• Who Are the owners of rec.aviation.soaring? What's next?

    From SF@211fletcher@bellsouth.net to rec.aviation.soaring on Tue Jan 16 10:48:52 2024
    From Newsgroup: rec.aviation.soaring

    Rec.aviation.Soaring's days are numbered
    I think this has been a valuable resource for the gliding community.
    It just seems like a good idea to move this type of resource to another platform while we can tell the current users what the new platform is going to be. A Workspace Google Group would work, and administrative authority could be used to kick out the spammers. Ownership shouldn't be one guy. run it through the SSA with a volunteer(s) serving as administrator? Similar to the contest rules Committee. Or an outreach mission for one of the larger gliding clubs?
    SF
    Notice from Google:
    Effective February 22, 2024, Google Groups will no longer support new Usenet content. Posting and subscribing will be disallowed, and new content from Usenet peers will not appear. Viewing and searching of historical data will still be supported as it is done today.
    --- Synchronet 3.21d-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From youngbl...@gmail.com@youngblood8116@gmail.com to rec.aviation.soaring on Tue Jan 16 12:26:53 2024
    From Newsgroup: rec.aviation.soaring

    On Tuesday, January 16, 2024 at 1:48:54rC>PM UTC-5, SF wrote:
    Rec.aviation.Soaring's days are numbered
    I think this has been a valuable resource for the gliding community.

    It just seems like a good idea to move this type of resource to another platform while we can tell the current users what the new platform is going to be. A Workspace Google Group would work, and administrative authority could be used to kick out the spammers. Ownership shouldn't be one guy. run it through the SSA with a volunteer(s) serving as administrator? Similar to the contest rules Committee. Or an outreach mission for one of the larger gliding clubs?

    SF

    Notice from Google:
    Effective February 22, 2024, Google Groups will no longer support new Usenet content. Posting and subscribing will be disallowed, and new content from Usenet peers will not appear. Viewing and searching of historical data will still be supported as it is done today.
    SF, glad that you have identified some of the problems with RAS Prime and the old RAS as we knew it. There are several problems with going to a Google based forum, one being security and the other the moderator format. As for myself I look at a moderator as kind of a Hitler figure being surrounded by his beloved brown coats. As you just mentioned no one person needs to make sure all his minions conform to his SOP. As I mentioned earlier there will be a new forum coming soon, just cannot exactly tell you the launch date, hopefully it will be up and running sooner than expected. The new forum will have many closets, that being a room for discussion of that specific topic, that alone will hopefully eliminate those who complain about reading post that are irrelevant to that specific subject.
    Hopefully you will soon be part of the new forum, I can assure you that there will not be a moderator as we have seen on some forums, rather a management style by committee made up of administrators from different sectors with a common goal. Old Bob, The Purist
    --- Synchronet 3.21d-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Tim Newport-Peace@tim@newportpeace.co.uk to rec.aviation.soaring on Tue Jan 16 22:26:07 2024
    From Newsgroup: rec.aviation.soaring

    On 16/01/2024 18:48, SF wrote:
    Rec.aviation.Soaring's days are numbered
    Wrong!

    RAS via the eternal-september.org route is alive and well.

    It filters out Spam, OBTP and for some reason, Charles Longley.


    --- Synchronet 3.21d-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Eric G@eric@flyguy.netto to rec.aviation.soaring on Tue Jan 16 15:10:25 2024
    From Newsgroup: rec.aviation.soaring

    On 1/16/2024 2:26 PM, Tim Newport-Peace wrote:
    On 16/01/2024 18:48, SF wrote:
    Rec.aviation.Soaring's days are numbered
    Wrong!

    RAS via the eternal-september.org route is alive and well.

    It filters out Spam, OBTP and for some reason, Charles Longley.


    RAS is alive but not well, as the most of the postings here are now about mucking around
    in it's corpse or moving to the platform that the soul of RAS now inhabits: RAS_Prime on
    Google (https://groups.google.com/g/rasprime). I hope more people will move to it, and it
    will regain some international appeal.
    Eric G
    --- Synchronet 3.21d-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From youngbl...@gmail.com@youngblood8116@gmail.com to rec.aviation.soaring on Tue Jan 16 15:16:26 2024
    From Newsgroup: rec.aviation.soaring

    On Tuesday, January 16, 2024 at 6:10:32rC>PM UTC-5, Eric G wrote:
    On 1/16/2024 2:26 PM, Tim Newport-Peace wrote:
    On 16/01/2024 18:48, SF wrote:
    Rec.aviation.Soaring's days are numbered
    Wrong!

