From Newsgroup: rec.arts.tv

Lane W wrote:

David Dalton wrote:

-aFrom the thread rCLSarah is my press agentrCY on alt.religion.druid :

#1 has been reversed again (liferCOs a bitch)---incompatible
human couples will be broken across species boundaries
in the sudden evolution and wonrCOt be made optimally
sexually compatible.

I divine that, worldwide, 11% of couples already were
optimally sexually compatible, 64% were partially
compatible (compatible, but less than optimally
compatible), and 25% were incompatible.

How can it be as high as 25%? Well, it is higher in
some countries than others. Also, it includes:

one-way attraction relationships:
a) gay--straight-type-1-F
b) gay--bif
c) lesbian--straight-type-1-M
d) lesbian--bim
e) straight-type-2-M--straight-type-1-F
f) straight-type-2-F--straight-type-1-M

and

platonic relationships:
g) gay--lesbian
h) gay--straight-type-2-F
i) lesbian--straight-type-2-M
j) straight-type-2-M--straight-type-2-F (rare)

Note I define bisexual as attracted to both genders, not
necessarily having sex with both genders, so there are
far more bims and bifs than reported in surveys.

(a)-(d) result in the black widow/er effect (see my recent
posts on sci.med.diseases.cancer ).

Again all of (a)--(j) will be split across species boundaries
and wonrCOt be made optimally sexually compatible.
Also one-way attraction will be turned off so gays and
lesbians will not be able to form deceptive one-way
attraction relationships in their new species.

An exception is fence-jumping foursomes of 2G+2L
pretending to be two (G,L) couples, which will
become a four-spirit Vico foursome (optimally
sexually compatible across all six possible links).

For definitions of my terminology see my
Eight Sexual Harmonics theory at
https://www.nfld.com/~dalton/8H.html
(but I have yet to add the black widow/er theory to it).

My uncle tells me how he met my aunt after he had given up on
girls. Thus, in an effort to get a woman, I've given up girls
several times this year.

forget it lane, you are not fit for reltionships. one should know
oneself.

--- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: rec.arts.tv

On 9/17/2026 8:09 AM, jojo wrote:

Lane W wrote:

David Dalton wrote:

-aFrom the thread rCLSarah is my press agentrCY on alt.religion.druid :

#1 has been reversed again (liferCOs a bitch)---incompatible
human couples will be broken across species boundaries
in the sudden evolution and wonrCOt be made optimally
sexually compatible.

I divine that, worldwide, 11% of couples already were
optimally sexually compatible, 64% were partially
compatible (compatible, but less than optimally
compatible), and 25% were incompatible.

How can it be as high as 25%? Well, it is higher in
some countries than others. Also, it includes:

one-way attraction relationships:
a) gay--straight-type-1-F
b) gay--bif
c) lesbian--straight-type-1-M
d) lesbian--bim
e) straight-type-2-M--straight-type-1-F
f) straight-type-2-F--straight-type-1-M

and

platonic relationships:
g) gay--lesbian
h) gay--straight-type-2-F
i) lesbian--straight-type-2-M
j) straight-type-2-M--straight-type-2-F (rare)

Note I define bisexual as attracted to both genders, not
necessarily having sex with both genders, so there are
far more bims and bifs than reported in surveys.

(a)-(d) result in the black widow/er effect (see my recent
posts on sci.med.diseases.cancer ).

Again all of (a)--(j) will be split across species boundaries
and wonrCOt be made optimally sexually compatible.
Also one-way attraction will be turned off so gays and
lesbians will not be able to form deceptive one-way
attraction relationships in their new species.

An exception is fence-jumping foursomes of 2G+2L
pretending to be two (G,L) couples, which will
become a four-spirit Vico foursome (optimally
sexually compatible across all six possible links).

For definitions of my terminology see my
Eight Sexual Harmonics theory at
https://www.nfld.com/~dalton/8H.html
(but I have yet to add the black widow/er theory to it).

My uncle tells me how he met my aunt after he had given up on girls.
Thus, in an effort to get a woman, I've given up girls several times
this year.

forget it lane, you are not fit for reltionships. one should know oneself.

Let's not get personal.

