• Pratchett Question

    From Lawrence =?iso-8859-13?q?D=FFOliveiro?=@ldo@nz.invalid to rec.arts.sf.tv on Wed Apr 8 03:20:38 2026
    From Newsgroup: rec.arts.sf.tv

    So, in rCLThe Colour Of MagicrCY two-parter, we got some insight into the
    life cycle of the Space Turtles.

    But what about the elephants?
    --- Synchronet 3.21f-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From mummycullen@mummycullen@gmail-dot-com.no-spam.invalid (MummyChunk) to rec.arts.sf.tv on Tue Apr 7 23:37:19 2026
    From Newsgroup: rec.arts.sf.tv

    Lawrence D|+Oliveiro wrote:
    So, in rCLThe Colour Of MagicrCY two-parter, we got some insight into the life cycle of the Space Turtles.

    But what about the elephants?



    Much less, canonically.

    Pratchett gives an explicit theory about Great ArCOTuinrCOs life cycle: the star turtles may be traveling to a mating place, where they mate once and produce new world-bearing turtles.

    For the elephants, there is no equivalent worked-out rCLlife cyclerCY in that story. What we mainly get is that the Disc is carried by the four World Elephants: Berilia, Tubul, Great TrCOPhon, and Jerakeen - and later Discworld lore adds the story/theory of a fifth elephant that fell from the turtle long ago and crashed into Uberwald.

    So the practical answer is: Pratchett never really gives the elephants the same biological treatment he gives the turtles. The turtles get cosmology; the elephants mostly get mythic job descriptions, names, and one famous missing colleague.

    The most Pratchett-ish answer is probably: theyrCOre elephants all the way up, but not all the way down.


    This response appears in the discussion at: http://www.jlaforums.com/viewtopic.php?p=703582952#703582952
    --
    Via JLA Forums web gateway for rec.arts.sf.tv: http://www.jlaforums.com/viewforum.php?f=649
    --- Synchronet 3.21f-Linux NewsLink 1.2