• Re: "Trump EO Calls for Review of Federal Childhood Vaccine Guidelines"

    From kludge@kludge@panix.com (Scott Dorsey) to rec.arts.sf.written on Sat Jun 6 18:05:29 2026
    From Newsgroup: rec.arts.sf.written

    Paul S Person <psperson@old.netcom.invalid> wrote:
    Actually, I think those reacting this way to AIDS are worse than MAGA. >Fortunately, the /Republican/ President appointed a very conservative
    Surgeon General who reacted to AIDS as the threat it was and had no >toleration for those attacking the victims.

    This is absolutely true. Koop was a Reagan appointee and he did absolutely
    the best he could even when Reagan and many of his cronies were fighting him all the way down.

    But note this: in spite of all the infighting, in spite of talk about
    removing Koop, no real attempt was ever made because he was so respected
    and everyone viewed him as competent.

    He was a doctor, and a good doctor, and he did what doctors are supposed to
    do. He was not an unqualified political appointee.

    This is why I used to sometimes for a Republican for some offices:
    they did a really good job as Treasurer or Auditor. This is because
    they were very strict in doing their work.

    Absolutely agreed. But unfortunately the Republican party of today is not
    the same party of the eighties.

    And I think that in general competence is less respected in the country too. That's very much a MAGA thing but it is certainly not exclusive to them. --scott
    --
    "C'est un Nagra. C'est suisse, et tres, tres precis."
    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Paul S Person@psperson@old.netcom.invalid to rec.arts.sf.written on Sun Jun 7 08:50:09 2026
    From Newsgroup: rec.arts.sf.written

    On Sat, 6 Jun 2026 18:05:29 -0400 (EDT), kludge@panix.com (Scott
    Dorsey) wrote:
    Paul S Person <psperson@old.netcom.invalid> wrote:
    Actually, I think those reacting this way to AIDS are worse than MAGA. >>Fortunately, the /Republican/ President appointed a very conservative >>Surgeon General who reacted to AIDS as the threat it was and had no >>toleration for those attacking the victims.

    This is absolutely true. Koop was a Reagan appointee and he did absolutely >the best he could even when Reagan and many of his cronies were fighting him >all the way down.

    But note this: in spite of all the infighting, in spite of talk about >removing Koop, no real attempt was ever made because he was so respected
    and everyone viewed him as competent.

    He was a doctor, and a good doctor, and he did what doctors are supposed to >do. He was not an unqualified political appointee.

    This is why I used to sometimes for a Republican for some offices:
    they did a really good job as Treasurer or Auditor. This is because
    they were very strict in doing their work.

    Absolutely agreed. But unfortunately the Republican party of today is not >the same party of the eighties.

    And I think that in general competence is less respected in the country too. >That's very much a MAGA thing but it is certainly not exclusive to them.
    If they do really, really, really badly that might shock them (that
    is, the people running the Party, not MAGA) about 15 steps back toward
    the center.
    Leaving the task of getting the Dems to move 15 steps back toward the
    center. It has not escaped my notice that they, too, are way out on
    the fringe.
    Note: "15" is not to be taken literally, but conceptually.
    --
    "Here lies the Tuscan poet Aretino,
    Who evil spoke of everyone but God,
    Giving as his excuse, 'I never knew him.'"
    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From kludge@kludge@panix.com (Scott Dorsey) to rec.arts.sf.written on Tue Jun 9 10:32:25 2026
    From Newsgroup: rec.arts.sf.written

    Paul S Person <psperson@old.netcom.invalid> wrote:

    If they do really, really, really badly that might shock them (that
    is, the people running the Party, not MAGA) about 15 steps back toward
    the center.

    Not toward the center, but toward actually being fiscally conservative
    instead of promoting crazy social change and a personality cult at the
    expense of supporting their constitutents.

    Leaving the task of getting the Dems to move 15 steps back toward the
    center. It has not escaped my notice that they, too, are way out on
    the fringe.

