Sysop: | Amessyroom |
---|---|
Location: | Fayetteville, NC |
Users: | 27 |
Nodes: | 6 (0 / 6) |
Uptime: | 35:51:44 |
Calls: | 631 |
Calls today: | 2 |
Files: | 1,187 |
D/L today: |
22 files (29,767K bytes) |
Messages: | 172,999 |
Hello! https://pi-dach.dorfdsl.de/rocksolid/overboard.php?thisgroup=de.alt.folklore.computer
The post itself looks fine when viewed directly, but in the "latest"
view, the encoding of special German characters is broken.
This affects
<AABmyvIvTIsAAAoF.A3.flnews@WStation7.micha.freeshell.org>
Message-ID: <slrnvckmpm.55rd.hjp-usenet4@trintignant.hjp.at>
On Sun, 25 Aug 2024 11:32:03 +0200, Marco Moock wrote:
https://pi-dach.dorfdsl.de/rocksolid/overboard.php?thisgroup=de.alt.folklore.computer
The post itself looks fine when viewed directly, but in the "latest"
view, the encoding of special German characters is broken.
This affects
<AABmyvIvTIsAAAoF.A3.flnews@WStation7.micha.freeshell.org>
Message-ID: <slrnvckmpm.55rd.hjp-usenet4@trintignant.hjp.at>
Thank you. I've just added the group to my test server and will get on it.
I appreciate feedback from users about character display issues as the
groups I read are all English (guess why)
The first user, years ago, that got me on the right path to displaying >multibyte characters properly was Russian and was very helpful (very
specific feedback) in getting things working.
These articles use "charset=ISO-8859-1" for the body.
On 25.08.2024 um 15:12 Uhr Marcel Logen wrote:
These articles use "charset=ISO-8859-1" for the body.
Is that RFC-conform or is there an issue with the article itself?
Marco Moock in rocksolid.nodes.help:
On 25.08.2024 um 15:12 Uhr Marcel Logen wrote:
These articles use "charset=ISO-8859-1" for the body.
Is that RFC-conform or is there an issue with the article itself?
The use of ISO-8859-1 is perfectly correct and RFC compliant,
but has become rather rare (in favor of UTF-8).
On Sun, 25 Aug 2024 16:05:00 +0200, Marcel Logen wrote:
Marco Moock in rocksolid.nodes.help:
On 25.08.2024 um 15:12 Uhr Marcel Logen wrote:
These articles use "charset=ISO-8859-1" for the body.
Is that RFC-conform or is there an issue with the article itself?
The use of ISO-8859-1 is perfectly correct and RFC compliant,
but has become rather rare (in favor of UTF-8).
Yes, this charset is fine and should not be the problem.
I am working on this, but it will take some time. Part of the issue, but
not all of it, is decoding a portion of the body to create the
"snippet". I
know it sounds simple to just decode the entire body and create the
snippet, but there is more to it than that.
It will take a bit of time to work out.
Does this look better? https://postimg.cc/Zv4gwcVP
On 25.08.2024 um 18:42 Uhr Retro Guy wrote:
Does this look better? https://postimg.cc/Zv4gwcVP
Looks fine, umlauts are now working.
I have just pushed this fix, and several others, to devel.
On 25.08.2024 um 20:45 Uhr Retro Guy wrote:
I have just pushed this fix, and several others, to devel.
Is this currently considered stable for production or should I wait
before switching to the current version?