    RAS via the eternal-september.org route is alive and well.

    It filters out Spam, OBTP and for some reason, Charles Longley.


    RAS is alive but not well, as the most of the postings here are now about mucking around
    in it's corpse or moving to the platform that the soul of RAS now inhabits: RAS_Prime on
    Google (https://groups.google.com/g/rasprime). I hope more people will move to it, and it
    will regain some international appeal.
    Eric G
    Eric you must open your eyes and see for yourself that RAS Prime has never gained the appeal of RAS, why? I think the SF has pretty much hit the nail on the head. Old Bob, The Purist
    --- Synchronet 3.21d-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Dan Marotta@dcmarotta@earthlink.net to rec.aviation.soaring on Tue Jan 16 17:18:34 2024
    From Newsgroup: rec.aviation.soaring

    So, can anyone cast any light on why OBTP has been blocked by RAS?

    As to google groups - not for me.-a Same for any moderated group. I'm a
    firm believer in the First Amendment.-a For our non-US readers, here is a link:

    https://www.law.cornell.edu/constitution/first_amendment

    Dan 5J
    On 1/16/24 11:48, SF wrote:
    Rec.aviation.Soaring's days are numbered
    I think this has been a valuable resource for the gliding community.

    It just seems like a good idea to move this type of resource to another platform while we can tell the current users what the new platform is going to be. A Workspace Google Group would work, and administrative authority could be used to kick out the spammers. Ownership shouldn't be one guy. run it through the SSA with a volunteer(s) serving as administrator? Similar to the contest rules Committee. Or an outreach mission for one of the larger gliding clubs?

    SF

    Notice from Google:
    Effective February 22, 2024, Google Groups will no longer support new Usenet content. Posting and subscribing will be disallowed, and new content from Usenet peers will not appear. Viewing and searching of historical data will still be supported as it is done today.
    --- Synchronet 3.21d-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Eric G@eric@flyguy.netto to rec.aviation.soaring on Tue Jan 16 20:39:51 2024
    From Newsgroup: rec.aviation.soaring

    A reader of the First Amendment will find it protects us from Government censorship, but
    not from the moderation of a private group like RAS_Prime, which is protected by the
    Freedom of Association derived from the First Amendment. So, RAS_Prime is an exemplar of
    the First Amendment, just as is rec.aviation.soaring (with or without the "moderation/censorship" of eternal-september).

    On 1/16/2024 4:18 PM, Dan Marotta wrote:
    So, can anyone cast any light on why OBTP has been blocked by RAS?

    As to google groups - not for me.-a Same for any moderated group. I'm a firm believer in
    the First Amendment.-a For our non-US readers, here is a link:

    https://www.law.cornell.edu/constitution/first_amendment

    Dan 5J
    On 1/16/24 11:48, SF wrote:
    Rec.aviation.Soaring's days are numbered
    I think this has been a valuable resource for the gliding community.

    It just seems like a good idea to move this type of resource to another platform while
    we can tell the current users what the new platform is going to be.-a A Workspace Google
    Group would work, and administrative authority could be used to kick out the spammers.
    Ownership shouldn't be one guy.-a run it through the SSA with a volunteer(s) serving as
    administrator?-a Similar to the contest rules Committee.-a Or an outreach mission for one
    of the larger gliding clubs?

    SF

    Notice from Google:
    Effective February 22, 2024, Google Groups will no longer support new Usenet content.
    Posting and subscribing will be disallowed, and new content from Usenet peers will not
    appear. Viewing and searching of historical data will still be supported as it is done
    today.

    --- Synchronet 3.21d-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Tim Newport-Peace@tim@newportpeace.co.uk to rec.aviation.soaring on Wed Jan 17 09:07:50 2024
    From Newsgroup: rec.aviation.soaring

    On 16/01/2024 23:10, Eric G wrote:
    On 1/16/2024 2:26 PM, Tim Newport-Peace wrote:
    On 16/01/2024 18:48, SF wrote:
    Rec.aviation.Soaring's days are numbered
    Wrong!

