question is why we lost the ability to be quadrupedal.
Quadrupedality is extremely important, and ti is much faster than bipedality, especially in non-endurance applications, which are the
original applications. So, we desperately needed quadrupedality (unlike gibbons, who don't need it at all, and yet, they didn't lose the ability
for it). So, we needed quadrupedality, and yet, we lost it. Why? It has
to be really important reason. I know why, but nobody listens to me.
| Sysop: | Amessyroom |
|---|---|
| Location: | Fayetteville, NC |
| Users: | 65 |
| Nodes: | 6 (0 / 6) |
| Uptime: | 13:15:14 |
| Calls: | 862 |
| Files: | 1,311 |
| D/L today: |
7 files (11,196K bytes) |
| Messages: | 265,448 |