From Newsgroup: rec.sport.soccer

Maybe they have an Arsenal hater updating this?

1 Bournemouth 0 0 0 0 0-0 0
2 Arsenal 0 0 0 0 0-0 0
3 Aston Villa 0 0 0 0 0-0 0
4 Brentford 0 0 0 0 0-0 0
5 Brighton 0 0 0 0 0-0 0
6 Chelsea 0 0 0 0 0-0 0
7 Coventry 0 0 0 0 0-0 0
8 Crystal P 0 0 0 0 0-0 0
9 Everton 0 0 0 0 0-0 0
10 Fulham 0 0 0 0 0-0 0
11 Hull 0 0 0 0 0-0 0
12 Ipswich 0 0 0 0 0-0 0
13 Leeds 0 0 0 0 0-0 0
14 Liverpool 0 0 0 0 0-0 0
15 Man City 0 0 0 0 0-0 0
16 Man United 0 0 0 0 0-0 0
17 Newcastle 0 0 0 0 0-0 0
18 Nottingham 0 0 0 0 0-0 0
19 Sunderland 0 0 0 0 0-0 0
20 Tottenham 0 0 0 0 0-0 0
--
Manchester United FC - CHAMPIONS
Latest: England '13 (20th) Europa '17, UEFA '08, World '08
--- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: rec.sport.soccer

anders t wrote:

Maybe they have an Arsenal hater updating this?

1 Bournemouth 0 0 0 0 0-0 0
2 Arsenal 0 0 0 0 0-0 0
3 Aston Villa 0 0 0 0 0-0 0
4 Brentford 0 0 0 0 0-0 0
5 Brighton 0 0 0 0 0-0 0
6 Chelsea 0 0 0 0 0-0 0
7 Coventry 0 0 0 0 0-0 0
8 Crystal P 0 0 0 0 0-0 0
9 Everton 0 0 0 0 0-0 0
10 Fulham 0 0 0 0 0-0 0
11 Hull 0 0 0 0 0-0 0
12 Ipswich 0 0 0 0 0-0 0
13 Leeds 0 0 0 0 0-0 0
14 Liverpool 0 0 0 0 0-0 0
15 Man City 0 0 0 0 0-0 0
16 Man United 0 0 0 0 0-0 0
17 Newcastle 0 0 0 0 0-0 0
18 Nottingham 0 0 0 0 0-0 0
19 Sunderland 0 0 0 0 0-0 0
20 Tottenham 0 0 0 0 0-0 0

Well, the table isn't wrong is it? It's alphabetical, so
AFC Bournemouth would come before Arse, wouldn't it?

:-)
--- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: rec.sport.soccer

On 25/07/2026 17:35, anders t wrote:

Maybe they have an Arsenal hater updating this?

1 Bournemouth [SNIP]

Rayan's club at the top of the Premier League table? Looks appropriate
if you ask me.


Best regards,

Ll|-o
--- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: rec.sport.soccer

On 2026-07-25 14:30, Blueshirt wrote:

anders t wrote:

Maybe they have an Arsenal hater updating this?

1 Bournemouth 0 0 0 0 0-0 0
2 Arsenal 0 0 0 0 0-0 0
3 Aston Villa 0 0 0 0 0-0 0
4 Brentford 0 0 0 0 0-0 0
5 Brighton 0 0 0 0 0-0 0
6 Chelsea 0 0 0 0 0-0 0
7 Coventry 0 0 0 0 0-0 0
8 Crystal P 0 0 0 0 0-0 0
9 Everton 0 0 0 0 0-0 0
10 Fulham 0 0 0 0 0-0 0
11 Hull 0 0 0 0 0-0 0
12 Ipswich 0 0 0 0 0-0 0
13 Leeds 0 0 0 0 0-0 0
14 Liverpool 0 0 0 0 0-0 0
15 Man City 0 0 0 0 0-0 0
16 Man United 0 0 0 0 0-0 0
17 Newcastle 0 0 0 0 0-0 0
18 Nottingham 0 0 0 0 0-0 0
19 Sunderland 0 0 0 0 0-0 0
20 Tottenham 0 0 0 0 0-0 0

Well, the table isn't wrong is it? It's alphabetical, so
AFC Bournemouth would come before Arse, wouldn't it?

Hmm why does the the AFC come before Bournemouth but after Sunderland ?
(it seems it really does but I wonder why)

:-)

--- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: rec.sport.soccer

In article <xn0pspe538uq0o000@news.eternal-september.org>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:

anders t wrote:

Maybe they have an Arsenal hater updating this?