    RAS via the eternal-september.org route is alive and well.

    It filters out Spam, OBTP and for some reason, Charles Longley.


    RAS is alive but not well, as the most of the postings here are now
    about mucking around in it's corpse or moving to the platform that the
    soul of RAS now inhabits: RAS_Prime on Google (https://groups.google.com/g/rasprime). I hope more people will move to
    it, and it will regain some international appeal.
    Eric G

    I have noticed that the volume of Spam has reduced considerably of late.
    Have some of us adopted a policy of Spamming the Spammers?

    As to why OBTP is filtered out, I could not say, but Bob knows and it is
    up to him to complain to Eternal-September.org's moderators.


    --- Synchronet 3.21d-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Mark628CA@mark@mmfabrication.com to rec.aviation.soaring on Wed Jan 17 04:54:47 2024
    From Newsgroup: rec.aviation.soaring

    https://xkcd.com/1357/

    Free Speech and moderated groups explained.
    --- Synchronet 3.21d-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Dan Marotta@dcmarotta@earthlink.net to rec.aviation.soaring on Wed Jan 17 08:34:54 2024
    From Newsgroup: rec.aviation.soaring

    Yaaas...-a The owners of the google group can censor those who choose to
    sign up.-a That's why I'm not and won't be there.-a And, just as I have
    the freedom to say whatever I want here, others have the freedom to not
    read it or even leave the group if free expression of views which offend
    them hurt too much.-a It simply amazes me that some folks can't just not
    look at what offends them, they want to block others from seeing it, too.

    Dan 5J
    On 1/16/24 21:39, Eric G wrote:
    A reader of the First Amendment will find it protects us from
    Government censorship, but not from the moderation of a private group
    like RAS_Prime, which is protected by the Freedom of Association
    derived from the First Amendment. So, RAS_Prime is an exemplar of the
    First Amendment, just as is rec.aviation.soaring (with or without the "moderation/censorship" of eternal-september).

    On 1/16/2024 4:18 PM, Dan Marotta wrote:
    So, can anyone cast any light on why OBTP has been blocked by RAS?

    As to google groups - not for me.-a Same for any moderated group. I'm
    a firm believer in the First Amendment.-a For our non-US readers, here
    is a link:

    https://www.law.cornell.edu/constitution/first_amendment

    Dan 5J
    On 1/16/24 11:48, SF wrote:
    Rec.aviation.Soaring's days are numbered
    I think this has been a valuable resource for the gliding community.

    It just seems like a good idea to move this type of resource to
    another platform while we can tell the current users what the new
    platform is going to be.-a A Workspace Google Group would work, and
    administrative authority could be used to kick out the spammers.-a
    Ownership shouldn't be one guy.-a run it through the SSA with a
    volunteer(s) serving as administrator? Similar to the contest rules
    Committee.-a Or an outreach mission for one of the larger gliding clubs? >>>
    SF

    Notice from Google:
    Effective February 22, 2024, Google Groups will no longer support
    new Usenet content. Posting and subscribing will be disallowed, and
    new content from Usenet peers will not appear. Viewing and searching
    of historical data will still be supported as it is done today.

    --- Synchronet 3.21d-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From SF@211fletcher@bellsouth.net to rec.aviation.soaring on Fri Jan 19 11:42:10 2024
    From Newsgroup: rec.aviation.soaring

    On Tuesday, January 16, 2024 at 1:48:54rC>PM UTC-5, SF wrote:
    Rec.aviation.Soaring's days are numbered
    I think this has been a valuable resource for the gliding community.

    It just seems like a good idea to move this type of resource to another platform while we can tell the current users what the new platform is going to be. A Workspace Google Group would work, and administrative authority could be used to kick out the spammers. Ownership shouldn't be one guy. run it through the SSA with a volunteer(s) serving as administrator? Similar to the contest rules Committee. Or an outreach mission for one of the larger gliding clubs?