    I'm not sure if this is really the case any more. The center in the US
    has always been pretty far to the right compared with much of the rest
    of the world, at least since the Red Scare. I am seeing signs of that
    changing and I am seeing those signs as a reaction to the economic takeover
    of the ultra-rich.

    Both conservatives and liberals need to pay attention to that takeover and
    deal with it, or else they are both doomed.
    --scott
    --
    "C'est un Nagra. C'est suisse, et tres, tres precis."
    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Paul S Person@psperson@old.netcom.invalid to rec.arts.sf.written on Tue Jun 9 09:17:41 2026
    From Newsgroup: rec.arts.sf.written

    On Tue, 9 Jun 2026 10:32:25 -0400 (EDT), kludge@panix.com (Scott
    Dorsey) wrote:
    Paul S Person <psperson@old.netcom.invalid> wrote:

    If they do really, really, really badly that might shock them (that
    is, the people running the Party, not MAGA) about 15 steps back toward
    the center.

    Not toward the center, but toward actually being fiscally conservative >instead of promoting crazy social change and a personality cult at the >expense of supporting their constitutents.
    The center is composed of a lot of people, a lot of whom balance their
    personal budget every month and see no reason why the gummint
    shouldn't do the same.
    But, yes, I would expect the repositioned Republican Party to also
    return to at least the pre-Ronnie version of fiscal conservatism.
    Leaving the task of getting the Dems to move 15 steps back toward the >>center. It has not escaped my notice that they, too, are way out on
    the fringe.

    I'm not sure if this is really the case any more. The center in the US
    has always been pretty far to the right compared with much of the rest
    of the world, at least since the Red Scare. I am seeing signs of that >changing and I am seeing those signs as a reaction to the economic takeover >of the ultra-rich.
    Every time Bernie, the Friends of Bernie, or Hillary speak, the Dems
    lose votes. This is one of their strategies to ensure they don't
    actually win.
    Nevertheless, the center probably has shifted leftwards a bit, given
    the support for (say) gay marriage prior to the Supreme Court decision
    and the continuing support for reasonable access to abortion.
    Not to mention the reaction to the on-camera police murder of a
    certain Floyd. And other similar atrocities over the preceding decade
    or two.
    Up here in Seattle, of course, the "center" is pretty far to the left.
    This is why, when a group of residents blocked off their street so the
    local pimps wouldn't send bullets into their houses, the city's
    response was -- to remove the barriers.
    The barriers work, BTW, because even gang-bangers and pimps don't want
    to work in a street with limited access.
    Both conservatives and liberals need to pay attention to that takeover and >deal with it, or else they are both doomed.
    And then we can produce two new parties, from the (new, if
    appropriate) center, but one slightly to the right (fiscally
    conservative, inter alia) and the other to the left (tax and spend,
    inter alia).
    --
    "Here lies the Tuscan poet Aretino,
    Who evil spoke of everyone but God,
    Giving as his excuse, 'I never knew him.'"
    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From kludge@kludge@panix.com (Scott Dorsey) to rec.arts.sf.written on Tue Jun 9 21:50:05 2026
    From Newsgroup: rec.arts.sf.written

    Paul S Person <psperson@old.netcom.invalid> wrote:
    Nevertheless, the center probably has shifted leftwards a bit, given
    the support for (say) gay marriage prior to the Supreme Court decision
    and the continuing support for reasonable access to abortion.

    The Republicans are mostly responsible for the legalization of gay
    marriage. Nobody on the left ever really considered it a serious
    possibility, but the folks on the right kept harping on it over and
    over again... and the more they harped on it, the more people in
    the middle started thinking "gay marriage? Why not?" It was never
    taken seriously at all until the folks on the right started making
    people take it seriously.

    Not to mention the reaction to the on-camera police murder of a
    certain Floyd. And other similar atrocities over the preceding decade
    or two.

    That sort of thing happened all the time, but when it happens on-camera
    people realize that there's a problem. I lived in a bad neighborhood
    in Atlanta for a while and I got to see police who were at war with the
    people they were supposed to be protecting. This isn't unusual, but
    until people in the general population started seeing it, nobody cared.