I've been reading these boards for thirty years and I've never heard of
anyone hooking up with girls at recarts.tv. YMMV.
--- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: rec.arts.tv

On Sep 17, 2026, Lane W wrote
(in article <118gpd6$b2b8$1@dont-email.me>):

David Dalton wrote:

From the thread rCLSarah is my press agentrCY on alt.religion.druid :

#1 has been reversed again (liferCOs a bitch)---incompatible
human couples will be broken across species boundaries
in the sudden evolution and wonrCOt be made optimally
sexually compatible.

I divine that, worldwide, 11% of couples already were
optimally sexually compatible, 64% were partially
compatible (compatible, but less than optimally
compatible), and 25% were incompatible.

How can it be as high as 25%? Well, it is higher in
some countries than others. Also, it includes:

one-way attraction relationships:
a) gay--straight-type-1-F
b) gay--bif
c) lesbian--straight-type-1-M
d) lesbian--bim
e) straight-type-2-M--straight-type-1-F
f) straight-type-2-F--straight-type-1-M

and

platonic relationships:
g) gay--lesbian
h) gay--straight-type-2-F
i) lesbian--straight-type-2-M
j) straight-type-2-M--straight-type-2-F (rare)

Note I define bisexual as attracted to both genders, not
necessarily having sex with both genders, so there are
far more bims and bifs than reported in surveys.

(a)-(d) result in the black widow/er effect (see my recent
posts on sci.med.diseases.cancer ).

Again all of (a)--(j) will be split across species boundaries
and wonrCOt be made optimally sexually compatible.
Also one-way attraction will be turned off so gays and
lesbians will not be able to form deceptive one-way
attraction relationships in their new species.

An exception is fence-jumping foursomes of 2G+2L
pretending to be two (G,L) couples, which will
become a four-spirit Vico foursome (optimally
sexually compatible across all six possible links).

For definitions of my terminology see my
Eight Sexual Harmonics theory at
https://www.nfld.com/~dalton/8H.html
(but I have yet to add the black widow/er theory to it).

My uncle tells me how he met my aunt after he had given up on girls.
Thus, in an effort to get a woman, I've given up girls several times
this year.

Maybe your aunt is a trans man?

Anyway, a new judging of my workings by Goddess is in
progress, so there is a chance that the recent change
regarding incompatible couples could be reversed again.
(I guess the last supposed judging was fake.)
--
https://www.nfld.com/~dalton/dtales.html Salmon on the Thorns (mystic page) rCLEarly morning, jubilators, up to no good, instigators... Sons of long forgotten races, that the darkest night embracesrCY (Ron Hynes & D.OrCOD)


--- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: rec.arts.tv

On Sep 17, 2026, David Dalton wrote
(in article<0001HW.305C4CA8004C48E030B4CE38F@news.eternal-september.org>):

On Sep 17, 2026, Lane W wrote
(in article <118gpd6$b2b8$1@dont-email.me>):

David Dalton wrote:

From the thread rCLSarah is my press agentrCY on alt.religion.druid :

#1 has been reversed again (liferCOs a bitch)---incompatible
human couples will be broken across species boundaries
in the sudden evolution and wonrCOt be made optimally
sexually compatible.

I divine that, worldwide, 11% of couples already were
optimally sexually compatible, 64% were partially
compatible (compatible, but less than optimally
compatible), and 25% were incompatible.

How can it be as high as 25%? Well, it is higher in
some countries than others. Also, it includes:

one-way attraction relationships:
a) gay--straight-type-1-F
b) gay--bif
c) lesbian--straight-type-1-M
d) lesbian--bim
e) straight-type-2-M--straight-type-1-F
f) straight-type-2-F--straight-type-1-M

and

platonic relationships:
g) gay--lesbian
h) gay--straight-type-2-F
i) lesbian--straight-type-2-M
j) straight-type-2-M--straight-type-2-F (rare)

Note I define bisexual as attracted to both genders, not
necessarily having sex with both genders, so there are
far more bims and bifs than reported in surveys.

(a)-(d) result in the black widow/er effect (see my recent
posts on sci.med.diseases.cancer ).

Again all of (a)--(j) will be split across species boundaries
and wonrCOt be made optimally sexually compatible.
Also one-way attraction will be turned off so gays and
lesbians will not be able to form deceptive one-way
attraction relationships in their new species.

An exception is fence-jumping foursomes of 2G+2L
pretending to be two (G,L) couples, which will
become a four-spirit Vico foursome (optimally
sexually compatible across all six possible links).

