From Newsgroup: rec.sport.soccer


1 - 0 Norway min. 33.

I think the foul on Kane in the buildup was quite obvious.
--- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: rec.sport.soccer

FF wrote:

1 - 0 Norway min. 33.

I think the foul on Kane in the buildup was quite obvious.

QFs of course.

--- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: rec.sport.soccer

FF wrote:

FF wrote:

1 - 0 Norway min. 33.

I think the foul on Kane in the buildup was quite obvious.

QFs of course.

Beautiful goal by Bellingham, a personal action after a good cross from
the left from Gordon.

1 - 1 in minute 45 + 2.
--- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: rec.sport.soccer

FF wrote:

FF wrote:

FF wrote:

1 - 0 Norway min. 33.

I think the foul on Kane in the buildup was quite obvious.

QFs of course.

Beautiful goal by Bellingham, a personal action after a good cross
from the left from Gordon.

1 - 1 in minute 45 + 2.

Norway score again, and again after an obvious offensive foul by
Haaland. Fortunately this time the video ref steps in and the goal is cancelled.
--- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: rec.sport.soccer

FF wrote:

FF wrote:

FF wrote:

FF wrote:

1 - 0 Norway min. 33.

I think the foul on Kane in the buildup was quite obvious.

QFs of course.

Beautiful goal by Bellingham, a personal action after a good cross
from the left from Gordon.

1 - 1 in minute 45 + 2.

Norway score again, and again after an obvious offensive foul by
Haaland. Fortunately this time the video ref steps in and the goal is cancelled.

Min. 70 something, England lucky to escape this time, Norway hit the
crossbar after a corer. Pickford was beaten.
--- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: rec.sport.soccer

FF wrote:

FF wrote:

FF wrote:

FF wrote:

FF wrote:

1 - 0 Norway min. 33.

I think the foul on Kane in the buildup was quite obvious.

QFs of course.

Beautiful goal by Bellingham, a personal action after a good cross
from the left from Gordon.

1 - 1 in minute 45 + 2.

Norway score again, and again after an obvious offensive foul by
Haaland. Fortunately this time the video ref steps in and the goal
is cancelled.

Min. 70 something, England lucky to escape this time, Norway hit the
crossbar after a corer. Pickford was beaten.

1 - 1 FT, so we have extra-time.

In the last maybe 20 minutes Norway actually looked more dangerous when
they had the ball (but England had more of it). Both teams seemed
pretty tired at the end. Barring a Haaland shot or some brilliance from
Kane or Bellingham, PKs look rather likely.
--- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: rec.sport.soccer

FF wrote:

FF wrote:

FF wrote:

FF wrote:

FF wrote:

FF wrote:

1 - 0 Norway min. 33.

I think the foul on Kane in the buildup was quite obvious.

QFs of course.

Beautiful goal by Bellingham, a personal action after a good
cross from the left from Gordon.

1 - 1 in minute 45 + 2.

Norway score again, and again after an obvious offensive foul by
Haaland. Fortunately this time the video ref steps in and the goal
is cancelled.

Min. 70 something, England lucky to escape this time, Norway hit the crossbar after a corer. Pickford was beaten.

1 - 1 FT, so we have extra-time.

In the last maybe 20 minutes Norway actually looked more dangerous
when they had the ball (but England had more of it). Both teams seemed
pretty tired at the end. Barring a Haaland shot or some brilliance
from Kane or Bellingham, PKs look rather likely.

There should have been some 7 or 8 YCs but none was shown. They're
clearly not fashionable at this Cup.
--- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: rec.sport.soccer

FF wrote:

FF wrote:

FF wrote:

FF wrote:

FF wrote:

FF wrote:

FF wrote:

1 - 0 Norway min. 33.

I think the foul on Kane in the buildup was quite obvious.

QFs of course.

Beautiful goal by Bellingham, a personal action after a good
cross from the left from Gordon.

1 - 1 in minute 45 + 2.

Norway score again, and again after an obvious offensive foul by Haaland. Fortunately this time the video ref steps in and the
goal is cancelled.

Min. 70 something, England lucky to escape this time, Norway hit
the crossbar after a corer. Pickford was beaten.

1 - 1 FT, so we have extra-time.

In the last maybe 20 minutes Norway actually looked more dangerous
when they had the ball (but England had more of it). Both teams
seemed pretty tired at the end. Barring a Haaland shot or some
brilliance from Kane or Bellingham, PKs look rather likely.

There should have been some 7 or 8 YCs but none was shown. They're
clearly not fashionable at this Cup.

