From Newsgroup: sci.anthropology.paleo


So Israel is fighting in Gaza, and Lebanon, and Syria, and
Iran and even fighting forces in Iraq...

Jordan is teetering on collapse.

It's never been very stable and shock waves from the Islamic
victory in Syria are reverberating in Jordan...

Turkey is threatening conflict with Israel...

The belief in victory no matter what, the arrogance in
insisting you can do ANYTHING without consequences...

Israel won't survive a decade without meaningful regime
change, and even then it may be too late.
--
https://jtem.tumblr.com/tagged/The%20Book%20of%20JTEM/page/5

--- Synchronet 3.21d-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: sci.anthropology.paleo

On 20.12.2024. 0:12, JTEM wrote:

So Israel is fighting in Gaza, and Lebanon, and Syria, and
Iran and even fighting forces in Iraq...

Jordan is teetering on collapse.

It's never been very stable and shock waves from the Islamic
victory in Syria are reverberating in Jordan...

Turkey is threatening conflict with Israel...

The belief in victory no matter what, the arrogance in
insisting you can do ANYTHING without consequences...

Israel won't survive a decade without meaningful regime
change, and even then it may be too late.

Why are you so fired up about it? Like, it is the question of life or
death for you, not for Israel.
--- Synchronet 3.21d-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: sci.anthropology.paleo

On 12/20/24 7:18 AM, Mario Petrinovic wrote:

-a-a-a-a-a-a-a Why are you so fired up about it? Like, it is the question of
life or death for you, not for Israel.

A third-world skank hole like Yemen fires off a few missiles
at ships and suddenly global shipping costs the world markets
BILLIONS of dollars extra per day.

Extra time, fuel, insurance...

The United States can survive without middle eastern oil. Europe
can't. It'll need Russian oil and gas, which means ending their
quest for WWIII over the Ukraine.

Once Israel is gone it's not like the Arab world is going to
transform into a culture of peaceful humanitarians. The wars
will continue, the targets will change. Europe will be in their
sights.

Nuclear weapons are not an "If" but a "When." Seeing how we are
speaking of a culture that has sought to maximize the deaths
and suffering amongst it's own people people, there is little
doubt that these weapons will be used on civilian targets.

It is a global conflict. The one happening right now has global
consequences, the one it is rapidly morphing into has dire
global consequences...
--
https://jtem.tumblr.com/tagged/The%20Book%20of%20JTEM/page/5
--- Synchronet 3.21d-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: sci.anthropology.paleo

On 20.12.2024. 16:29, JTEM wrote:

On 12/20/24 7:18 AM, Mario Petrinovic wrote:

-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a Why are you so fired up about it? Like, it is the question of
life or death for you, not for Israel.

A third-world skank hole like Yemen fires off a few missiles
at ships and suddenly global shipping costs the world markets
BILLIONS of dollars extra per day.

Extra time, fuel, insurance...

The United States can survive without middle eastern oil. Europe
can't. It'll need Russian oil and gas, which means ending their
quest for WWIII over the Ukraine.

Once Israel is gone it's not like the Arab world is going to
transform into a culture of peaceful humanitarians. The wars
will continue, the targets will change. Europe will be in their
sights.

Nuclear weapons are not an "If" but a "When." Seeing how we are
speaking of a culture that has sought to maximize the deaths
and suffering amongst it's own people people, there is little
doubt that these weapons will be used on civilian targets.

It is a global conflict. The one happening right now has global
consequences, the one it is rapidly morphing into has dire
global consequences...

Well, yes, the war in Syria had global consequences, but it is already
finished, global consequences already happened, right now we are in
post-war period, not pre-war, everything is already over.
You remind me on Serbs, they are threatening that they will rage war
on Kosovo. And I am telling them, well, this war already happened, and
you've lost it already, lol.
And Europe is doing just fine without Russian resources, for three
years already. We can get other resources. Everything is fine, don't
worry. I already told you that resources are worthless, the lack of
resources is argument of fools. It is important what you do with those resources. A tree is a resource, but wooden chair is much more valuable.
My country (Croatia) has trees, but it exports it, and it imports wooden chairs. Why? Because we are stupid. Europe isn't stupid, those who have resources (Russia) are stupid. With such a big corruption they will
never be able to organize efficient production. But Europe is able to
organize efficient production. This is why Russia is living by selling
its resources, not by selling its products.
So, the bottom line is, those who are forced to sell their resources
because they are too stupid to sell their products, they will always
lose. And somebody told you that those who are selling resources are the winners. No, they are losers, it is so obvious, just look around, for
gods sake, those who are selling resources are poor, those whom are
selling products are rich.
--- Synchronet 3.21d-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: sci.anthropology.paleo

Mario Petrinovic wrote:

-a-a-a-a-a-a-a Well, yes, the war in Syria had global consequences,

Had? Past tense? It's raging, and the current success is
threatening to topple Jordan, at the very least.

