From Newsgroup: rec.gambling.lottery
ES Nigel wrote:
NN wrote:
On 29/06/2026 18:17, Marmaduke Jinks wrote:
On 29/06/2026 16:12, ES Nigel wrote:
NN wrote:
[14, 20, 36, 43]
[11, 23, 39, 8]
My experimental system coughed up six numbers again and I nearly
missed it.
[34, 30, 01, 45, 08, 07]
These numbers are only valid for the first round.
Jinks Picks
[1 6 7 21 26 27 31 36 37 51 56 57]
Enormous luck everyone :-)
MJ
Result = 13 33 35 40 43 54 (56)
NN:
= [43]
= []
Nigel:
= []
MJ:
= []
Result = 05 08 26 33 39 42 (54)
NN:
= [8 39]
= []
Nigel:
= [8]
MJ:
= [26]
Richard Lloyd's Merseyworld site has the numbers in drawn order as
3185 Wed 1 Jul 2026 33 40 35 43 54 13 (56) 2,000,000 0 Lotto
6 3
3185 Wed 1 Jul 2026 08 33 26 39 42 05 (54) 2,000,000 0 Lotto
4 4
However the Allwyn draw video shows the drawn order for Round 2 to be:
33 42 05 08 26 39 (54)
Is Allwyn telling porkies down the telephone?
Richard Lloyd's site has the numbers for Wednesday's Round 2 in a
different order to the video again.
I have a system that depends on having numbers from previous draws in
drawn order. It doesn't work the way I expected it to - it ought to be
just an overcomplicated random number generator but it seems to generate mostly high numbers and I haven't yet been able to work out why.
It tries to work out (crudely) the most likely ball for each position.
That means there can be collisions. For example, for yesterday's Round 1
draw (I ignore the Round 2 draws), it predicted 46 to be the 2nd and 6th balls.
Now that Allwyn have stopped publishing the numbers in drawn order on
their website and they're telling lies on the telephone, the draw video
is the only resource left.
--- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2