From Newsgroup: rec.arts.sf.written

Cujo DeSockpuppet wrote:

Daniel70 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> wrote in news:11573kh$1ejr8$2@dont- email.me:

On 8/08/2026 7:41 pm, Blueshirt wrote:

The True Doctor wrote:

On 07/08/2026 17:02, Scott Dorsey wrote:

Paul S Person <psperson@old.netcom.invalid> wrote:

Anyone else beginning to suspect that The True Doctor
is a troll? Or, worse, a potty-mouthed bot?

He is not a bot since he predates the existence of real
usenet bots. He basically posts random crap to the drwho
groups and drives off real discussion,

I do nothing of the kind.

I think some people might have mixed you up with Dave, because
you have Doctor in your nym.

There's more than one Doctor but there's only one Agamemnon!

but occasionally will get threads crossposted into other
groups. Whether he is a an offical troll is hard to say.

That sounds more like Dave, aka The Doctor, to me. He loves
cross-posting everywhere to spread his chaos.

.... but he will tell you that he is merely trying to attract other
posters into the 'Doctor Who' groups.

Does Binky still claim that when Binky sets followups to
alt.sex.pedophilia? I'd call him a liar but that's a tad late.

Binky's parents bought him an ISP so that he would have
a real job, they probably though he would finally leave
the nest and have a real life of his own, when they made
that purchase.

Imagine their disappointment when Binky didn't leave
their basement.

That fucker is literally a 50 something year old virgin,
without a clue about real life.

It's no wonder Will Dockery slurps that asshole.
--- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: rec.arts.sf.written

Bruce <Bruce@guffaw.noneya> wrote in news:18c9ef697ab7a2c2$85102$967852$6cdd666a@news.thecubenet.com:

Cujo DeSockpuppet wrote:

Daniel70 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> wrote in
news:11573kh$1ejr8$2@dont- email.me:

On 8/08/2026 7:41 pm, Blueshirt wrote:

The True Doctor wrote:

On 07/08/2026 17:02, Scott Dorsey wrote:

Paul S Person <psperson@old.netcom.invalid> wrote:

Anyone else beginning to suspect that The True Doctor
is a troll? Or, worse, a potty-mouthed bot?

He is not a bot since he predates the existence of real
usenet bots. He basically posts random crap to the drwho
groups and drives off real discussion,

I do nothing of the kind.

I think some people might have mixed you up with Dave, because
you have Doctor in your nym.

There's more than one Doctor but there's only one Agamemnon!

but occasionally will get threads crossposted into other
groups. Whether he is a an offical troll is hard to say.

That sounds more like Dave, aka The Doctor, to me. He loves
cross-posting everywhere to spread his chaos.

.... but he will tell you that he is merely trying to attract other
posters into the 'Doctor Who' groups.

Does Binky still claim that when Binky sets followups to
alt.sex.pedophilia? I'd call him a liar but that's a tad late.

Binky's parents bought him an ISP so that he would have
a real job, they probably though he would finally leave
the nest and have a real life of his own, when they made
that purchase.

Imagine their disappointment when Binky didn't leave
their basement.

That fucker is literally a 50 something year old virgin,
without a clue about real life.

It's no wonder Will Dockery slurps that asshole.

All that Dreckery's parents left him was a shed and a brother to mooch
from.
--
"I've known for over a year that this guy is the assassin of the Usenet
poetry community. When I first arrived, I thought he was keeping the
lights on in a dead group by reposting from archives. I soon realized
that he was just endlessly reposting his own stuff, that he had killed
the group by flooding it, and that most of the people he called
"trolls" were actually the members of the group.
I've joined the crowd. I'm done trying to work with him and speak reason
to him. It's exhausting and pointless." - Little Willie Douchebag gets
another asskicking from The One True Melissa
--- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: rec.arts.sf.written

On 09/08/2026 04:36, Paul S Person wrote:

On Fri, 7 Aug 2026 21:37:15 -0000 (UTC), doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca (The Doctor) wrote:

Marxism-Leninism is satanic evil.

Whatever.
Personally, I think "religion" describes it quite well.
It sure irritates a lot of people who /insist/ that no form of atheism
can possibly be a religion.

What irritates is your adherence to the twisted logic that claims almost anything that some people have a firm opinion about is a religion. Which
leads to the word, religion, having little meaning, You also conflate
religion with implied fanaticism.
Religion simply means belief in a supernatural being.
Atheism simply means an absence of belief in a supernatural being.

--- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: rec.arts.sf.written

In article <1159pkr$29s1c$1@dont-email.me>, Titus G <noone@nowhere.com> wrote: >On 09/08/2026 04:36, Paul S Person wrote:

On Fri, 7 Aug 2026 21:37:15 -0000 (UTC), doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca (The
Doctor) wrote:

Marxism-Leninism is satanic evil.

Whatever.
Personally, I think "religion" describes it quite well.
It sure irritates a lot of people who /insist/ that no form of atheism
can possibly be a religion.

What irritates is your adherence to the twisted logic that claims almost >anything that some people have a firm opinion about is a religion. Which >leads to the word, religion, having little meaning, You also conflate >religion with implied fanaticism.
Religion simply means belief in a supernatural being.
Atheism simply means an absence of belief in a supernatural being.

Agnosticism is not atheism.

Please do not mwke that mistke.
--
Member - Liberal International This is doctor@nk.ca Ici doctor@nk.ca
Yahweh, King & country!Never Satan President Republic!Beware AntiChrist rising! Look at Psalms 14 and 53 on Atheism ; 31 years in the ISP business!
--- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: rec.arts.sf.written

On 8/8/26 16:00, Titus G wrote:

On 09/08/2026 04:36, Paul S Person wrote:

On Fri, 7 Aug 2026 21:37:15 -0000 (UTC), doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca (The
Doctor) wrote:

Marxism-Leninism is satanic evil.

No it is just good old fashioned human error.
The same sort of error that leads Republicans and Democrats
to make laws against substances and behaviors that they
do not like. Things like murder, theft, suicide alcohol
& drug use, homosexual behavior and relations, prostitution
and child abuse, rape and slavery of various sorts.

Some such aa child abuse cause real problems in life
and might be justified but just making laws and promoting
severe punishments for such does not stop the alcoholic,
the drug user, the prostitute, the homosexual from loving,
any more than existing law and teaching stop the thief
or the murderer.

Indeed such laws make it harder for the persons
involved to make positive contributions to society. The
prostitute assuming she/he/? if not enslaved is trying
to make a living. The drug user and alcohol is a drug
is trying to relieve pain of one sort or another. The
homosexuals are just trying to be happy as are the
transgendered and gender free. All are born with a
particular disposition and cannot escape it with the
fear of legal consequences.

Child abuse is the result of child abuse which
means that until effective therapy is developed they
must be locked away from society with the other rapists
thieves, swindlers and murderers.

Whatever.
Personally, I think "religion" describes it quite well.
It sure irritates a lot of people who /insist/ that no form of atheism
can possibly be a religion.

What irritates is your adherence to the twisted logic that claims almost anything that some people have a firm opinion about is a religion. Which leads to the word, religion, having little meaning, You also conflate religion with implied fanaticism.
Religion simply means belief in a supernatural being.
Atheism simply means an absence of belief in a supernatural being.

Well in RC HS religion was defined as a Way Of Life. In HS in hte 1950s it was simpler to point out the differences between say
Catholicism, Judaism, Buddhism, Hinduism, Islamic, Taoist and Shintoism
in simple examples from each as a Way Of Life.

I do not think atheism qualifies as there is no one
particular way of life specified, just the anti-supernatural belief.
Then the atheists can make up their minds as to how to live without supernatural dependency.

bliss - study, practice, and experience
--- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: rec.arts.sf.written

On Sun, 9 Aug 2026 12:37:12 -0000 (UTC), doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca (The
Doctor) wrote:

In article <1159pkr$29s1c$1@dont-email.me>, Titus G <noone@nowhere.com> wrote:

On 09/08/2026 04:36, Paul S Person wrote:

On Fri, 7 Aug 2026 21:37:15 -0000 (UTC), doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca (The
Doctor) wrote:

Marxism-Leninism is satanic evil.

Whatever.
Personally, I think "religion" describes it quite well.
It sure irritates a lot of people who /insist/ that no form of atheism
can possibly be a religion.

What irritates is your adherence to the twisted logic that claims almost >>anything that some people have a firm opinion about is a religion. Which >>leads to the word, religion, having little meaning, You also conflate >>religion with implied fanaticism.
Religion simply means belief in a supernatural being.
Atheism simply means an absence of belief in a supernatural being.

Agnosticism is not atheism.

Please do not mwke that mistke.

They make that mistake all the time.
And they don't care, because their deeply-held religious belief (as
expressed above) requires that mistake.
--
"Here lies the Tuscan poet Aretino,
Who evil spoke of everyone but God,
Giving as his excuse, 'I never knew him.'"
--- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: rec.arts.sf.written

The Doctor <doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca> wrote:

In article <1159pkr$29s1c$1@dont-email.me>, Titus G <noone@nowhere.com> wrote:

On 09/08/2026 04:36, Paul S Person wrote:

On Fri, 7 Aug 2026 21:37:15 -0000 (UTC), doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca (The
Doctor) wrote:

Marxism-Leninism is satanic evil.

