• The cruelest man to Rome ATP1000 final!

    From kalevi@kalevi@kolttonen.fi (Kalevi Kolttonen) to rec.sport.tennis on Sat May 16 14:54:21 2026
    From Newsgroup: rec.sport.tennis

    Hello!

    Jannik Sinner, the cruelest man on the ATP tour,
    has just made it to the Rome ATP1000 final, beating
    Medvedev during the time span of two days. The semifinal
    was suspended yesterday and resumed today.

    The first set was all Sinner, he simply killed it there.

    But after that, Daniil Medvedev played top tennis and
    fought very bravely, winning the second set and making
    the third a close battle. But Sinner got the one break
    of serve in the third and it was enough to take the
    set and match.

    I have to say I have not seen Medvedev play this well
    in several years, let alone on clay. Playing like this,
    he was close to beating Sinner and even could have
    won the whole tournament.

    Regarding the final Casper Ruud vs Jannik Sinner, I
    expect Sinner to have it easier than against Medvedev.

    But I am not 100% confident that Sinner will beat
    Ruud. Like I have said, all players have bad days,
    intermediate days and good days. Given the right
    circumstances, Ruud could be the champion on Sunday.
    He is a former Roland Garros finalist and has
    played well during the whole week.

    It will be an interesting final!!!

    br,
    KK
    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From kalevi@kalevi@kolttonen.fi (Kalevi Kolttonen) to rec.sport.tennis on Sat May 16 17:22:12 2026
    From Newsgroup: rec.sport.tennis

    Kalevi Kolttonen <kalevi@kolttonen.fi> wrote:
    But I am not 100% confident that Sinner will beat
    Ruud. Like I have said, all players have bad days,
    intermediate days and good days. Given the right
    circumstances, Ruud could be the champion on Sunday.
    He is a former Roland Garros finalist and has
    played well during the whole week.

    I just googled for some betting odds. The best odds
    for Sinner's victory are 1,12 while the best odds
    for Ruud are 7,5. So the betting agencies have
    strong faith in Sinner becoming the champion tomorrow.

    Despite that fact, I believe Ruud is not without
    a chance. Perhaps the betting odds are a bit
    over-optimistic predicting Sinner's easy victory.

    The match against Medvedev showed that Sinner
    *can* be vulnerable. Usually Sinner dominates
    the baseline rallies, but after the first set
    in the semifinal, Medvedev made some bold moves
    and was able to dictate many rallies.

    But being on his home soil and missing only
    the Rome title to win all the ATP1000 Masters
    events, I am sure Sinner will be ultra motivated
    to play his best on Sunday. Grabbing Rome would
    be gold for him and Italy in general.

    br,
    KK
    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Whisper@whisper@ozemail.com.au to rec.sport.tennis on Sun May 17 12:11:26 2026
    From Newsgroup: rec.sport.tennis

    On 17/05/2026 3:22 am, Kalevi Kolttonen wrote:
    Kalevi Kolttonen <kalevi@kolttonen.fi> wrote:
    But I am not 100% confident that Sinner will beat
    Ruud. Like I have said, all players have bad days,
    intermediate days and good days. Given the right
    circumstances, Ruud could be the champion on Sunday.
    He is a former Roland Garros finalist and has
    played well during the whole week.

    I just googled for some betting odds. The best odds
    for Sinner's victory are 1,12 while the best odds
    for Ruud are 7,5. So the betting agencies have
    strong faith in Sinner becoming the champion tomorrow.

    Despite that fact, I believe Ruud is not without
    a chance. Perhaps the betting odds are a bit
    over-optimistic predicting Sinner's easy victory.

    The match against Medvedev showed that Sinner
    *can* be vulnerable. Usually Sinner dominates
    the baseline rallies, but after the first set
    in the semifinal, Medvedev made some bold moves
    and was able to dictate many rallies.