Min. 93, Bellingham strikes again, on a rebound. I don't think this
time the keeper was at fault, the first shot was very strong.

2 - 1 England. Now Norway have to go on the offensive.
--- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: rec.sport.soccer

FF wrote:

FF wrote:

FF wrote:

FF wrote:

FF wrote:

FF wrote:

FF wrote:

FF wrote:

1 - 0 Norway min. 33.

I think the foul on Kane in the buildup was quite
obvious.

QFs of course.

Beautiful goal by Bellingham, a personal action after a good
cross from the left from Gordon.

1 - 1 in minute 45 + 2.

Norway score again, and again after an obvious offensive foul
by Haaland. Fortunately this time the video ref steps in and
the goal is cancelled.

Min. 70 something, England lucky to escape this time, Norway hit
the crossbar after a corer. Pickford was beaten.

1 - 1 FT, so we have extra-time.

In the last maybe 20 minutes Norway actually looked more dangerous
when they had the ball (but England had more of it). Both teams
seemed pretty tired at the end. Barring a Haaland shot or some
brilliance from Kane or Bellingham, PKs look rather likely.

There should have been some 7 or 8 YCs but none was shown. They're
clearly not fashionable at this Cup.

Min. 93, Bellingham strikes again, on a rebound. I don't think this
time the keeper was at fault, the first shot was very strong.

2 - 1 England. Now Norway have to go on the offensive.

Min. 103, an english penalty is cancelled after VAR review. I strongly disagree. The english attacker protected the ball, which was his in the
first place, and the norwegian brought him down.
--- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: rec.sport.soccer

FF wrote:

FF wrote:

FF wrote:

FF wrote:

FF wrote:

FF wrote:

FF wrote:

FF wrote:

FF wrote:

1 - 0 Norway min. 33.

I think the foul on Kane in the buildup was quite
obvious.

QFs of course.

Beautiful goal by Bellingham, a personal action after a
good cross from the left from Gordon.

1 - 1 in minute 45 + 2.

Norway score again, and again after an obvious offensive
foul by Haaland. Fortunately this time the video ref steps
in and the goal is cancelled.

Min. 70 something, England lucky to escape this time, Norway
hit the crossbar after a corer. Pickford was beaten.

1 - 1 FT, so we have extra-time.

In the last maybe 20 minutes Norway actually looked more
dangerous when they had the ball (but England had more of it).
Both teams seemed pretty tired at the end. Barring a Haaland
shot or some brilliance from Kane or Bellingham, PKs look
rather likely.

There should have been some 7 or 8 YCs but none was shown. They're clearly not fashionable at this Cup.

Min. 93, Bellingham strikes again, on a rebound. I don't think this
time the keeper was at fault, the first shot was very strong.

2 - 1 England. Now Norway have to go on the offensive.

Min. 103, an english penalty is cancelled after VAR review. I strongly disagree. The english attacker protected the ball, which was his in
the first place, and the norwegian brought him down.

Looks like Haaland is subbed in the mini-break of ET. It wasn't his day
today, clearly, but without him Norway's chance looks even slimmer.
--- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: rec.sport.soccer

FF <...@yahoo.com> wrote:

FF wrote:

FF wrote:

1 - 0 Norway min. 33.

I think the foul on Kane in the buildup was quite obvious.

QFs of course.

Beautiful goal by Bellingham, a personal action after a good cross from
the left from Gordon.

This only happened because NylandrCys goal kick hit
the cable from which the skycam is suspended, and
the ball fell kindly for the English to break the other
direction.

No official on the field caught it, but a couple of
Norwegians plus their coach pointed it out immediately,
and VAR really really should have caught it. IsnrCOt there
a sensor in the ball for that exact sort of thing?

Ciao,
Werner

1 - 1 in minute 45 + 2.

--- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: rec.sport.soccer

FF wrote:

FF wrote:

FF wrote:

FF wrote:

FF wrote:

FF wrote:

FF wrote:

FF wrote:

FF wrote:

FF wrote:

1 - 0 Norway min. 33.

I think the foul on Kane in the buildup was quite
obvious.

QFs of course.

Beautiful goal by Bellingham, a personal action after a
good cross from the left from Gordon.

1 - 1 in minute 45 + 2.

Norway score again, and again after an obvious offensive
foul by Haaland. Fortunately this time the video ref steps
in and the goal is cancelled.

Min. 70 something, England lucky to escape this time, Norway
hit the crossbar after a corer. Pickford was beaten.

1 - 1 FT, so we have extra-time.