    SF

    Notice from Google:
    Effective February 22, 2024, Google Groups will no longer support new Usenet content. Posting and subscribing will be disallowed, and new content from Usenet peers will not appear. Viewing and searching of historical data will still be supported as it is done today.
    So good discussion here. All things considered I'm going to RAS_Prime. The eternal September thing just looked too wonky, maybe its not, but I've got a short attention span sometimes.
    First amendment...Censorship...Free Speech...Do we really want to bring in the lawyers? Badge flights are close enough to that for me. For example: I was at 6,000 ft & 5 miles from the the airport when the logger batteries failed on my first Gold Distance flight, I had landing witnesses, but alas...that wasn't good enough....Appeal denied.
    I think that if our online personas matched up with our standing in front of you communications, nobody would be getting banned. We all exclude asshats from our circles, whenever possible, and until they become a protected class, that's perfectly legal. So don't be an asshat if you don't want to be treated like one. There have been several on here over the years that I met in-person. They turned out to be much nicer than their online personas would lead you to believe.
    If spammers get excluded, I'm fine with that, cause I've got them squarely in the asshat category.
    I still think that a small group rather than a single individual doing the deciding on exclusion is the way to go. Unless it gets turned in to a HOA, man I hate HOA's. Never buy a condo in South Carolina., and never follow a glider with an engine.
    SF
    --- Synchronet 3.21d-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From youngbl...@gmail.com@youngblood8116@gmail.com to rec.aviation.soaring on Sat Jan 20 04:24:57 2024
    From Newsgroup: rec.aviation.soaring

    On Friday, January 19, 2024 at 2:42:13rC>PM UTC-5, SF wrote:
    On Tuesday, January 16, 2024 at 1:48:54rC>PM UTC-5, SF wrote:
    Rec.aviation.Soaring's days are numbered
    I think this has been a valuable resource for the gliding community.

    It just seems like a good idea to move this type of resource to another platform while we can tell the current users what the new platform is going to be. A Workspace Google Group would work, and administrative authority could be used to kick out the spammers. Ownership shouldn't be one guy. run it through the SSA with a volunteer(s) serving as administrator? Similar to the contest rules Committee. Or an outreach mission for one of the larger gliding clubs?

    SF

    Notice from Google:
    Effective February 22, 2024, Google Groups will no longer support new Usenet content. Posting and subscribing will be disallowed, and new content from Usenet peers will not appear. Viewing and searching of historical data will still be supported as it is done today.
    So good discussion here. All things considered I'm going to RAS_Prime. The eternal September thing just looked too wonky, maybe its not, but I've got a short attention span sometimes.

    First amendment...Censorship...Free Speech...Do we really want to bring in the lawyers? Badge flights are close enough to that for me. For example: I was at 6,000 ft & 5 miles from the the airport when the logger batteries failed on my first Gold Distance flight, I had landing witnesses, but alas...that wasn't good enough....Appeal denied.

    I think that if our online personas matched up with our standing in front of you communications, nobody would be getting banned. We all exclude asshats from our circles, whenever possible, and until they become a protected class, that's perfectly legal. So don't be an asshat if you don't want to be treated like one. There have been several on here over the years that I met in-person. They turned out to be much nicer than their online personas would lead you to believe.

    If spammers get excluded, I'm fine with that, cause I've got them squarely in the asshat category.

    I still think that a small group rather than a single individual doing the deciding on exclusion is the way to go. Unless it gets turned in to a HOA, man I hate HOA's. Never buy a condo in South Carolina., and never follow a glider with an engine.

    SF
    SF, one can choose where to hang their hat, most hat racks have many post that need to be occupied. Hope you find RAS P enjoyable and fun, probably won't be much humor, I say that from experience. I certainly understand the loss of proof on the distance flight, at least you had a battery powered recorder and not one of the old barographs that we used back in the days. Take care, keep your eyes open for the upcoming forum that is inclusive and managed by committee, NOT MODERATED! Old Bob, The Purist
    --- Synchronet 3.21d-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Ramy@ramyyanetz@gmail.com to rec.aviation.soaring on Sat Jan 20 09:51:43 2024
    From Newsgroup: rec.aviation.soaring

    I switched over to RAS_Prime Google group and find it alive, easy to use and active , much more than the dying RAS. It is unfortunate that Google decided to sunset newsgroups instead of implementing spam filters but it is what it is.
    Sure there is eternal whatever for the few die hards but it is going to be very quiet there.
    I understand some folks looking for other homebrew solutions from fear of censorship, good luck with that. IrCOll stick with mainstream solution.
    Ramy
    On Tuesday, January 16, 2024 at 10:48:54rC>AM UTC-8, SF wrote:
    Rec.aviation.Soaring's days are numbered
    I think this has been a valuable resource for the gliding community.