For definitions of my terminology see my
Eight Sexual Harmonics theory at
https://www.nfld.com/~dalton/8H.html
(but I have yet to add the black widow/er theory to it).

My uncle tells me how he met my aunt after he had given up on girls.
Thus, in an effort to get a woman, I've given up girls several times
this year.

Maybe your aunt is a trans man?

Anyway, a new judging of my workings by Goddess is in
progress, so there is a chance that the recent change
regarding incompatible couples could be reversed again.
(I guess the last supposed judging was fake.)

FULL RESET, with two changes required:

1. committed incompatible couples that are non-abusive, or
will be made non-abusive by becoming optimally sexually
compatible, will be made optimally sexually compatible
and wonrCOt be split across species boundaries, and

2. the group I recently divined would go into English species
will not.

Those have been back and forth a few times.
This is getting fucking ridiculous.
--
https://www.nfld.com/~dalton/dtales.html (Salmon on the Thorns)
rCLMy momma was a waitress; My daddy a truck driver; The thing
that kept their power from them; Slowed me down awhile.rCY (Ferron)

--- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: rec.arts.tv

David Dalton wrote:

On Sep 17, 2026, David Dalton wrote
(in article<0001HW.305C4CA8004C48E030B4CE38F@news.eternal-september.org>):

On Sep 17, 2026, Lane W wrote
(in article <118gpd6$b2b8$1@dont-email.me>):

David Dalton wrote:

From the thread rCLSarah is my press agentrCY on alt.religion.druid : >>>>
#1 has been reversed again (liferCOs a bitch)---incompatible
human couples will be broken across species boundaries
in the sudden evolution and wonrCOt be made optimally
sexually compatible.

I divine that, worldwide, 11% of couples already were
optimally sexually compatible, 64% were partially
compatible (compatible, but less than optimally
compatible), and 25% were incompatible.

How can it be as high as 25%? Well, it is higher in
some countries than others. Also, it includes:

one-way attraction relationships:
a) gay--straight-type-1-F
b) gay--bif
c) lesbian--straight-type-1-M
d) lesbian--bim
e) straight-type-2-M--straight-type-1-F
f) straight-type-2-F--straight-type-1-M

and

platonic relationships:
g) gay--lesbian
h) gay--straight-type-2-F
i) lesbian--straight-type-2-M
j) straight-type-2-M--straight-type-2-F (rare)

Note I define bisexual as attracted to both genders, not
necessarily having sex with both genders, so there are
far more bims and bifs than reported in surveys.

(a)-(d) result in the black widow/er effect (see my recent
posts on sci.med.diseases.cancer ).

Again all of (a)--(j) will be split across species boundaries
and wonrCOt be made optimally sexually compatible.
Also one-way attraction will be turned off so gays and
lesbians will not be able to form deceptive one-way
attraction relationships in their new species.

An exception is fence-jumping foursomes of 2G+2L
pretending to be two (G,L) couples, which will
become a four-spirit Vico foursome (optimally
sexually compatible across all six possible links).

For definitions of my terminology see my
Eight Sexual Harmonics theory at
https://www.nfld.com/~dalton/8H.html
(but I have yet to add the black widow/er theory to it).

My uncle tells me how he met my aunt after he had given up on girls.
Thus, in an effort to get a woman, I've given up girls several times
this year.

Maybe your aunt is a trans man?

Anyway, a new judging of my workings by Goddess is in
progress, so there is a chance that the recent change
regarding incompatible couples could be reversed again.
(I guess the last supposed judging was fake.)

FULL RESET, with two changes required:

1. committed incompatible couples that are non-abusive, or
will be made non-abusive by becoming optimally sexually
compatible, will be made optimally sexually compatible
and wonrCOt be split across species boundaries, and

2. the group I recently divined would go into English species
will not.

Those have been back and forth a few times.
This is getting fucking ridiculous.

Perhaps your father is an angus cow? I learned a great deal of English
from mine, but the lack is understandable, were this the case.
--
Everything I fight for leaves a bitter taste
Everything I cry for laughs into my face
Everything I scream for barely knows my name
Everything I'd die for will die just the same
--- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: rec.arts.tv

Dude wrote:

On 9/17/2026 8:09 AM, jojo wrote:

Lane W wrote:

David Dalton wrote:

-aFrom the thread rCLSarah is my press agentrCY on
alt.religion.druid :

#1 has been reversed again (liferCOs a bitch)---incompatible
human couples will be broken across species boundaries
in the sudden evolution and wonrCOt be made optimally
sexually compatible.

