• Re: Georgia proposes seriously idiotic voting system

    From The Horny Goat@lcraver@home.ca to rec.arts.tv on Fri Jun 19 17:42:34 2026
    From Newsgroup: rec.arts.tv

    On Mon, 15 Jun 2026 07:41:33 -0700, anim8rfsk <anim8rfsk@cox.net>

    In Arizona, they just have the mailman keep the ballots away from us and
    then take them out in the desert and have a bonfire. ItrCOs a lot cleaner >system.

    Our poll clerks do the same thing BUT only 2 weeks after the last
    appeal (if any) is resolved and the result certified.
    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From The Horny Goat@lcraver@home.ca to rec.arts.tv on Fri Jun 19 17:46:36 2026
    From Newsgroup: rec.arts.tv

    On Mon, 15 Jun 2026 07:20:59 -0400, NoBody <NoBody@nowhere.com> wrote:

    The reason is simple: It's far easier to manipulate results. Look at >California with their ridiculous mail in process. Don't like the
    results of elections day, just wait for the "mail in ballots" to show
    up and maigically the results change. It's happened multiple times
    now.

    This is why I oppose mail in voting.

    The exception is what my daughter (who lives an hour outside London in
    the UK) has to do when she votes in a Canadian election. She has to
    either go to the Embassy in London (it's on the NE side of Trafalgar
    square so it's easily reached by tube) or mail it in in a courier
    envelope at her own expense. Embassy votes are normally not processed
    for a week after the election and are mostly used by Embassy staff not individuals living in the UK.
    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2