• [OT] Citizen with gun engages mass shooter

    From Rhino@no_offline_contact@example.com to rec.arts.tv on Mon Aug 3 20:56:05 2026
    From Newsgroup: rec.arts.tv

    For some reason, this came up on my feed just now. It's about a mass
    shooter at an In-n-out burger place in Idaho who got engaged by a
    civilian before the police arrived:

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pViE2p5d9G4 [14 minutes]

    I think the presenter makes many good points but I have to admit I'm
    puzzled about why the good guy who was trying to take out the mass
    shooter had a suppressor on his pistol. I don't know a lot about
    suppressors (otherwise known as silencers) but I thought all a
    suppressor did was make the shot *somewhat* quieter. As far as I know,
    it doesn't make the gun any more lethal by increasing the muzzle
    velocity, improving the accuracy or anything like that.

    Does someone who knows more about guns have a guess about why he'd use a suppressor?
    --
    Rhino

    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From BTR1701@atropos@mac.com to rec.arts.tv on Tue Aug 4 04:06:59 2026
    From Newsgroup: rec.arts.tv

    On Aug 3, 2026 at 5:56:05 PM PDT, "Rhino" <no_offline_contact@example.com> wrote:

    For some reason, this came up on my feed just now. It's about a mass
    shooter at an In-n-out burger place in Idaho who got engaged by a
    civilian before the police arrived:

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pViE2p5d9G4 [14 minutes]

    I think the presenter makes many good points but I have to admit I'm
    puzzled about why the good guy who was trying to take out the mass
    shooter had a suppressor on his pistol. I don't know a lot about
    suppressors (otherwise known as silencers) but I thought all a
    suppressor did was make the shot *somewhat* quieter. As far as I know,
    it doesn't make the gun any more lethal by increasing the muzzle
    velocity, improving the accuracy or anything like that.

    Does someone who knows more about guns have a guess about why he'd use a suppressor?

    Saves your hearing. You can keep better situational awareness when you're not being deafened by your own gunfire.

    Guy was using a FN 5.7x28 pistol. It's an interesting choice. I mean, we know that round can be effective because that's what the Fort Hood shooter used,
    but it's not widely regarded as an effective self defense load. Gutsy to go up against someone armed with an AR with that.

    If you're not familiar with it you should google it. It looks like a miniature rifle round, and its main claim to fame is that it's screaming fast.


    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From shawn@nanoflower@notforg.m.a.i.l.com to rec.arts.tv on Tue Aug 4 01:31:19 2026
    From Newsgroup: rec.arts.tv

    On Tue, 4 Aug 2026 04:06:59 -0000 (UTC), BTR1701 <atropos@mac.com>
    wrote:

    On Aug 3, 2026 at 5:56:05 PM PDT, "Rhino" <no_offline_contact@example.com> >wrote:

    For some reason, this came up on my feed just now. It's about a mass
    shooter at an In-n-out burger place in Idaho who got engaged by a
    civilian before the police arrived:

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pViE2p5d9G4 [14 minutes]

    I think the presenter makes many good points but I have to admit I'm
    puzzled about why the good guy who was trying to take out the mass
    shooter had a suppressor on his pistol. I don't know a lot about
    suppressors (otherwise known as silencers) but I thought all a
    suppressor did was make the shot *somewhat* quieter. As far as I know,
    it doesn't make the gun any more lethal by increasing the muzzle
    velocity, improving the accuracy or anything like that.

    Does someone who knows more about guns have a guess about why he'd use a
    suppressor?

    Saves your hearing. You can keep better situational awareness when you're not >being deafened by your own gunfire.

    Guy was using a FN 5.7x28 pistol. It's an interesting choice. I mean, we know >that round can be effective because that's what the Fort Hood shooter used, >but it's not widely regarded as an effective self defense load. Gutsy to go up >against someone armed with an AR with that.

    If you're not familiar with it you should google it. It looks like a miniature >rifle round, and its main claim to fame is that it's screaming fast.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Re9uV-a_mLo

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=w5JTyDx7-rI
    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Rhino@no_offline_contact@example.com to rec.arts.tv on Tue Aug 4 07:18:01 2026
    From Newsgroup: rec.arts.tv

    On 2026-08-04 12:06 a.m., BTR1701 wrote:
    On Aug 3, 2026 at 5:56:05 PM PDT, "Rhino" <no_offline_contact@example.com> wrote:

    For some reason, this came up on my feed just now. It's about a mass
    shooter at an In-n-out burger place in Idaho who got engaged by a
    civilian before the police arrived:

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pViE2p5d9G4 [14 minutes]

    I think the presenter makes many good points but I have to admit I'm
    puzzled about why the good guy who was trying to take out the mass
    shooter had a suppressor on his pistol. I don't know a lot about
    suppressors (otherwise known as silencers) but I thought all a
    suppressor did was make the shot *somewhat* quieter. As far as I know,
    it doesn't make the gun any more lethal by increasing the muzzle
    velocity, improving the accuracy or anything like that.

