From Newsgroup: rec.gambling.lottery

While my contributions to Lotto predictions are episodic at best, one of
my systems reckons 38 is worth a mention.

Jinx, jinx, jinx!


--- Synchronet 3.21f-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: rec.gambling.lottery

On 21/03/2026 3:58 pm, ES Nigel wrote:

While my contributions to Lotto predictions are episodic at best, one of
my systems reckons 38 is worth a mention.

Jinx, jinx, jinx!

[13, 23, 33, 54]
[10, 24, 35, 50]

I am going with these but these are not the choices I would have picked.

--- Synchronet 3.21f-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: rec.gambling.lottery

On 21/03/2026 6:53 pm, NN wrote:

On 21/03/2026 3:58 pm, ES Nigel wrote:

While my contributions to Lotto predictions are episodic at best, one
of my systems reckons 38 is worth a mention.

Jinx, jinx, jinx!

[13, 23, 33, 54]
[10, 24, 35, 50]

I am going with these but these are not the choices I would have picked.

Result=[05 10 18 28 34 53 (46)]

Nigel: = []

NN: = []
= []
--- Synchronet 3.21f-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: rec.gambling.lottery

NN wrote:

On 21/03/2026 6:53 pm, NN wrote:

On 21/03/2026 3:58 pm, ES Nigel wrote:

While my contributions to Lotto predictions are episodic at best, one
of my systems reckons 38 is worth a mention.

Jinx, jinx, jinx!

[13, 23, 33, 54]
[10, 24, 35, 50]

I am going with these but these are not the choices I would have picked.

Result=[05 10 18 28 34 53 (46)]

Nigel: = []

NN: = []
= []

Oops.

38 was the first ball out - for Thunderball :-(

--- Synchronet 3.21f-Linux NewsLink 1.2