But it's far from the only conflict. Syria, Iran, Lebanon,
Yemen, rockets are fired from Iraq... Turkey is threatening
intervention...
--
https://jtem.tumblr.com/tagged/The%20Book%20of%20JTEM/page/5
--- Synchronet 3.21d-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: sci.anthropology.paleo

On 20.12.2024. 22:39, JTEM wrote:

-aMario Petrinovic wrote:

-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a Well, yes, the war in Syria had global consequences,

Had? Past tense?-a It's raging, and the current success is
threatening to topple Jordan, at the very least.

But it's far from the only conflict. Syria, Iran, Lebanon,
Yemen, rockets are fired from Iraq... Turkey is threatening
intervention...

The source of all those threats is Russia, and Russia clearly lost
(this is why you are so angry, lol). Now Russian doesn't know where to
put its Mediterranean fleet. By losing Syria, Russia also lost influence
on Africa (which, actually, isn't that much important), but it showed
all those countries who were expecting to be supported by Russian
strength, that Russia is weak.
For example, by far the biggest ally of Putin in Europe is (was)
Serbian president Vucic. Well, look at that, Vucic just announced his
resign, although Serbians perceive him as if he is god.
See, the defeat of Assad in Syria was the turning point in this war,
and now this house of cards comes tumbling down.
--- Synchronet 3.21d-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: sci.anthropology.paleo

Mario Petrinovic wrote:

-a-a-a-a-a-a-a The source of all those threats is Russia,

No. The problem is an inhumanly arrogant government headed
by Net In Yoohoo or whatever the hell his name is.

Well. THAT, and whoever has been ruling in Biden's name...

and Russia clearly
lost (this is why you are so angry

Russia has won in the Ukraine. And the sanctions are hurting
the west. Russia's economy is growing more/faster.

It's one reason why a growing number of Americans are fed up!
We're paying for European expansionism, not Europe, and even
then it's failing!

They're banning natural gas use in many places in the U.S.,
meanwhile we're exporting TRILLIONS of cubic feet of natural
gas every single day to an ungrateful Europe, at bargain
prices, only for Europe to impose tariffs and then screech
like the little bitches they are when Trump talks about
returning the favor, or telling them to pay their fair share
for NATO...
--
https://jtem.tumblr.com/tagged/The%20Book%20of%20JTEM/page/5
--- Synchronet 3.21d-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: sci.anthropology.paleo

On 21.12.2024. 8:14, JTEM wrote:

-aMario Petrinovic wrote:

-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a The source of all those threats is Russia,

No. The problem is an inhumanly arrogant government headed
by Net In Yoohoo or whatever the hell his name is.

Well. THAT, and whoever has been ruling in Biden's name...

and Russia clearly lost (this is why you are so angry

Russia has won in the Ukraine. And the sanctions are hurting
the west. Russia's economy is growing more/faster.

It's one reason why a growing number of Americans are fed up!
We're paying for European expansionism, not Europe, and even
then it's failing!

They're banning natural gas use in many places in the U.S.,
meanwhile we're exporting TRILLIONS of cubic feet of natural
gas every single day to an ungrateful Europe, at bargain
prices, only for Europe to impose tariffs and then screech
like the little bitches they are when Trump talks about
returning the favor, or telling them to pay their fair share
for NATO...

