• Webb Telescope = strongest hint yet of alien life!

    From a425couple@a425couple@hotmail.com to alt.astronomy,rec.aviation.military on Sat Mar 7 15:56:23 2026
    From Newsgroup: rec.aviation.military

    Science and Astronomy
    -+
    Follow
    oSdtprneos
    -+
    EfU? James Webb Space Telescope has just delivered the strongest hint yet
    of alien life! Scientists studying the distant exoplanet K2-18 b (about
    120 light-years away in the constellation Leo) have detected methane,
    carbon dioxide, and a possible trace of dimethyl sulfide (DMS)rCoa
    molecule that, on Earth, is produced almost exclusively by living
    organisms such as marine plankton.

    K2-18 b sits comfortably in the habitable zone of its star and may be a
    vast ocean-covered rCLHycean world,rCY a type of planet scientists believe could host microbial life beneath a hydrogen-rich atmosphere. The
    discovery was made by analyzing the planetrCOs atmosphere as starlight
    passed through it during a transit, allowing researchers to identify its chemical fingerprints.

    While scientists stress that this is not yet definitive proof of life,
    the presence of these molecules together makes K2-18 b one of the most compelling candidates ever found for extraterrestrial biology. Future observations by the James Webb Space Telescope will attempt to confirm
    whether the dimethyl sulfide signal is real and determine if biological processes could truly be responsible.

    If confirmed, this discovery could mark the first real evidence that
    life exists beyond Earth, a finding that would forever change our understanding of the universe and our place within it.

    comments include

    Nick Wellington
    The odds of their being life on one of the trillions of planets within
    one of the trillions of galaxies out there is statistically nearly 100%.
    The odds that we will actually ever contact any of them is physically
    nearly 0%.

    Rickniz Clark
    Why does a Alien need Oxygen, water, certain Temp. .... they wouldn't be aliens..they would be our cousins !

    Terry Eldon
    It's beyond me that ANYONE could doubt that there is life out there.
    It seems rather arrogant to think that with sooooooooooooooooooooooo
    many planets, there is life on only ONE of them!

    Ray Golden
    A planet that size will have some freaking HUGE life forms to resist
    that gravity.

    Chris Stogsdill
    I've always wondered why they are looking for life in the Goldilocks
    zone....
    Even on earth we have creatures living in extreme environments; why
    couldn't they on other planets, too? Are they looking for HUMAN life on
    other planets? Or just... life?

    John Toepfer
    LetrCOs see: 120 light years x 365 days per year x 40 years to travel 1
    light day = 1.7 million years for us to get there. Efno

    Shane Cogdill
    IrCOm completely ignorant here so bear with me. How is we can detect a
    trace of a molecule but canrCOt get a good pic of the planet?

    Gary Alexander
    I have met a number of political candidates that are definitely alien to
    life as we know itEf-EEf-EEf-E


    --- Synchronet 3.21d-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Jim Wilkins@muratlanne@gmail.com to alt.astronomy,rec.aviation.military on Sat Mar 7 19:26:49 2026
    From Newsgroup: rec.aviation.military

    "a425couple" wrote in message news:IW2rR.3$s8m.2@fx39.iad...

    EfU? James Webb Space Telescope has just delivered the strongest hint yet
    of alien life! Scientists studying the distant exoplanet K2-18 b (about
    120 light-years away in the constellation Leo) have detected methane,
    carbon dioxide, and a possible trace of dimethyl sulfide (DMS)rCoa
    molecule that, on Earth, is produced almost exclusively by living
    organisms such as marine plankton.
    ----------------------------
    Almost but not quite, it seems.

    https://www.science.org/content/article/what-presumed-sign-life-doing-dead-comet
    "Scientists have discovered dimethyl sulfide (DMS), a molecule thought to
    have only living sources, on a cold, lifeless comet. The finding calls into question the moleculerCOs usefulness as a biosignature and the significance of an earlier hint of it in the atmosphere of an alien planet."

    Photon and particle radiation can ionize or split molecules which allows
    them to reassemble differently with whatever they encounter. Many protein components are simple enough to be made this way and have been detected in space. Chemical synthesis isn't really much different, break bonds and let them rearrange, then separate what you want from what recombined in other ways.
    B.S. Chem '69

    https://phys.org/news/2026-01-complex-blocks-life-spontaneously-space.html "That said, we still don't know exactly how life began. But research like
    ours shows that many of the complex molecules necessary for life are created naturally in space."

