• Re: [OT] Trans person calls activist friends over traffic stop

    From The True Melissa@thetruemelissa@gmail.comNOSPAM to rec.arts.tv on Tue Aug 4 13:26:42 2026
    From Newsgroup: rec.arts.tv

    Verily, in article <114t18m$28jj1$1@dont-email.me>, did Rhino <no_offline_contact@example.com> deliver unto us this message:
    A woman with a dead headlight gets pulled over at a traffic stop. The officer asks for her ID, license and insurance but she freaks out
    because the officer has a flashlight on and is looking around the car.
    She screams that she does NOT grant consent and is apparently ignorant
    of the fact that an officer can look at what's in plain sight without consent. Of course he can't tell her that because SHE WILL NOT SHUT UP
    FOR ONE SECOND. She sends out a desperate "May Day" on her phone as she
    is screaming at the officer and two activists soon arrive to interfere.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sknpMYU0LPU [13 minutes]


    The part that intrigues me is that she thinks cooperation is leverage.
    She tells him to stop looking in her car "or you won't get my license."
    She says this in a firm and commanding tone, believing that she's
    telling him what's what.

    One cannot influence police by threatening to withold cooperation. The
    attempt is likely to end badly.

    I've seen a few other videos where people stand up for imaginary rights
    and end up in handcuffs. There's a lot of misinformation out there, and
    it's getting people in trouble.
    --
    The meek shall inherit, we're told,
    But I'm not so easily sold.
    For supposing they should,
    It would do them no good --
    They'd lose it at once to the bold.
    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From BTR1701@no_email@invalid.invalid to rec.arts.tv on Tue Aug 4 19:15:07 2026
    From Newsgroup: rec.arts.tv

    The True Melissa <thetruemelissa@gmail.comNOSPAM> wrote:
    Verily, in article <114t18m$28jj1$1@dont-email.me>, did Rhino <no_offline_contact@example.com> deliver unto us this message:
    A woman with a dead headlight gets pulled over at a traffic stop. The
    officer asks for her ID, license and insurance but she freaks out
    because the officer has a flashlight on and is looking around the car.
    She screams that she does NOT grant consent and is apparently ignorant
    of the fact that an officer can look at what's in plain sight without
    consent. Of course he can't tell her that because SHE WILL NOT SHUT UP
    FOR ONE SECOND. She sends out a desperate "May Day" on her phone as she
    is screaming at the officer and two activists soon arrive to interfere.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sknpMYU0LPU [13 minutes]


    The part that intrigues me is that she thinks cooperation is leverage.
    She tells him to stop looking in her car "or you won't get my license."
    She says this in a firm and commanding tone, believing that she's
    telling him what's what.

    One cannot influence police by threatening to withold cooperation. The attempt is likely to end badly.

    I've seen a few other videos where people stand up for imaginary rights
    and end up in handcuffs. There's a lot of misinformation out there, and
    it's getting people in trouble.

    One of the most prolific imaginary rights out there is they seem to think
    they have the right to have a supervisor called to the scene and the moment they invoke their 14.5 Amendment Right to a Supervisor, all police
    enforcement must stop until that supervisor arrives.

    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Rhino@no_offline_contact@example.com to rec.arts.tv on Tue Aug 4 20:05:42 2026
    From Newsgroup: rec.arts.tv

    On 2026-08-04 3:15 p.m., BTR1701 wrote:
    The True Melissa <thetruemelissa@gmail.comNOSPAM> wrote:
    Verily, in article <114t18m$28jj1$1@dont-email.me>, did Rhino
    <no_offline_contact@example.com> deliver unto us this message:
    A woman with a dead headlight gets pulled over at a traffic stop. The
    officer asks for her ID, license and insurance but she freaks out
    because the officer has a flashlight on and is looking around the car.
    She screams that she does NOT grant consent and is apparently ignorant
    of the fact that an officer can look at what's in plain sight without
    consent. Of course he can't tell her that because SHE WILL NOT SHUT UP
    FOR ONE SECOND. She sends out a desperate "May Day" on her phone as she
    is screaming at the officer and two activists soon arrive to interfere.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sknpMYU0LPU [13 minutes]


    The part that intrigues me is that she thinks cooperation is leverage.
    She tells him to stop looking in her car "or you won't get my license."
    She says this in a firm and commanding tone, believing that she's
    telling him what's what.

    One cannot influence police by threatening to withold cooperation. The
    attempt is likely to end badly.

    I've seen a few other videos where people stand up for imaginary rights
    and end up in handcuffs. There's a lot of misinformation out there, and
    it's getting people in trouble.

    One of the most prolific imaginary rights out there is they seem to think they have the right to have a supervisor called to the scene and the moment they invoke their 14.5 Amendment Right to a Supervisor, all police enforcement must stop until that supervisor arrives.

