• **2025 Pool** Race 23, Qatari GP - Final Results

    From Mark@mpconmy@gmail.com to rec.autos.sport.f1 on Mon Dec 1 09:19:29 2025
    From Newsgroup: rec.autos.sport.f1


    Hmmm...one race to go and the championship - and pool - are very close
    at the front...

    The top 5 are currently:

    1 Hornplayer9599 274
    2 Phil Carmody 272
    3 durian 270
    3 Mark Jackson 270
    5 Alan Baker 262

    The people who scored points are:

    8 Eric 18
    10 a425couple 14
    6 JohnM 14
    16 mairsz 14
    18 Martin Harran 14
    2 Phil Carmody 14
    5 Alan Baker 10
    21 Ar 10
    23 Carl Keehn 10
    8 ceg 10
    24 D Munz 10
    10 Darryl Johnson 10
    3 durian 10
    14 EB5AGV 10
    1 Hornplayer9599 10
    6 Hugh 10
    19 Mark 10
    3 Mark Jackson 10
    12 scole 10
    12 Sir Tim 10
    17 Sreekumar A 10
    22 User8270 10
    15 Yazoo 10
    20 Shaun 8

    Let me know about the inevitable mistakes!
    ;-)

    Mark

    The overall table looks like:

    1 Mark 10 12 10 6 18 10 14 6 10 4
    8 18 18 8 12 12 2 12 8 12
    8 8 10 236
    2 a425couple 16 12 10 8 6 18 12 8 20 4
    12 12 18 18 12 10 4 8 10 12
    4 4 14 252
    3 Martin Harran 14 12 6 6 10 14 12 4 10 4
    6 18 20 12 14 12 12 12 14 6
    4 2 14 238
    4 Darryl Johnson 10 8 10 6 18 14 16 8 14 6
    12 8 12 10 12 20 12 6 12 12
    4 12 10 252
    5 Geoff 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
    0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
    0 0 0 0
    6 Eric 8 18 10 10 16 12 10 4 14 8
    10 18 24 18 6 10 4 8 12 6
    4 6 18 254
    7 Yazoo 12 20 10 12 6 18 10 6 20 4
    4 12 18 12 14 12 2 8 10 12
    12 2 10 246
    8 User8270 10 4 10 6 14 12 10 4 10 8
    10 6 14 12 10 4 4 6 12 2
    2 18 10 198
    9 Carl Keehn 6 8 10 0 6 12 12 6 20 0
    14 6 20 18 14 10 0 6 2 8
    - 8 10 196
    10 Sir Tim 16 12 10 8 10 18 12 8 12 0
    6 18 26 12 16 10 10 6 10 8
    8 4 10 250
    11 scole 12 12 10 4 16 16 10 6 20 4
    6 18 18 18 12 12 0 4 4 14
    10 14 10 250
    12 Hornplayer9599 10 8 8 18 10 20 18 6 20 4
    8 18 18 8 10 12 6 12 10 16
    18 6 10 274
    13 Ar 6 10 6 6 14 18 12 14 14 6
    16 6 10 10 8 18 0 4 12 8
    8 4 10 220
    14 Hugh 12 6 10 12 10 18 14 6 12 2
    6 18 18 18 14 12 2 10 6 8
    8 24 10 256
    15 D Munz 10 14 6 12 4 12 6 6 4 8
    8 6 2 12 12 6 2 0 12 2
    0 10 10 164
    16 Shaun 0 0 10 12 6 18 10 16 12 2
    20 18 14 24 6 10 4 4 6 12
    12 6 8 230
    17 Mark Jackson 18 12 10 12 10 24 10 8 18 2
    8 12 18 12 12 10 12 6 8 8
    12 18 10 270
    18 JohnM 16 12 10 8 10 18 12 8 20 4
    8 18 18 12 14 12 2 8 10 4
    8 10 14 256
    19 Phil Carmody 14 12 10 6 6 18 12 6 16 2
    10 18 24 12 12 12 6 10 14 8
    16 14 14 272
    20 mairsz 12 12 10 16 6 18 12 6 18 2
    6 18 6 12 16 12 2 10 8 2
    18 8 14 244
    21 Sreekumar A 12 8 12 4 10 16 14 6 12 2
    6 18 20 18 14 10 2 6 10 8
    16 8 10 242
    22 EB5AGV 20 12 10 4 10 14 14 6 12 2
    6 18 14 24 10 10 2 14 8 8
    16 4 10 248
    23 durian 20 8 10 8 10 18 12 8 20 4
    6 18 18 12 14 10 8 8 20 8
    8 12 10 270
    24 Alan Baker 10 20 10 4 6 18 12 10 20 2
    20 18 10 18 10 12 0 4 12 16
    8 12 10 262
    25 ceg 14 8 10 8 10 12 14 16 12 4
    10 18 10 14 12 12 2 10 20 8
    16 4 10 254