    Same thing about opiates.... middle class Americans didn't care until
    their kids and neighbors started getting addicted too. It took that
    to get them to take it seriously.

    These aren't problems of the right or the left and as long as people keep seeing them as the problems of only one side they will never get addressed. --scott
    --
    "C'est un Nagra. C'est suisse, et tres, tres precis."
    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Paul S Person@psperson@old.netcom.invalid to rec.arts.sf.written on Sat Jun 6 08:36:16 2026
    From Newsgroup: rec.arts.sf.written

    On Fri, 5 Jun 2026 17:46:29 -0400 (EDT), kludge@panix.com (Scott
    Dorsey) wrote:
    Chris Thompson <the_thompsons@earthlink.net> wrote:

    We're seeing in real time the results of this administration's utter >>incompetence in the field of public health. In 2014 USAID and the 101st >>Airborne teamed up in Operation United Assistance. It took some time but >>they got the Ebola outbreak under control and saved thousands of lives. >>USAID is now gone and we're doing almost nothing to contain the current >>outbreak.
    <snippo>
    The same people saying this are the same people who ignored AIDS because
    it just affected gay people and not them. That one didn't come out well. Actually, I think those reacting this way to AIDS are worse than MAGA. Fortunately, the /Republican/ President appointed a very conservative
    Surgeon General who reacted to AIDS as the threat it was and had no
    toleration for those attacking the victims.
    This is why I used to sometimes for a Republican for some offices:
    they did a really good job as Treasurer or Auditor. This is because
    they were very strict in doing their work.
    But, sadly, only MAGA or MAGA-appealing Republicans run for those
    offices now. And they can't be trusted. Not one little bit.
    --
    "Here lies the Tuscan poet Aretino,
    Who evil spoke of everyone but God,
    Giving as his excuse, 'I never knew him.'"
    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Lawrence =?iso-8859-13?q?D=FFOliveiro?=@ldo@nz.invalid to rec.arts.sf.written on Sun Jun 28 07:25:01 2026
    From Newsgroup: rec.arts.sf.written

    On Wed, 3 Jun 2026 18:42:21 -0500, Lynn McGuire wrote:

    Something is definitely going on when you dump 84+ doses into a
    child.

    Particularly when there are far more than 84 different things that can
    kill a child. Seems like something is coming up short.
    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Lawrence =?iso-8859-13?q?D=FFOliveiro?=@ldo@nz.invalid to rec.arts.sf.written on Sun Jun 28 07:26:46 2026
    From Newsgroup: rec.arts.sf.written

    On Wed, 3 Jun 2026 17:37:31 -0500, Lynn McGuire wrote:

    https://resistthemainstream.com/new-trump-directive-triggers-nationwide-health-policy-overhaul/

    "A new study indicates that this could prevent ~35,000 autism cases
    per year."

    Funny, the page doesnrCOt give any reference to the actual study.

    Could it be ... it doesnrCOt exist?
    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Lawrence =?iso-8859-13?q?D=FFOliveiro?=@ldo@nz.invalid to rec.arts.sf.written on Sun Jun 28 07:27:39 2026
    From Newsgroup: rec.arts.sf.written

    On Fri, 5 Jun 2026 18:20:16 -0500, Lynn McGuire wrote:

    I gave you the URL, go verify it for yourself.

    HererCOs one for you:

    https://my.clevelandclinic.org/health/articles/11288-childhood-immunization-schedule

    List of disease effects that the vaccines protect from:

