From Newsgroup: rec.gambling.lottery
On 28/06/2026 10:11, NN wrote:
On 26/06/2026 3:38 pm, Marmaduke Jinks wrote:
On 25/06/2026 22:07, NN wrote:
[4, 35, 14, 40]
[48, 55, 4, 34]
Jinks Picks
[10 11 15 17 19]
[20 21 25 27 29]
Good luck NN :-)
MJ
result = 22 34 41 43 54 56 (24)
NN:
-a-a = []
-a-a = [34]
MJ:
-a-a = []
-a-a = []
result = 12 18 40 43 44 45 (29)
NN:
-a-a = [40]
-a-a = []
MJ:
-a-a = [12]
-a-a = []
Mixed bag.
I didnt realise the jackpots werent equal. Not that it changes anything. Still hard to win
They wrote to me on Twitter that if someone had won the Jackpot in the
first draw and then another had won the Jackpot in the other draw those
two would have split the -u9m.
Although I'm fine that someone won the jackpot I'd still like to see the trickle down effect on the lower prizes, if no one wins the Jackpot(s).
As it stood you only got -u10 for a Match3. Which is tough.
MJ
--
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. www.avast.com
--- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2