• Starlink report

    From sticks@wolverine01@charter.net to rec.outdoors.rv-travel on Sun Jun 28 15:48:11 2026
    From Newsgroup: rec.outdoors.rv-travel

    I thought I had promised a report if I used it last week, but I can't
    find that post, so I'll start a new one.

    I did have cell service that was fair and would have worked, but I
    figured I'd fire up the Starlink and see how it did. I didn't have a
    great clear sky. Basically from the back of the trailer I had good
    pointing north, which is the most important, but everything behind there
    was under the trees. Still, it told me I had obstructions, but it
    shouldn't affect my usage very much.

    Again I ran into the issue where I had smashed that stink bug in the one Ethernet connection. At first I thought it was trees and not good
    enough coverage, but checking the logs kept saying it was disconnecting
    from the router. I did tilt it a little out of what they call proper alignment to give it more northern sky. Eventually, I took it down from
    the pole and saw it was just a little gummed looking on one or two of
    the connection copper contacts on the panel, so I scraped them the best
    I could and put it back up. It immediately started working and I knew I
    had found the problem. I never did change the tilt back and it didn't complain, so I don't know if it would have done better if I changed that.

    Speeds were not great, but since I only had 1/2 a clear sky I figured it
    was OK considering. It did work much better than my cell service. I
    did a speed test up there and it came in at about 30 Mbps. Much lower
    than I've had before.

    For reference, at home I just installed a new router. Before the swap
    we were down to 50Mbps on our cable internet. The new router gets us up
    to 575Mbps and is a dramatic improvement. So once home, I set up the
    Starlink here in clear sky. 255Mbps download, and 32Mbps upload. Those upload speeds are faster than I get with cable for some reason.

    Data usage. The $55 100 GB plan should be just fine for me. I used it
    for three days and did a couple speed tests, and then when I got home
    did several more as well as hooking up my garage desktop. I only use a
    little under 5 GB and had 95 GB left. Plus, I thought they would charge
    me $55, but they evidently pro-rate the usage and it only ended up
    costing me $20. That surprised me. So now that I'm done for the month,
    I'll go back and put it back into pause mode.
    --
    Science DoesnrCOt Support Darwin. Scientists Do

    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From bfh@redydog@rye.net to rec.outdoors.rv-travel on Sun Jun 28 22:26:07 2026
    From Newsgroup: rec.outdoors.rv-travel

    sticks wrote:
    I thought I had promised a report if I used it last week, but I can't
    find that post, so I'll start a new one.

    I did have cell service that was fair and would have worked, but I
    figured I'd fire up the Starlink and see how it did.-a I didn't have a
    great clear sky.-a Basically from the back of the trailer I had good pointing north, which is the most important, but everything behind
    there was under the trees.-a Still, it told me I had obstructions, but
    it shouldn't affect my usage very much.

    Again I ran into the issue where I had smashed that stink bug in the
    one Ethernet connection.-a At first I thought it was trees and not good enough coverage, but checking the logs kept saying it was
    disconnecting from the router.-a I did tilt it a little out of what
    they call proper alignment to give it more northern sky.-a Eventually,
    I took it down from the pole and saw it was just a little gummed
    looking on one or two of the connection copper contacts on the panel,
    so I scraped them the best I could and put it back up.-a It immediately started working and I knew I had found the problem.-a I never did
    change the tilt back and it didn't complain, so I don't know if it
    would have done better if I changed that.

    Speeds were not great, but since I only had 1/2 a clear sky I figured
    it was OK considering.-a It did work much better than my cell service.
    I did a speed test up there and it came in at about 30 Mbps.-a Much
    lower than I've had before.

    For reference, at home I just installed a new router.-a Before the swap
    we were down to 50Mbps on our cable internet.-a The new router gets us
    up to 575Mbps and is a dramatic improvement.-a So once home, I set up
    the Starlink here in clear sky.-a 255Mbps download, and 32Mbps upload. Those upload speeds are faster than I get with cable for some reason.

    Data usage.-a The $55 100 GB plan should be just fine for me.-a I used
    it for three days and did a couple speed tests, and then when I got
    home did several more as well as hooking up my garage desktop.-a I only
    use a little under 5 GB and had 95 GB left.-a Plus, I thought they
    would charge me $55, but they evidently pro-rate the usage and it only
    ended up costing me $20.-a That surprised me.-a So now that I'm done for
    the month, I'll go back and put it back into pause mode.

    When you fire it up again, you might to experiment a little and see
    how true this is:

    --------------------------------------------------------------------
    Me: since there are so many sats up now, why does the starlink antenna
    need to point north

    AI: That's a good question. The short answer is: it's not because all
    the satellites are north of you. It's because of how Starlink manages interference and coverage.

    Here's why:

    The satellites are constantly moving across the sky. A Starlink dish
    ("Dishy") doesn't lock onto one satellite. It tracks whichever
    satellites are best at the moment and hands off from one to another automatically.
    In the continental U.S., the dish is generally aimed north to avoid transmitting toward the crowded belt of Geostationary orbit over the
    equator, which appears due south from your location. Many
    communications satellites occupy that region. Pointing north helps
    Starlink avoid causing interference with them.
    The antenna isn't fixed to one direction. Although the dish may be
    physically tilted north, its phased-array antenna electronically
    steers its beam over a wide portion of the sky. It can communicate
    with satellites passing overhead without mechanically moving very much.
    The direction depends on where you are.
    In most of the continental U.S., it tilts north.
    In parts of the Southern Hemisphere, it often tilts south.
    Near the poles, the orientation can be different.
    Some newer Starlink models have no motors and simply lie flat after installation, steering the beam electronically.

    As Starlink continues launching satellites, the preferred pointing
    direction may become less critical in some areas, but avoiding
    interference with geostationary satellites is still an important
    design consideration.

    So even with thousands of Starlink satellites in orbit, the dish
    points north primarily to protect the geostationary satellite belt to
    the southrConot because that's where the Starlink satellites are --------------------------------------------------------------------------
    --
    bill
    Theory don't mean squat if it don't work.
    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2