Sysop: | Amessyroom |
---|---|
Location: | Fayetteville, NC |
Users: | 23 |
Nodes: | 6 (0 / 6) |
Uptime: | 57:07:25 |
Calls: | 584 |
Calls today: | 1 |
Files: | 1,139 |
D/L today: |
179 files (27,921K bytes) |
Messages: | 112,135 |
Hello!
I've seen that the NoCeM processing doesn't work as intended currently.
It didn't match all in the first run, something seems to be wrong.
root@pi-dach:~# tail -f /var/spool/rslight/log/nocem.log
Nov 20 06:53:12 spoolnews Good signature in: nocem@eternal-september.org[2024.11.20.06.48.49]7UJV71
Nov 20 06:55:27 spoolnews Good Issuer and Type for: i2pn2-nocem@i2pn2.org[2024.11.20.06.53.16]8DpQdd
Nov 20 06:55:27 spoolnews Good signature in: i2pn2-nocem@i2pn2.org[2024.11.20.06.53.16]8DpQdd
Nov 20 06:55:27 spoolnews TRYING: <86d12f8f-4@6dc-4bee-92b6-1c0ad35c9998> IN: de.soc.misc
Nov 20 06:55:27 spoolnews TRYING: <376cdb09-3@ae3-4b39-aae4-68efe0c15e40> IN: de.soc.misc
Nov 20 06:55:27 rocksolid DELETING: <376cdb09-3@ae3-4b39-aae4-68efe0c15e40> IN: de.soc.misc
Nov 20 06:55:29 spoolnews TRYING: <4ce8313e-2@73a-464c-b249-790665a2eb16> IN: de.talk.tagesgeschehen
Nov 20 06:55:29 Group not found: de.talk.tagesgeschehen
Nov 20 06:55:29 spoolnews Good Issuer and Type for: nocem@eternal-september.org[2024.11.18.16.55.49]9vE37U
Nov 20 06:55:29 spoolnews Good signature in: nocem@eternal-september.org[2024.11.18.16.55.49]9vE37U^C
root@pi-dach:~# mv /var/spool/rslight/nocem/processed/nocem@eternal-september.org[2024.11.18.16.55.49]9vE37U /var/spool/rslight/nocem/nocem@eternal-september.org[2024.11.18.16.55.49]9vE37U
root@pi-dach:~# systemctl restart rslight
root@pi-dach:~# tail -f /var/spool/rslight/log/nocem.log
Nov 20 06:55:29 spoolnews TRYING: <4ce8313e-2@73a-464c-b249-790665a2eb16> IN: de.talk.tagesgeschehen
Nov 20 06:55:29 Group not found: de.talk.tagesgeschehen
Nov 20 06:55:29 spoolnews Good Issuer and Type for: nocem@eternal-september.org[2024.11.18.16.55.49]9vE37U
Nov 20 06:55:29 spoolnews Good signature in: nocem@eternal-september.org[2024.11.18.16.55.49]9vE37U
Nov 20 06:56:56 spoolnews Good Issuer and Type for: i2pn2-nocem@i2pn2.org[2024.11.20.06.55.34]IOAs8g
Nov 20 06:56:56 spoolnews Good signature in: i2pn2-nocem@i2pn2.org[2024.11.20.06.55.34]IOAs8g
Nov 20 06:56:56 spoolnews TRYING: <e0de2718-8@c36-4ff0-bc4e-259e4b35649e> IN: de.talk.tagesgeschehen
Nov 20 06:56:56 Group not found: de.talk.tagesgeschehen
Nov 20 06:56:56 spoolnews TRYING: <ff42bd54-1@ac6-47b5-ba9d-3bac61e47c40> IN: de.soc.misc
Nov 20 06:56:56 rocksolid DELETING: <ff42bd54-1@ac6-47b5-ba9d-3bac61e47c40> IN: de.soc.misc
Nov 20 06:57:00 spoolnews Good Issuer and Type for: nocem@eternal-september.org[2024.11.18.16.55.49]9vE37U
Nov 20 06:57:00 spoolnews Good signature in: nocem@eternal-september.org[2024.11.18.16.55.49]9vE37U
Nov 20 06:57:00 spoolnews Good Issuer and Type for: nocem@eternal-september.org[2024.11.20.06.55.34]nzViBL
Nov 20 06:57:00 spoolnews Good signature in: nocem@eternal-september.org[2024.11.20.06.55.34]nzViBL^C
root@pi-dach:~#
m@ryz:~$
Both e-s and i2pn2 most likely have almost the same de.* bot articles
listed.