    Hepatitis B (HepB)
    Chronic liver infection, liver failure, liver cancer, death.
    RSV antibody (Nirsevimab)
    Pneumonia, bronchiolitis.
    Rotavirus (RV5, RV1)
    Severe diarrhea, dehydration, death.
    Diphtheria, tetanus, and acellular pertussis (DTaP)
    Heart muscle swelling, heart failure, coma, paralysis,
    seizures, broken bones, trouble breathing, pneumonia, death.
    Haemophilus influenzae type B (Hib)
    Brain damage, hearing loss, limb loss, death.
    Pneumococcal conjugate (PCV15, PCV20)
    Pneumonia, blood poisoning, meningitis, death.
    Inactivated poliovirus (IPV)
    Paralysis, death.
    COVID-19
    Pneumonia, blood clots, liver damage, heart damage, kidney
    damage, long COVID, death.
    Influenza (IIV)
    Pneumonia, sinus infection, ear infection, worsened underlying
    conditions (heart or lung), death.
    Measles, mumps, rubella (MMR)
    Brain swelling, pneumonia, swollen testicles or ovaries,
    deafness, death.
    Varicella (VAR)
    Infected sores, brain swelling, pneumonia, death.
    Hepatitis A (HepA)
    Liver failure, death.
    Tetanus, diphtheria, and acellular pertussis (Tdap)
    Heart muscle swelling, heart failure, coma, paralysis,
    seizures, broken bones, trouble breathing, pneumonia, death.
    Human papillomavirus (HPV)
    Genital warts, cancer (including cancer of the cervix, mouth and throat).
    Meningococcal (MenACWY)
    Limb loss, deafness, seizures, death.

    It is a rCLbit maximalistrCY to think that nearly all these things could possibly kill your kid, isnrCOt it?

    All these deadly diseases have all somehow magically gone away.
    Somebody waved a wand and uttered a few spells or something. Who needs vaccination?
    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Paul S Person@psperson@old.netcom.invalid to rec.arts.sf.written on Sun Jun 28 08:55:07 2026
    From Newsgroup: rec.arts.sf.written

    On Sun, 28 Jun 2026 07:27:39 -0000 (UTC), Lawrence D|Oliveiro
    <ldo@nz.invalid> wrote:
    On Fri, 5 Jun 2026 18:20:16 -0500, Lynn McGuire wrote:

    I gave you the URL, go verify it for yourself.

    HereAs one for you:

    https://my.clevelandclinic.org/health/articles/11288-childhood-immunization-schedule

    List of disease effects that the vaccines protect from:
    <snippo list of short descriptions of diseases, most of which list
    "death" as the last of the things that might, or might not occur, in
    any particular patient>
    It is a obit maximalisto to think that nearly all these things could
    possibly kill your kid, isnAt it?
    The full list of "things [that] could kill your kid" is a lot longer
    than that.
    Chasing a pet into a busy street can do it.
    Get a grip,
    All these deadly diseases have all somehow magically gone away.
    Somebody waved a wand and uttered a few spells or something. Who needs >vaccination?
    Who said they went away? Oh, wait, RFK Jr, no doubt.
    Just don't be surprised if, 20 years from now (or even sooner,
    depending on how long this "weekly poke" thing has been going on), a
    lot of young adults turn, when they finally get to make the decision,
    to /not/ go to the doctor unless something is /clearly/ wrong.
    'Cause their own experience is that "going to the doctor" means
    "getting poked", and they don't have to ask "where's the fun in that"
    because they know, from their own experience, that there is /no/ fun
    in that.
    Then watch the AMA double down on the "annual checkup" because, after
    all, without patients their members have no income.
    --
    "Here lies the Tuscan poet Aretino,
    Who evil spoke of everyone but God,
    Giving as his excuse, 'I never knew him.'"
    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From BobbieSellers@bliss-sf4ever@dslextremeinvalid.com to rec.arts.sf.written on Sun Jun 28 09:54:05 2026
    From Newsgroup: rec.arts.sf.written

    On 6/28/26 00:27, Lawrence DrCOOliveiro wrote:
    On Fri, 5 Jun 2026 18:20:16 -0500, Lynn McGuire wrote:

    I gave you the URL, go verify it for yourself.

    HererCOs one for you:

    https://my.clevelandclinic.org/health/articles/11288-childhood-immunization-schedule

    List of disease effects that the vaccines protect from:

    Hepatitis B (HepB)
    Chronic liver infection, liver failure, liver cancer, death.