    --- Synchronet 3.21d-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Daniel@me@sc1f1dan.com to alt.astronomy,rec.aviation.military on Mon Mar 9 14:58:36 2026
    From Newsgroup: rec.aviation.military

    "Jim Wilkins" <muratlanne@gmail.com> writes:

    "a425couple" wrote in message news:IW2rR.3$s8m.2@fx39.iad...

    EfU? James Webb Space Telescope has just delivered the strongest hint yet
    of alien life! Scientists studying the distant exoplanet K2-18 b (about
    120 light-years away in the constellation Leo) have detected methane,
    carbon dioxide, and a possible trace of dimethyl sulfide (DMS)rCoa
    molecule that, on Earth, is produced almost exclusively by living
    organisms such as marine plankton.
    ----------------------------
    Almost but not quite, it seems.

    https://www.science.org/content/article/what-presumed-sign-life-doing-dead-comet
    "Scientists have discovered dimethyl sulfide (DMS), a molecule thought
    to have only living sources, on a cold, lifeless comet. The finding
    calls into question the moleculerCOs usefulness as a biosignature and
    the significance of an earlier hint of it in the atmosphere of an
    alien planet."

    Photon and particle radiation can ionize or split molecules which
    allows them to reassemble differently with whatever they
    encounter. Many protein components are simple enough to be made this
    way and have been detected in space. Chemical synthesis isn't really
    much different, break bonds and let them rearrange, then separate what
    you want from what recombined in other ways.
    B.S. Chem '69

    https://phys.org/news/2026-01-complex-blocks-life-spontaneously-space.html "That said, we still don't know exactly how life began. But research
    like ours shows that many of the complex molecules necessary for life
    are created naturally in space."

    The planet is orbiting a spectral class M 2.8 dwarf. The double-edged
    sword about M-type 'habitable zones' is that they're not habitable. I
    surmise the planet had a thicker atmosphere early on and it is
    surprising it possesses one today even though it is a sub-neptunian. It
    would be cool to know if the winds are supersonic.

    But, since it does have an atmosphere, it wouldn't be shocking to learn
    that the high radiation environment results in a complex mix of crazy chemistry.

    I would be very surprised if life exists. Just a very bad candidate.

    I wish they'd focus on K type specral class stars and their planets.

    With K2-18B, followup papers have discredited any notion that the
    chemistry on that planet indicate biomarkers as Jim pointed out. Goes to
    show how science continues to improve our understanding of nature and revises/devalues earlier assumptions.

    Daniel
    sysop | air & wave bbs
    finger | calcmandan@bbs.erb.pw
    --- Synchronet 3.21d-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Kualinar@kuakinar@videotron.ca to alt.astronomy,rec.aviation.military on Wed Mar 11 11:09:02 2026
    From Newsgroup: rec.aviation.military

    Le 2026-03-09 |a 17:58, Daniel a |-crit-a:
    "Jim Wilkins" <muratlanne@gmail.com> writes:

    "a425couple" wrote in message news:IW2rR.3$s8m.2@fx39.iad...

    EfU? James Webb Space Telescope has just delivered the strongest hint yet
    of alien life! Scientists studying the distant exoplanet K2-18 b (about
    120 light-years away in the constellation Leo) have detected methane,
    carbon dioxide, and a possible trace of dimethyl sulfide (DMS)rCoa
    molecule that, on Earth, is produced almost exclusively by living
    organisms such as marine plankton.
    ----------------------------
    Almost but not quite, it seems.

    https://www.science.org/content/article/what-presumed-sign-life-doing-dead-comet
    "Scientists have discovered dimethyl sulfide (DMS), a molecule thought
    to have only living sources, on a cold, lifeless comet. The finding
    calls into question the moleculerCOs usefulness as a biosignature and
    the significance of an earlier hint of it in the atmosphere of an
    alien planet."

    Photon and particle radiation can ionize or split molecules which
    allows them to reassemble differently with whatever they
    encounter. Many protein components are simple enough to be made this
    way and have been detected in space. Chemical synthesis isn't really
    much different, break bonds and let them rearrange, then separate what
    you want from what recombined in other ways.
    B.S. Chem '69

    https://phys.org/news/2026-01-complex-blocks-life-spontaneously-space.html >> "That said, we still don't know exactly how life began. But research
    like ours shows that many of the complex molecules necessary for life
    are created naturally in space."