Maybe I can add more logging like, 'Article not found'?
Please let me know if I'm missing what you're saying, so we can fix
the problem if there is one.
On 20.11.2024 um 17:01 Uhr Retro Guy wrote:
Both e-s and i2pn2 most likely have almost the same de.* bot articles
listed.
Maybe I can add more logging like, 'Article not found'?
Please let me know if I'm missing what you're saying, so we can fix
the problem if there is one.
Maybe it got deleted after that because I copied all nocems from
processes to the parent and rerun the script.
Now a new example. The article exists, the NoCeM will be processed
again, but the article won't be deleted.
root@pi-dach:~# fgrep -r '<e150a205-b@abb-4dae-9d27-b65c06ec2682>' /var/spool/rslight/nocem/*
/var/spool/rslight/nocem/processed/nocem@eternal-september.org[2024.11.18.16.55.49]9vE37U:<e150a205-b@abb-4dae-9d27-b65c06ec2682> de.soc.wirtschaft
root@pi-dach:~# mv /var/spool/rslight/nocem/processed/nocem@eternal-september.org[2024.11.18.16.55.49]9vE37U /var/spool/rslight/nocem/nocem@eternal-september.org[2024.11.18.16.55.49]9vE37U
root@pi-dach:~# systemctl restart rslight
root@pi-dach:~# tail -f /var/spool/rslight/log/nocem.log
Nov 20 17:16:51 spoolnews Bad Issuer or Type for: i2pn2-nocem@i2pn2.org[2024.11.20.17.04.51]rjz1ag
Nov 20 17:53:09 spoolnews Bad Issuer or Type for: i2pn2-nocem@i2pn2.org[2024.11.20.17.41.05]jbecPq
Nov 20 18:05:12 spoolnews Bad Issuer or Type for: i2pn2-nocem@i2pn2.org[2024.11.20.17.53.12]V15j6u
Nov 20 18:05:12 spoolnews Bad Issuer or Type for: i2pn2-nocem@i2pn2.org[2024.11.20.17.53.13]aOe5Ce
Nov 20 18:17:25 spoolnews Bad Issuer or Type for: i2pn2-nocem@i2pn2.org[2024.11.20.18.05.15]1qnkiG
Nov 20 18:41:42 spoolnews Bad Issuer or Type for: i2pn2-nocem@i2pn2.org[2024.11.20.18.29.39]UNqeKA
Nov 20 18:41:42 spoolnews Bad Issuer or Type for: robot@pasdenom.info[2024.11.20.18.29.39]rV3AEk
Nov 20 19:05:02 spoolnews Good Issuer and Type for: nocem@eternal-september.org[2024.11.18.16.55.49]9vE37U
Nov 20 19:05:02 spoolnews Good signature in: nocem@eternal-september.org[2024.11.18.16.55.49]9vE37U
Nov 20 19:05:02 spoolnews Bad Issuer or Type for: robot@pasdenom.info[2024.11.20.18.53.52]iyJ4pc
^C
root@pi-dach:~# fgrep -r '<e150a205-b@abb-4dae-9d27-b65c06ec2682>' /var/spool/rslight/nocem/*
/var/spool/rslight/nocem/processed/nocem@eternal-september.org[2024.11.18.16.55.49]9vE37U:<e150a205-b@abb-4dae-9d27-b65c06ec2682> de.soc.wirtschaft
root@pi-dach:~#
On 20.11.2024 um 17:01 Uhr Retro Guy wrote:
Both e-s and i2pn2 most likely have almost the same de.* bot articles
listed.
