From Newsgroup: rec.arts.tv

On Sep 16, 2026 at 8:29:10 AM PDT, "Rhino" <no_offline_contact@example.com> wrote:

An English village named Piddington has voted overwhelmingly to leave
the UK.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BLUR7EA6bds [12 minutes]

This, of course, is a strictly symbolic act and has no legal weight at
all since there is no provision under UK law for villages, towns or
cities to secede from their country.

The reason for the vote? Deep concerns over plans to establish housing
for migrants on a nearby military base. The government wants to house
1256 migrants close to the village which far exceeds the village's population of under 400.

It is probably no coincidence that their local MP is a Liberal-Democrat
who championed the area serving as a sanctuary for refugees.

I read an article about this and was amazed that even when reality comes crashing in on their heads, these people are still captured by woke ideology. They oppose the camp full of illegal Bomalians, but not because they're 3rd-world savages who are coming to take whatever they can from the British people-- whether it's free financial benefits or sex with their women and children-- and give nothing in return. No, even as they oppose the camp, they can't help but virtue-signal that they're still woke:

"It's not that asylum seekers are dangerous. It's men in general." So even if they were a camp full of Nordics and Scandinavians, they'd still be all about the rapin' according to this dingbat. Men are evil no matter where they come from.

"Our village is just in the wrong location." i.e., I fully support the continued importation of a bazillion Bomalians to leech off our society, raise my taxes through the roof, and make me a minority in my own country. It's the penance we owe for being white and successful after all. I just don't think this particular place is the right one for them. Please inflict them on
someone else.

"We're just worried about the health of the migrants in an isolated place with limited services like Piddington. Conditions like this can bring out the worst in any man."

Of course they never think to even ask their government overlords why they're ALL male in the first place, since the government has been beating the drum
for years that these are women, children, and families fleeing persecution.
Yet when it comes time to quintuple the population of a small town overnight with yet another load of "refugees" from France, they're all strangely males between the ages of 20 and 40. No women. No kids. Just fighting-age men who lounge about all day doing nothing but collecting your tax money and staring
at your 12-year-old daughter and licking their lips as you walk her to
school.

I also recently read that in these Arab dustbins in the Middle East and
Africa, they're literally advertising Europe in general and the UK in particular as a place where a lonely Muslim man can go get easy sex with white infidel women, which is blessed by Islamic theology as not even being a sin. The Quran allows Muslims to sexually abuse women if they are infidels because infidels are worthless garbage. So is anyone surprised that when you let literally millions of 20-something barbarians from this savage death cult
flood into your society, that rapes shoot into the stratosphere? And yet the government keeps doing it.

At this point, Trump would be morally justified in arming the British people
so that they could take out their own government because their government is
as much a threat to them as any external dictator ever could be.


--- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: rec.arts.tv

BTR1701 <atropos@mac.com> wrote:

I read an article about this and was amazed that even when reality comes >crashing in on their heads, these people are still captured by woke ideology. >They oppose the camp full of illegal Bomalians, but not because they're >3rd-world savages who are coming to take whatever they can from the British >people-- whether it's free financial benefits or sex with their women and >children-- and give nothing in return. No, even as they oppose the camp, they >can't help but virtue-signal that they're still woke:

"It's not that asylum seekers are dangerous. It's men in general." So even if >they were a camp full of Nordics and Scandinavians, they'd still be all about >the rapin' according to this dingbat. Men are evil no matter where they come >from.

Been there, done that. Vikings were white slavers.

. . .

--- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: rec.arts.tv

On 2026-09-17 1:16 p.m., BTR1701 wrote:

On Sep 16, 2026 at 8:29:10 AM PDT, "Rhino" <no_offline_contact@example.com> wrote:

An English village named Piddington has voted overwhelmingly to leave
the UK.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BLUR7EA6bds [12 minutes]

This, of course, is a strictly symbolic act and has no legal weight at
all since there is no provision under UK law for villages, towns or
cities to secede from their country.

The reason for the vote? Deep concerns over plans to establish housing
for migrants on a nearby military base. The government wants to house
1256 migrants close to the village which far exceeds the village's
population of under 400.

It is probably no coincidence that their local MP is a Liberal-Democrat
who championed the area serving as a sanctuary for refugees.

