From Newsgroup: rec.arts.sf.tv

Neutronium is the fictional material collected from the heart of
collapsed Neutron Stars in Star Trek. But it is based on a real life
thing, the hypothetical matter state of an all Neutron solid. Also the collapsed heart of a supermassive star. But if that is the case, then
there is a glaring issue with it, which I'll look at in this video.

https://youtu.be/R4yFhnLuOyI?si=iNTjE0Zf5DywzVdg
--
Democrats and the liberal media hate President Trump more than they
love this country.

--- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: rec.arts.sf.tv

Ubiquitous <weberm@polaris.net> writes:

Neutronium is the fictional material collected from the heart of
collapsed Neutron Stars in Star Trek. But it is based on a real life
thing, the hypothetical matter state of an all Neutron solid. Also the collapsed heart of a supermassive star. But if that is the case, then
there is a glaring issue with it, which I'll look at in this video.

https://youtu.be/R4yFhnLuOyI?si=iNTjE0Zf5DywzVdg

I wasn't aware they utilized such terminology in star trek. I assume
it's a sort of 'metal' used in the construction of something. How cute, but
a typical hand-wavy sci-fi concept.

Neutron stars are remnants of supergiant stellar cores. The exotic state
of matter, in a stellar remnant, adopts its properties due to the
intense gravitational forces at work.

This is tantamount to water at the bottom of the deep ocean. Take a
bottle of deep ocean water and dump it on the surface of the ocean, it
won't stay compressed.

If one had a method of removing an amount of matter from a stellar
remnant, the lack of intense gravitational forces acting on the sample
would allow it to revert, albeit violently, to its natural
state. Explosive decompression.

I wouldn't want to be in the room.

--
Daniel
sysop | air & wave bbs
finger | info@bbs.airandwave.net
--- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: rec.arts.sf.tv

On Thu, 23 Jul 2026 15:44:09 -0700, Daniel wrote:

This is tantamount to water at the bottom of the deep ocean. Take a
bottle of deep ocean water and dump it on the surface of the ocean,
it won't stay compressed.

I donrCOt think the EarthrCOs oceans are deep enough for anything
interesting to happen to the water in the deepest parts, like changing
into a different phase.

Someplace like Europa or such, with underground oceans that may be
dozens or even hundreds of kilometres deep ... thatrCOs a different
story. I think.

If one had a method of removing an amount of matter from a stellar
remnant, the lack of intense gravitational forces acting on the
sample would allow it to revert, albeit violently, to its natural
state. Explosive decompression.

I wouldn't want to be in the room.

If it were of more than microscopic size, IrCOm guessing it might be
advisable not to be anywhere on the same planet ...
--- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: rec.arts.sf.tv

Lawrence DrCOOliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> writes:

On Thu, 23 Jul 2026 15:44:09 -0700, Daniel wrote:

This is tantamount to water at the bottom of the deep ocean. Take a
bottle of deep ocean water and dump it on the surface of the ocean,
it won't stay compressed.

I donrCOt think the EarthrCOs oceans are deep enough for anything
interesting to happen to the water in the deepest parts, like changing
into a different phase.

I was talking about pressure only.

Someplace like Europa or such, with underground oceans that may be
dozens or even hundreds of kilometres deep ... thatrCOs a different
story. I think.

Doubt europa would have deep oceans. I'd like to know for sure.

If one had a method of removing an amount of matter from a stellar
remnant, the lack of intense gravitational forces acting on the
sample would allow it to revert, albeit violently, to its natural
state. Explosive decompression.

I wouldn't want to be in the room.

If it were of more than microscopic size, IrCOm guessing it might be advisable not to be anywhere on the same planet ...

Fair.

--
Daniel
sysop | air & wave bbs
finger | info@bbs.airandwave.net
--- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: rec.arts.sf.tv

On Sat, 01 Aug 2026 01:41:07 -0700, Daniel wrote:

Doubt europa would have deep oceans. I'd like to know for sure.

OccamrCOs Razor: nothing else can (easily) explain the evidence:

rCo Discontinuities in the pattern of cracks in the surface ice,
indicating that portions of that surface have moved relative to
each other in the past, often by quite large distances, pointing to
the underlying layers not being solid
rCo Magnetic field patterns pointing to a liquid interior with
high salinity

We see similar things with Enceladus around Saturn.

Actually, I think at least two othersrCa of JupiterrCOs big moons show
signs of underground oceans, albeit not with the planetwide extent of
Europa.

rCaWhich effectively means rCLall of them, except the volcanic onerCY.
--- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: rec.arts.sf.tv

Lawrence DrCOOliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> writes:

On Sat, 01 Aug 2026 01:41:07 -0700, Daniel wrote:

Doubt europa would have deep oceans. I'd like to know for sure.

OccamrCOs Razor: nothing else can (easily) explain the evidence:

rCo Discontinuities in the pattern of cracks in the surface ice,
indicating that portions of that surface have moved relative to
each other in the past, often by quite large distances, pointing to
the underlying layers not being solid
rCo Magnetic field patterns pointing to a liquid interior with
high salinity

We see similar things with Enceladus around Saturn.

Actually, I think at least two othersrCa of JupiterrCOs big moons show
signs of underground oceans, albeit not with the planetwide extent of
Europa.

rCaWhich effectively means rCLall of them, except the volcanic onerCY.

I'd have to do more reading on the matter. I tend to focus more on
cosmology.
--- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2