    But being on his home soil and missing only
    the Rome title to win all the ATP1000 Masters
    events, I am sure Sinner will be ultra motivated
    to play his best on Sunday. Grabbing Rome would
    be gold for him and Italy in general.

    br,
    KK


    Sinner beat Ruud 60 61 here last year.

    Should be tougher tonight though, maybe 3 setter or 2 tight sets. Ruud
    will have a game plan and has nothing to lose. Sinner has huge
    motivation to complete the set and possibly eyeing off a calendar year
    Masters Grand Slam. This would be a huge legacy boost for him, may be impossible to replicate in future, and help his goat discussions down
    the track as he builds his slam tally. Playing and winning all the
    Masters is too much mentally and physically so this will be his only opportunity to achieve it imo. Going forward he'll be more selective
    and skip some, but he really needs to go for this opportunity.
    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From kalevi@kalevi@kolttonen.fi (Kalevi Kolttonen) to rec.sport.tennis on Sun May 17 11:47:15 2026
    From Newsgroup: rec.sport.tennis

    Whisper <whisper@ozemail.com.au> wrote:
    Sinner beat Ruud 60 61 here last year.

    Wow, I did not remember that.

    [...] winning all the Masters is too much mentally
    and physically so this will be his only
    opportunity to achieve it imo.

    Agreed. This is the year to do it if ever. But it will
    still be extremely hard.

    br,
    KK
    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From *skriptis@skriptis@post.t-com.hr to rec.sport.tennis on Sun May 17 14:29:50 2026
    From Newsgroup: rec.sport.tennis

    ------=_Part_0_24550635.1779020990074
    Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
    Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

    kalevi@kolttonen.fi (Kalevi Kolttonen) Wrote in message:r
    Whisper <whisper@ozemail.com.au> wrote:> Sinner beat Ruud 60 61 here last year.Wow, I did not remember that.> [...] winning all the Masters is too much mentally> and physically so this will be his only > opportunity to achieve it imo.Agreed. This is the year to do it if ever. But it willstill be extremely hard.br,KK



    Very hard and somewhat pointless.

    It would be incredible but kinda like Wilding's triple world championship title or Rosewall's and Laver's pro slam, incomparable to anything else, either before or after and thus sidelined in history books.
    --




    ----Android NewsGroup Reader---- https://piaohong.s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com/usenet/index.html ------=_Part_0_24550635.1779020990074--
    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Sawfish@sawfish666@gmail.com to rec.sport.tennis on Sun May 17 09:31:24 2026
    From Newsgroup: rec.sport.tennis

    On 5/16/26 7:11 PM, Whisper wrote:
    On 17/05/2026 3:22 am, Kalevi Kolttonen wrote:
    Kalevi Kolttonen <kalevi@kolttonen.fi> wrote:
    But I am not 100% confident that Sinner will beat
    Ruud. Like I have said, all players have bad days,
    intermediate days and good days. Given the right
    circumstances, Ruud could be the champion on Sunday.
    He is a former Roland Garros finalist and has
    played well during the whole week.

    I just googled for some betting odds. The best odds
    for Sinner's victory are 1,12 while the best odds
    for Ruud are 7,5. So the betting agencies have
    strong faith in Sinner becoming the champion tomorrow.

    Despite that fact, I believe Ruud is not without
    a chance. Perhaps the betting odds are a bit
    over-optimistic predicting Sinner's easy victory.

    The match against Medvedev showed that Sinner
    *can* be vulnerable. Usually Sinner dominates
    the baseline rallies, but after the first set
    in the semifinal, Medvedev made some bold moves
    and was able to dictate many rallies.

    But being on his home soil and missing only
    the Rome title to win all the ATP1000 Masters
    events, I am sure Sinner will be ultra motivated
    to play his best on Sunday. Grabbing Rome would
    be gold for him and Italy in general.

    br,
    KK


    Sinner beat Ruud 60 61 here last year.

