[19, 10, 13, 6]
[45, 37, 15, 33]
NN wrote:
[19, 10, 13, 6]
[45, 37, 15, 33]
Sadly, my new system chose this moment to cough up six numbers.
I guess they only apply to the first draw.
52,18,57,12,50,47
Good luck to everyone except Allwyn
On 08/06/2026 22:36, ES Nigel wrote:
NN wrote:I've got a new system too.
[19, 10, 13, 6]
[45, 37, 15, 33]
Sadly, my new system chose this moment to cough up six numbers.
I guess they only apply to the first draw.
52,18,57,12,50,47
Good luck to everyone except Allwyn
I looked at 6 indicators (from the results of the 6/59 game)
- whether a line had a number divisible in its entirety by 3
- whether a range (highest no. minus lowest) was less than 52
- whether a range was greater than 35
- whether the sum was greater than 149
- whether the sum was less than 215
- also that line had a number divisible in its entirety by 5
So (in shadow) it looks like it might produce a profit on separate sets
of 376 and 297, which were chosen on different ideas.-a One idea was
setting Covermaster to pick the lowest set for a Match3 (131, 132 & then
133 lines).-a Doubtful I shall be splashing out in the short term.
But Jinks Picks for Weds
[51 53 54 57 59]
Enormous luck everyone :-)
Allwyn continue to screw up the 6/59 game.
MJ
On 09/06/2026 13:09, Marmaduke Jinks wrote:
On 08/06/2026 22:36, ES Nigel wrote:
NN wrote:I've got a new system too.
[19, 10, 13, 6]
[45, 37, 15, 33]
Sadly, my new system chose this moment to cough up six numbers.
I guess they only apply to the first draw.
52,18,57,12,50,47
Good luck to everyone except Allwyn
I looked at 6 indicators (from the results of the 6/59 game)
- whether a line had a number divisible in its entirety by 3
- whether a range (highest no. minus lowest) was less than 52
- whether a range was greater than 35
- whether the sum was greater than 149
- whether the sum was less than 215
- also that line had a number divisible in its entirety by 5
So (in shadow) it looks like it might produce a profit on separate
sets of 376 and 297, which were chosen on different ideas.-a One idea
was setting Covermaster to pick the lowest set for a Match3 (131, 132
& then 133 lines).-a Doubtful I shall be splashing out in the short term.
But Jinks Picks for Weds
[51 53 54 57 59]
Enormous luck everyone :-)
Allwyn continue to screw up the 6/59 game.
MJ
result = 01 12 25 29 40 41 (16)
-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a 02 05 12 42 47 41 (51)
NN:
-a-a-a-a-a-a = []
-a-a-a-a-a-a = []
Nigel:
-a-a-a-a-a-a = [12]
-a-a-a-a-a-a = [12 47]
MJ:
-a-a-a-a-a-a = []
well done Nigel
On 11/06/2026 15:16, NN wrote:
On 09/06/2026 13:09, Marmaduke Jinks wrote:
On 08/06/2026 22:36, ES Nigel wrote:
NN wrote:I've got a new system too.
[19, 10, 13, 6]
[45, 37, 15, 33]
Sadly, my new system chose this moment to cough up six numbers.
I guess they only apply to the first draw.
52,18,57,12,50,47
Good luck to everyone except Allwyn
I looked at 6 indicators (from the results of the 6/59 game)
- whether a line had a number divisible in its entirety by 3
- whether a range (highest no. minus lowest) was less than 52
- whether a range was greater than 35
- whether the sum was greater than 149
- whether the sum was less than 215
- also that line had a number divisible in its entirety by 5
So (in shadow) it looks like it might produce a profit on separate
sets of 376 and 297, which were chosen on different ideas. One idea
was setting Covermaster to pick the lowest set for a Match3 (131, 132
& then 133 lines). Doubtful I shall be splashing out in the short term. >>>
But Jinks Picks for Weds
[51 53 54 57 59]
Enormous luck everyone :-)
Allwyn continue to screw up the 6/59 game.
MJ
result = 01 12 25 29 40 41 (16)
02 05 12 42 47 41 (51)
NN:
= []
= []
Nigel:
= [12]
= [12 47]
MJ:
= []
well done Nigel
Yes, well done Nigel :-)
MJ
| Sysop: | Amessyroom |
|---|---|
| Location: | Fayetteville, NC |
| Users: | 70 |
| Nodes: | 6 (0 / 6) |
| Uptime: | 37:56:47 |
| Calls: | 948 |
| Calls today: | 2 |
| Files: | 1,325 |
| Messages: | 280,561 |