1 Bournemouth 0 0 0 0 0-0 0
2 Arsenal 0 0 0 0 0-0 0
3 Aston Villa 0 0 0 0 0-0 0
4 Brentford 0 0 0 0 0-0 0
5 Brighton 0 0 0 0 0-0 0
6 Chelsea 0 0 0 0 0-0 0
7 Coventry 0 0 0 0 0-0 0
8 Crystal P 0 0 0 0 0-0 0
9 Everton 0 0 0 0 0-0 0
10 Fulham 0 0 0 0 0-0 0
11 Hull 0 0 0 0 0-0 0
12 Ipswich 0 0 0 0 0-0 0
13 Leeds 0 0 0 0 0-0 0
14 Liverpool 0 0 0 0 0-0 0
15 Man City 0 0 0 0 0-0 0
16 Man United 0 0 0 0 0-0 0
17 Newcastle 0 0 0 0 0-0 0
18 Nottingham 0 0 0 0 0-0 0
19 Sunderland 0 0 0 0 0-0 0
20 Tottenham 0 0 0 0 0-0 0

Well, the table isn't wrong is it? It's alphabetical, so
AFC Bournemouth would come before Arse, wouldn't it?

:-)

100% spot on!
--
Member - Liberal International This is doctor@nk.ca Ici doctor@nk.ca
Yahweh, King & country!Never Satan President Republic!Beware AntiChrist rising! Look at Psalms 14 and 53 on Atheism ; 31 years in the ISP business!
--- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: rec.sport.soccer

MH wrote:

On 2026-07-25 14:30, Blueshirt wrote:

anders t wrote:

Maybe they have an Arsenal hater updating this?

1 Bournemouth 0 0 0 0 0-0 0
2 Arsenal 0 0 0 0 0-0 0

Well, the table isn't wrong is it? It's alphabetical,
so AFC Bournemouth would come before Arse, wouldn't it?

Hmm why does the the AFC come before Bournemouth but after
Sunderland ? (it seems it really does but I wonder why)

Obviously Bournemouth were preparing for the days when the
league table was listed/sorted alphabetical... ;-)
--- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: rec.sport.soccer

Quoting Blueshirt in rec.sport.soccer:

anders t wrote:

Maybe they have an Arsenal hater updating this?

1 Bournemouth 0 0 0 0 0-0 0
2 Arsenal 0 0 0 0 0-0 0
3 Aston Villa 0 0 0 0 0-0 0
4 Brentford 0 0 0 0 0-0 0
5 Brighton 0 0 0 0 0-0 0
6 Chelsea 0 0 0 0 0-0 0
7 Coventry 0 0 0 0 0-0 0
8 Crystal P 0 0 0 0 0-0 0
9 Everton 0 0 0 0 0-0 0
10 Fulham 0 0 0 0 0-0 0
11 Hull 0 0 0 0 0-0 0
12 Ipswich 0 0 0 0 0-0 0
13 Leeds 0 0 0 0 0-0 0
14 Liverpool 0 0 0 0 0-0 0
15 Man City 0 0 0 0 0-0 0
16 Man United 0 0 0 0 0-0 0
17 Newcastle 0 0 0 0 0-0 0
18 Nottingham 0 0 0 0 0-0 0
19 Sunderland 0 0 0 0 0-0 0
20 Tottenham 0 0 0 0 0-0 0

Well, the table isn't wrong is it? It's alphabetical, so
AFC Bournemouth would come before Arse, wouldn't it?

:-)

What? Arsenal FC Bournemouth???

;-)
--
Manchester United FC - CHAMPIONS
Latest: England '13 (20th) Europa '17, UEFA '08, World '08
--- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: rec.sport.soccer

Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:

MH wrote:

On 2026-07-25 14:30, Blueshirt wrote:

anders t wrote:

Maybe they have an Arsenal hater updating this?

1 Bournemouth 0 0 0 0 0-0 0
2 Arsenal 0 0 0 0 0-0 0

Well, the table isn't wrong is it? It's alphabetical,
so AFC Bournemouth would come before Arse, wouldn't it?

Hmm why does the the AFC come before Bournemouth but after
Sunderland ? (it seems it really does but I wonder why)

Obviously Bournemouth were preparing for the days when the
league table was listed/sorted alphabetical... ;-)

ThatrCOs exactly what they did!

https://www.bbc.com/sport/football/articles/c3v7zq1wnqxo

Ciao,
Werner

--- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: rec.sport.soccer

anders t formulated on Saturday :

Maybe they have an Arsenal hater updating this?