Maybe I can add more logging like, 'Article not found'?
Please let me know if I'm missing what you're saying, so we can fix
the problem if there is one.
Maybe it got deleted after that because I copied all nocems from
processes to the parent and rerun the script.
Now a new example. The article exists, the NoCeM will be processed
again, but the article won't be deleted.
root@pi-dach:~# fgrep -r '<e150a205-b@abb-4dae-9d27-b65c06ec2682>' /var/spool/rslight/nocem/* /var/spool/rslight/nocem/processed/nocem@eternal-september.org[2024.11.18.16.55.49]9vE37U:<e150a205-b@abb-4dae-9d27-b65c06ec2682>
de.soc.wirtschaft
root@pi-dach:~# mv /var/spool/rslight/nocem/processed/nocem@eternal-september.org[2024.11.18.16.55.49]9vE37U
/var/spool/rslight/nocem/nocem@eternal-september.org[2024.11.18.16.55.49]9vE37U
root@pi-dach:~# systemctl restart rslight
root@pi-dach:~# tail -f /var/spool/rslight/log/nocem.log
Nov 20 17:16:51 spoolnews Bad Issuer or Type for: i2pn2-nocem@i2pn2.org[2024.11.20.17.04.51]rjz1ag
Nov 20 17:53:09 spoolnews Bad Issuer or Type for: i2pn2-nocem@i2pn2.org[2024.11.20.17.41.05]jbecPq
Nov 20 18:05:12 spoolnews Bad Issuer or Type for: i2pn2-nocem@i2pn2.org[2024.11.20.17.53.12]V15j6u
Nov 20 18:05:12 spoolnews Bad Issuer or Type for: i2pn2-nocem@i2pn2.org[2024.11.20.17.53.13]aOe5Ce
Nov 20 18:17:25 spoolnews Bad Issuer or Type for: i2pn2-nocem@i2pn2.org[2024.11.20.18.05.15]1qnkiG
Nov 20 18:41:42 spoolnews Bad Issuer or Type for: i2pn2-nocem@i2pn2.org[2024.11.20.18.29.39]UNqeKA
Nov 20 18:41:42 spoolnews Bad Issuer or Type for: robot@pasdenom.info[2024.11.20.18.29.39]rV3AEk
Nov 20 19:05:02 spoolnews Good Issuer and Type for: nocem@eternal-september.org[2024.11.18.16.55.49]9vE37U
Nov 20 19:05:02 spoolnews Good signature in: nocem@eternal-september.org[2024.11.18.16.55.49]9vE37U
Nov 20 19:05:02 spoolnews Bad Issuer or Type for: robot@pasdenom.info[2024.11.20.18.53.52]iyJ4pc
On Wed, 20 Nov 2024 19:06:40 +0000, Marco Moock wrote:
On 20.11.2024 um 17:01 Uhr Retro Guy wrote:
Both e-s and i2pn2 most likely have almost the same de.* bot articles
listed.
Maybe I can add more logging like, 'Article not found'?
Please let me know if I'm missing what you're saying, so we can fix
the problem if there is one.
Maybe it got deleted after that because I copied all nocems from
processes to the parent and rerun the script.
Now a new example. The article exists, the NoCeM will be processed
again, but the article won't be deleted.