I divine that, worldwide, 11% of couples already were
optimally sexually compatible, 64% were partially
compatible (compatible, but less than optimally
compatible), and 25% were incompatible.

How can it be as high as 25%? Well, it is higher in
some countries than others. Also, it includes:

one-way attraction relationships:
a) gay--straight-type-1-F
b) gay--bif
c) lesbian--straight-type-1-M
d) lesbian--bim
e) straight-type-2-M--straight-type-1-F
f) straight-type-2-F--straight-type-1-M

and

platonic relationships:
g) gay--lesbian
h) gay--straight-type-2-F
i) lesbian--straight-type-2-M
j) straight-type-2-M--straight-type-2-F (rare)

Note I define bisexual as attracted to both genders, not
necessarily having sex with both genders, so there are
far more bims and bifs than reported in surveys.

(a)-(d) result in the black widow/er effect (see my recent
posts on sci.med.diseases.cancer ).

Again all of (a)--(j) will be split across species boundaries
and wonrCOt be made optimally sexually compatible.
Also one-way attraction will be turned off so gays and
lesbians will not be able to form deceptive one-way
attraction relationships in their new species.

An exception is fence-jumping foursomes of 2G+2L
pretending to be two (G,L) couples, which will
become a four-spirit Vico foursome (optimally
sexually compatible across all six possible links).

For definitions of my terminology see my
Eight Sexual Harmonics theory at
https://www.nfld.com/~dalton/8H.html
(but I have yet to add the black widow/er theory to it).

My uncle tells me how he met my aunt after he had given up on
girls. Thus, in an effort to get a woman, I've given up girls
several times this year.

forget it lane, you are not fit for reltionships. one should
know oneself.

Let's not get personal.

I've been reading these boards for thirty years and I've never
heard of anyone hooking up with girls at recarts.tv. YMMV.

oh you have not spoken to lane yet, try having 1 conversation
with him. just 1.

--- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: rec.arts.tv

Lane W wrote:

David Dalton wrote:

On Sep 17, 2026, David Dalton wrote
(in
article<0001HW.305C4CA8004C48E030B4CE38F@news.eternal-september.org>):

On Sep 17, 2026, Lane W wrote
(in article <118gpd6$b2b8$1@dont-email.me>):

David Dalton wrote:

-aFrom the thread rCLSarah is my press agentrCY on
alt.religion.druid :

#1 has been reversed again (liferCOs a bitch)---incompatible
human couples will be broken across species boundaries
in the sudden evolution and wonrCOt be made optimally
sexually compatible.

I divine that, worldwide, 11% of couples already were
optimally sexually compatible, 64% were partially
compatible (compatible, but less than optimally
compatible), and 25% were incompatible.

How can it be as high as 25%? Well, it is higher in
some countries than others. Also, it includes:

one-way attraction relationships:
a) gay--straight-type-1-F
b) gay--bif
c) lesbian--straight-type-1-M
d) lesbian--bim
e) straight-type-2-M--straight-type-1-F
f) straight-type-2-F--straight-type-1-M

and

platonic relationships:
g) gay--lesbian
h) gay--straight-type-2-F
i) lesbian--straight-type-2-M
j) straight-type-2-M--straight-type-2-F (rare)

Note I define bisexual as attracted to both genders, not
necessarily having sex with both genders, so there are
far more bims and bifs than reported in surveys.

(a)-(d) result in the black widow/er effect (see my recent
posts on sci.med.diseases.cancer ).

Again all of (a)--(j) will be split across species boundaries
and wonrCOt be made optimally sexually compatible.
Also one-way attraction will be turned off so gays and
lesbians will not be able to form deceptive one-way
attraction relationships in their new species.

An exception is fence-jumping foursomes of 2G+2L
pretending to be two (G,L) couples, which will
become a four-spirit Vico foursome (optimally
sexually compatible across all six possible links).

For definitions of my terminology see my
Eight Sexual Harmonics theory at
https://www.nfld.com/~dalton/8H.html
(but I have yet to add the black widow/er theory to it).

My uncle tells me how he met my aunt after he had given up on
girls.
Thus, in an effort to get a woman, I've given up girls
several times
this year.

Maybe your aunt is a trans man?