    Should be tougher tonight though, maybe 3 setter or 2 tight sets.-a Ruud will have a game plan and has nothing to lose.-a Sinner has huge
    motivation to complete the set and possibly eyeing off a calendar year Masters Grand Slam.-a This would be a huge legacy boost for him, may be impossible to replicate in future, and help his goat discussions down
    the track as he builds his slam tally.-a Playing and winning all the
    Masters is too much mentally and physically so this will be his only opportunity to achieve it imo.-a Going forward he'll be more selective
    and skip some, but he really needs to go for this opportunity.

    The biggest difference emerging between Sinner and Alcaraz is that
    Sinner *wants it all* but Alcaraz is looking a lot less motivated.

    I sure hope that it doesn't turn out that Alcaraz, the single most
    talented player I've seen, begins to lose his resolve to win as it gets
    less easy to do so.
    --
    ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
    "To the average American or Englishman the very name of anarchy causes a shudder, because it invariably conjures up a picture of a land
    terrorized by low-browed assassins with matted beards, carrying bombs in
    one hand and mugs of beer in the other. But as a matter of fact, there
    is no reason whatever to believe that, if all laws were abolished
    tomorrow, such swine would survive the day."

    --H. L. Mencken ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From kalevi@kalevi@kolttonen.fi (Kalevi Kolttonen) to rec.sport.tennis on Sun May 17 17:18:01 2026
    From Newsgroup: rec.sport.tennis

    Whisper <whisper@ozemail.com.au> wrote:
    Sinner beat Ruud 60 61 here last year.

    Now it was much closer: 6-4, 6-4. Ruud did not
    play a bad match, but Sinner was just that much
    better today. It is mind-blowing to think about it:

    1) Adriano Panatta sitting in the stands watching,
    having won in Rome back 1976, exactly 50 years ago

    2) Italy's president watching there too

    3) New record at stake: to become the second man
    to win all ATP1000 clay court events during the
    spring (Nadal did it before)

    4) New record at stake: to become the second man to
    win all nine ATP1000 Masters singles titles
    (Djoker did it *twice*)

    Somehow Sinner pulled it off. It is rare to see
    such a big smile from him when wins a match, but
    it is obvious he was glad and also relieved. He
    withstood Ruud's attack and lived up to the
    expectations to win.

    This is fucking *incredible*!

    What a time be a tennis fan!

    br,
    KK
    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From kalevi@kalevi@kolttonen.fi (Kalevi Kolttonen) to rec.sport.tennis on Sun May 17 17:25:33 2026
    From Newsgroup: rec.sport.tennis

    Kalevi Kolttonen <kalevi@kolttonen.fi> wrote:
    Now it was much closer: 6-4, 6-4. Ruud did not
    play a bad match, but Sinner was just that much
    better today. It is mind-blowing to think about it:

    In my previous post I forgot to mention one more
    record unique to Sinner: The only man to have won
    *six* consecutive ATP1000 singles titles! Not even
    Djoker, Rafa or Federer could achieve it.

    Now Sinner needs to rest well and practice sensibly
    and I guess it is very safe to say he is the biggest
    favourite to win in Roland Garros. But like always,
    being the favourite does not automatically make
    him a champion. I am sure there will be tough matches
    ahead of him.

    Medvedev in particular seems to be in a great form so
    he is someone to look after in Paris! But Alcaraz
    being away really should make it that much easier
    for Sinner.

    br,
    KK
    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From *skriptis@skriptis@post.t-com.hr to rec.sport.tennis on Sun May 17 19:30:57 2026
    From Newsgroup: rec.sport.tennis

    ------=_Part_0_135234820.1779039057305
    Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
    Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