I read an article about this and was amazed that even when reality comes crashing in on their heads, these people are still captured by woke ideology. They oppose the camp full of illegal Bomalians, but not because they're 3rd-world savages who are coming to take whatever they can from the British people-- whether it's free financial benefits or sex with their women and children-- and give nothing in return. No, even as they oppose the camp, they can't help but virtue-signal that they're still woke:

"It's not that asylum seekers are dangerous. It's men in general." So even if they were a camp full of Nordics and Scandinavians, they'd still be all about the rapin' according to this dingbat. Men are evil no matter where they come from.

"Our village is just in the wrong location." i.e., I fully support the continued importation of a bazillion Bomalians to leech off our society, raise
my taxes through the roof, and make me a minority in my own country. It's the penance we owe for being white and successful after all. I just don't think this particular place is the right one for them. Please inflict them on someone else.

"We're just worried about the health of the migrants in an isolated place with
limited services like Piddington. Conditions like this can bring out the worst
in any man."

I saw a speech by the spokesman who announced the referendum result to
the media and he said there was a wide diversity of political opinion in
the village so the remarks you're citing may be from the leftist fringe
in the village. But he was very clear in saying the women are terrified,
not of diversity but sexual assault on them and their daughters.

Of course they never think to even ask their government overlords why they're ALL male in the first place, since the government has been beating the drum for years that these are women, children, and families fleeing persecution. Yet when it comes time to quintuple the population of a small town overnight with yet another load of "refugees" from France, they're all strangely males between the ages of 20 and 40. No women. No kids. Just fighting-age men who lounge about all day doing nothing but collecting your tax money and staring at your 12-year-old daughter and licking their lips as you walk her to school.

The mainstream media NEVER talk about the age/gender of the "refugees".
I think they realize that admitting the startling uniformity there is kryptonite for them so they just don't talk about it. And they're always nattering about how these new people are doctors and engineers -
although *potential* doctors and engineers is slightly more realistic
but only slightly. Most of them will be on the dole for the rest of
their lives and if they work at all, they will do doing DoorDash
deliveries or working in the kebab shops. And that's the honest one; I
have no doubt many will be turning to crime to make a living and
supplement the money they get on the dole.t

I saw an article the other day that said a whistleblower in the
organization that decides where refugee claimants are refugees and not migrants KNOWS that only 1% of the refugee claimants are real refugees;
the rest are economic migrants. The fucking government KNOWS these
people aren't refugees but let's them in anyway!!

I also recently read that in these Arab dustbins in the Middle East and Africa, they're literally advertising Europe in general and the UK in particular as a place where a lonely Muslim man can go get easy sex with white
infidel women, which is blessed by Islamic theology as not even being a sin. The Quran allows Muslims to sexually abuse women if they are infidels because infidels are worthless garbage. So is anyone surprised that when you let literally millions of 20-something barbarians from this savage death cult flood into your society, that rapes shoot into the stratosphere? And yet the government keeps doing it.

It's like their own governments don't want them, isn't it? More likely,
it's an outfit like the Muslim Brotherhood and its many offshoot
organizations that are sending as many men to the West as they can as
they work out the rest of the planning: training and arming them to
launch jihad from within the West. I've already heard rumours that
they've got summer camps in the UK that are getting used for training
and that arms caches are filling up but no one is sharing hard proof yet.

At this point, Trump would be morally justified in arming the British people so that they could take out their own government because their government is as much a threat to them as any external dictator ever could be.

The current government - and sadly the previous Conservative government
- both bear massive responsibility for the current trajectory although
it actually began with the election of Tony Blair. Most of the British
people are thoroughly sick of the Conservatives and Labour so Reform is
the brightest hope right now if they don't make any big mistakes.

Reform was recently gifted 72 million pounds by just two wealthy donors
to build their organizations and it's caused a huge kerfuffle in the UK, although the Conservatives and Labour and have taken in much more in the
past generation so it's hard to take their wailing seriously.
--
Rhino
--- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: rec.arts.tv

On Sep 17, 2026 at 8:40:45 PM PDT, "Rhino" <no_offline_contact@example.com> wrote:

On 2026-09-17 1:16 p.m., BTR1701 wrote:

On Sep 16, 2026 at 8:29:10 AM PDT, "Rhino" <no_offline_contact@example.com> >> wrote:

An English village named Piddington has voted overwhelmingly to leave
the UK.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BLUR7EA6bds [12 minutes]

This, of course, is a strictly symbolic act and has no legal weight at
all since there is no provision under UK law for villages, towns or
cities to secede from their country.

