From Newsgroup: rec.arts.tv
anim8rfsk <
anim8rfsk@cox.net> wrote:
The True Melissa <thetruemelissa@gmail.comNOSPAM> wrote:
Verily, in article <1148uo2$3kgsu$6@dont-email.me>, did atropos@mac.com
deliver unto us this message:
On Jul 27, 2026 at 2:34:18 PM PDT, "anim8rfsk" <anim8rfsk@cox.net> wrote: >>>
shawn <nanoflower@notforg.m.a.i.l.com> wrote:
On Mon, 27 Jul 2026 00:38:21 -0700, anim8rfsk <anim8rfsk@cox.net>
wrote:
shawn <nanoflower@notforg.m.a.i.l.com> wrote:
I blame the source material
That's no excuse. Never read the MADAME WEB comic but I know it wasn't >>>>> an extensive series so it clearly wasn't that well liked.
I guess the writers weren't capable of rising above the base material. >>>>
It shouldn?t exist at all. Spider-Man should be a freak science accident >>>> not the most recent in a long series of mystical people and spider totems. >>>
+1
They messed with Spidey's origin story? That was surely a mistake.
Everyone knows he was bitten by a radioactive spider.
They made it not an accident, but mystical destiny. No one was impressed.
This morning, I read that thererCOs a female character in the new movie who
was also in the lab when Peter was bitten and was also bitten. Busy Spider.
--
The last thing I want to do is hurt you, but it is still on my list.
--- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2