Anyway, a new judging of my workings by Goddess is in
progress, so there is a chance that the recent change
regarding incompatible couples could be reversed again.
(I guess the last supposed judging was fake.)

FULL RESET, with two changes required:

1. committed incompatible couples that are non-abusive, or
will be made non-abusive by becoming optimally sexually
compatible, will be made optimally sexually compatible
and wonrCOt be split across species boundaries, and

2. the group I recently divined would go into English species
will not.

Those have been back and forth a few times.
This is getting fucking ridiculous.

Perhaps your father is an angus cow? I learned a great deal of
English from mine, but the lack is understandable, were this the
case.

are you sure your aunt is not a trans man?

--- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: rec.arts.tv

jojo wrote:

Dude wrote:

On 9/17/2026 8:09 AM, jojo wrote:

Lane W wrote:

David Dalton wrote:

-aFrom the thread rCLSarah is my press agentrCY on alt.religion.druid : >>>>>
#1 has been reversed again (liferCOs a bitch)---incompatible
human couples will be broken across species boundaries
in the sudden evolution and wonrCOt be made optimally
sexually compatible.

I divine that, worldwide, 11% of couples already were
optimally sexually compatible, 64% were partially
compatible (compatible, but less than optimally
compatible), and 25% were incompatible.

How can it be as high as 25%? Well, it is higher in
some countries than others. Also, it includes:

one-way attraction relationships:
a) gay--straight-type-1-F
b) gay--bif
c) lesbian--straight-type-1-M
d) lesbian--bim
e) straight-type-2-M--straight-type-1-F
f) straight-type-2-F--straight-type-1-M

and

platonic relationships:
g) gay--lesbian
h) gay--straight-type-2-F
i) lesbian--straight-type-2-M
j) straight-type-2-M--straight-type-2-F (rare)

Note I define bisexual as attracted to both genders, not
necessarily having sex with both genders, so there are
far more bims and bifs than reported in surveys.

(a)-(d) result in the black widow/er effect (see my recent
posts on sci.med.diseases.cancer ).

Again all of (a)--(j) will be split across species boundaries
and wonrCOt be made optimally sexually compatible.
Also one-way attraction will be turned off so gays and
lesbians will not be able to form deceptive one-way
attraction relationships in their new species.

An exception is fence-jumping foursomes of 2G+2L
pretending to be two (G,L) couples, which will
become a four-spirit Vico foursome (optimally
sexually compatible across all six possible links).

For definitions of my terminology see my
Eight Sexual Harmonics theory at
https://www.nfld.com/~dalton/8H.html
(but I have yet to add the black widow/er theory to it).

My uncle tells me how he met my aunt after he had given up on girls.
Thus, in an effort to get a woman, I've given up girls several times
this year.

forget it lane, you are not fit for reltionships. one should know
oneself.

Let's not get personal.

I've been reading these boards for thirty years and I've never heard
of anyone hooking up with girls at recarts.tv. YMMV.

oh you have not spoken to lane yet, try having 1 conversation with him.
just 1.

Tryin' to take what isn't yours like a goddamn rat.
See, personally I wouldn't want to go out like that...

I'd love to shake your hand, Dude. You're doing a nice job keeping order around here. Myself, I have extremely curtailed most of my nastiest
comments.
--
Everything I fight for leaves a bitter taste
Everything I cry for laughs into my face
Everything I scream for barely knows my name
Everything I'd die for will die just the same
--- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: rec.arts.tv

On 9/18/2026 6:19 AM, jojo wrote:

Dude wrote:

On 9/17/2026 8:09 AM, jojo wrote:

Lane W wrote:

David Dalton wrote:

-aFrom the thread rCLSarah is my press agentrCY on alt.religion.druid : >>>>>
#1 has been reversed again (liferCOs a bitch)---incompatible
human couples will be broken across species boundaries
in the sudden evolution and wonrCOt be made optimally
sexually compatible.

I divine that, worldwide, 11% of couples already were
optimally sexually compatible, 64% were partially
compatible (compatible, but less than optimally
compatible), and 25% were incompatible.

How can it be as high as 25%? Well, it is higher in
some countries than others. Also, it includes:

one-way attraction relationships:
a) gay--straight-type-1-F
b) gay--bif
c) lesbian--straight-type-1-M
d) lesbian--bim
e) straight-type-2-M--straight-type-1-F
f) straight-type-2-F--straight-type-1-M

and

platonic relationships:
g) gay--lesbian
h) gay--straight-type-2-F
i) lesbian--straight-type-2-M
j) straight-type-2-M--straight-type-2-F (rare)

Note I define bisexual as attracted to both genders, not
necessarily having sex with both genders, so there are
far more bims and bifs than reported in surveys.