In the last maybe 20 minutes Norway actually looked more
dangerous when they had the ball (but England had more of it).
Both teams seemed pretty tired at the end. Barring a Haaland
shot or some brilliance from Kane or Bellingham, PKs look
rather likely.

There should have been some 7 or 8 YCs but none was shown.
They're clearly not fashionable at this Cup.

Min. 93, Bellingham strikes again, on a rebound. I don't think
this time the keeper was at fault, the first shot was very strong.

2 - 1 England. Now Norway have to go on the offensive.

Min. 103, an english penalty is cancelled after VAR review. I
strongly disagree. The english attacker protected the ball, which
was his in the first place, and the norwegian brought him down.

Looks like Haaland is subbed in the mini-break of ET. It wasn't his
day today, clearly, but without him Norway's chance looks even
slimmer.

Strange incident in min. 115, Pickford collides with one of his own
defenders and falls down injured, the ref stops the game. Ajer I think
protests vehemently and sees the yellow card. Honestly I think he's
right. There was no norwegian involved in the injury so why stop the
game ?
--- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: rec.sport.soccer

FF wrote:

FF wrote:

FF wrote:

FF wrote:

FF wrote:

FF wrote:

FF wrote:

FF wrote:

FF wrote:

FF wrote:

FF wrote:

1 - 0 Norway min. 33.

I think the foul on Kane in the buildup was quite obvious.

QFs of course.

Beautiful goal by Bellingham, a personal action after
a good cross from the left from Gordon.

1 - 1 in minute 45 + 2.

Norway score again, and again after an obvious offensive
foul by Haaland. Fortunately this time the video ref
steps in and the goal is cancelled.

Min. 70 something, England lucky to escape this time,
Norway hit the crossbar after a corer. Pickford was
beaten.

1 - 1 FT, so we have extra-time.

In the last maybe 20 minutes Norway actually looked more
dangerous when they had the ball (but England had more of
it). Both teams seemed pretty tired at the end. Barring a
Haaland shot or some brilliance from Kane or Bellingham,
PKs look rather likely.

There should have been some 7 or 8 YCs but none was shown.
They're clearly not fashionable at this Cup.

Min. 93, Bellingham strikes again, on a rebound. I don't think
this time the keeper was at fault, the first shot was very
strong.

2 - 1 England. Now Norway have to go on the offensive.

Min. 103, an english penalty is cancelled after VAR review. I
strongly disagree. The english attacker protected the ball, which
was his in the first place, and the norwegian brought him down.

Looks like Haaland is subbed in the mini-break of ET. It wasn't his
day today, clearly, but without him Norway's chance looks even
slimmer.

Strange incident in min. 115, Pickford collides with one of his own
defenders and falls down injured, the ref stops the game. Ajer I think protests vehemently and sees the yellow card. Honestly I think he's
right. There was no norwegian involved in the injury so why stop the
game ?

2 - 1 final score, England are in the semis.

A game full of strange incidents and ref errors, including, IMO, by the
VAR. In the end the result looks more or less deserved, fortunately it
didn't seem to wrongfully change the winner.
--- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: rec.sport.soccer

Werner Pichler wrote:

FF <...@yahoo.com> wrote:

FF wrote:

FF wrote:

1 - 0 Norway min. 33.

I think the foul on Kane in the buildup was quite obvious.

QFs of course.

Beautiful goal by Bellingham, a personal action after a good cross
from the left from Gordon.

This only happened because NylandrCys goal kick hit
the cable from which the skycam is suspended, and
the ball fell kindly for the English to break the other
direction.

No official on the field caught it, but a couple of
Norwegians plus their coach pointed it out immediately,
and VAR really really should have caught it. IsnrCOt there
a sensor in the ball for that exact sort of thing?

Ciao,
Werner

1 - 1 in minute 45 + 2.

Another strange incident. They probably have no rule against it, and of
course it shouldn't be possible in the first place.
Even so, Norway were still favored by the officiating IMO.
--- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: rec.sport.soccer

I thought England would progress but didn't expect Norway to get quite
so much of the play (in the 90 minutes, not so much extra time). There
were times where you could have been forgiven for thinking Brazil had
won the Met Life round of 16 match and decided to turn up in Norway shirts.

Felt like Norway deserved more from the game in the first 90 minutes but England have a bit of a knack for getting jammy in these sort of situations.



RM
--- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: rec.sport.soccer

FF wrote:

Werner Pichler wrote:

FF <...@yahoo.com> wrote:

FF wrote:

FF wrote:

1 - 0 Norway min. 33.

I think the foul on Kane in the buildup was quite obvious.

QFs of course.

