Anita Anand, our Palestinian-loving foreign minister, has declared that
if Benjamin Netanyahu's plane enters Canadian airspace, he will be
arrested. It's not clear how she will accomplish the arrest. Will she >dispatch some of our aging CF18 fighters to force the plane down? Or
just shoot it down with some kind of surface-to-air missile?
In <119312t$2jieq$2@dont-email.me> Rhino <no_offline_contact@example.com> writes:
Anita Anand, our Palestinian-loving foreign minister, has declared that
if Benjamin Netanyahu's plane enters Canadian airspace, he will be
arrested. It's not clear how she will accomplish the arrest. Will she
dispatch some of our aging CF18 fighters to force the plane down? Or
just shoot it down with some kind of surface-to-air missile?
If only my A Number One Unobtainable Canadian Heartthrob Chrystia Freeland was still running things....
Anita Anand, our Palestinian-loving foreign minister, has declared that
if Benjamin Netanyahu's plane enters Canadian airspace, he will be
arrested. It's not clear how she will accomplish the arrest. Will she dispatch some of our aging CF18 fighters to force the plane down? Or
just shoot it down with some kind of surface-to-air missile?
https://www.ctvnews.ca/canada/article/anand-to-see-if-netanyahu-is-crossing-canadian-airspace-with-arrest-warrant-in-effect/
Frankly, I have a lot of trouble believing that this is anything but virtue-signalling for the sake of pro-Palestinian supporters of the
Liberal Party.
On Sep 24, 2026 at 4:21:02 AM PDT, "Rhino" <no_offline_contact@example.com> wrote:
Anita Anand, our Palestinian-loving foreign minister, has declared that
if Benjamin Netanyahu's plane enters Canadian airspace, he will be
arrested. It's not clear how she will accomplish the arrest. Will she
dispatch some of our aging CF18 fighters to force the plane down? Or
just shoot it down with some kind of surface-to-air missile?
https://www.ctvnews.ca/canada/article/anand-to-see-if-netanyahu-is-crossing-canadian-airspace-with-arrest-warrant-in-effect/
Frankly, I have a lot of trouble believing that this is anything but
virtue-signalling for the sake of pro-Palestinian supporters of the
Liberal Party.
What's the point of talking tough like that and then not actually doing anything?
All that does is make you look weak. All talk and no action.
That's our Liberal Party staying true to its core beliefs: talk the talk but whatever you do, don't walk the walk because it might piss off some core constituencies.
On Thu, 24 Sep 2026, Rhino wrote:
That's our Liberal Party staying true to its core beliefs: talk the talk
but
whatever you do, don't walk the walk because it might piss off some core >> constituencies.
It's not unique to Canada. That's why MAGA--and not the DSA--has disrupted the USA two-party system so much.
On Thu, 24 Sep 2026, Rhino wrote:
That's our Liberal Party staying true to its core beliefs: talk the talk but >>whatever you do, don't walk the walk because it might piss off some core >>constituencies.
It's not unique to Canada. That's why MAGA--and not the DSA--has disrupted >the USA two-party system so much.
It's not unique to Canada. That's why MAGA--and not the DSA--has disrupted >> the USA two-party system so much.
Hahahahahahaha!
Good one
On Fri, 25 Sep 2026, BTR1701 wrote:
It's not unique to Canada. That's why MAGA--and not the DSA--has disrupted >>> the USA two-party system so much.
Hahahahahahaha!
Good one
For what it's worth I meant: "and NOW the DSA"
On Fri, 25 Sep 2026, BTR1701 wrote:
It's not unique to Canada. That's why MAGA--and not the DSA--has disrupted >>>the USA two-party system so much.
Hahahahahahaha!
Good one
For what it's worth I meant: "and NOW the DSA"
A voter has no legal obligation not to vote or assemble with other
voters in a way that won't disrupt the status quo.
That's ordinary politics.
On Sun, 27 Sep 2026, Adam H. Kerman wrote:
That's ordinary politics.
Duh
That's ordinary politics.
Duh
You're a dishonest debater. You take quotes out of context so that no
meaning remains. If you were aware that populism is merely ordinary
politics, then what's with the phony angst in this thread?
I gotta say it was also pretty shitty that you forced thread drift
without making a single comment on the original topic.
On Mon, 28 Sep 2026, Adam H. Kerman wrote:
That's ordinary politics.
Duh
You're a dishonest debater. You take quotes out of context so that no
meaning remains. If you were aware that populism is merely ordinary
politics, then what's with the phony angst in this thread?
I gotta say it was also pretty shitty that you forced thread drift
without making a single comment on the original topic.
Zero angst. Only pleasure. I love to see it happen. I live in DC and love seeing, real time, the populists pivot from supporting MAGA to supporting the DSA
On Mon, 28 Sep 2026, Adam H. Kerman wrote:
That's ordinary politics.
Duh
You're a dishonest debater. You take quotes out of context so that no >>meaning remains. If you were aware that populism is merely ordinary >>politics, then what's with the phony angst in this thread?
I gotta say it was also pretty shitty that you forced thread drift
without making a single comment on the original topic.
Zero angst. Only pleasure. I love to see it happen. I live in DC and love >seeing, real time, the populists pivot from supporting MAGA to supporting >the DSA in the course of just 20 months. All because of Iran. It's very >exciting. If you read angst then you're projecting, maybe. I an 56 and the >more things change the more they stay the same.
America keeps on getter better and better and everyone keeps on saying
that it's worse and worst.
It's a laugh-riot.
Post whatever you like, but start a new thread if your followup doesn't address the topic of the precursor article.
On Mon, 28 Sep 2026, Adam H. Kerman wrote:
Post whatever you like, but start a new thread if your followup doesn't
address the topic of the precursor article.
Maybe
| Sysop: | Amessyroom |
|---|---|
| Location: | Fayetteville, NC |
| Users: | 74 |
| Nodes: | 6 (0 / 6) |
| Uptime: | 120:07:36 |
| Calls: | 1,194 |
| Files: | 1,352 |
| Messages: | 290,002 |