    Sawfish <sawfish666@gmail.com> Wrote in message:r
    On 5/16/26 7:11 PM, Whisper wrote:> On 17/05/2026 3:22 am, Kalevi Koltton=
    en wrote:>> Kalevi Kolttonen <kalevi@kolttonen.fi> wrote:>>> But I am not 1= 00% confident that Sinner will beat>>> Ruud. Like I have said, all players = have bad days,>>> intermediate days and good days. Given the right>>> circu= mstances, Ruud could be the champion on Sunday.>>> He is a former Roland Ga= rros finalist and has>>> played well during the whole week.>>>> I just goog= led for some betting odds. The best odds>> for Sinner's victory are 1,12 wh= ile the best odds>> for Ruud are 7,5. So the betting agencies have>> strong=
    faith in Sinner becoming the champion tomorrow.>>>> Despite that fact, I b= elieve Ruud is not without>> a chance. Perhaps the betting odds are a bit>>=
    over-optimistic predicting Sinner's easy victory.>>>> The match against Me= dvedev showed that Sinner>> *can* be vulnerable. Usually Sinner dominates>>=
    the baseline rallies, but after the first set>> in the semifinal, Medvedev=
    made some bold moves>> and was able to dictate many rallies.>>>> But being=
    on his home soil and missing only>> the Rome title to win all the ATP1000 = Masters>> events, I am sure Sinner will be ultra motivated>> to play his be=
    st on Sunday. Grabbing Rome would>> be gold for him and Italy in general.>>=
    Sinner beat Ruud 60 61 here last year.> > Should be toughe=
    r tonight though, maybe 3 setter or 2 tight sets. Ruud > will have a game = plan and has nothing to lose. Sinner has huge > motivation to complete the=
    set and possibly eyeing off a calendar year > Masters Grand Slam. This wo= uld be a huge legacy boost for him, may be > impossible to replicate in fut= ure, and help his goat discussions down > the track as he builds his slam t= ally. Playing and winning all the > Masters is too much mentally and physi= cally so this will be his only > opportunity to achieve it imo. Going forw= ard he'll be more selective > and skip some, but he really needs to go for = this opportunity.The biggest difference emerging between Sinner and Alcaraz=
    is that Sinner *wants it all* but Alcaraz is looking a lot less motivated.=
    I sure hope that it doesn't turn out that Alcaraz, the single most talented=
    player I've seen, begins to lose his resolve to win as it gets less easy t=
    o do so.





    Whisper described it accurately it's Sampras effect.

    Alcaraz doesn't seem to need to prove anything to anyone, he knows his best=
    tops everyone's best.

    He needs the stage and high stakes.







    As Picard:

    "Whisper's assessment is quite accurate. This is indeed the Sampras effect.=
    "

    "Alcaraz appears to possess no need for validation from others. He possesse=
    s an unwavering certainty that his peak performance surpasses that of any c= ompetitor."

    "He requires the grand stage and the pressure of high-stakes competition to=
    truly excel."




    As Kirk:

    "The Whisper's analysis holds true. It's the Sampras phenomenon, plain and = simple."

    "Alcaraz isn't out to prove anything to anyone. He's already got the data. = When he's at his best, nobody else can match it."

    "He thrives on the pressure. Give him the spotlight and the highest stakes= =E2=80=94that's when he operates at maximum efficiency."




    As Trump:

    "Listen, Whisper said it, and it's true. It's the Sampras effect, a great e= ffect, a beautiful effect, really."

    "Alcaraz, he doesn't have to prove anything to anybody. He knows it, I know=
    it, you know it. His best is better than their best, believe me. It's not = even close."

    "He needs the big stage, the big stakes. Without the pressure, it's not the=
    same. He's a winner, and winners need to win when it counts, when everyone=
    is watching. Tremendous."




    Harris=20

    "Alright, listen up! Whisper finally got something right! It's the Sampras = effect, and it's obvious to anyone with eyes!"

    "This Alcaraz kid... he doesn't need to prove anything to you, me, or anybo= dy! He's got that look, that confidence! He knows when he brings his best g= ame, nobody else can touch him! Not even close!"