    Ordered by points:

    1 Hornplayer9599 10 8 8 18 10 20 18 6 20 4
    8 18 18 8 10 12 6 12 10 16
    18 6 10 274
    2 Phil Carmody 14 12 10 6 6 18 12 6 16 2
    10 18 24 12 12 12 6 10 14 8
    16 14 14 272
    3 durian 20 8 10 8 10 18 12 8 20 4
    6 18 18 12 14 10 8 8 20 8
    8 12 10 270
    3 Mark Jackson 18 12 10 12 10 24 10 8 18 2
    8 12 18 12 12 10 12 6 8 8
    12 18 10 270
    5 Alan Baker 10 20 10 4 6 18 12 10 20 2
    20 18 10 18 10 12 0 4 12 16
    8 12 10 262
    6 Hugh 12 6 10 12 10 18 14 6 12 2
    6 18 18 18 14 12 2 10 6 8
    8 24 10 256
    6 JohnM 16 12 10 8 10 18 12 8 20 4
    8 18 18 12 14 12 2 8 10 4
    8 10 14 256
    8 ceg 14 8 10 8 10 12 14 16 12 4
    10 18 10 14 12 12 2 10 20 8
    16 4 10 254
    8 Eric 8 18 10 10 16 12 10 4 14 8
    10 18 24 18 6 10 4 8 12 6
    4 6 18 254
    10 a425couple 16 12 10 8 6 18 12 8 20 4
    12 12 18 18 12 10 4 8 10 12
    4 4 14 252
    10 Darryl Johnson 10 8 10 6 18 14 16 8 14 6
    12 8 12 10 12 20 12 6 12 12
    4 12 10 252
    12 scole 12 12 10 4 16 16 10 6 20 4
    6 18 18 18 12 12 0 4 4 14
    10 14 10 250
    12 Sir Tim 16 12 10 8 10 18 12 8 12 0
    6 18 26 12 16 10 10 6 10 8
    8 4 10 250
    14 EB5AGV 20 12 10 4 10 14 14 6 12 2
    6 18 14 24 10 10 2 14 8 8
    16 4 10 248
    15 Yazoo 12 20 10 12 6 18 10 6 20 4
    4 12 18 12 14 12 2 8 10 12
    12 2 10 246
    16 mairsz 12 12 10 16 6 18 12 6 18 2
    6 18 6 12 16 12 2 10 8 2
    18 8 14 244
    17 Sreekumar A 12 8 12 4 10 16 14 6 12 2
    6 18 20 18 14 10 2 6 10 8
    16 8 10 242
    18 Martin Harran 14 12 6 6 10 14 12 4 10 4
    6 18 20 12 14 12 12 12 14 6
    4 2 14 238
    19 Mark 10 12 10 6 18 10 14 6 10 4
    8 18 18 8 12 12 2 12 8 12
    8 8 10 236
    20 Shaun 0 0 10 12 6 18 10 16 12 2
    20 18 14 24 6 10 4 4 6 12
    12 6 8 230
    21 Ar 6 10 6 6 14 18 12 14 14 6
    16 6 10 10 8 18 0 4 12 8
    8 4 10 220
    22 User8270 10 4 10 6 14 12 10 4 10 8
    10 6 14 12 10 4 4 6 12 2
    2 18 10 198
    23 Carl Keehn 6 8 10 0 6 12 12 6 20 0
    14 6 20 18 14 10 0 6 2 8
    - 8 10 196
    24 D Munz 10 14 6 12 4 12 6 6 4 8
    8 6 2 12 12 6 2 0 12 2
    0 10 10 164
    25 Geoff 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
    0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
    0 0 0 0

