From Newsgroup: rec.autos.sport.f1
On 1/30/26 23:24, pP85PrR wrote:
On 2026-01-30 9:22 AM, Edmund wrote:
Regulations.
What do you guys think of the regulations.
Specifically, why would they care about compression ratio?
Why would they care about a lot of things?
My point exactly Indeed! The rule makers have regulated F1 into a kind
of Renault Clio race, where innovation and creativity is forbidden and
as a result overtaking became impossible.
No worries, the rule makers simply make more rules, like the obligated parachute which drivers can "open" in certain situations so that they
can overtake again, then the obligated wrong tire rule.
No silly solution is spared to bring back some excitement that they
regulated away in the first place.
It's not Formula Libre, for
one thing. They can't just do whatever they want with the cars. The idea
is to work *within* the listed specifications.
No problem with regulations but they way overreached here.
Let the teams decide if they want a one cylinder engine or a 16 cylinder.
In the mean time we are "used" to the silly situation where we are now
but try to zoom out and you will see they regulated it to near death.
You can, I assume, run with a lower than maximum allowed compression, if
you don't mind having a few less ponies (or watts) pushing you along.
But while you could run with lower horespower, you can't run with less
than the minimum prescribed weight to compensate.
I could be wrong but I don't think there is any team opting for a lower
then allowed compression ratio, but it is absolutely nuts that
compression ratio is in the rule book.
--
Once an organization gains any influence, it will be corrupted from both within and without.
Edmund
--- Synchronet 3.21d-Linux NewsLink 1.2