    "And the stage? The high stakes? That's what he lives for! Back in my day, =
    we called it clutch! This kid needs the spotlight, the pressure, when every= thing's on the line! That's when he shines brightest! MAHONEY! Are you payi=
    ng attention? This is what separates the great ones from the chumps!"




    Sampras=20

    "You know, it's interesting to hear it framed that way. I never really thou= ght of it as 'my effect,' but I understand what people mean when they say t= hat."

    "This kid Alcaraz... he has something special. There's a confidence there t= hat reminds me of how I had to approach things. You reach a point where you=
    stop playing the opponent and start just executing your own game. You trus=
    t your preparation, your shots, and believe that when you're on, nobody can=
    hang with you."

    "The big stage, the high stakes... that's where it all comes together. Some=
    guys tighten up, but for a certain type of player, that's when everything = becomes clearer. The crowd, the pressure, the moment=E2=80=94it focuses you=
    . That's when you find out what you're really made of. He seems to have tha= t."



    Alcaraz=20

    "I'm just focused on my tennis, you know? I don't really think about 'effec= ts' or comparisons to the greats like Pete. That's for you guys to talk abo= ut."

    "I don't feel like I need to prove anything to anyone else. The only person=
    I need to prove things to is myself. I work so hard, and when I'm playing =
    my best tennis, I believe I can beat anyone on the other side of the net. T= hat's just the mindset you have to have at this level."

    "And yeah... it's true. I love the big moments. The big crowds, the night m= atches, the Grand Slams... that's when I feel most alive. I want the ball w= hen the match is on the line. It's not pressure, it's opportunity. That's w= hat I play for."



    --=20




    ----Android NewsGroup Reader---- https://piaohong.s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com/usenet/index.html ------=_Part_0_135234820.1779039057305--
    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Whisper@whisper@ozemail.com.au to rec.sport.tennis on Mon May 18 03:34:04 2026
    From Newsgroup: rec.sport.tennis

    On 17/05/2026 10:29 pm, *skriptis wrote:
    kalevi@kolttonen.fi (Kalevi Kolttonen) Wrote in message:r
    Whisper <whisper@ozemail.com.au> wrote:> Sinner beat Ruud 60 61 here last year.Wow, I did not remember that.> [...] winning all the Masters is too much mentally> and physically so this will be his only > opportunity to achieve it imo.Agreed. This is the year to do it if ever. But it willstill be extremely hard.br,KK



    Very hard and somewhat pointless.

    It would be incredible but kinda like Wilding's triple world championship title or Rosewall's and Laver's pro slam, incomparable to anything else, either before or after and thus sidelined in history books.





    Good point. Relevant to recent modern era but end of the day it's
    always the slams. Carlos 7 Sinner 4. Sinner could get to 7 in about 4 months. Will have to see how strongly Carlos can come back. He won't
    want Sinner to be Wimbledon champ last 2 years so motivation will be high.
    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Whisper@whisper@ozemail.com.au to rec.sport.tennis on Mon May 18 03:36:36 2026
    From Newsgroup: rec.sport.tennis

    On 18/05/2026 2:31 am, Sawfish wrote:
    On 5/16/26 7:11 PM, Whisper wrote:
    On 17/05/2026 3:22 am, Kalevi Kolttonen wrote:
    Kalevi Kolttonen <kalevi@kolttonen.fi> wrote:
    But I am not 100% confident that Sinner will beat
    Ruud. Like I have said, all players have bad days,
    intermediate days and good days. Given the right
    circumstances, Ruud could be the champion on Sunday.
    He is a former Roland Garros finalist and has
    played well during the whole week.

    I just googled for some betting odds. The best odds
    for Sinner's victory are 1,12 while the best odds
    for Ruud are 7,5. So the betting agencies have
    strong faith in Sinner becoming the champion tomorrow.