    The weird thing is that I've seen a lot of videos where the demand for a supervisor IS honoured and further conversation with the suspect IS
    stopped until the supervisor gets there. Of course the officer always
    detains the suspect and doesn't just let them go. Maybe they've found
    that things go smoother if they honour the supervisor requests?
    --
    Rhino
    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Rhino@no_offline_contact@example.com to rec.arts.tv on Tue Aug 4 20:49:41 2026
    From Newsgroup: rec.arts.tv

    On 2026-08-04 1:26 p.m., The True Melissa wrote:
    Verily, in article <114t18m$28jj1$1@dont-email.me>, did Rhino <no_offline_contact@example.com> deliver unto us this message:
    A woman with a dead headlight gets pulled over at a traffic stop. The
    officer asks for her ID, license and insurance but she freaks out
    because the officer has a flashlight on and is looking around the car.
    She screams that she does NOT grant consent and is apparently ignorant
    of the fact that an officer can look at what's in plain sight without
    consent. Of course he can't tell her that because SHE WILL NOT SHUT UP
    FOR ONE SECOND. She sends out a desperate "May Day" on her phone as she
    is screaming at the officer and two activists soon arrive to interfere.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sknpMYU0LPU [13 minutes]


    The part that intrigues me is that she thinks cooperation is leverage.
    She tells him to stop looking in her car "or you won't get my license."
    She says this in a firm and commanding tone, believing that she's
    telling him what's what.

    One cannot influence police by threatening to withold cooperation. The attempt is likely to end badly.

    I've seen a few other videos where people stand up for imaginary rights
    and end up in handcuffs. There's a lot of misinformation out there, and
    it's getting people in trouble.


    I wonder if it is TV and movies that give people their distorted
    understanding of what their rights actually are? There's no doubt that
    there is a LOT of misinformation in TV shows. I've been down a bit of a
    rabbit hole for the past week or two looking at bodycam videos and there
    are a surprising number of people that think:
    - they don't have to show their ID, licence and proof of insurance when stopped by police
    - they don't have to get out of the car when directed to
    - they CAN demand a supervisor if they don't like what the officer is saying
    - they can struggle when the officer is putting the cuffs on and not
    have it count as resisting
    - they can trot out "sovereign citizen" bullcrap and that it will work

    I don't know if these notions come from TV but what other vector could
    account for this? We're not talking about people who went to law school
    here. The only other source for this thinking that comes to mind is that they're getting these ideas from the elementary and high schools and
    colleges from the "activists" teaching there.

    I think it might be a valuable public service if popular cop shows like
    The Rookie made a point of showing some traffic stops where people
    behave like in the videos and Nolan and his colleagues politely educate
    them on the REAL rules. A good writer should be able to make that
    entertaining AND educational with a bit of humour thrown in.
    --
    Rhino
    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From The True Melissa@thetruemelissa@gmail.comNOSPAM to rec.arts.tv on Wed Aug 5 07:55:56 2026
    From Newsgroup: rec.arts.tv

    Verily, in article <114u1b5$2ja5u$1@dont-email.me>, did Rhino <no_offline_contact@example.com> deliver unto us this message:

    I wonder if it is TV and movies that give people their distorted understanding of what their rights actually are? There's no doubt that
    there is a LOT of misinformation in TV shows. I've been down a bit of a rabbit hole for the past week or two looking at bodycam videos and there
    are a surprising number of people that think:
    - they don't have to show their ID, licence and proof of insurance when stopped by police
    - they don't have to get out of the car when directed to
    - they CAN demand a supervisor if they don't like what the officer is saying - they can struggle when the officer is putting the cuffs on and not
    have it count as resisting
    - they can trot out "sovereign citizen" bullcrap and that it will work

    I don't know if these notions come from TV but what other vector could account for this?

    The Internet is a big source, especially for the sovereign citizen
    stuff. These people collect in chat rooms and spread misinformation to
    each other. Once four or five people have repeated something like "You
    don't have to show your license unless the cop has a warrant," it starts
    to sound more credible. That's just how humans work.


    We're not talking about people who went to law school
    here. The only other source for this thinking that comes to mind is that they're getting these ideas from the elementary and high schools and colleges from the "activists" teaching there.

    I think it might be a valuable public service if popular cop shows like
    The Rookie made a point of showing some traffic stops where people
    behave like in the videos and Nolan and his colleagues politely educate
    them on the REAL rules. A good writer should be able to make that entertaining AND educational with a bit of humour thrown in.

    I have a feeling the people in question would dismiss such a scene as propaganda and tell each other the show is wrong.