Beautiful goal by Bellingham, a personal action after a good cross
from the left from Gordon.

This only happened because NylandrCys goal kick hit
the cable from which the skycam is suspended, and
the ball fell kindly for the English to break the other
direction.

No official on the field caught it, but a couple of
Norwegians plus their coach pointed it out immediately,
and VAR really really should have caught it. IsnrCOt there
a sensor in the ball for that exact sort of thing?

Ciao,
Werner

1 - 1 in minute 45 + 2.

Another strange incident. They probably have no rule against it, and
of course it shouldn't be possible in the first place.
Even so, Norway were still favored by the officiating IMO.

I don't know for sure, they'll probably explain it at some point, but
it's possible that this has to be ignored because it happens so rarely.
It's rather similar to when the ball hits a corner flag, it's part of
the game. So this wouldn't be an error actually.
--- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: rec.sport.soccer

"FF" <...@yahoo.com> writes:

It's rather similar to when the ball hits a corner flag, it's part of
the game. So this wouldn't be an error actually.

The corner flag is required, the camera cable is not.

Probably a dropped ball at the point of impact vertical projection into
the field.

-- HASM
--- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: rec.sport.soccer


Werner Pichler wrote:

FF <...@yahoo.com> wrote:

Beautiful goal by Bellingham, a personal action after a good
cross from the left from Gordon.

This only happened because NylandrCys goal kick hit
the cable from which the skycam is suspended, and
the ball fell kindly for the English to break the other
direction.

No official on the field caught it, but a couple of
Norwegians plus their coach pointed it out immediately,
and VAR really really should have caught it. IsnrCOt there
a sensor in the ball for that exact sort of thing?

There is and it didn't register a touch, (FIFA released the
Snicko soundwave) so therefore it's just the Norwegians
clutching at straws. Every goal in this tournament has to be
challenged over something doesn't it? No team can lose
gracefully any more it seems... either the ref did this, or the
ref didn't do that, or VAR didn't pick something up, or did...
but got it wrong.

<rolls eyes>
--- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: rec.sport.soccer

Quoting Blueshirt in rec.sport.soccer:

There is and it didn't register a touch, (FIFA released the
Snicko soundwave) so therefore it's just the Norwegians
clutching at straws.

That tech doesn't work that high up. Norway wuz rob'd.
--
Manchester United FC - CHAMPIONS
Latest: England '13 (20th) Europa '17, UEFA '08, World '08
--- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: rec.sport.soccer

HASM wrote:

"FF" <...@yahoo.com> writes:

It's rather similar to when the ball hits a corner flag, it's part
of the game. So this wouldn't be an error actually.

The corner flag is required, the camera cable is not.

Probably a dropped ball at the point of impact vertical projection
into the field.

-- HASM

It is required, for a good transmission. We have to think at the
viewers at home because they are paying the big money.

OK, they say in this case it didn't happen. Did they also say what must
be done when it does happen ?
--- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: rec.sport.soccer

FF wrote:

HASM wrote:

"FF" <...@yahoo.com> writes:

It's rather similar to when the ball hits a corner flag,
it's part of the game. So this wouldn't be an error
actually.

The corner flag is required, the camera cable is not.

Probably a dropped ball at the point of impact vertical
projection into the field.

It is required, for a good transmission. We have to think at
the viewers at home because they are paying the big money.

OK, they say in this case it didn't happen. Did they also say
what must be done when it does happen ?

I don't know, but I would also think, as HASM said, that the
referee would re-start the game with a drop ball similar to when
a referee gets in the way of a pass in the middle of the field.

I'd be more concerned if it did happen why the sensor in the
ball didn't pick up the contact with the cable when it picked up
the ball brushing the hair of a Croatian player a week ago!

--- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: rec.sport.soccer

anders t wrote:

Quoting Blueshirt in rec.sport.soccer:

There is and it didn't register a touch, (FIFA released
the Snicko soundwave) so therefore it's just the Norwegians
clutching at straws.

That tech doesn't work that high up.

Norway wuz rob'd.

I'd feel more sorry for them if they'd actually created some
more chances for the big fella... he was like a man standing
around waiting for a bus most of the game. What Sorloth was
thinking on that wasted attack I don't know...

In fact the best pass Haaland nearly got was from John Stones!
--- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: rec.sport.soccer

Blueshirt wrote:

I'd be more concerned if it did happen why the sensor in the
ball didn't pick up the contact with the cable when it picked up
the ball brushing the hair of a Croatian player a week ago!

For the time being the most likely explanation is that it actually
didn't happen. (Or maybe the tech just malfunctioned, this happens too.)
--- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2