    Despite that fact, I believe Ruud is not without
    a chance. Perhaps the betting odds are a bit
    over-optimistic predicting Sinner's easy victory.

    The match against Medvedev showed that Sinner
    *can* be vulnerable. Usually Sinner dominates
    the baseline rallies, but after the first set
    in the semifinal, Medvedev made some bold moves
    and was able to dictate many rallies.

    But being on his home soil and missing only
    the Rome title to win all the ATP1000 Masters
    events, I am sure Sinner will be ultra motivated
    to play his best on Sunday. Grabbing Rome would
    be gold for him and Italy in general.

    br,
    KK


    Sinner beat Ruud 60 61 here last year.

    Should be tougher tonight though, maybe 3 setter or 2 tight sets.
    Ruud will have a game plan and has nothing to lose.-a Sinner has huge
    motivation to complete the set and possibly eyeing off a calendar year
    Masters Grand Slam.-a This would be a huge legacy boost for him, may be
    impossible to replicate in future, and help his goat discussions down
    the track as he builds his slam tally.-a Playing and winning all the
    Masters is too much mentally and physically so this will be his only
    opportunity to achieve it imo.-a Going forward he'll be more selective
    and skip some, but he really needs to go for this opportunity.

    The biggest difference emerging between Sinner and Alcaraz is that
    Sinner *wants it all* but Alcaraz is looking a lot less motivated.

    I sure hope that it doesn't turn out that Alcaraz, the single most
    talented player I've seen, begins to lose his resolve to win as it gets
    less easy to do so.




    I think he'll keep getting up for most slams while Sinner looks like he
    has hunger to win everything like Fed/Novak. End of the day you want to
    be on top of the slam mountain. If that's the only way we'll see peak
    Carlos I'll take it.
    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Whisper@whisper@ozemail.com.au to rec.sport.tennis on Mon May 18 03:38:44 2026
    From Newsgroup: rec.sport.tennis

    On 18/05/2026 3:18 am, Kalevi Kolttonen wrote:
    Whisper <whisper@ozemail.com.au> wrote:
    Sinner beat Ruud 60 61 here last year.

    Now it was much closer: 6-4, 6-4. Ruud did not
    play a bad match, but Sinner was just that much
    better today. It is mind-blowing to think about it:

    1) Adriano Panatta sitting in the stands watching,
    having won in Rome back 1976, exactly 50 years ago

    2) Italy's president watching there too

    3) New record at stake: to become the second man
    to win all ATP1000 clay court events during the
    spring (Nadal did it before)

    4) New record at stake: to become the second man to
    win all nine ATP1000 Masters singles titles
    (Djoker did it *twice*)

    Somehow Sinner pulled it off. It is rare to see
    such a big smile from him when wins a match, but
    it is obvious he was glad and also relieved. He
    withstood Ruud's attack and lived up to the
    expectations to win.

    This is fucking *incredible*!

    What a time be a tennis fan!

    br,
    KK


    Surprising that Nadal has only swept the clay Masters only once, in
    2010. That was his best year, also winning Wim/USO/FO. Nadal is still
    the only man in history to win Wim/USO/FO in same year on 3 surfaces.
    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Sawfish@sawfish666@gmail.com to rec.sport.tennis on Sun May 17 10:57:06 2026
    From Newsgroup: rec.sport.tennis