    It just seems like a good idea to move this type of resource to another platform while we can tell the current users what the new platform is going to be. A Workspace Google Group would work, and administrative authority could be used to kick out the spammers. Ownership shouldn't be one guy. run it through the SSA with a volunteer(s) serving as administrator? Similar to the contest rules Committee. Or an outreach mission for one of the larger gliding clubs?

    SF

    Notice from Google:
    Effective February 22, 2024, Google Groups will no longer support new Usenet content. Posting and subscribing will be disallowed, and new content from Usenet peers will not appear. Viewing and searching of historical data will still be supported as it is done today.
    --- Synchronet 3.21d-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From youngbl...@gmail.com@youngblood8116@gmail.com to rec.aviation.soaring on Sat Jan 20 15:05:58 2024
    From Newsgroup: rec.aviation.soaring

    On Saturday, January 20, 2024 at 12:51:45rC>PM UTC-5, Ramy wrote:
    I switched over to RAS_Prime Google group and find it alive, easy to use and active , much more than the dying RAS. It is unfortunate that Google decided to sunset newsgroups instead of implementing spam filters but it is what it is.
    Sure there is eternal whatever for the few die hards but it is going to be very quiet there.
    I understand some folks looking for other homebrew solutions from fear of censorship, good luck with that. IrCOll stick with mainstream solution.

    Ramy
    On Tuesday, January 16, 2024 at 10:48:54rC>AM UTC-8, SF wrote:
    Rec.aviation.Soaring's days are numbered
    I think this has been a valuable resource for the gliding community.

    It just seems like a good idea to move this type of resource to another platform while we can tell the current users what the new platform is going to be. A Workspace Google Group would work, and administrative authority could be used to kick out the spammers. Ownership shouldn't be one guy. run it through the SSA with a volunteer(s) serving as administrator? Similar to the contest rules Committee. Or an outreach mission for one of the larger gliding clubs?

    SF

    Notice from Google:
    Effective February 22, 2024, Google Groups will no longer support new Usenet content. Posting and subscribing will be disallowed, and new content from Usenet peers will not appear. Viewing and searching of historical data will still be supported as it is done today.
    Good luck Ramy, glad you found a home. OBTP
    --- Synchronet 3.21d-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Eric G@eric@flyguy.netto to rec.aviation.soaring on Sat Jan 20 15:58:08 2024
    From Newsgroup: rec.aviation.soaring

    On 1/20/2024 9:51 AM, Ramy wrote:
    I switched over to RAS_Prime Google group and find it alive, easy to use and active , much more than the dying RAS. It is unfortunate that Google decided to sunset newsgroups instead of implementing spam filters but it is what it is.
    Sure there is eternal whatever for the few die hards but it is going to be very quiet there.
    I understand some folks looking for other homebrew solutions from fear of censorship, good luck with that. IrCOll stick with mainstream solution.

    Ramy

    I agree with Ramy. Go directly to the group with

    https://groups.google.com/g/rasprime

    You can read all the posts, but can't post anything until you join the group.

    Eric G
    --- Synchronet 3.21d-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From youngbl...@gmail.com@youngblood8116@gmail.com to rec.aviation.soaring on Sat Jan 20 16:01:48 2024
    From Newsgroup: rec.aviation.soaring

    On Saturday, January 20, 2024 at 6:58:16rC>PM UTC-5, Eric G wrote:
    On 1/20/2024 9:51 AM, Ramy wrote:
    I switched over to RAS_Prime Google group and find it alive, easy to use and active , much more than the dying RAS. It is unfortunate that Google decided to sunset newsgroups instead of implementing spam filters but it is what it is.
    Sure there is eternal whatever for the few die hards but it is going to be very quiet there.
    I understand some folks looking for other homebrew solutions from fear of censorship, good luck with that. IrCOll stick with mainstream solution.

    Ramy

    I agree with Ramy. Go directly to the group with

    https://groups.google.com/g/rasprime

    You can read all the posts, but can't post anything until you join the group.

    Eric G
    Eric, you may have spoken too soon, hope to see you over on, "Cloudstreet". OBTP
    --- Synchronet 3.21d-Linux NewsLink 1.2