    Does someone who knows more about guns have a guess about why he'd use a
    suppressor?

    Saves your hearing. You can keep better situational awareness when you're not being deafened by your own gunfire.

    Fair enough; that makes perfect sense.

    Guy was using a FN 5.7x28 pistol. It's an interesting choice. I mean, we know that round can be effective because that's what the Fort Hood shooter used, but it's not widely regarded as an effective self defense load. Gutsy to go up
    against someone armed with an AR with that.

    If you're not familiar with it you should google it. It looks like a miniature
    rifle round, and its main claim to fame is that it's screaming fast.


    I'm impressed that you were able to determine the exact pistol from that blurry footage! Oh wait, the Wikipedia article says the USSS uses that
    pistol so you are presumably quite familiar with it and therefore
    recognize it more easily. Still, there are an awful lot of pistols that
    look like that with the differences being too subtle to distinguish for
    an untrained guy like me.

    You remind me of when my father, brother and I would sit out on the
    porch when I was a kid and identify the passing cars. My father and
    brother would easily name each make, model and year of the cars and I'd
    be unable to come up with any of them except perhaps a few really
    obvious ones like the VW Beetle.... I still can't really tell cars apart unless I can read the badge on it.
    --
    Rhino
    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Rhino@no_offline_contact@example.com to rec.arts.tv on Tue Aug 4 07:52:42 2026
    From Newsgroup: rec.arts.tv

    On 2026-08-04 1:31 a.m., shawn wrote:
    On Tue, 4 Aug 2026 04:06:59 -0000 (UTC), BTR1701 <atropos@mac.com>
    wrote:

    On Aug 3, 2026 at 5:56:05 PM PDT, "Rhino" <no_offline_contact@example.com> >> wrote:

    For some reason, this came up on my feed just now. It's about a mass
    shooter at an In-n-out burger place in Idaho who got engaged by a
    civilian before the police arrived:

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pViE2p5d9G4 [14 minutes]

    I think the presenter makes many good points but I have to admit I'm
    puzzled about why the good guy who was trying to take out the mass
    shooter had a suppressor on his pistol. I don't know a lot about
    suppressors (otherwise known as silencers) but I thought all a
    suppressor did was make the shot *somewhat* quieter. As far as I know,
    it doesn't make the gun any more lethal by increasing the muzzle
    velocity, improving the accuracy or anything like that.

    Does someone who knows more about guns have a guess about why he'd use a >>> suppressor?

    Saves your hearing. You can keep better situational awareness when you're not
    being deafened by your own gunfire.

    Guy was using a FN 5.7x28 pistol. It's an interesting choice. I mean, we know
    that round can be effective because that's what the Fort Hood shooter used, >> but it's not widely regarded as an effective self defense load. Gutsy to go up
    against someone armed with an AR with that.

    If you're not familiar with it you should google it. It looks like a miniature
    rifle round, and its main claim to fame is that it's screaming fast.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Re9uV-a_mLo

    Wow, talk about a target-rich environment! He could shoot boxes and
    boxes of ammo without ever having to replace a target!

    I was shocked to see a .22 doing so much damage to a cinder block. I've
    seen a few other shooting videos but I never saw such a small round do
    that much damage. I've always thought of a .22 as barely lethal and only
    at close range based on TV dramas and the videos I've seen but anything
    that could do that much to a cinder block is certainly going to be
    lethal to a person....


    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=w5JTyDx7-rI

    I had no idea that someone made target dummies that reproduced the human
    body in so much detail. I'll bet those are expensive!

    And then there are the high-speed cameras that actually capture bullets traversing the targets. Those can't be cheap either....
    --
    Rhino
    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From shawn@nanoflower@notforg.m.a.i.l.com to rec.arts.tv on Tue Aug 4 10:51:04 2026
    From Newsgroup: rec.arts.tv

    On Tue, 4 Aug 2026 07:52:42 -0400, Rhino
    <no_offline_contact@example.com> wrote:

    On 2026-08-04 1:31 a.m., shawn wrote:
    On Tue, 4 Aug 2026 04:06:59 -0000 (UTC), BTR1701 <atropos@mac.com>
    wrote:

    On Aug 3, 2026 at 5:56:05 PM PDT, "Rhino" <no_offline_contact@example.com> >>> wrote:

    For some reason, this came up on my feed just now. It's about a mass
    shooter at an In-n-out burger place in Idaho who got engaged by a
    civilian before the police arrived:

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pViE2p5d9G4 [14 minutes]

    I think the presenter makes many good points but I have to admit I'm
    puzzled about why the good guy who was trying to take out the mass
    shooter had a suppressor on his pistol. I don't know a lot about
    suppressors (otherwise known as silencers) but I thought all a
    suppressor did was make the shot *somewhat* quieter. As far as I know, >>>> it doesn't make the gun any more lethal by increasing the muzzle
    velocity, improving the accuracy or anything like that.