(a)-(d) result in the black widow/er effect (see my recent
posts on sci.med.diseases.cancer ).

Again all of (a)--(j) will be split across species boundaries
and wonrCOt be made optimally sexually compatible.
Also one-way attraction will be turned off so gays and
lesbians will not be able to form deceptive one-way
attraction relationships in their new species.

An exception is fence-jumping foursomes of 2G+2L
pretending to be two (G,L) couples, which will
become a four-spirit Vico foursome (optimally
sexually compatible across all six possible links).

For definitions of my terminology see my
Eight Sexual Harmonics theory at
https://www.nfld.com/~dalton/8H.html
(but I have yet to add the black widow/er theory to it).

My uncle tells me how he met my aunt after he had given up on girls.
Thus, in an effort to get a woman, I've given up girls several times
this year.

forget it lane, you are not fit for reltionships. one should know
oneself.

Let's not get personal.

I've been reading these boards for thirty years and I've never heard
of anyone hooking up with girls at recarts.tv. YMMV.

oh you have not spoken to lane yet, try having 1 conversation with him.
just 1.

So, for the record, I've never heard of anyone hooking up with girls on
this board.

Look what happened to Evelyn, Kitty and Cupcake!
--- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: rec.arts.tv

On Sep 18, 2026, David Dalton wrote
(in article<0001HW.305CFF98005B579D30B4CE38F@news.eternal-september.org>):

On Sep 17, 2026, David Dalton wrote
(in article<0001HW.305C4CA8004C48E030B4CE38F@news.eternal-september.org>):

On Sep 17, 2026, Lane W wrote
(in article <118gpd6$b2b8$1@dont-email.me>):

David Dalton wrote:

From the thread rCLSarah is my press agentrCY on alt.religion.druid :

#1 has been reversed again (liferCOs a bitch)---incompatible
human couples will be broken across species boundaries
in the sudden evolution and wonrCOt be made optimally
sexually compatible.

I divine that, worldwide, 11% of couples already were
optimally sexually compatible, 64% were partially
compatible (compatible, but less than optimally
compatible), and 25% were incompatible.

How can it be as high as 25%? Well, it is higher in
some countries than others. Also, it includes:

one-way attraction relationships:
a) gay--straight-type-1-F
b) gay--bif
c) lesbian--straight-type-1-M
d) lesbian--bim
e) straight-type-2-M--straight-type-1-F
f) straight-type-2-F--straight-type-1-M

and

platonic relationships:
g) gay--lesbian
h) gay--straight-type-2-F
i) lesbian--straight-type-2-M
j) straight-type-2-M--straight-type-2-F (rare)

Note I define bisexual as attracted to both genders, not
necessarily having sex with both genders, so there are
far more bims and bifs than reported in surveys.

(a)-(d) result in the black widow/er effect (see my recent
posts on sci.med.diseases.cancer ).

Again all of (a)--(j) will be split across species boundaries
and wonrCOt be made optimally sexually compatible.
Also one-way attraction will be turned off so gays and
lesbians will not be able to form deceptive one-way
attraction relationships in their new species.

An exception is fence-jumping foursomes of 2G+2L
pretending to be two (G,L) couples, which will
become a four-spirit Vico foursome (optimally
sexually compatible across all six possible links).

For definitions of my terminology see my
Eight Sexual Harmonics theory at
https://www.nfld.com/~dalton/8H.html
(but I have yet to add the black widow/er theory to it).

My uncle tells me how he met my aunt after he had given up on girls. Thus, in an effort to get a woman, I've given up girls several times
this year.

Maybe your aunt is a trans man?

Anyway, a new judging of my workings by Goddess is in
progress, so there is a chance that the recent change
regarding incompatible couples could be reversed again.
(I guess the last supposed judging was fake.)

FULL RESET, with two changes required:

1. committed incompatible couples that are non-abusive, or
will be made non-abusive by becoming optimally sexually
compatible, will be made optimally sexually compatible
and wonrCOt be split across species boundaries, and

2. the group I recently divined would go into English species
will not.

Those have been back and forth a few times.

