From Newsgroup: rec.arts.tv
On Jun 30, 2026 at 1:30:41 AM PDT, "Ubiquitous" <
weberm@polaris.net> wrote:
What did you watch?
An old STAR TREK episode: Conscience of the King
This episode doesn't make much sense.
First we're told that Governor Kodos of Tarsus IV seized dictatorial power during a famine and as the Thanos of his time, decreed that half the
population would be put death so that the other half could survive on the remaining food. There were 8000 colonists, which resulted in a massacre of
4000 people. Supposedly "quickly and painlessly", but if they were all killed quickly and painlessly, why did Kirk's friend at the beginning have half his face mutilated?
Then we're told that there are only nine people alive who survived the
massacre and could identify Kodos, to include Kirk and a young Enterprise officer named Reilly.
This makes no sense. The historical tapes clearly say Kodos only killed half the colonists. That means there should be 4000 people who could identify him. It's not like Kudos was just some random schlub. He was the governor of their colony. Why wouldn't they all be able to identify him? Four thousand colonists and no one's looking at their own governor directly except nine people, two of whom are children?
And why do they need people to identify Kodos anyway? He was the leader of the colony. Politicians have their pictures taken all the time. There would be plenty of photos that could be used to identify him. Hell, Kirk pulled one up on the Enterprise's computer when he first started to suspect.
And the inclusion on Reilly on the list of nine is also bizarre. You can tell just by looking at him that he's barely in his 20s and the Kodos massacre happened 20 years before, which means at best he'd have been a toddler when it happened and wouldn't be able to identify anyone from back then. Even Kirk would have been what? 10, maybe 12 years old?
What kind of drugs were the writers of this episode on?
Another thing that didn't make sense: when Kirk has the computer run the list of nine and hears Reilly's name, he makes a point of transferring Reilly from his post down to the dark bowels of the ship. I assumed Kirk was setting
Reilly up as bait, to put him somewhere he'd be vulnerable to lure the killer out and catch him. But no. Kirk just transferred him down there and then
forgot about him, where he was nearly murdered. Why the hell did Kirk do
that?
--- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2