The reason for the vote? Deep concerns over plans to establish housing
for migrants on a nearby military base. The government wants to house
1256 migrants close to the village which far exceeds the village's
population of under 400.

It is probably no coincidence that their local MP is a Liberal-Democrat >>> who championed the area serving as a sanctuary for refugees.

I read an article about this and was amazed that even when reality comes
crashing in on their heads, these people are still captured by woke
ideology.
They oppose the camp full of illegal Bomalians, but not because they're
3rd-world savages who are coming to take whatever they can from the British >> people-- whether it's free financial benefits or sex with their women and >> children-- and give nothing in return. No, even as they oppose the camp,
they
can't help but virtue-signal that they're still woke:

"It's not that asylum seekers are dangerous. It's men in general." So even >> if
they were a camp full of Nordics and Scandinavians, they'd still be all
about
the rapin' according to this dingbat. Men are evil no matter where they come
from.

"Our village is just in the wrong location." i.e., I fully support the
continued importation of a bazillion Bomalians to leech off our society,
raise
my taxes through the roof, and make me a minority in my own country. It's >> the
penance we owe for being white and successful after all. I just don't think >> this particular place is the right one for them. Please inflict them on
someone else.

"We're just worried about the health of the migrants in an isolated place >> with
limited services like Piddington. Conditions like this can bring out the
worst
in any man."

I saw a speech by the spokesman who announced the referendum result to
the media and he said there was a wide diversity of political opinion in
the village so the remarks you're citing may be from the leftist fringe
in the village. But he was very clear in saying the women are terrified,
not of diversity but sexual assault on them and their daughters.

Of course they never think to even ask their government overlords why
they're
ALL male in the first place, since the government has been beating the drum >> for years that these are women, children, and families fleeing persecution. >> Yet when it comes time to quintuple the population of a small town overnight
with yet another load of "refugees" from France, they're all strangely males
between the ages of 20 and 40. No women. No kids. Just fighting-age men who >> lounge about all day doing nothing but collecting your tax money and staring
at your 12-year-old daughter and licking their lips as you walk her to
school.

The mainstream media NEVER talk about the age/gender of the "refugees".
I think they realize that admitting the startling uniformity there is kryptonite for them so they just don't talk about it. And they're always nattering about how these new people are doctors and engineers -
although *potential* doctors and engineers is slightly more realistic
but only slightly. Most of them will be on the dole for the rest of
their lives and if they work at all, they will do doing DoorDash
deliveries or working in the kebab shops. And that's the honest one; I
have no doubt many will be turning to crime to make a living and
supplement the money they get on the dole.t

I saw an article the other day that said a whistleblower in the
organization that decides where refugee claimants are refugees and not migrants KNOWS that only 1% of the refugee claimants are real refugees;
the rest are economic migrants. The fucking government KNOWS these
people aren't refugees but let's them in anyway!!

Well, the vast majority of them are coming across the Channel in dinghys from *France*. France isn't at war. It's not an oppressive government. What persecution can they possibly be fleeing in France that would make them refugees? Lack of croissants in their morning breakfast?


--- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: rec.arts.tv

On Sep 17, 2026 at 8:40:45 PM PDT, "Rhino" <no_offline_contact@example.com> wrote:

On 2026-09-17 1:16 p.m., BTR1701 wrote:

On Sep 16, 2026 at 8:29:10 AM PDT, "Rhino" <no_offline_contact@example.com> >> wrote:

An English village named Piddington has voted overwhelmingly to leave
the UK.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BLUR7EA6bds [12 minutes]

This, of course, is a strictly symbolic act and has no legal weight at
all since there is no provision under UK law for villages, towns or
cities to secede from their country.

The reason for the vote? Deep concerns over plans to establish housing
for migrants on a nearby military base. The government wants to house
1256 migrants close to the village which far exceeds the village's
population of under 400.