Those two have been reversed again.

1. incompatible human couples will be split across species
boundaries and wonrCOt be made optimally sexually compatible.

I had hoped that this would be reversed, with qualifications
for abusive relationships, in a mystic attempt I started
tonight, but it wasnrCOt, even though I wanted it to be.
So I am hoping that this attempt fails and that I get
to try again at Harvest Moon and that it will be reversed
then.
--
https://www.nfld.com/~dalton/dtales.html (Salmon on the Thorns)
rCLMy momma was a waitress; My daddy a truck driver; The thing
that kept their power from them; Slowed me down awhile.rCY (Ferron)

--- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: rec.arts.tv

On Sep 22, 2026, David Dalton wrote
(in article<0001HW.30623A7B00EA211D30A8DE38F@news.eternal-september.org>):

On Sep 18, 2026, David Dalton wrote
(in article<0001HW.305CFF98005B579D30B4CE38F@news.eternal-september.org>):

On Sep 17, 2026, David Dalton wrote
(in article<0001HW.305C4CA8004C48E030B4CE38F@news.eternal-september.org>):

On Sep 17, 2026, Lane W wrote
(in article <118gpd6$b2b8$1@dont-email.me>):

David Dalton wrote:

From the thread rCLSarah is my press agentrCY on alt.religion.druid :

#1 has been reversed again (liferCOs a bitch)---incompatible
human couples will be broken across species boundaries
in the sudden evolution and wonrCOt be made optimally
sexually compatible.

I divine that, worldwide, 11% of couples already were
optimally sexually compatible, 64% were partially
compatible (compatible, but less than optimally
compatible), and 25% were incompatible.

How can it be as high as 25%? Well, it is higher in
some countries than others. Also, it includes:

one-way attraction relationships:
a) gay--straight-type-1-F
b) gay--bif
c) lesbian--straight-type-1-M
d) lesbian--bim
e) straight-type-2-M--straight-type-1-F
f) straight-type-2-F--straight-type-1-M

and

platonic relationships:
g) gay--lesbian
h) gay--straight-type-2-F
i) lesbian--straight-type-2-M
j) straight-type-2-M--straight-type-2-F (rare)

Note I define bisexual as attracted to both genders, not
necessarily having sex with both genders, so there are
far more bims and bifs than reported in surveys.

(a)-(d) result in the black widow/er effect (see my recent
posts on sci.med.diseases.cancer ).

Again all of (a)--(j) will be split across species boundaries
and wonrCOt be made optimally sexually compatible.
Also one-way attraction will be turned off so gays and
lesbians will not be able to form deceptive one-way
attraction relationships in their new species.

An exception is fence-jumping foursomes of 2G+2L
pretending to be two (G,L) couples, which will
become a four-spirit Vico foursome (optimally
sexually compatible across all six possible links).

For definitions of my terminology see my
Eight Sexual Harmonics theory at
https://www.nfld.com/~dalton/8H.html
(but I have yet to add the black widow/er theory to it).

My uncle tells me how he met my aunt after he had given up on girls. Thus, in an effort to get a woman, I've given up girls several times this year.

Maybe your aunt is a trans man?

Anyway, a new judging of my workings by Goddess is in
progress, so there is a chance that the recent change
regarding incompatible couples could be reversed again.
(I guess the last supposed judging was fake.)

FULL RESET, with two changes required:

1. committed incompatible couples that are non-abusive, or
will be made non-abusive by becoming optimally sexually
compatible, will be made optimally sexually compatible
and wonrCOt be split across species boundaries, and

2. the group I recently divined would go into English species
will not.

Those have been back and forth a few times.

Those two have been reversed again.

1. incompatible human couples will be split across species
boundaries and wonrCOt be made optimally sexually compatible.

I had hoped that this would be reversed, with qualifications
for abusive relationships, in a mystic attempt I started
tonight, but it wasnrCOt, even though I wanted it to be.
So I am hoping that this attempt fails and that I get
to try again at Harvest Moon and that it will be reversed
then.

OK, it was reversed again.