    On 5/17/26 10:30 AM, *skriptis wrote:
    Sawfish <sawfish666@gmail.com> Wrote in message:r
    On 5/16/26 7:11 PM, Whisper wrote:> On 17/05/2026 3:22 am, Kalevi Kolttonen wrote:>> Kalevi Kolttonen <kalevi@kolttonen.fi> wrote:>>> But I am not 100% confident that Sinner will beat>>> Ruud. Like I have said, all players have bad days,>>> intermediate days and good days. Given the right>>> circumstances, Ruud could be the champion on Sunday.>>> He is a former Roland Garros finalist and has>>> played well during the whole week.>>>> I just googled for some betting odds. The best odds>> for Sinner's victory are 1,12 while the best odds>> for Ruud are 7,5. So the betting agencies have>> strong faith in Sinner becoming the champion tomorrow.>>>> Despite that fact, I believe Ruud is not without>> a chance. Perhaps the betting odds are a bit>> over-optimistic predicting Sinner's easy victory.>>>> The match against Medvedev showed that Sinner>> *can* be vulnerable. Usually Sinner dominates>> the baseline rallies, but after the first set>> in the semifinal, Medvedev made some bold moves>> and was able to dictate many rallies.>>>> But being on his home soil and missing only>> the Rome title to win all the ATP1000 Masters>> events, I am sure Sinner will be ultra motivated>> to play his best on Sunday. Grabbing Rome would>> be gold for him and Italy in general.>>>> br,>> KK> > > Sinner beat Ruud 60 61 here last year.> > Should be tougher tonight though, maybe 3 setter or 2 tight sets. Ruud > will have a game plan and has nothing to lose. Sinner has huge > motivation to complete the set and possibly eyeing off a calendar year > Masters Grand Slam. This would be a huge legacy boost for him, may be > impossible to replicate in future, and help his goat discussions down > the track as he builds his slam tally. Playing and winning all the > Masters is too much mentally and physically so this will be his only > opportunity to achieve it imo. Going forward he'll be more selective > and skip some, but he really needs to go for this opportunity.The biggest difference emerging between Sinner and Alcaraz is that Sinner *wants it all* but Alcaraz is looking a lot less motivated.I sure hope that it doesn't turn out that Alcaraz, the single most talented player I've seen, begins to lose his resolve to win as it gets less easy to do so.





    Whisper described it accurately it's Sampras effect.

    Alcaraz doesn't seem to need to prove anything to anyone, he knows his best tops everyone's best.

    He needs the stage and high stakes.







    As Picard:

    "Whisper's assessment is quite accurate. This is indeed the Sampras effect."

    "Alcaraz appears to possess no need for validation from others. He possesses an unwavering certainty that his peak performance surpasses that of any competitor."

    "He requires the grand stage and the pressure of high-stakes competition to truly excel."




    As Kirk:

    "The Whisper's analysis holds true. It's the Sampras phenomenon, plain and simple."

    "Alcaraz isn't out to prove anything to anyone. He's already got the data. When he's at his best, nobody else can match it."

    "He thrives on the pressure. Give him the spotlight and the highest stakesrCothat's when he operates at maximum efficiency."




    As Trump:

    "Listen, Whisper said it, and it's true. It's the Sampras effect, a great effect, a beautiful effect, really."

    "Alcaraz, he doesn't have to prove anything to anybody. He knows it, I know it, you know it. His best is better than their best, believe me. It's not even close."

    "He needs the big stage, the big stakes. Without the pressure, it's not the same. He's a winner, and winners need to win when it counts, when everyone is watching. Tremendous."




    Harris

    "Alright, listen up! Whisper finally got something right! It's the Sampras effect, and it's obvious to anyone with eyes!"

    "This Alcaraz kid... he doesn't need to prove anything to you, me, or anybody! He's got that look, that confidence! He knows when he brings his best game, nobody else can touch him! Not even close!"

    "And the stage? The high stakes? That's what he lives for! Back in my day, we called it clutch! This kid needs the spotlight, the pressure, when everything's on the line! That's when he shines brightest! MAHONEY! Are you paying attention? This is what separates the great ones from the chumps!"




    Sampras

    "You know, it's interesting to hear it framed that way. I never really thought of it as 'my effect,' but I understand what people mean when they say that."

    "This kid Alcaraz... he has something special. There's a confidence there that reminds me of how I had to approach things. You reach a point where you stop playing the opponent and start just executing your own game. You trust your preparation, your shots, and believe that when you're on, nobody can hang with you."