    It's worth trying, though.
    --
    The meek shall inherit, we're told,
    But I'm not so easily sold.
    For supposing they should,
    It would do them no good --
    They'd lose it at once to the bold.
    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From anim8rfsk@anim8rfsk@cox.net to rec.arts.tv on Wed Aug 5 06:34:27 2026
    From Newsgroup: rec.arts.tv

    The True Melissa <thetruemelissa@gmail.comNOSPAM> wrote:
    Verily, in article <114u1b5$2ja5u$1@dont-email.me>, did Rhino <no_offline_contact@example.com> deliver unto us this message:

    I wonder if it is TV and movies that give people their distorted
    understanding of what their rights actually are? There's no doubt that
    there is a LOT of misinformation in TV shows. I've been down a bit of a
    rabbit hole for the past week or two looking at bodycam videos and there
    are a surprising number of people that think:
    - they don't have to show their ID, licence and proof of insurance when
    stopped by police
    - they don't have to get out of the car when directed to
    - they CAN demand a supervisor if they don't like what the officer is saying >> - they can struggle when the officer is putting the cuffs on and not
    have it count as resisting
    - they can trot out "sovereign citizen" bullcrap and that it will work

    I don't know if these notions come from TV but what other vector could
    account for this?

    IrCOve wondered if those sovereign citizen packets of misinformation they
    carry is something they mail away for or if they just print them themselves from some website. Maybe there are meetings like alcoholics anonymous. It
    would take a lot for me to believe I donrCOt have to pay an annual car registration fee.



    The Internet is a big source, especially for the sovereign citizen
    stuff. These people collect in chat rooms and spread misinformation to
    each other. Once four or five people have repeated something like "You
    don't have to show your license unless the cop has a warrant," it starts
    to sound more credible. That's just how humans work.


    We're not talking about people who went to law school
    here. The only other source for this thinking that comes to mind is that
    they're getting these ideas from the elementary and high schools and
    colleges from the "activists" teaching there.

    I think it might be a valuable public service if popular cop shows like
    The Rookie made a point of showing some traffic stops where people
    behave like in the videos and Nolan and his colleagues politely educate
    them on the REAL rules. A good writer should be able to make that
    entertaining AND educational with a bit of humour thrown in.

    I have a feeling the people in question would dismiss such a scene as propaganda and tell each other the show is wrong.

    It's worth trying, though.

    --
    The last thing I want to do is hurt you, but it is still on my list.
    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Rhino@no_offline_contact@example.com to rec.arts.tv on Wed Aug 5 14:09:15 2026
    From Newsgroup: rec.arts.tv

    On 2026-08-05 9:34 a.m., anim8rfsk wrote:
    The True Melissa <thetruemelissa@gmail.comNOSPAM> wrote:
    Verily, in article <114u1b5$2ja5u$1@dont-email.me>, did Rhino
    <no_offline_contact@example.com> deliver unto us this message:

    I wonder if it is TV and movies that give people their distorted
    understanding of what their rights actually are? There's no doubt that
    there is a LOT of misinformation in TV shows. I've been down a bit of a
    rabbit hole for the past week or two looking at bodycam videos and there >>> are a surprising number of people that think:
    - they don't have to show their ID, licence and proof of insurance when
    stopped by police
    - they don't have to get out of the car when directed to
    - they CAN demand a supervisor if they don't like what the officer is saying
    - they can struggle when the officer is putting the cuffs on and not
    have it count as resisting
    - they can trot out "sovereign citizen" bullcrap and that it will work

    I don't know if these notions come from TV but what other vector could
    account for this?

    IrCOve wondered if those sovereign citizen packets of misinformation they carry is something they mail away for or if they just print them themselves from some website. Maybe there are meetings like alcoholics anonymous. It would take a lot for me to believe I donrCOt have to pay an annual car registration fee.

    They're getting them from a website (or more likely multiple websites
    that are using similar scams). One of the videos I saw in the last week
    or two actually mentioned the organization and I found their website and posted about it in one of the followups to one of my threads. That post included a link to the website and a summary of the claims about this documentation. >

    The Internet is a big source, especially for the sovereign citizen
    stuff. These people collect in chat rooms and spread misinformation to
    each other. Once four or five people have repeated something like "You
    don't have to show your license unless the cop has a warrant," it starts
    to sound more credible. That's just how humans work.


    We're not talking about people who went to law school
    here. The only other source for this thinking that comes to mind is that >>> they're getting these ideas from the elementary and high schools and
    colleges from the "activists" teaching there.

    I think it might be a valuable public service if popular cop shows like
    The Rookie made a point of showing some traffic stops where people
    behave like in the videos and Nolan and his colleagues politely educate
    them on the REAL rules. A good writer should be able to make that
    entertaining AND educational with a bit of humour thrown in.

    I have a feeling the people in question would dismiss such a scene as
    propaganda and tell each other the show is wrong.

    It's worth trying, though.




    --
    Rhino
    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2