root@pi-dach:~# fgrep -r '<e150a205-b@abb-4dae-9d27-b65c06ec2682>'
/var/spool/rslight/nocem/*
/var/spool/rslight/nocem/processed/nocem@eternal-september.org[2024.11.18.16.55.49]9vE37U:<e150a205-b@abb-4dae-9d27-b65c06ec2682>
de.soc.wirtschaft
root@pi-dach:~# mv
/var/spool/rslight/nocem/processed/nocem@eternal-september.org[2024.11.18.16.55.49]9vE37U
/var/spool/rslight/nocem/nocem@eternal-september.org[2024.11.18.16.55.49]9vE37U
root@pi-dach:~# systemctl restart rslight
root@pi-dach:~# tail -f /var/spool/rslight/log/nocem.log
Nov 20 17:16:51 spoolnews Bad Issuer or Type for:
i2pn2-nocem@i2pn2.org[2024.11.20.17.04.51]rjz1ag
Nov 20 17:53:09 spoolnews Bad Issuer or Type for:
i2pn2-nocem@i2pn2.org[2024.11.20.17.41.05]jbecPq
Nov 20 18:05:12 spoolnews Bad Issuer or Type for:
i2pn2-nocem@i2pn2.org[2024.11.20.17.53.12]V15j6u
Nov 20 18:05:12 spoolnews Bad Issuer or Type for:
i2pn2-nocem@i2pn2.org[2024.11.20.17.53.13]aOe5Ce
Nov 20 18:17:25 spoolnews Bad Issuer or Type for:
i2pn2-nocem@i2pn2.org[2024.11.20.18.05.15]1qnkiG
Nov 20 18:41:42 spoolnews Bad Issuer or Type for:
i2pn2-nocem@i2pn2.org[2024.11.20.18.29.39]UNqeKA
Nov 20 18:41:42 spoolnews Bad Issuer or Type for:
robot@pasdenom.info[2024.11.20.18.29.39]rV3AEk
Nov 20 19:05:02 spoolnews Good Issuer and Type for:
nocem@eternal-september.org[2024.11.18.16.55.49]9vE37U
Nov 20 19:05:02 spoolnews Good signature in:
nocem@eternal-september.org[2024.11.18.16.55.49]9vE37U
Nov 20 19:05:02 spoolnews Bad Issuer or Type for:
robot@pasdenom.info[2024.11.20.18.53.52]iyJ4pc
Does the log file ever show 'TRYING' for the message?
Could you please provide the MID of the nocem message itself please?
On Wed, 20 Nov 2024 20:28:46 +0000, Retro Guy wrote:<snip>
On Wed, 20 Nov 2024 19:06:40 +0000, Marco Moock wrote:
On 20.11.2024 um 17:01 Uhr Retro Guy wrote:
Both e-s and i2pn2 most likely have almost the same de.* bot articles
listed.
Maybe I can add more logging like, 'Article not found'?
Please let me know if I'm missing what you're saying, so we can fix
the problem if there is one.
Maybe it got deleted after that because I copied all nocems from
processes to the parent and rerun the script.
Now a new example. The article exists, the NoCeM will be processed
again, but the article won't be deleted.
Does the log file ever show 'TRYING' for the message?
Could you please provide the MID of the nocem message itself please?
Ok, I found the MID.
Do any articles listed in that nocem get 'TRYING' at all? Or just some
of them? I'll try it myself here also.
On Wed, 20 Nov 2024 20:32:10 +0000, Retro Guy wrote:
On Wed, 20 Nov 2024 20:28:46 +0000, Retro Guy wrote:<snip>
On Wed, 20 Nov 2024 19:06:40 +0000, Marco Moock wrote:
On 20.11.2024 um 17:01 Uhr Retro Guy wrote:
Both e-s and i2pn2 most likely have almost the same de.* bot articles >>>>> listed.
Maybe I can add more logging like, 'Article not found'?
Please let me know if I'm missing what you're saying, so we can fix
the problem if there is one.
Maybe it got deleted after that because I copied all nocems from
processes to the parent and rerun the script.
Now a new example. The article exists, the NoCeM will be processed
again, but the article won't be deleted.
Does the log file ever show 'TRYING' for the message?
Could you please provide the MID of the nocem message itself please?
Ok, I found the MID.
Do any articles listed in that nocem get 'TRYING' at all? Or just some
of them? I'll try it myself here also.
Please give the attached 'nocem.php' a test. No changes to logging, but
some changes to reading the nocem.