    DUPLICATOR RANKER1 RANKER2 RESULTS
    1. BAH HAM VER HAM NOR
    HAM VER LEC HAM RIC VET HAM RIC VET NOR VER RUS
    8 8 15/20 0 0 18/20 0 0 18/20
    2. EMI NOR VER VER PIA
    NOR VER RUS VER STR HUL VER STR HUL PIA NOR RUS
    12 20 17/20 0 0 19/20 0 0 19/20
    3. POR PIA VER VER VER
    PIA NOR RUS VER OCO STR VER OCO STR VER NOR PIA
    10 30 17/20 2 2 19/20 2 2 19/20
    4. SPA VER VER VER PIA
    VER NOR PIA VER OCO STR VER OCO STR PIA RUS NOR
    6 36 18/20 0 2 19/20 0 2 19/20
    5. MON PIA VER VER VER
    PIA RUS NOR VER HAM OCO VER HAM OCO PIA VER LEC
    10 46 17/20 8 10 19/20 8 10 19/20
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Eric@nawww@afraidnot.org to rec.autos.sport.f1 on Mon Dec 1 18:10:10 2025
    From Newsgroup: rec.autos.sport.f1

    On 2025-12-01 2:19am, Mark wrote:
    Hmmm...one race to go and the championship - and pool - are very close
    at the front...

    The top 5 are currently:

    1 Hornplayer9599 274
    2 Phil Carmody 272
    3 durian 270
    3 Mark Jackson 270
    5 Alan Baker 262

    The people who scored points are:

    8 Eric 18
    10 a425couple 14
    6 JohnM 14
    16 mairsz 14
    18 Martin Harran 14
    2 Phil Carmody 14
    5 Alan Baker 10
    21 Ar 10
    23 Carl Keehn 10
    8 ceg 10
    24 D Munz 10
    10 Darryl Johnson 10
    3 durian 10
    14 EB5AGV 10
    1 Hornplayer9599 10
    6 Hugh 10
    19 Mark 10
    3 Mark Jackson 10
    12 scole 10
    12 Sir Tim 10
    17 Sreekumar A 10
    22 User8270 10
    15 Yazoo 10
    20 Shaun 8

    Finally, I got lucky with some picks again!
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Alan@nuh-uh@nope.com to rec.autos.sport.f1 on Mon Dec 1 19:18:33 2025
    From Newsgroup: rec.autos.sport.f1

    On 2025-12-01 01:19, Mark wrote:
    Hmmm...one race to go and the championship - and pool - are very close
    at the front...

    The top 5 are currently:

    1 Hornplayer9599 274
    2 Phil Carmody 272
    3 durian 270
    3 Mark Jackson 270
    5 Alan Baker 262

    The people who scored points are:

    8 Eric 18
    10 a425couple 14
    6 JohnM 14
    16 mairsz 14
    18 Martin Harran 14
    2 Phil Carmody 14
    5 Alan Baker 10

    If McLaren hadn't screwed up on strategy...
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Martin Harran@martinharran@gmail.com to rec.autos.sport.f1 on Tue Dec 2 18:43:48 2025
    From Newsgroup: rec.autos.sport.f1

    On Mon, 1 Dec 2025 19:18:33 -0800, Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:

    [...]

    If McLaren hadn't screwed up on strategy...