    The planet is orbiting a spectral class M 2.8 dwarf. The double-edged
    sword about M-type 'habitable zones' is that they're not habitable. I
    surmise the planet had a thicker atmosphere early on and it is
    surprising it possesses one today even though it is a sub-neptunian. It
    would be cool to know if the winds are supersonic.

    But, since it does have an atmosphere, it wouldn't be shocking to learn
    that the high radiation environment results in a complex mix of crazy chemistry.

    I would be very surprised if life exists. Just a very bad candidate.

    I wish they'd focus on K type specral class stars and their planets.

    With K2-18B, followup papers have discredited any notion that the
    chemistry on that planet indicate biomarkers as Jim pointed out. Goes to
    show how science continues to improve our understanding of nature and revises/devalues earlier assumptions.

    Daniel
    sysop | air & wave bbs
    finger | calcmandan@bbs.erb.pw

    Finding planets around M type stars is easy : Tight orbits, dimmest
    star, planets larger relative to the star. That mean that the chance of
    a planet transiting in front of the star is higher, and the change in luminosity more noticeable.

    Finding planets around K type stars is harder : Broader orbits,
    relatively bright star, the same planet is smaller relative to the star.

    Around G type stars, like our Sun, the detection is even more difficult.
    --- Synchronet 3.21d-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Daniel@me@sc1f1dan.com to alt.astronomy,rec.aviation.military on Wed Mar 11 11:52:22 2026
    From Newsgroup: rec.aviation.military

    Kualinar <kuakinar@videotron.ca> writes:

    Le 2026-03-09 |a 17:58, Daniel a |-crit-a:
    "Jim Wilkins" <muratlanne@gmail.com> writes:

    "a425couple" wrote in message news:IW2rR.3$s8m.2@fx39.iad...

    EfU? James Webb Space Telescope has just delivered the strongest hint yet >>> of alien life! Scientists studying the distant exoplanet K2-18 b (about
    120 light-years away in the constellation Leo) have detected methane,
    carbon dioxide, and a possible trace of dimethyl sulfide (DMS)rCoa
    molecule that, on Earth, is produced almost exclusively by living
    organisms such as marine plankton.
    ----------------------------
    Almost but not quite, it seems.

    https://www.science.org/content/article/what-presumed-sign-life-doing-dead-comet
    "Scientists have discovered dimethyl sulfide (DMS), a molecule thought
    to have only living sources, on a cold, lifeless comet. The finding
    calls into question the moleculerCOs usefulness as a biosignature and
    the significance of an earlier hint of it in the atmosphere of an
    alien planet."

    Photon and particle radiation can ionize or split molecules which
    allows them to reassemble differently with whatever they
    encounter. Many protein components are simple enough to be made this
    way and have been detected in space. Chemical synthesis isn't really
    much different, break bonds and let them rearrange, then separate what
    you want from what recombined in other ways.
    B.S. Chem '69

    https://phys.org/news/2026-01-complex-blocks-life-spontaneously-space.html >>> "That said, we still don't know exactly how life began. But research
    like ours shows that many of the complex molecules necessary for life
    are created naturally in space."
    The planet is orbiting a spectral class M 2.8 dwarf. The
    double-edged
    sword about M-type 'habitable zones' is that they're not habitable. I
    surmise the planet had a thicker atmosphere early on and it is
    surprising it possesses one today even though it is a sub-neptunian. It
    would be cool to know if the winds are supersonic.
    But, since it does have an atmosphere, it wouldn't be shocking to
    learn
    that the high radiation environment results in a complex mix of crazy
    chemistry.
    I would be very surprised if life exists. Just a very bad candidate.
    I wish they'd focus on K type specral class stars and their planets.
    With K2-18B, followup papers have discredited any notion that the
    chemistry on that planet indicate biomarkers as Jim pointed out. Goes to
    show how science continues to improve our understanding of nature and
    revises/devalues earlier assumptions.
    Daniel
    sysop | air & wave bbs
    finger | calcmandan@bbs.erb.pw

    Finding planets around M type stars is easy : Tight orbits, dimmest
    star, planets larger relative to the star. That mean that the chance
    of a planet transiting in front of the star is higher, and the change
    in luminosity more noticeable.

    Finding planets around K type stars is harder : Broader orbits,
    relatively bright star, the same planet is smaller relative to the
    star.

    Around G type stars, like our Sun, the detection is even more difficult.

    Yeah I'm sure. The radiance difference isn't that large between M
    and K. It's just G and K's are far more rare. M's are also WAY more
    prevalent so statistically they'll have more detections.
    --- Synchronet 3.21d-Linux NewsLink 1.2