• This is cheating? Why?

    From AMuzi@am@yellowjersey.org to rec.bicycles.tech on Wed Jul 15 08:52:32 2026
    From Newsgroup: rec.bicycles.tech

    Being distracted during a race is an advantage?

    https://nypost.com/2026/07/14/tech/tour-de-france-cyclist-willie-smit-disqualified-over-ai-glasses/
    --
    Andrew Muzi
    am@yellowjersey.org
    Open every day since 1 April, 1971

    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Rolf Mantel@news@hartig-mantel.de to rec.bicycles.tech on Wed Jul 15 16:58:40 2026
    From Newsgroup: rec.bicycles.tech

    Am 15.07.2026 um 15:52 schrieb AMuzi:
    Being distracted during a race is an advantage?

    https://nypost.com/2026/07/14/tech/tour-de-france-cyclist-willie-smit- disqualified-over-ai-glasses/

    If the glasses open an illegal communication channel, they are rightly classified as giving an unfair advantage.

    But this is not the reason:
    Distraction 'by operating a rider-held camera' clearly is a safety
    hazard. One could argue that the rule should only apply to 'hand-held'
    or 'rider-manipulated' cameras as the glasses don't rely on active rider
    input but that is a slippery slope. In the next race a rider is told to
    look at certain billboards during the race to generate additional
    advertizing income (this is obviously not possible for a bicycle-mounted camera).

    Rolf
    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From zen cycle@funkmasterxx@hotmail.com to rec.bicycles.tech on Thu Jul 16 07:01:43 2026
    From Newsgroup: rec.bicycles.tech

    On 7/15/2026 10:58 AM, Rolf Mantel wrote:
    Am 15.07.2026 um 15:52 schrieb AMuzi:
    Being distracted during a race is an advantage?

    https://nypost.com/2026/07/14/tech/tour-de-france-cyclist-willie-smit-
    disqualified-over-ai-glasses/

    If the glasses open an illegal communication channel, they are rightly classified as giving an unfair advantage.

    But this is not the reason:
    Distraction 'by operating a rider-held camera' clearly is a safety
    hazard.-a One could argue that the rule should only apply to 'hand-held'
    or 'rider-manipulated' cameras as the glasses don't rely on active rider input but that is a slippery slope.-a In the next race a rider is told to look at certain billboards during the race to generate additional advertizing income (this is obviously not possible for a bicycle-mounted camera).

    Rolf
    +1,
    This is why the UCI is limiting the size of computer screens in road
    racing and does not allow bar mounted electronics in track racing - the distraction is simply too dangerous.
    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From =?UTF-8?B?Y3ljbGludG9t?=@cyclintom@yahoo.com to rec.bicycles.tech on Fri Jul 17 15:52:33 2026
    From Newsgroup: rec.bicycles.tech

    On Wed Jul 15 16:58:40 2026 Rolf Mantel wrote:
    Am 15.07.2026 um 15:52 schrieb AMuzi:
    Being distracted during a race is an advantage?

    https://nypost.com/2026/07/14/tech/tour-de-france-cyclist-willie-smit- disqualified-over-ai-glasses/

    If the glasses open an illegal communication channel, they are rightly classified as giving an unfair advantage.

    But this is not the reason:
    Distraction 'by operating a rider-held camera' clearly is a safety
    hazard. One could argue that the rule should only apply to 'hand-held'
    or 'rider-manipulated' cameras as the glasses don't rely on active rider input but that is a slippery slope. In the next race a rider is told to
    look at certain billboards during the race to generate additional
    advertizing income (this is obviously not possible for a bicycle-mounted camera).
    Considering your throry, it makes sense to ban any directed cameras.
    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2