    I struggle to understand how they did that. If you're in the lead and
    your main threat does something different, surely the reaction should
    be to cover it.
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Mark Jackson@mjackson@alumni.caltech.edu to rec.autos.sport.f1 on Tue Dec 2 15:43:53 2025
    From Newsgroup: rec.autos.sport.f1

    On 12/2/2025 1:43 PM, Martin Harran wrote:
    On Mon, 1 Dec 2025 19:18:33 -0800, Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:

    [...]

    If McLaren hadn't screwed up on strategy...

    I struggle to understand how they did that. If you're in the lead and
    your main threat does something different, surely the reaction should
    be to cover it.

    Stella:

    "We didn't expect everyone else to pit. Obviously if everyone else
    behind you pits, then it makes pitting definitely the right thing to do."

    Having left Piastri out they presumably could have decided to have
    Norris follow Verstappen into the pits. Perhaps there wasn't time to reconsider?

    Note also that had there been a second safety car at any time except lap
    32 they would have looked brilliant.
    --
    Mark Jackson - https://mark-jackson.online/
    Every human society must justify its inequalities.
    - Thomas Piketty
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Alan@nuh-uh@nope.com to rec.autos.sport.f1 on Tue Dec 2 13:53:31 2025
    From Newsgroup: rec.autos.sport.f1

    On 2025-12-02 10:43, Martin Harran wrote:
    On Mon, 1 Dec 2025 19:18:33 -0800, Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:

    [...]

    If McLaren hadn't screwed up on strategy...

    I struggle to understand how they did that. If you're in the lead and
    your main threat does something different, surely the reaction should
    be to cover it.

    But it doesn't work that way.

    Because they were in the lead, McLaren had to make their choice about
    what to do behind the safety care BEFORE they could see what Verstappen
    was going to do.

    And because everyone else behind Verstappen then pitted, he got to keep
    really good track position.

    If the McLarens had then pitted on the subsequent lap, they would have
    come out somewhere around 5 seconds ahead of where the only other car
    not to pit at the first opportunity did.

    That would be Ocon, whose stop was 5 seconds longer than normal for a
    penalty.

    Even accounting for that difference, pitting on the second lap behind
    the safety would have put both McLarens pretty close to dead last
    (except for Ocon of course).

    No: once they decided not to pit on the first opportunity, pitting
    behind the safety car was no longer an option; not at a track where
    passing is as difficult as it was during this event.

    The mistake was not having it in the game plan that if you got a safety
    car after 7 laps were completed...

    (i.e. When stopping with a 25 lap imposed maximum stint length would no
    longer force you into a mandatory third stop)

    ...you would always pit.

    All that could have and should have been decided before the race even began. --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From ~misfit~@shaun.at.pukekohe@gmail.com to rec.autos.sport.f1 on Wed Dec 3 12:10:11 2025
    From Newsgroup: rec.autos.sport.f1

    On 3/12/2025 9:43 am, Mark Jackson wrote:
    On 12/2/2025 1:43 PM, Martin Harran wrote:
    On Mon, 1 Dec 2025 19:18:33 -0800, Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:

    [...]

    If McLaren hadn't screwed up on strategy...

    I struggle to understand how they did that. If you're in the lead and
    your main threat does something different, surely the reaction should
    be to cover it.

    Stella:

    "We didn't expect everyone else to pit. Obviously if everyone else behind you pits, then it makes
    pitting definitely the right thing to do."

    Having left Piastri out they presumably could have decided to have Norris follow Verstappen into
    the pits.-a Perhaps there wasn't time to reconsider?

    Can you imagine the outrage in Aus of they'd done that?

    Note also that had there been a second safety car at any time except lap 32 they would have looked
    brilliant.

    Yep. Like most F1 strategy there was an element of gambling. Unfortunately for McLaren it didn't
    pay out this time.
    --
    Shaun.

    "Humans will have advanced a long, long way when religious belief has a cozy little classification
    in the DSM"
    David Melville.
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2