    Does someone who knows more about guns have a guess about why he'd use a >>>> suppressor?

    Saves your hearing. You can keep better situational awareness when you're not
    being deafened by your own gunfire.

    Guy was using a FN 5.7x28 pistol. It's an interesting choice. I mean, we know
    that round can be effective because that's what the Fort Hood shooter used, >>> but it's not widely regarded as an effective self defense load. Gutsy to go up
    against someone armed with an AR with that.

    If you're not familiar with it you should google it. It looks like a miniature
    rifle round, and its main claim to fame is that it's screaming fast.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Re9uV-a_mLo

    Wow, talk about a target-rich environment! He could shoot boxes and
    boxes of ammo without ever having to replace a target!

    I was shocked to see a .22 doing so much damage to a cinder block. I've
    seen a few other shooting videos but I never saw such a small round do
    that much damage. I've always thought of a .22 as barely lethal and only
    at close range based on TV dramas and the videos I've seen but anything
    that could do that much to a cinder block is certainly going to be
    lethal to a person....

    LOL. I should find those animated videos that go into various weapons.
    One discusses various ammo and the extensive variations available such
    as for .22 or shotgun shells.
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2E7DZvWQEek


    Enjoy.. Unfortunately he doesn't go into the variations on .22s.

    https://www.youtube.com/shorts/DylAP7ienhg

    https://www.youtube.com/shorts/yFkXoUBtZHQ

    https://www.youtube.com/shorts/DQddZjvm74A

    https://www.youtube.com/shorts/nT1W1A9hrRg



    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=w5JTyDx7-rI

    I had no idea that someone made target dummies that reproduced the human >body in so much detail. I'll bet those are expensive!

    And then there are the high-speed cameras that actually capture bullets >traversing the targets. Those can't be cheap either....

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EvVLGGtVMzQ

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=txOqq5D-oIk&list=PLOuiTcOfHswijDDKfX1ndv9zDBdjCt5em

    https://www.youtube.com/shorts/oz3hqfwHAa8
    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From shawn@nanoflower@notforg.m.a.i.l.com to rec.arts.tv on Tue Aug 4 10:54:24 2026
    From Newsgroup: rec.arts.tv

    On Tue, 04 Aug 2026 10:51:04 -0400, shawn
    <nanoflower@notforg.m.a.i.l.com> wrote:

    On Tue, 4 Aug 2026 07:52:42 -0400, Rhino
    <no_offline_contact@example.com> wrote:

    On 2026-08-04 1:31 a.m., shawn wrote:
    On Tue, 4 Aug 2026 04:06:59 -0000 (UTC), BTR1701 <atropos@mac.com>
    wrote:

    On Aug 3, 2026 at 5:56:05 PM PDT, "Rhino" <no_offline_contact@example.com> >>>> wrote:

    For some reason, this came up on my feed just now. It's about a mass >>>>> shooter at an In-n-out burger place in Idaho who got engaged by a
    civilian before the police arrived:

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pViE2p5d9G4 [14 minutes]

    I think the presenter makes many good points but I have to admit I'm >>>>> puzzled about why the good guy who was trying to take out the mass
    shooter had a suppressor on his pistol. I don't know a lot about
    suppressors (otherwise known as silencers) but I thought all a
    suppressor did was make the shot *somewhat* quieter. As far as I know, >>>>> it doesn't make the gun any more lethal by increasing the muzzle
    velocity, improving the accuracy or anything like that.

    Does someone who knows more about guns have a guess about why he'd use a >>>>> suppressor?

    Saves your hearing. You can keep better situational awareness when you're not
    being deafened by your own gunfire.

    Guy was using a FN 5.7x28 pistol. It's an interesting choice. I mean, we know
    that round can be effective because that's what the Fort Hood shooter used,
    but it's not widely regarded as an effective self defense load. Gutsy to go up
    against someone armed with an AR with that.

