Sysop: | Amessyroom |
---|---|
Location: | Fayetteville, NC |
Users: | 23 |
Nodes: | 6 (0 / 6) |
Uptime: | 54:28:13 |
Calls: | 583 |
Files: | 1,139 |
D/L today: |
179 files (27,921K bytes) |
Messages: | 111,799 |
Stefan Schmitz wrote:
Am 29.06.2024 um 10:34 schrieb Retro Guy:
Stefan Schmitz wrote:
Am 24.06.2024 um 21:10 schrieb Retro Guy:How does this look? I did some testing and the depth (number of '>>') in >>> quoted blank lines is maintained:
I think I fixed it (see test thread here). It wraps the last word but >>>>> does
not add a blank line.
Thanks for this fix.
Combining the last word with the next line is a much bigger task that >>>>> I'm
not going to take on right now (eventually), but it MIGHT be fixed.
There is another issue that would probably be easier to solve.
Blank lines of the quoted posting are not marked as quoted in the reply. >>>> It would look better if all lines of the quoted posting start with ">". >>>
-------------------
Retro Guy wrote:
Retro Guy wrote:
Here I am creatingREPLY to depth ONE article
Line 3 some articles with blank lines
Line 4 to quote and test with
Line 6 is the sixth line
Line 8
test
REPLY to depth TWO article
TEST 2
-----------------
Have you entered manually a blank line after "Line 8" and "test"? If
not, there is one quoted blank line too much at the end of each quoting.
Thank you. I'll continue to work on this. I have removed the last blank
line being quoted, but still seeing it on some articles. Also with or
without sig makes a difference.
I will continue on this, thank you for the feedback!