1 Bournemouth 0 0 0 0 0-0 0
2 Arsenal 0 0 0 0 0-0 0
3 Aston Villa 0 0 0 0 0-0 0

Bournemouth has a better fairplay index, so it's in 1st place world cup
docet
--
/-\ /\/\ /\/\ /-\ /\/\ /\/\ /-\ T /-\
-=- -=- -=- -=- -=- -=- -=- -=- - -=-
........... [ al lavoro ] ...........
-.-. .... . ... .. ...- .. -. -.-. .- --- -.-. .... . ... .. .--. . .-.
-.. .- ..-. --- .-. --.. .- - --- .-. --- . .--- ..- ...- . -- . .-.
-.. .-
--- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: rec.sport.soccer

Quoting Ammammata in rec.sport.soccer:

anders t formulated on Saturday :

Maybe they have an Arsenal hater updating this?

1 Bournemouth 0 0 0 0 0-0 0
2 Arsenal 0 0 0 0 0-0 0
3 Aston Villa 0 0 0 0 0-0 0

Bournemouth has a better fairplay index, so it's in 1st place world cup >docet

That theory doesn't hold. Arsenal would be dead last, if true.
--
Manchester United FC - CHAMPIONS
Latest: England '13 (20th) Europa '17, UEFA '08, World '08
--- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: rec.sport.soccer

anders t wrote:

Quoting Ammammata in rec.sport.soccer:

anders t formulated on Saturday :

Maybe they have an Arsenal hater updating this?

1 Bournemouth 0 0 0 0 0-0 0
2 Arsenal 0 0 0 0 0-0 0
3 Aston Villa 0 0 0 0 0-0 0

Bournemouth has a better fairplay index, so it's in 1st
place world cup docet

That theory doesn't hold. Arsenal would be dead last, if true.

Harsh. (But I like it!)

IIRC correctly, it was Chelsea FC that were actually bottom of
the 2025/26 Premier League fair play table... for some freak of
nature reason that had nothing to do with them being dirty and
physical at all.

;-)

Ammammata's theory is wrong anyway, it really is because their
official name is AFC Bournemouth...
--- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: rec.sport.soccer

In article <xn0psuhnh2rigzo000@post.eweka.nl>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:

anders t wrote:

Quoting Ammammata in rec.sport.soccer:

anders t formulated on Saturday :

Maybe they have an Arsenal hater updating this?

1 Bournemouth 0 0 0 0 0-0 0
2 Arsenal 0 0 0 0 0-0 0
3 Aston Villa 0 0 0 0 0-0 0

Bournemouth has a better fairplay index, so it's in 1st
place world cup docet

That theory doesn't hold. Arsenal would be dead last, if true.

Harsh. (But I like it!)

IIRC correctly, it was Chelsea FC that were actually bottom of
the 2025/26 Premier League fair play table... for some freak of
nature reason that had nothing to do with them being dirty and
physical at all.

;-)

Ammammata's theory is wrong anyway, it really is because their
official name is AFC Bournemouth...

Whatever!

I still say

Arseal will finish tops with Chelsea, Spurs, Brentfosrt and other London
teams on top

and the Botoom 5 will be Everton, Aston Villa, Man C, Man U and Liverpool.d
--
Member - Liberal International This is doctor@nk.ca Ici doctor@nk.ca
Yahweh, King & country!Never Satan President Republic!Beware AntiChrist rising! Look at Psalms 14 and 53 on Atheism ; 31 years in the ISP business!
--- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: rec.sport.soccer

The Doctor wrote:

I still say

Arseal will finish tops with Chelsea, Spurs, Brentford and
other London teams on top

As far as predictions go... I see that London-centric one as
being highly unlikely. But you'd get good odds at the bookies
so throw a fiver on it and see how you go...

and the Botoom 5 will be Everton, Aston Villa, Man C, Man U
and Liverpool.

Actually, that one is more unlikely... so not worth wasting any
money on!
--- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: rec.sport.soccer

On 25/07/2026 19:13, Ll|-o wrote:

On 25/07/2026 17:35, anders t wrote:

Maybe they have an Arsenal hater updating this?

-a-a-a 1 Bournemouth [SNIP]

Rayan's club at the top of the Premier League table? Looks appropriate
if you ask me.

Do Bournemouth supporters sing the "Oi, boa noite!" song?

Tchau!
Jesus Petry

--- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2