First, before war Russia was selling its resources bellow market
value, in order to chain Europe to Russian resources. Because of that
you could buy cheap Mercedeses in US. Of course, US knew what is going
on, the West was luring Russia into a trap. But those cheap Russian
resources actually were much more expensive, because Russia was doing
this in order to conquer the whole Balkans, and more, to spread its
poison all over the world again. So, those "cheap" Russian resources
weren't actually cheap at all. After the war Russia will not sell it
cheap anymore.
The second, I am Croat, but I like to watch Serbian channels (Serbs
and Croats speak the same language). Serbs are saying that US is selling expensive gas to Europe, and that it is earning big money that way.
Everybody knows that US is actually the only winner of this war.
The third, Europe is supposed to pay money for American NATO, NATO
forces in Europe are American forces. It is for the benefit of US that
Europe doesn't have big army. So, in essence, Europe would pay for
American army. Which is alright, only, don't make out of it something
which it isn't. We are in all this together, the whole NATO, America,
Canada, and Europe. And this is the only way it can be. If we want to
expand, we need to have broad market, US and European. What would be if
Europe said that we don't need Windows in Europe, that we don't need
Apple in Europe. Europe was selling Mercedeses in US because US allowed
it, US is selling computers in Europe because Europe is allowing it.
There is nothing wrong with this. What is wrong is your blindness, which
sees only in front of your nose. The market is fair, or, at least, so
far it was managed for the mutual benefits. Of course, you can do
whatever you want, everybody can, but try to be smart, instead of being stupid. What, now you don't have Russia as an enemy, now you want to
make Europe as an enemy? Do whatever you want.
--- Synchronet 3.21d-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: sci.anthropology.paleo

Mario Petrinovic wrote:

-a-a-a-a-a-a-a First, before war Russia was selling its resources bellow market value, in order to

The Ukraine was ass raping Europe over "Transmission fees" on
anything that moved through their territory. So they built a
pipeline to go around the Ukraine, and then a second pipeline
to go around the Ukraine.

Because of

that you could buy cheap Mercedeses in US.

They don't sell a cheap mercedes in the U.S. and never have.

BMW won't sell their cheapest models either.

They build SUVs here...

Of course, US knew what is
going on, the West was luring Russia into a trap.

Actually it was a Six of One/Half Dozen of the Other deal.

Europe sold the Ukraine to Russia for cheap fossil fuels,
which is why Russia had to wait until the second pipeline
was built before it could invade. And if Russia won, good for
Europe! All the cheap fossil fuels without Ukrainian
transmission fees. And if Russia lost then they could restore
the royal family, or what's left of it...

But none of this changes the fact that Europe wants the
Ukraine and that senile old coot in the Whitehouse has been
paying for the war.
--
https://jtem.tumblr.com/tagged/The%20Book%20of%20JTEM/page/5
--- Synchronet 3.21d-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: sci.anthropology.paleo

On 21.12.2024. 14:28, JTEM wrote:

-aMario Petrinovic wrote:

-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a First, before war Russia was selling its resources bellow >> market value, in order to

The Ukraine was ass raping Europe over "Transmission fees" on
anything that moved through their territory. So they built a
pipeline to go around the Ukraine, and then a second pipeline
to go around the Ukraine.

-aBecause of

that you could buy cheap Mercedeses in US.

They don't sell a cheap mercedes in the U.S. and never have.

BMW won't sell their cheapest models either.

They build SUVs here...

Well, I've read that Mercedes was 30 % cheaper in the US than in
Germany. I still remember the days when a lot of Americans drove Mercedes.

Of course, US knew what is going on, the West was luring Russia into a
trap.

Actually it was a Six of One/Half Dozen of the Other deal.

Europe sold the Ukraine to Russia for cheap fossil fuels,
which is why Russia had to wait until the second pipeline
was built before it could invade. And if Russia won, good for
Europe!-a All the cheap fossil fuels without Ukrainian
transmission fees. And if Russia lost then they could restore
the royal family, or what's left of it...

But none of this changes the fact that Europe wants the
Ukraine and that senile old coot in the Whitehouse has been
paying for the war.

Europe got rid of colonies long time ago, they don't need anybody,
just like US don't need anybody. Western Balkans still isn't in EU,
although it is in the heart of EU. And EU could force this easily, if
they want it. You don't enter by force in the EU, actually, even if you desperately want to be a member of EU, you'll be lucky if you'll be
accepted. It is counterproductive to force those things. And especially
they don't need that rotten Ukraine, where Russian (Syrskyi) commands
the Ukrainian army, this only brings trouble.
The problem is that the goal of Russia is to get Odessa. Odessa is
important for only one reason, to attack Balkans, nothing else. So it is actually Russia who has foul intentions, and Europe is only defending
itself. Just like you are saying whole the time, Europe *wants* to buy resources from Russia, why not. The problem is that Russia is attacking Europe, this is the problem. Just like you are saying all the time.
You see, you know exactly what is going on, only in your head it makes
some strange construction. Yes, it is only logical that Europe is buying resources from Russia. And yes, just like you are saying all the time,
Russia wants to conquer Europe. These are your own words, and yet you
don't see anything.
--- Synchronet 3.21d-Linux NewsLink 1.2