On Wed, 20 Nov 2024 21:04:40 +0000, Retro Guy wrote:
On Wed, 20 Nov 2024 20:32:10 +0000, Retro Guy wrote:
On Wed, 20 Nov 2024 20:28:46 +0000, Retro Guy wrote:<snip>
On Wed, 20 Nov 2024 19:06:40 +0000, Marco Moock wrote:
On 20.11.2024 um 17:01 Uhr Retro Guy wrote:
Both e-s and i2pn2 most likely have almost the same de.* bot articles >>>>>> listed.
Maybe I can add more logging like, 'Article not found'?
Please let me know if I'm missing what you're saying, so we can fix >>>>>> the problem if there is one.
Maybe it got deleted after that because I copied all nocems from
processes to the parent and rerun the script.
Now a new example. The article exists, the NoCeM will be processed
again, but the article won't be deleted.
Does the log file ever show 'TRYING' for the message?
Could you please provide the MID of the nocem message itself please?
Ok, I found the MID.
Do any articles listed in that nocem get 'TRYING' at all? Or just some
of them? I'll try it myself here also.
Please give the attached 'nocem.php' a test. No changes to logging, but
some changes to reading the nocem.
Ignore me, ignore that attached nocem.php. I'll have something later
today.
On Thu, 21 Nov 2024 9:42:33 +0000, Retro Guy wrote:
On Wed, 20 Nov 2024 21:04:40 +0000, Retro Guy wrote:
On Wed, 20 Nov 2024 20:32:10 +0000, Retro Guy wrote:
On Wed, 20 Nov 2024 20:28:46 +0000, Retro Guy wrote:<snip>
On Wed, 20 Nov 2024 19:06:40 +0000, Marco Moock wrote:
On 20.11.2024 um 17:01 Uhr Retro Guy wrote:
Both e-s and i2pn2 most likely have almost the same de.* bot articles >>>>>>> listed.
Maybe I can add more logging like, 'Article not found'?
Please let me know if I'm missing what you're saying, so we can fix >>>>>>> the problem if there is one.
Maybe it got deleted after that because I copied all nocems from
processes to the parent and rerun the script.
Now a new example. The article exists, the NoCeM will be processed >>>>>> again, but the article won't be deleted.
Does the log file ever show 'TRYING' for the message?
Could you please provide the MID of the nocem message itself please?
Ok, I found the MID.
Do any articles listed in that nocem get 'TRYING' at all? Or just some >>>> of them? I'll try it myself here also.
Please give the attached 'nocem.php' a test. No changes to logging, but
some changes to reading the nocem.
Ignore me, ignore that attached nocem.php. I'll have something later
today.
I've added quite a bit of logging. This is some, but there is more for
other things that could occur:
-----
Nov 21 15:15:02 spoolnews <01b9780d-0@301-4f1a-b64d-f8de69a2c3d9> not
found in history database (this is not an error)
Nov 21 15:15:02 spoolnews TRYING:
<01b9780d-0@301-4f1a-b64d-f8de69a2c3d9> IN: de.rec.sport.misc
Nov 21 15:15:02 other <01b9780d-0@301-4f1a-b64d-f8de69a2c3d9> not found
in: de.rec.sport.misc
-----
Nov 21 15:15:02 spoolnews <9425f3f5-0@192-418d-bd4d-a8c5641eb1ad> not
found in history database (this is not an error)
Nov 21 15:15:02 spoolnews TRYING:
<9425f3f5-0@192-418d-bd4d-a8c5641eb1ad> IN: de.soc.misc
Nov 21 15:15:02 Group not found: de.soc.misc
-----
I've also cleaned up identifying the mid and group names from the NoCeM, allowing for tabs or spaces, and spaces or commas, depending on how each admin is producing their scripts.
What we need to do is let it run, and see what is logged, or what part
of the logging is never reached. I've been letting it run for hours now
and it seems ok, but can never be sure until it's in production.
I'll be moving it into 'devel' soon. I'll let you know.