    And anxiety in survivors over the possible outcome of Liver cancer.

    RSV antibody (Nirsevimab)
    Pneumonia, bronchiolitis.
    Rotavirus (RV5, RV1)
    Severe diarrhea, dehydration, death.
    Diphtheria, tetanus, and acellular pertussis (DTaP)
    Heart muscle swelling, heart failure, coma, paralysis,
    seizures, broken bones, trouble breathing, pneumonia, death.
    Haemophilus influenzae type B (Hib)
    Brain damage, hearing loss, limb loss, death.
    Pneumococcal conjugate (PCV15, PCV20)
    Pneumonia, blood poisoning, meningitis, death.
    Inactivated poliovirus (IPV)
    Paralysis, death.
    Also disability and amputation of affected limbs.

    COVID-19
    Pneumonia, blood clots, liver damage, heart damage, kidney
    damage, long COVID, death.
    Influenza (IIV)
    Pneumonia, sinus infection, ear infection, worsened underlying
    conditions (heart or lung), death.
    Measles, mumps, rubella (MMR)
    Brain swelling, pneumonia, swollen testicles or ovaries,
    deafness, death.

    The effects of swollen testicles or ovaries is possible impotence
    for males along with disturbed puberty, and infertility
    for both sexes.


    Varicella (VAR)
    Infected sores, brain swelling, pneumonia, death.
    Hepatitis A (HepA)
    Liver failure, death.
    Tetanus, diphtheria, and acellular pertussis (Tdap)
    Heart muscle swelling, heart failure, coma, paralysis,
    seizures, broken bones, trouble breathing, pneumonia, death.
    Human papillomavirus (HPV)
    Genital warts, cancer (including cancer of the cervix, mouth and throat).
    Don't forget infertility and death.

    Meningococcal (MenACWY)
    Limb loss, deafness, seizures, death.

    It is a rCLbit maximalistrCY to think that nearly all these things could possibly kill your kid, isnrCOt it?

    All these deadly diseases have all somehow magically gone away.
    Somebody waved a wand and uttered a few spells or something. Who needs vaccination?

    More people.

    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From oldernow@oldernow@dev.null to rec.arts.sf.written on Mon Jun 29 19:47:35 2026
    From Newsgroup: rec.arts.sf.written

    On 2026-06-28, Paul S Person <psperson@old.netcom.invalid> wrote:
    Just don't be surprised if, 20 years from now
    (or even sooner, depending on how long this
    "weekly poke" thing has been going on), a lot
    of young adults turn, when they finally get to
    make the decision, to /not/ go to the doctor
    unless something is /clearly/ wrong.

    'Cause their own experience is that "going to
    the doctor" means "getting poked", and they
    don't have to ask "where's the fun in that"
    because they know, from their own experience,
    that there is /no/ fun in that.

    Then watch the AMA double down on the "annual
    checkup" because, after all, without patients
    their members have no income.

    Indeed, going to a doctor to improve one's health
    is on par with going to a journalist to improve
    one's understanding of what allegedly happened.
    --
    v^v^v^v^v^v^v^v^v^v^v^v^v^v^v^v^v^v^v^v^v^v
    | alt.troll.adam-h-kerman: proof that the |
    | internet sometimes gets something right | ^v^v^v^v^v^v^v^v^v^v^v^v^v^v^v^v^v^v^v^v^v^
    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From oldernow@oldernow@dev.null to rec.arts.sf.written on Mon Jun 29 19:49:27 2026
    From Newsgroup: rec.arts.sf.written

    On 2026-06-28, BobbieSellers <bliss-sf4ever@dslextremeinvalid.com> wrote:

    The effects of swollen testicles

    Speaking of which:
    --
    v^v^v^v^v^v^v^v^v^v^v^v^v^v^v^v^v^v^v^v^v^v
    | alt.troll.adam-h-kerman: proof that the |
    | internet sometimes gets something right | ^v^v^v^v^v^v^v^v^v^v^v^v^v^v^v^v^v^v^v^v^v^
    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2