Whatever.
Personally, I think "religion" describes it quite well.
It sure irritates a lot of people who /insist/ that no form of atheism
can possibly be a religion.

What irritates is your adherence to the twisted logic that claims almost >>anything that some people have a firm opinion about is a religion. Which >>leads to the word, religion, having little meaning, You also conflate >>religion with implied fanaticism.
Religion simply means belief in a supernatural being.
Atheism simply means an absence of belief in a supernatural being.

Agnosticism is not atheism.

Please do not mwke that mistke.

Some say the Zionist Israel entity is the atheist capital of the world. Hyperbole aside, it's an interesting thesis.
It's difficult to discern per capita atheism. It's easier to use "irreligious" instead. According to one source, about 80% of the Zionist
Israel entity's population is irreligious:

Among Israel's Jewish populace, only 20% or so identify
as "religious",

<https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Irreligion_in_Israel>

If that percentage is even close to accurate, it implies that the
irreligious comprise the core constituency of the Epstein Coalition.

Danke,

--
Don.......My cat's )\._.,--....,'``. veritas _|_ telltale tall tail /, _.. \ _\ (`._ ,. liberabit |
tells tall tales.. `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.' vos |

--- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: rec.arts.sf.written

On 10/08/2026 04:18, Paul S Person wrote:

On Sun, 9 Aug 2026 12:37:12 -0000 (UTC), doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca (The Doctor) wrote:

In article <1159pkr$29s1c$1@dont-email.me>, Titus G <noone@nowhere.com> wrote:

On 09/08/2026 04:36, Paul S Person wrote:

On Fri, 7 Aug 2026 21:37:15 -0000 (UTC), doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca (The >>>> Doctor) wrote:

Marxism-Leninism is satanic evil.

Whatever.
Personally, I think "religion" describes it quite well.
It sure irritates a lot of people who /insist/ that no form of atheism >>>> can possibly be a religion.

What irritates is your adherence to the twisted logic that claims almost >>> anything that some people have a firm opinion about is a religion. Which >>> leads to the word, religion, having little meaning, You also conflate
religion with implied fanaticism.
Religion simply means belief in a supernatural being.
Atheism simply means an absence of belief in a supernatural being.

Agnosticism is not atheism.

No. Agnosticism simply describes the state of not knowing whether there
are supernatural beings.

Please do not mwke that mistke.

They make that mistake all the time.
And they don't care, because their deeply-held religious belief (as
expressed above) requires that mistake.

Superstitious people, namely Paul, who believe in gods, angels, devils, fairies, etc have difficulty tolerating those who do not and in a
twisted form of abuse that undermines their own belief, accuse
disbelievers of harbouring a version of their own insanity by calling
them religious.

--- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: rec.arts.sf.written

Titus G <noone@nowhere.com> writes:

On 10/08/2026 04:18, Paul S Person wrote:

On Sun, 9 Aug 2026 12:37:12 -0000 (UTC), doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca (The
Doctor) wrote:

In article <1159pkr$29s1c$1@dont-email.me>, Titus G <noone@nowhere.com> wrote:

On 09/08/2026 04:36, Paul S Person wrote:

On Fri, 7 Aug 2026 21:37:15 -0000 (UTC), doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca (The >>>>> Doctor) wrote:

Marxism-Leninism is satanic evil.

Whatever.
Personally, I think "religion" describes it quite well.
It sure irritates a lot of people who /insist/ that no form of atheism >>>>> can possibly be a religion.

What irritates is your adherence to the twisted logic that claims almost >>>> anything that some people have a firm opinion about is a religion. Which >>>> leads to the word, religion, having little meaning, You also conflate
religion with implied fanaticism.
Religion simply means belief in a supernatural being.
Atheism simply means an absence of belief in a supernatural being.

Agnosticism is not atheism.

No. Agnosticism simply describes the state of not knowing whether there
are supernatural beings.

Please do not mwke that mistke.

They make that mistake all the time.
And they don't care, because their deeply-held religious belief (as
expressed above) requires that mistake.

Superstitious people, namely Paul, who believe in gods, angels, devils, >fairies, etc have difficulty tolerating those who do not and in a
twisted form of abuse that undermines their own belief, accuse
disbelievers of harbouring a version of their own insanity by calling
them religious.

Indeed. It is similar to the trumpet's use of the term TDS, which applies
to the supporters far more than to those who do not support the orange
clown show.
--- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2