I will continue running this and watch for any issues, which of course
relies on NoCeM being posted.
On 21.11.2024 um 16:16 Uhr Retro Guy wrote:
I will continue running this and watch for any issues, which of course
relies on NoCeM being posted.
Is there a reason not to apply the spam articles and try the old NoCeMs
for testing?
If you think it is production-ready, I will install it on my machine.
That appears to have worked fine, and shows more of the logging in the process.
On 21.11.2024 17:08 Uhr Retro Guy wrote:
That appears to have worked fine, and shows more of the logging in the
process.
I've now upgraded to the current devel.
root@pi-dach:~/rocksolid-light/Rocksolid_Light# grep '<e150a205-b@abb-4dae-9d27-b65c06ec2682>' /var/spool/rslight/nocem/processed/*
/var/spool/rslight/nocem/processed/nocem@eternal-september.org[2024.11.18.16.55.49]9vE37U:<e150a205-b@abb-4dae-9d27-b65c06ec2682> de.soc.wirtschaft
root@pi-dach:~/rocksolid-light/Rocksolid_Light# mv /var/spool/rslight/nocem/processed/nocem@eternal-september.org[2024.11.18.16.55.49]9vE37U /var/spool/rslight/nocem/nocem@eternal-september.org[2024.11.18.16.55.49]9vE37U
root@pi-dach:~/rocksolid-light/Rocksolid_Light# systemctl restart rslight root@pi-dach:~/rocksolid-light/Rocksolid_Light# tail -f /var/spool/rslight/log/nocem.log |grep -i 'found\|dele'
Nov 21 19:13:58 rocksolid <d02aaed0-3@484-492a-8a1c-3b8d12816766> not found in: de.sci.misc
Nov 21 19:13:58 spoolnews <d3a0319b-1@b9b-4792-a0a6-63ff2a2c734f> appears as deleted:nocem in history. Trying anyway...
Nov 21 19:13:58 rocksolid <d3a0319b-1@b9b-4792-a0a6-63ff2a2c734f> not found in: de.soc.wirtschaft
Nov 21 19:13:58 spoolnews <01b9780d-0@301-4f1a-b64d-f8de69a2c3d9> not found in history database (this is not an error)
Nov 21 19:13:58 rocksolid <01b9780d-0@301-4f1a-b64d-f8de69a2c3d9> not found in: de.rec.sport.misc
Nov 21 19:13:58 spoolnews <669d497d-d@64b-48c5-9c1f-062a5a6cf63d> not found in history database (this is not an error)
It stops after that, no more lines. File moved to processed.
Marco Moock wrote:
On 21.11.2024 17:08 Uhr Retro Guy wrote:
That appears to have worked fine, and shows more of the logging in the
process.
I've now upgraded to the current devel.
root@pi-dach:~/rocksolid-light/Rocksolid_Light# grep
'<e150a205-b@abb-4dae-9d27-b65c06ec2682>'
/var/spool/rslight/nocem/processed/*
/var/spool/rslight/nocem/processed/nocem@eternal-september.org[2024.11.18.16.55.49]9vE37U:<e150a205-b@abb-4dae-9d27-b65c06ec2682>
de.soc.wirtschaft
root@pi-dach:~/rocksolid-light/Rocksolid_Light# mv
/var/spool/rslight/nocem/processed/nocem@eternal-september.org[2024.11.18.16.55.49]9vE37U
/var/spool/rslight/nocem/nocem@eternal-september.org[2024.11.18.16.55.49]9vE37U
root@pi-dach:~/rocksolid-light/Rocksolid_Light# systemctl restart
rslight
root@pi-dach:~/rocksolid-light/Rocksolid_Light# tail -f
/var/spool/rslight/log/nocem.log |grep -i 'found\|dele'
Nov 21 19:13:58 rocksolid <d02aaed0-3@484-492a-8a1c-3b8d12816766> not
found in: de.sci.misc
Nov 21 19:13:58 spoolnews <d3a0319b-1@b9b-4792-a0a6-63ff2a2c734f>
appears as deleted:nocem in history. Trying anyway...