    "The big stage, the high stakes... that's where it all comes together. Some guys tighten up, but for a certain type of player, that's when everything becomes clearer. The crowd, the pressure, the momentrCoit focuses you. That's when you find out what you're really made of. He seems to have that."



    Alcaraz

    "I'm just focused on my tennis, you know? I don't really think about 'effects' or comparisons to the greats like Pete. That's for you guys to talk about."

    "I don't feel like I need to prove anything to anyone else. The only person I need to prove things to is myself. I work so hard, and when I'm playing my best tennis, I believe I can beat anyone on the other side of the net. That's just the mindset you have to have at this level."

    "And yeah... it's true. I love the big moments. The big crowds, the night matches, the Grand Slams... that's when I feel most alive. I want the ball when the match is on the line. It's not pressure, it's opportunity. That's what I play for."

    I guess we're going to see soon enough.




    --
    ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

    "I yam what I yam what I yam."

    --Popeye the Sailor

    ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From =?UTF-8?Q?Pelle_Svansl=C3=B6s?=@pelle@svans.los to rec.sport.tennis on Sun May 17 20:57:23 2026
    From Newsgroup: rec.sport.tennis

    On 17.5.2026 20.36, Whisper wrote:
    On 18/05/2026 2:31 am, Sawfish wrote:
    On 5/16/26 7:11 PM, Whisper wrote:
    On 17/05/2026 3:22 am, Kalevi Kolttonen wrote:
    Kalevi Kolttonen <kalevi@kolttonen.fi> wrote:
    But I am not 100% confident that Sinner will beat
    Ruud. Like I have said, all players have bad days,
    intermediate days and good days. Given the right
    circumstances, Ruud could be the champion on Sunday.
    He is a former Roland Garros finalist and has
    played well during the whole week.

    I just googled for some betting odds. The best odds
    for Sinner's victory are 1,12 while the best odds
    for Ruud are 7,5. So the betting agencies have
    strong faith in Sinner becoming the champion tomorrow.

    Despite that fact, I believe Ruud is not without
    a chance. Perhaps the betting odds are a bit
    over-optimistic predicting Sinner's easy victory.

    The match against Medvedev showed that Sinner
    *can* be vulnerable. Usually Sinner dominates
    the baseline rallies, but after the first set
    in the semifinal, Medvedev made some bold moves
    and was able to dictate many rallies.

    But being on his home soil and missing only
    the Rome title to win all the ATP1000 Masters
    events, I am sure Sinner will be ultra motivated
    to play his best on Sunday. Grabbing Rome would
    be gold for him and Italy in general.

    br,
    KK


    Sinner beat Ruud 60 61 here last year.

    Should be tougher tonight though, maybe 3 setter or 2 tight sets.
    Ruud will have a game plan and has nothing to lose.-a Sinner has huge
    motivation to complete the set and possibly eyeing off a calendar
    year Masters Grand Slam.-a This would be a huge legacy boost for him,
    may be impossible to replicate in future, and help his goat
    discussions down the track as he builds his slam tally.-a Playing and
    winning all the Masters is too much mentally and physically so this
    will be his only opportunity to achieve it imo.-a Going forward he'll
    be more selective and skip some, but he really needs to go for this
    opportunity.

    The biggest difference emerging between Sinner and Alcaraz is that
    Sinner *wants it all* but Alcaraz is looking a lot less motivated.

    I sure hope that it doesn't turn out that Alcaraz, the single most
    talented player I've seen, begins to lose his resolve to win as it
    gets less easy to do so.




    I think he'll keep getting up for most slams while Sinner looks like he
    has hunger to win everything like Fed/Novak. End of the day you want to
    be on top of the slam mountain.

    Singing.

    "You want to be singing on top of the slam mountain".
    --
    "And off they went, from here to there,
    The bear, the bear, and the maiden fair"
    -- Traditional
    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2