From Newsgroup: rec.arts.tv
Verily, in article <111jpt3$3p8vi$
1@dont-email.me>, did
no_offline_contact@example.com deliver unto us this message:
I saw this story and was shocked:
https://www.cnn.com/2026/06/23/us/high-school-prison-homeless-man-fire-nyc-subway
He's caused life-altering injuries to his victim and it's a miracle that
he didn't die but the judge only gives him 5 and a half years in the slammer. What is he'd actually killed him? Would the sentence have been
6 years? Is that how little we value human life now?
According to the story, he was charged only with arson. The judge gave
him a fairly stiff arson sentence. The judge isn't allowed to add more charges, so I guess that was the DA's decision.
It's so strange to me that he wasn't charged with attempted manslaughter
or something, or even attempted second-degree murder since he seemed to
have intent in the moment. I guess this is what the DA thought would
stick?
--
The True Melissa - Canal Winchester - Ohio
United States of America - North America - Earth
Solar System - Milky Way - Local Group
Virgo Cluster - Laniakea Supercluster - Cosmos
--- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2