Nov 21 19:13:58 rocksolid <d3a0319b-1@b9b-4792-a0a6-63ff2a2c734f> not
found in: de.soc.wirtschaft
Nov 21 19:13:58 spoolnews <01b9780d-0@301-4f1a-b64d-f8de69a2c3d9> not
found in history database (this is not an error)
Nov 21 19:13:58 rocksolid <01b9780d-0@301-4f1a-b64d-f8de69a2c3d9> not
found in: de.rec.sport.misc
Nov 21 19:13:58 spoolnews <669d497d-d@64b-48c5-9c1f-062a5a6cf63d> not
found in history database (this is not an error)
It stops after that, no more lines. File moved to processed.
I assume there are more than three mids listed to remove in the nocem.
Can you send the MID of the nocem itself so I can run the exact same one please?
On Thu, 21 Nov 2024 20:34:09 +0000, Retro Guy wrote:
Marco Moock wrote:
On 21.11.2024 17:08 Uhr Retro Guy wrote:
That appears to have worked fine, and shows more of the logging in the >>>> process.
I've now upgraded to the current devel.
root@pi-dach:~/rocksolid-light/Rocksolid_Light# grep
'<e150a205-b@abb-4dae-9d27-b65c06ec2682>'
/var/spool/rslight/nocem/processed/*
/var/spool/rslight/nocem/processed/nocem@eternal-september.org[2024.11.18.16.55.49]9vE37U:<e150a205-b@abb-4dae-9d27-b65c06ec2682>
de.soc.wirtschaft
root@pi-dach:~/rocksolid-light/Rocksolid_Light# mv
/var/spool/rslight/nocem/processed/nocem@eternal-september.org[2024.11.18.16.55.49]9vE37U
/var/spool/rslight/nocem/nocem@eternal-september.org[2024.11.18.16.55.49]9vE37U
root@pi-dach:~/rocksolid-light/Rocksolid_Light# systemctl restart
rslight
root@pi-dach:~/rocksolid-light/Rocksolid_Light# tail -f
/var/spool/rslight/log/nocem.log |grep -i 'found\|dele'
Nov 21 19:13:58 rocksolid <d02aaed0-3@484-492a-8a1c-3b8d12816766> not
found in: de.sci.misc
Nov 21 19:13:58 spoolnews <d3a0319b-1@b9b-4792-a0a6-63ff2a2c734f>
appears as deleted:nocem in history. Trying anyway...
Nov 21 19:13:58 rocksolid <d3a0319b-1@b9b-4792-a0a6-63ff2a2c734f> not
found in: de.soc.wirtschaft
Nov 21 19:13:58 spoolnews <01b9780d-0@301-4f1a-b64d-f8de69a2c3d9> not
found in history database (this is not an error)
Nov 21 19:13:58 rocksolid <01b9780d-0@301-4f1a-b64d-f8de69a2c3d9> not
found in: de.rec.sport.misc
Nov 21 19:13:58 spoolnews <669d497d-d@64b-48c5-9c1f-062a5a6cf63d> not
found in history database (this is not an error)
It stops after that, no more lines. File moved to processed.
I assume there are more than three mids listed to remove in the nocem.
Can you send the MID of the nocem itself so I can run the exact same one
please?
What do you see in nocem log without the grep (grep -i 'found\|dele')?
I just ran a different e-s nocem and got this:
Can you send the MID of the nocem itself so I can run the exact same
one please?
What do you see in nocem log without the grep (grep -i 'found\|dele')?
On 21.11.2024 20:51 Uhr Retro Guy wrote:
What do you see in nocem log without the grep (grep -i 'found\|dele')?
As I see the message got deleted yesterday.
I still see some spam, but not covered by the processed messages.
There are older NoCeMs from E-S, but they don't seem to be in the
processed folder. Is there an easy way to let it poll them or is the
easier way that I get them from a newsserver and copy them to the nocem
dir?