• =?UTF-8?B?4oCcRXZlcnk=?= UAP video released by the U.S. Department of War in 14 =?UTF-8?B?bWludXRlc+KAnQ==?=

    From Lawrence =?iso-8859-13?q?D=FFOliveiro?=@ldo@nz.invalid to rec.arts.sf.written on Tue May 12 02:35:07 2026
    From Newsgroup: rec.arts.sf.written

    So I carefully watched the video at <https://www.zdnet.com/video/every-uap-video-released-by-the-u-s-department-of-war-in-14-minutes/>.
    ItrCOs amazing that the most advanced military force in the world, with
    the whole range of electronic surveillance measures at their disposal,
    could be baffled by a few random lights in the sky.

    The basic problem is, the recording equipment is designed for target acquisition in a battle situation, not for scientific observation.
    There is no detail on how the equipment is calibrated, so we have no
    idea what the image brightness levels mean. Has a particular
    phenomenon ever been captured from more than one viewpoint at a time?
    Were they seen from any of the other vehicles that appear in some of
    the records? That would give us a better idea of how far away it was.
    Because I suspect a lot of these phenomena are quite close -- inside
    the equipment, in fact. Many of them are artifacts, bugs in the
    processing system.

    Look at the sequence from 12:34 onwards: one bright dot is drifting
    around as itrCOs tracked, but itrCOs instructive to compare it against
    another nearby which stays absolutely fixed in the view. Both of them
    get affected as they pass too close to one of those windmill-like
    objects, even though the fixed one might happen to be in front in some
    cases, not behind. How can an object that is moving through the scene
    be kept so perfectly in position in the camera? It canrCOt.
    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Paul S Person@psperson@old.netcom.invalid to rec.arts.sf.written on Tue May 12 08:45:46 2026
    From Newsgroup: rec.arts.sf.written

    On Tue, 12 May 2026 02:35:07 -0000 (UTC), Lawrence D|Oliveiro
    <ldo@nz.invalid> wrote:
    So I carefully watched the video at ><https://www.zdnet.com/video/every-uap-video-released-by-the-u-s-department-of-war-in-14-minutes/>.
    ItAs amazing that the most advanced military force in the world, with
    the whole range of electronic surveillance measures at their disposal,
    could be baffled by a few random lights in the sky.
    If they were clear, the aerial phenomena would not be unidentified.
    --
    "Here lies the Tuscan poet Aretino,
    Who evil spoke of everyone but God,
    Giving as his excuse, 'I never knew him.'"
    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Charles Packer@mailbox@cpacker.org to rec.arts.sf.written on Thu May 14 07:58:55 2026
    From Newsgroup: rec.arts.sf.written

    On Tue, 12 May 2026 02:35:07 -0000 (UTC), Lawrence DrCOOliveiro wrote:

    So I carefully watched the video at <https://www.zdnet.com/video/every-uap-video-released-by-the-u-s-
    department-of-war-in-14-minutes/>.
    ItrCOs amazing that the most advanced military force in the world, with
    the whole range of electronic surveillance measures at their disposal,
    could be baffled by a few random lights in the sky.


    Thinking rationally about UAPs involves evaluating two probabilities:
    A: That intelligent beings from another world would be watching us
    B: That smartass beings from this world would want us to believe A
    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2