From the thread rCLHarvest Moon weekrCY on alt.religion.druid :

"3. committed incompatible couples that are non-abusive,
or will be made non-abusive by becoming optimally
sexually compatible, will be made optimally sexually
compatible and wonrCOt be split across species boundaries."
--
https://www.nfld.com/~dalton/dtales.html (Salmon on the Thorns)
rCLMy momma was a waitress; My daddy a truck driver; The thing
that kept their power from them; Slowed me down awhile.rCY (Ferron)

--- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: rec.arts.tv

On Sep 23, 2026, David Dalton wrote
(in article<0001HW.306484AC0104E68630A8DE38F@news.eternal-september.org>):

On Sep 22, 2026, David Dalton wrote
(in article<0001HW.30623A7B00EA211D30A8DE38F@news.eternal-september.org>):

On Sep 18, 2026, David Dalton wrote
(in article<0001HW.305CFF98005B579D30B4CE38F@news.eternal-september.org>):

On Sep 17, 2026, David Dalton wrote
(in article<0001HW.305C4CA8004C48E030B4CE38F@news.eternal-september.org>):

On Sep 17, 2026, Lane W wrote
(in article <118gpd6$b2b8$1@dont-email.me>):

David Dalton wrote:

From the thread rCLSarah is my press agentrCY on alt.religion.druid :

#1 has been reversed again (liferCOs a bitch)---incompatible
human couples will be broken across species boundaries
in the sudden evolution and wonrCOt be made optimally
sexually compatible.

I divine that, worldwide, 11% of couples already were
optimally sexually compatible, 64% were partially
compatible (compatible, but less than optimally
compatible), and 25% were incompatible.

How can it be as high as 25%? Well, it is higher in
some countries than others. Also, it includes:

one-way attraction relationships:
a) gay--straight-type-1-F
b) gay--bif
c) lesbian--straight-type-1-M
d) lesbian--bim
e) straight-type-2-M--straight-type-1-F
f) straight-type-2-F--straight-type-1-M

and

platonic relationships:
g) gay--lesbian
h) gay--straight-type-2-F
i) lesbian--straight-type-2-M
j) straight-type-2-M--straight-type-2-F (rare)

Note I define bisexual as attracted to both genders, not necessarily having sex with both genders, so there are
far more bims and bifs than reported in surveys.

(a)-(d) result in the black widow/er effect (see my recent
posts on sci.med.diseases.cancer ).

Again all of (a)--(j) will be split across species boundaries
and wonrCOt be made optimally sexually compatible.
Also one-way attraction will be turned off so gays and
lesbians will not be able to form deceptive one-way
attraction relationships in their new species.

An exception is fence-jumping foursomes of 2G+2L
pretending to be two (G,L) couples, which will
become a four-spirit Vico foursome (optimally
sexually compatible across all six possible links).

For definitions of my terminology see my
Eight Sexual Harmonics theory at https://www.nfld.com/~dalton/8H.html
(but I have yet to add the black widow/er theory to it).

My uncle tells me how he met my aunt after he had given up on girls. Thus, in an effort to get a woman, I've given up girls several times this year.

Maybe your aunt is a trans man?

Anyway, a new judging of my workings by Goddess is in
progress, so there is a chance that the recent change
regarding incompatible couples could be reversed again.
(I guess the last supposed judging was fake.)

FULL RESET, with two changes required:

1. committed incompatible couples that are non-abusive, or
will be made non-abusive by becoming optimally sexually
compatible, will be made optimally sexually compatible
and wonrCOt be split across species boundaries, and

2. the group I recently divined would go into English species
will not.

Those have been back and forth a few times.

Those two have been reversed again.

1. incompatible human couples will be split across species
boundaries and wonrCOt be made optimally sexually compatible.

I had hoped that this would be reversed, with qualifications
for abusive relationships, in a mystic attempt I started
tonight, but it wasnrCOt, even though I wanted it to be.
So I am hoping that this attempt fails and that I get
to try again at Harvest Moon and that it will be reversed
then.

OK, it was reversed again.

From the thread rCLHarvest Moon weekrCY on alt.religion.druid :

"3. committed incompatible couples that are non-abusive,
or will be made non-abusive by becoming optimally
sexually compatible, will be made optimally sexually
compatible and wonrCOt be split across species boundaries."

And unfortunately, against my wishes, it has been reversed
again:

"2. incompatible human couples will be split across species
boundaries and wonrCOt be made optimally sexually compatible."
--
https://www.nfld.com/~dalton/dtales.html (Salmon on the Thorns)
rCLMy momma was a waitress; My daddy a truck driver; The thing
that kept their power from them; Slowed me down awhile.rCY (Ferron)

--- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2