It is probably no coincidence that their local MP is a Liberal-Democrat >>> who championed the area serving as a sanctuary for refugees.

I read an article about this and was amazed that even when reality comes
crashing in on their heads, these people are still captured by woke
ideology.
They oppose the camp full of illegal Bomalians, but not because they're
3rd-world savages who are coming to take whatever they can from the British >> people-- whether it's free financial benefits or sex with their women and >> children-- and give nothing in return. No, even as they oppose the camp,
they
can't help but virtue-signal that they're still woke:

"It's not that asylum seekers are dangerous. It's men in general." So even >> if
they were a camp full of Nordics and Scandinavians, they'd still be all
about
the rapin' according to this dingbat. Men are evil no matter where they come
from.

"Our village is just in the wrong location." i.e., I fully support the
continued importation of a bazillion Bomalians to leech off our society,
raise
my taxes through the roof, and make me a minority in my own country. It's >> the
penance we owe for being white and successful after all. I just don't think >> this particular place is the right one for them. Please inflict them on
someone else.

"We're just worried about the health of the migrants in an isolated place >> with
limited services like Piddington. Conditions like this can bring out the
worst
in any man."

I saw a speech by the spokesman who announced the referendum result to
the media and he said there was a wide diversity of political opinion in
the village so the remarks you're citing may be from the leftist fringe
in the village. But he was very clear in saying the women are terrified,
not of diversity but sexual assault on them and their daughters.

Here you go:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jkku3vAPJQw&pp=0gcJCSQMAYcqIYzv


--- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: rec.arts.tv

On 2026-09-18 12:23 a.m., BTR1701 wrote:

On Sep 17, 2026 at 8:40:45 PM PDT, "Rhino" <no_offline_contact@example.com> wrote:

On 2026-09-17 1:16 p.m., BTR1701 wrote:

On Sep 16, 2026 at 8:29:10 AM PDT, "Rhino" <no_offline_contact@example.com>
wrote:

An English village named Piddington has voted overwhelmingly to leave >>>> the UK.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BLUR7EA6bds [12 minutes]

This, of course, is a strictly symbolic act and has no legal weight at >>>> all since there is no provision under UK law for villages, towns or
cities to secede from their country.

The reason for the vote? Deep concerns over plans to establish housing >>>> for migrants on a nearby military base. The government wants to house >>>> 1256 migrants close to the village which far exceeds the village's
population of under 400.

It is probably no coincidence that their local MP is a Liberal-Democrat >>>> who championed the area serving as a sanctuary for refugees.

I read an article about this and was amazed that even when reality comes >>> crashing in on their heads, these people are still captured by woke
ideology.
They oppose the camp full of illegal Bomalians, but not because they're >>> 3rd-world savages who are coming to take whatever they can from the British
people-- whether it's free financial benefits or sex with their women and >>> children-- and give nothing in return. No, even as they oppose the camp, >>> they
can't help but virtue-signal that they're still woke:

"It's not that asylum seekers are dangerous. It's men in general." So even
if
they were a camp full of Nordics and Scandinavians, they'd still be all >>> about
the rapin' according to this dingbat. Men are evil no matter where they come
from.

"Our village is just in the wrong location." i.e., I fully support the >>> continued importation of a bazillion Bomalians to leech off our society, >>> raise
my taxes through the roof, and make me a minority in my own country. It's >>> the
penance we owe for being white and successful after all. I just don't think
this particular place is the right one for them. Please inflict them on >>> someone else.

"We're just worried about the health of the migrants in an isolated place >>> with
limited services like Piddington. Conditions like this can bring out the >>> worst
in any man."

I saw a speech by the spokesman who announced the referendum result to
the media and he said there was a wide diversity of political opinion in
the village so the remarks you're citing may be from the leftist fringe
in the village. But he was very clear in saying the women are terrified,
not of diversity but sexual assault on them and their daughters.

Of course they never think to even ask their government overlords why
they're
ALL male in the first place, since the government has been beating the drum
for years that these are women, children, and families fleeing persecution.
Yet when it comes time to quintuple the population of a small town overnight
with yet another load of "refugees" from France, they're all strangely males
between the ages of 20 and 40. No women. No kids. Just fighting-age men who
lounge about all day doing nothing but collecting your tax money and staring
at your 12-year-old daughter and licking their lips as you walk her to >>> school.

