• Ingredient lists on labels on blends and tins

    From mandy george@georgemandy39@gmail.com to rec.food.drink.tea on Sat Apr 18 12:44:28 2015
    From Newsgroup: rec.food.drink.tea

    Generally, I avoid teas in tins -- Downton Abbey English Breakfast, Royal This and That stuff. and all the British sounding blends of assam, ceylon, kenya, etc.
    My main problem is that there is so often a conflict between what the label implies and what the ingredients are listed as. You get all the stuff about it being specially selected from some local garden in China but then the ingredients show just :Green tea" or "A blend of black teas."
    Any expert out there on what the labels actual mean -- if a "darjeeling" shows the ingredients are just "Black tea" how much Darjeeling does it actually have in it? Harrod's pushes a High Alishan Taiwan Oolong as Oolong Green tea" and the ingredients don;t specify country of origin or type.
    Is this a con game?
    thanks
    M
    --- Synchronet 3.21d-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From mandy george@georgemandy39@gmail.com to rec.food.drink.tea on Mon Apr 20 12:07:48 2015
    From Newsgroup: rec.food.drink.tea

    On Saturday, April 18, 2015 at 3:44:29 PM UTC-4, mandy george wrote:
    Generally, I avoid teas in tins -- Downton Abbey English Breakfast, Royal This and That stuff. and all the British sounding blends of assam, ceylon, kenya, etc.

    My main problem is that there is so often a conflict between what the label implies and what the ingredients are listed as. You get all the stuff about it being specially selected from some local garden in China but then the ingredients show just :Green tea" or "A blend of black teas."

    Any expert out there on what the labels actual mean -- if a "darjeeling" shows the ingredients are just "Black tea" how much Darjeeling does it actually have in it? Harrod's pushes a High Alishan Taiwan Oolong as Oolong Green tea" and the ingredients don;t specify country of origin or type.

    Is this a con game?

    thanks
    M
    Thanks (I think)
    I'm lost... I checked a few boxes and there seems a disconnect between the descriptions and ingredient list. Examples
    Twinings Pure Oloong tea
    Ad: "ancient blend of carefully selected black teas"
    Ingredients "oolong tea"
    Harney Black Tea Paris
    Ad: "Fruity black tea" plus flavorings
    Ingredients: "Chinese black tea"
    Lively Tea Organic English Breakfast
    Ad: Organic EB tea
    Ing: "black tea"
    Taylor afternoon Darjeeling "highest tea gardens in foothill so of Himalayas" Ingredients "Darjeeling tea.
    Wrapper ""Tea produce of more than one country."

    What is all this about? It looks to me as if the label tells me nothing about the actual tea. What is Taylor up to? When I see something I may want to buy, how can I tell what I will be getting?
    --- Synchronet 3.21d-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Oregonian Haruspex@bob_davis_retired@yahoo.com to rec.food.drink.tea on Thu Apr 23 12:14:17 2015
    From Newsgroup: rec.food.drink.tea

    On 2015-04-18 19:44:28 +0000, mandy george said:

    Generally, I avoid teas in tins -- Downton Abbey English Breakfast,
    Royal This and That stuff. and all the British sounding blends of
    assam, ceylon, kenya, etc.

    My main problem is that there is so often a conflict between what the
    label implies and what the ingredients are listed as. You get all the
    stuff about it being specially selected from some local garden in China
    but then the ingredients show just :Green tea" or "A blend of black
    teas."
    Any expert out there on what the labels actual mean -- if a
    "darjeeling" shows the ingredients are just "Black tea" how much
    Darjeeling does it actually have in it? Harrod's pushes a High Alishan Taiwan Oolong as Oolong Green tea" and the ingredients don;t specify
    country of origin or type.
    Is this a con game?

    thanks
    M

    I avoid blended teas specifically for this reason. However, I do enjoy regular old Lipton, as well as PG Tips, both in the loose boxes. Both
    are respectable for an inexpensive black tea, with a consistent flavor
    box to box. The Lipton is qctually a fine enough tea to stand on its
    own even against fancier blacks - it has a very very light smoky touch
    and it's just delightful. PG Tips seems to have more of a malty Assam character.

    Oddly enough, both kinds of tea are quite insipid when bagged!

    --- Synchronet 3.21d-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From kludge@kludge@panix.com (Scott Dorsey) to rec.food.drink.tea on Wed Apr 29 11:49:19 2015
    From Newsgroup: rec.food.drink.tea

    Oregonian Haruspex <bob_davis_retired@yahoo.com> wrote:

    I avoid blended teas specifically for this reason. However, I do enjoy >regular old Lipton, as well as PG Tips, both in the loose boxes. Both
    are respectable for an inexpensive black tea, with a consistent flavor
    box to box. The Lipton is qctually a fine enough tea to stand on its
    own even against fancier blacks - it has a very very light smoky touch
    and it's just delightful. PG Tips seems to have more of a malty Assam >character.
    Oddly enough, both kinds of tea are quite insipid when bagged!

    Lipton yellow label and red label are two totally different blends with no
    real connection to one another. Very strange.

    PG Tips I don't know about, I have only seen the ctc granules...
    --scott
    --
    "C'est un Nagra. C'est suisse, et tres, tres precis."
    --- Synchronet 3.21d-Linux NewsLink 1.2