The article links probably are clickbait based on
"Round-Trip Mars Missions in the 2031 Window: Feasible and
Extreme Scenarios Derived from CA21-Anchored Trajectories"
(2025-10-24) by Marcelo de Oliveira Souza.
I took a quick look at both articles, and still have no idea as to how
the faster trip is obtained, and what observing asteroids have to do
with it.
On 5/3/26 11:46 AM, Stefan Ram wrote:. . .
The article links probably are clickbait based onWhile that is surely a related precursor by the same author, the summary >articles I linked to are based on:
"Round-Trip Mars Missions in the 2031 Window: Feasible and
Extreme Scenarios Derived from CA21-Anchored Trajectories"
(2025-10-24) by Marcelo de Oliveira Souza.
" Using asteroid early orbital data for rapid mars missions "
in the Sept 2026(!) volume of Acta Astronautica.
Again, how is this news?
No joking: Get there in as little as 56 days, roundtrips as short as
153 days
I prefer the one gravity seven day flight as chronicled in "Red
Thunder" by John Varley.
No joking: Get there in as little as 56 days, roundtrips as short as 153 days
https://phys.org/news/2026-04-interplanetary-shortcut- mars.html#google_vignette
and
https://gizmodo.com/astronomer-finds-a-shortcut-to-mars-by-following-an- asteroids-journey-through-space-2000752127
Some quotes:
" In a new study, Marcelo de Oliveira Souza of the State University of Northern Rio de Janeiro followed the predicted route of asteroid 2001
CA21 to look for a new path to reach Mars. The results, published in the journal Acta Astronautica, identify a course that would take
approximately 153 days for a round trip to the Red Planet and back. "
"The paper does not suggest that future missions must follow this
specific asteroid. Instead, it demonstrates a possible way to identify faster flight paths that traditional methods might miss. "This study illustrates how the well-defined plane geometry of a preliminary small-
body orbit can be employed as a methodological screening tool for rapid interplanetary transfer identification." "
On Sun, 3 May 2026 21:12:36 -0500, Lynn McGuire wrote:
I prefer the one gravity seven day flight as chronicled in "Red
Thunder" by John Varley.
Who wouldnrCOt? ;)
But that would require some major amount (or exotic kind) of fuel and
thrust ...
We could do even higher accelerations, if we could submerge the
occupants in some kind of fluid that would give them neutral buoyancy
and that they could breathe ...
With "clickbait" I did not want to refer to your post, but rather the
tendency of some magazines to take a paper like, "Melanosomes suggest
koreanosaurus boseongensis had dark pigments", and turn it into,
"This unbelievable color changes everything we know about dinosaurs!".
Verily, in article <dino-20260503175558@ram.dialup.fu-berlin.de>, did ram@zedat.fu-berlin.de deliver unto us this message:
With "clickbait" I did not want to refer to your
post, but rather the tendency of some magazines
to take a paper like, "Melanosomes suggest
koreanosaurus boseongensis had dark pigments",
and turn it into, "This unbelievable color
changes everything we know about dinosaurs!".
Unfortunately, it works. YouTube looks the way
it does because clickbait works.
| Sysop: | Amessyroom |
|---|---|
| Location: | Fayetteville, NC |
| Users: | 65 |
| Nodes: | 6 (0 / 6) |
| Uptime: | 08:19:41 |
| Calls: | 862 |
| Files: | 1,311 |
| D/L today: |
2 files (6,679K bytes) |
| Messages: | 264,942 |