The mainstream media NEVER talk about the age/gender of the "refugees".
I think they realize that admitting the startling uniformity there is
kryptonite for them so they just don't talk about it. And they're always
nattering about how these new people are doctors and engineers -
although *potential* doctors and engineers is slightly more realistic
but only slightly. Most of them will be on the dole for the rest of
their lives and if they work at all, they will do doing DoorDash
deliveries or working in the kebab shops. And that's the honest one; I
have no doubt many will be turning to crime to make a living and
supplement the money they get on the dole.t

I saw an article the other day that said a whistleblower in the
organization that decides where refugee claimants are refugees and not
migrants KNOWS that only 1% of the refugee claimants are real refugees;
the rest are economic migrants. The fucking government KNOWS these
people aren't refugees but let's them in anyway!!

Well, the vast majority of them are coming across the Channel in dinghys from *France*. France isn't at war. It's not an oppressive government. What persecution can they possibly be fleeing in France that would make them refugees? Lack of croissants in their morning breakfast?

What's worse is that the UK has already given France around a billion
pounds to have them STOP the boats from leaving France but there have
been several journalists - and a British MP - who have filmed the French police helping the migrants get on the boats and even escorting them to Britain to ensure they don't have problems on the way across the
Channel! Obviously, the French are happy to see them on their way
because they have plenty of problems with these migrants on their own.
--
Rhino
--- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: rec.arts.tv

On 2026-09-18 2:50 a.m., BTR1701 wrote:

On Sep 17, 2026 at 8:40:45 PM PDT, "Rhino" <no_offline_contact@example.com> wrote:

On 2026-09-17 1:16 p.m., BTR1701 wrote:

On Sep 16, 2026 at 8:29:10 AM PDT, "Rhino" <no_offline_contact@example.com>
wrote:

An English village named Piddington has voted overwhelmingly to leave >>>> the UK.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BLUR7EA6bds [12 minutes]

This, of course, is a strictly symbolic act and has no legal weight at >>>> all since there is no provision under UK law for villages, towns or
cities to secede from their country.

The reason for the vote? Deep concerns over plans to establish housing >>>> for migrants on a nearby military base. The government wants to house >>>> 1256 migrants close to the village which far exceeds the village's
population of under 400.

It is probably no coincidence that their local MP is a Liberal-Democrat >>>> who championed the area serving as a sanctuary for refugees.

I read an article about this and was amazed that even when reality comes >>> crashing in on their heads, these people are still captured by woke
ideology.
They oppose the camp full of illegal Bomalians, but not because they're >>> 3rd-world savages who are coming to take whatever they can from the British
people-- whether it's free financial benefits or sex with their women and >>> children-- and give nothing in return. No, even as they oppose the camp, >>> they
can't help but virtue-signal that they're still woke:

"It's not that asylum seekers are dangerous. It's men in general." So even
if
they were a camp full of Nordics and Scandinavians, they'd still be all >>> about
the rapin' according to this dingbat. Men are evil no matter where they come
from.

"Our village is just in the wrong location." i.e., I fully support the >>> continued importation of a bazillion Bomalians to leech off our society, >>> raise
my taxes through the roof, and make me a minority in my own country. It's >>> the
penance we owe for being white and successful after all. I just don't think
this particular place is the right one for them. Please inflict them on >>> someone else.

"We're just worried about the health of the migrants in an isolated place >>> with
limited services like Piddington. Conditions like this can bring out the >>> worst
in any man."

I saw a speech by the spokesman who announced the referendum result to
the media and he said there was a wide diversity of political opinion in
the village so the remarks you're citing may be from the leftist fringe
in the village. But he was very clear in saying the women are terrified,
not of diversity but sexual assault on them and their daughters.

Here you go:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jkku3vAPJQw&pp=0gcJCSQMAYcqIYzv

There's (at least) one in every crowd isn't there? Relentless virtue-signallers, I mean. Watson is right to point out that here
enthusiasm for multiculturalism makes it more than a little hypocritical
for her to be living in an almost entirely white area.
--
Rhino
--- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2