    If you're not familiar with it you should google it. It looks like a miniature
    rifle round, and its main claim to fame is that it's screaming fast.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Re9uV-a_mLo

    Wow, talk about a target-rich environment! He could shoot boxes and
    boxes of ammo without ever having to replace a target!

    I was shocked to see a .22 doing so much damage to a cinder block. I've >>seen a few other shooting videos but I never saw such a small round do >>that much damage. I've always thought of a .22 as barely lethal and only >>at close range based on TV dramas and the videos I've seen but anything >>that could do that much to a cinder block is certainly going to be
    lethal to a person....

    LOL. I should find those animated videos that go into various weapons.
    One discusses various ammo and the extensive variations available such
    as for .22 or shotgun shells.
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2E7DZvWQEek


    Enjoy.. Unfortunately he doesn't go into the variations on .22s.

    https://www.youtube.com/shorts/DylAP7ienhg

    https://www.youtube.com/shorts/yFkXoUBtZHQ

    https://www.youtube.com/shorts/DQddZjvm74A

    https://www.youtube.com/shorts/nT1W1A9hrRg



    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=w5JTyDx7-rI

    I had no idea that someone made target dummies that reproduced the human >>body in so much detail. I'll bet those are expensive!

    And then there are the high-speed cameras that actually capture bullets >>traversing the targets. Those can't be cheap either....

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EvVLGGtVMzQ

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=txOqq5D-oIk&list=PLOuiTcOfHswijDDKfX1ndv9zDBdjCt5em

    https://www.youtube.com/shorts/oz3hqfwHAa8

    I should add this one :

    https://www.youtube.com/shorts/dtVvM2AU_TU
    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Rhino@no_offline_contact@example.com to rec.arts.tv on Tue Aug 4 20:02:59 2026
    From Newsgroup: rec.arts.tv

    On 2026-08-04 1:51 p.m., BTR1701 wrote:
    On Aug 4, 2026 at 4:18:01 AM PDT, "Rhino" <no_offline_contact@example.com> wrote:

    On 2026-08-04 12:06 a.m., BTR1701 wrote:
    On Aug 3, 2026 at 5:56:05 PM PDT, "Rhino" <no_offline_contact@example.com>
    wrote:

    For some reason, this came up on my feed just now. It's about a mass >>>> shooter at an In-n-out burger place in Idaho who got engaged by a
    civilian before the police arrived:

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pViE2p5d9G4 [14 minutes]

    I think the presenter makes many good points but I have to admit I'm >>>> puzzled about why the good guy who was trying to take out the mass
    shooter had a suppressor on his pistol. I don't know a lot about
    suppressors (otherwise known as silencers) but I thought all a
    suppressor did was make the shot *somewhat* quieter. As far as I know, >>>> it doesn't make the gun any more lethal by increasing the muzzle
    velocity, improving the accuracy or anything like that.

    Does someone who knows more about guns have a guess about why he'd use a >>>> suppressor?

    Saves your hearing. You can keep better situational awareness when you're >>> not
    being deafened by your own gunfire.

    Fair enough; that makes perfect sense.

    Guy was using a FN 5.7x28 pistol. It's an interesting choice. I mean, we >>> know
    that round can be effective because that's what the Fort Hood shooter used,
    but it's not widely regarded as an effective self defense load. Gutsy to go
    up
    against someone armed with an AR with that.

    If you're not familiar with it you should google it. It looks like a
    miniature
    rifle round, and its main claim to fame is that it's screaming fast.


    I'm impressed that you were able to determine the exact pistol from that
    blurry footage! Oh wait, the Wikipedia article says the USSS uses that
    pistol so you are presumably quite familiar with it and therefore
    recognize it more easily. Still, there are an awful lot of pistols that
    look like that with the differences being too subtle to distinguish for
    an untrained guy like me.

    What IrCOve learned from the legacy corporate media about guys like this:

    (1) Gun owners who involve themselves in situations like this are untrained yahoos who imagine themselves to be John Wick and are dangerous to innocent bystanders and probably shouldn't even be allowed to own guns at all.

    (2) Gun owners who do train are crazy unstable psychos living out their Call of Duty fantasies and are just itching to shoot someone, so they probably shouldn't even be allowed to own guns at all.


    Exactly. One video I saw bemoaned the fact that most legacy media
    coverage didn't mention the "good guy with the gun" at all, although the
    local media is apparently being quite open about it and the police
    chief's initial press conference *did* acknowledge him (and the off-duty trooper who also participated in the incident before on-duty police got there). I haven't watched any legacy media coverage. Have they said
    ANYTHING positive about the citizen who got involved? I'm going to be
    shocked if they said anything from any perspective but the two angles
    you've just cited.
    --
    Rhino
    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2