• Re: New breadmaker needed

    From Peter Flynn@peter@silmaril.ie to rec.food.baking on Sun Apr 28 00:34:37 2019
    From Newsgroup: rec.food.baking

    On 27/03/2019 13:47, Peter Flynn wrote:
    [...]
    Nothing out there seems to proclaim itself as the successor to the
    SD253, so I'm in the market for something useful. The only must-haves are:

    Thank you for various bits of help. I've narrowed it down to two:

    Lakeland BreadMaker Plus, which is big and boxy but comes with a stand
    for smaller baking trays, and a customisable program, which I would find useful. Mixed reviews comparing it to the Panasonic 251/2/3 though. https://www.lakeland.co.uk/17892

    Panasonic SD-2501 WXC, which is the closest direct successor I found,
    but weirdly rotated 90-# so the control panel is on the end not the side.
    Main USP is the gluten-free program, but I don't have a requirement for
    this.
    https://www.lakeland.co.uk/15352

    P
    --- Synchronet 3.21d-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Peter Flynn@peter@silmaril.ie to rec.food.baking on Thu Sep 26 14:01:13 2019
    From Newsgroup: rec.food.baking

    On 28/04/2019 00:34, Peter Flynn wrote:
    Lakeland BreadMaker Plus, which is big and boxy but comes with a
    stand for smaller baking trays, and a customisable program, which I
    would find useful. Mixed reviews comparing it to the Panasonic
    251/2/3 though. https://www.lakeland.co.uk/17892

    I took the leap and bought this the other day. Haven't used it yet, just
    done their prep work of washing the tin and putting it into a 10-min
    bake cycle, presumably to burn off dust and stuff.

    First impressions:

    Upsides: Nicely made, clear screen, good instruction book, detachable
    digital scales, more compact than my old Panasonic (I was wrong about
    'big and boxy'), well laid out and easy to use.

    Downsides: no on/off switch rCo you have to unplug or use a switched wall-socket. Both are impractical for me, as the wall-socket is behind
    the machine. The tin is flimsier than the Panasonic's, being made from
    pressed steel instead of what looks like die-cast. Both are foolish, amateurish cost-cutters: I would happily have paid another re410 or so.

    Major diff: the instructions say to load the tin with the salt and
    liquid FIRST, THEN flour and sugar and fat, and FINALLY the yeast (on
    top), to prevent the yeast contacting the liquid or salt prematurely.
    The Panasonic rCo for identical reasons rCo said yeast FIRST, then flour and sugar and fat and salt, and FINALLY the liquid on top (the flour forming
    a blocking layer). I'll try both: the Panasonic method always worked.

    A review in _Which?_ magazine said the delayed-action (overnight)
    wholewheat loaf was disappointing. I emailed Lakeland about this and
    they said they don't recommend doing wholewheat overnight anyway. But
    the Panasonic did it fine, so I'll experiment.

    It also apparently makes jam.

    Peter
    --- Synchronet 3.21d-Linux NewsLink 1.2